A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE

Abstract Background Infliximab is an anti-TNF therapy with proven efficacy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). An infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13 (marketed as Inflectra), has recently been introduced that could potentially result in large cost-savings...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology 2018-03, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.179-179
Hauptverfasser: Beilman, C L, Ma, C, McCabe, C, Fedorak, R, Halloran, B P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page 179
container_title Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
container_volume 1
creator Beilman, C L
Ma, C
McCabe, C
Fedorak, R
Halloran, B P
description Abstract Background Infliximab is an anti-TNF therapy with proven efficacy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). An infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13 (marketed as Inflectra), has recently been introduced that could potentially result in large cost-savings for this patient population. However, the molecular complexity and sensitivity to changes in manufacturing of biologic agents makes it difficult to verify the similarity of biosimilars to their respective innovator biologics. Due to these challenges, it is important to assess the effect of biosimilars on patient outcomes while considering the cost-savings associated with these therapies. Aims The aim of this study was to provide an economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade) to its biosimilar (Inflectra) for the management of CD. Methods A Markov model was constructed to simulate the progression of patients with CD after initiating either infliximab or its biosimilar, Inflectra. Based on this model, we calculated the cost and effectiveness of each treatment strategy over a 5-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were obtained from a literature search, and loss of response rates were obtained from published centre data and observational studies. The cost of health states were accessed using the CIHI patient cost estimator, and the cost of infliximab (Remicade and Inflectra) was obtained from the Alberta Health and Wellness Drug Benefit List. Utility values were obtained from a literature search, and the Standard Gamble approach was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was executed to characterize uncertainty. Results Over a 5-year period, infliximab therapy costs $167,388 and yielded 3.91 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Infliximab’s biosimilar costs patients $111,981 and yielded 3.61 QALYs over 5 years. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, infliximab’s biosimilar had a 91% chance of being cost-effective, whereas infliximab therapy had a 9% chance of being cost-effective. Conclusions Infliximab’s biosimilar Inflectra (CT-P13) resulted in large cost reductions despite similar effectiveness to its innovator biologic for patients with CD. Based on these results, the introduction and mainstream usage of Inflectra may help reduce the economic burden associated with CD. Funding Agencies CIHR
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6507792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1715-4aa390682ec6e53979fe0d9ffc39d4865afd7d577cdc1157e3b389faae7c42153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKw0AUHUTBUrt2O2shdibJZDIbIY2TdiAPaKJ0N0wnk9rSF4lVuvM3_D2_xISI4MrVvZx7HpcDwC1G9xgxZ7zRajVevZ8R8luAXICBTTCxbMTsy9_dd6_BqGk2CCEbu4g6ZAAWAUYuDLO8sHgU8bAQzzzleQ6zCIo0isVCJMEETkSWi0TEwRxG2RwWMw6TIA2mPOFp0XHDeTZLvz4-c_goch7k_AZcVWrbmNHPHIKniBfhzIqzqQiD2NKYtl-5SjkMeb5ttGeIwyirDCpZVWmHla7vEVWVtCSU6lJjTKhxlo7PKqUM1a6NiTMED73v8bTcmVKb_WuttvJYr3eqPsuDWsu_l_36Ra4Ob9IjiFJmtwbj3kDXh6apTfWrxUh25cquXNmX2wJd5F2vOJyO_5K_AUcFdzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Beilman, C L ; Ma, C ; McCabe, C ; Fedorak, R ; Halloran, B P</creator><creatorcontrib>Beilman, C L ; Ma, C ; McCabe, C ; Fedorak, R ; Halloran, B P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Infliximab is an anti-TNF therapy with proven efficacy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). An infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13 (marketed as Inflectra), has recently been introduced that could potentially result in large cost-savings for this patient population. However, the molecular complexity and sensitivity to changes in manufacturing of biologic agents makes it difficult to verify the similarity of biosimilars to their respective innovator biologics. Due to these challenges, it is important to assess the effect of biosimilars on patient outcomes while considering the cost-savings associated with these therapies. Aims The aim of this study was to provide an economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade) to its biosimilar (Inflectra) for the management of CD. Methods A Markov model was constructed to simulate the progression of patients with CD after initiating either infliximab or its biosimilar, Inflectra. Based on this model, we calculated the cost and effectiveness of each treatment strategy over a 5-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were obtained from a literature search, and loss of response rates were obtained from published centre data and observational studies. The cost of health states were accessed using the CIHI patient cost estimator, and the cost of infliximab (Remicade and Inflectra) was obtained from the Alberta Health and Wellness Drug Benefit List. Utility values were obtained from a literature search, and the Standard Gamble approach was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was executed to characterize uncertainty. Results Over a 5-year period, infliximab therapy costs $167,388 and yielded 3.91 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Infliximab’s biosimilar costs patients $111,981 and yielded 3.61 QALYs over 5 years. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, infliximab’s biosimilar had a 91% chance of being cost-effective, whereas infliximab therapy had a 9% chance of being cost-effective. Conclusions Infliximab’s biosimilar Inflectra (CT-P13) resulted in large cost reductions despite similar effectiveness to its innovator biologic for patients with CD. Based on these results, the introduction and mainstream usage of Inflectra may help reduce the economic burden associated with CD. Funding Agencies CIHR</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-2084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2018-03, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.179-179</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507792/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6507792/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1603,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beilman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorak, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, B P</creatorcontrib><title>A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE</title><title>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</title><description>Abstract Background Infliximab is an anti-TNF therapy with proven efficacy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). An infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13 (marketed as Inflectra), has recently been introduced that could potentially result in large cost-savings for this patient population. However, the molecular complexity and sensitivity to changes in manufacturing of biologic agents makes it difficult to verify the similarity of biosimilars to their respective innovator biologics. Due to these challenges, it is important to assess the effect of biosimilars on patient outcomes while considering the cost-savings associated with these therapies. Aims The aim of this study was to provide an economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade) to its biosimilar (Inflectra) for the management of CD. Methods A Markov model was constructed to simulate the progression of patients with CD after initiating either infliximab or its biosimilar, Inflectra. Based on this model, we calculated the cost and effectiveness of each treatment strategy over a 5-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were obtained from a literature search, and loss of response rates were obtained from published centre data and observational studies. The cost of health states were accessed using the CIHI patient cost estimator, and the cost of infliximab (Remicade and Inflectra) was obtained from the Alberta Health and Wellness Drug Benefit List. Utility values were obtained from a literature search, and the Standard Gamble approach was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was executed to characterize uncertainty. Results Over a 5-year period, infliximab therapy costs $167,388 and yielded 3.91 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Infliximab’s biosimilar costs patients $111,981 and yielded 3.61 QALYs over 5 years. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, infliximab’s biosimilar had a 91% chance of being cost-effective, whereas infliximab therapy had a 9% chance of being cost-effective. Conclusions Infliximab’s biosimilar Inflectra (CT-P13) resulted in large cost reductions despite similar effectiveness to its innovator biologic for patients with CD. Based on these results, the introduction and mainstream usage of Inflectra may help reduce the economic burden associated with CD. Funding Agencies CIHR</description><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><issn>2515-2084</issn><issn>2515-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtKw0AUHUTBUrt2O2shdibJZDIbIY2TdiAPaKJ0N0wnk9rSF4lVuvM3_D2_xISI4MrVvZx7HpcDwC1G9xgxZ7zRajVevZ8R8luAXICBTTCxbMTsy9_dd6_BqGk2CCEbu4g6ZAAWAUYuDLO8sHgU8bAQzzzleQ6zCIo0isVCJMEETkSWi0TEwRxG2RwWMw6TIA2mPOFp0XHDeTZLvz4-c_goch7k_AZcVWrbmNHPHIKniBfhzIqzqQiD2NKYtl-5SjkMeb5ttGeIwyirDCpZVWmHla7vEVWVtCSU6lJjTKhxlo7PKqUM1a6NiTMED73v8bTcmVKb_WuttvJYr3eqPsuDWsu_l_36Ra4Ob9IjiFJmtwbj3kDXh6apTfWrxUh25cquXNmX2wJd5F2vOJyO_5K_AUcFdzQ</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Beilman, C L</creator><creator>Ma, C</creator><creator>McCabe, C</creator><creator>Fedorak, R</creator><creator>Halloran, B P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE</title><author>Beilman, C L ; Ma, C ; McCabe, C ; Fedorak, R ; Halloran, B P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1715-4aa390682ec6e53979fe0d9ffc39d4865afd7d577cdc1157e3b389faae7c42153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Poster Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beilman, C L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCabe, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedorak, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, B P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beilman, C L</au><au>Ma, C</au><au>McCabe, C</au><au>Fedorak, R</au><au>Halloran, B P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>179-179</pages><issn>2515-2084</issn><eissn>2515-2092</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Infliximab is an anti-TNF therapy with proven efficacy for the induction and maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). An infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13 (marketed as Inflectra), has recently been introduced that could potentially result in large cost-savings for this patient population. However, the molecular complexity and sensitivity to changes in manufacturing of biologic agents makes it difficult to verify the similarity of biosimilars to their respective innovator biologics. Due to these challenges, it is important to assess the effect of biosimilars on patient outcomes while considering the cost-savings associated with these therapies. Aims The aim of this study was to provide an economic analysis comparing the cost-effectiveness of infliximab (Remicade) to its biosimilar (Inflectra) for the management of CD. Methods A Markov model was constructed to simulate the progression of patients with CD after initiating either infliximab or its biosimilar, Inflectra. Based on this model, we calculated the cost and effectiveness of each treatment strategy over a 5-year time horizon. Transition probabilities were obtained from a literature search, and loss of response rates were obtained from published centre data and observational studies. The cost of health states were accessed using the CIHI patient cost estimator, and the cost of infliximab (Remicade and Inflectra) was obtained from the Alberta Health and Wellness Drug Benefit List. Utility values were obtained from a literature search, and the Standard Gamble approach was used. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis was executed to characterize uncertainty. Results Over a 5-year period, infliximab therapy costs $167,388 and yielded 3.91 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Infliximab’s biosimilar costs patients $111,981 and yielded 3.61 QALYs over 5 years. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, infliximab’s biosimilar had a 91% chance of being cost-effective, whereas infliximab therapy had a 9% chance of being cost-effective. Conclusions Infliximab’s biosimilar Inflectra (CT-P13) resulted in large cost reductions despite similar effectiveness to its innovator biologic for patients with CD. Based on these results, the introduction and mainstream usage of Inflectra may help reduce the economic burden associated with CD. Funding Agencies CIHR</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2515-2084
ispartof Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2018-03, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.179-179
issn 2515-2084
2515-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6507792
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Poster Presentations
title A104 COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INFLIXIMAB BIOSIMILAR FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CROHN’S DISEASE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A104%20COST-EFFECTIVENESS%20OF%20INFLIXIMAB%20BIOSIMILAR%20FOR%20THE%20MANAGEMENT%20OF%20CROHN%E2%80%99S%20DISEASE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Canadian%20Association%20of%20Gastroenterology&rft.au=Beilman,%20C%20L&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=179-179&rft.issn=2515-2084&rft.eissn=2515-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jcag/gwy008.105&rfr_iscdi=true