A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory

Objectives Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of occupational health 2019-01, Vol.61 (1), p.135-142
Hauptverfasser: Ogawa, Masanori, Kabe, Isamu, Terauchi, Yasuhiro, Tanaka, Shigeru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title Journal of occupational health
container_volume 61
creator Ogawa, Masanori
Kabe, Isamu
Terauchi, Yasuhiro
Tanaka, Shigeru
description Objectives Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations in the workplace is imperative. The purpose of this study was to reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in a hospital pathology laboratory, in which approximately 15 000 pathological diagnoses are conducted yearly, using hardware and software interventions. Methods Although this laboratory had various ventilation systems, the formaldehyde concentration was high. Based on the Japanese work environment measurement system, the workplace was categorized as control class III, suggesting that improvements to workplace conditions were required. First, engineering controls were implemented and workers were asked not to block the ventilation system and not to keep waste fluid tanks open. However, the workplace required further improvement. Next, using a video camera and a formaldehyde detector, we attempted to visually educate workers about how much formaldehyde is emitted from the sample container based on the type of action undertaken. Results After the first intervention, the workplace improved to control class II. Control class II indicates that the workplace condition is between classes I and III; a good workplace condition is classified as class I. Although the work environment was still categorized as control class II after the second intervention, this intervention led to the further improvements. Conclusions The hardware and software interventions and safe working habits were effective in improving the work environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1348-9585.12018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6499338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2216242793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-b4ee75f31ef86c19199dc3752fe47be4722e91b5227ac44d102b75f4996314aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1LwzAYxoMoblbP3iTguVu--pGLMIY6ZbCLHiWkabp2dE1NW6X_vamdQ08eQsL7_vK8D-8DwDVGM4wQmWPKYp8HcTDDBOH4BEyPldNf7wm4aJodQpTQmJ6DCUUhjymjU_C2gE1rZau3PcyMhW2uodVpp9rCVNBkQ3Evy1TnfaqhMpXS1cAP3aKCEuamqYtWlrCWbW5K43RKmRiHGNtfgrNMlo2-OtweeH24f1mu_PXm8Wm5WPsqxEHsJ0zrKMgo1lkcKswx56miUUAyzaLEHUI0x0lASCQVYylGJHE84zykmElJPXA36tZdstfp6LEUtS320vbCyEL87VRFLrbmQ4ROg7qdeOD2IGDNe6ebVuxMZyvnWRCCQ8JI5DgPzEdKWdM0VmfHCRiJIQ8xbFwMGxffebgfN7-NHfmfABwQjsBnUer-Pz3xvFmRUfkLYCGW2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2216242793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ogawa, Masanori ; Kabe, Isamu ; Terauchi, Yasuhiro ; Tanaka, Shigeru</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Masanori ; Kabe, Isamu ; Terauchi, Yasuhiro ; Tanaka, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations in the workplace is imperative. The purpose of this study was to reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in a hospital pathology laboratory, in which approximately 15 000 pathological diagnoses are conducted yearly, using hardware and software interventions. Methods Although this laboratory had various ventilation systems, the formaldehyde concentration was high. Based on the Japanese work environment measurement system, the workplace was categorized as control class III, suggesting that improvements to workplace conditions were required. First, engineering controls were implemented and workers were asked not to block the ventilation system and not to keep waste fluid tanks open. However, the workplace required further improvement. Next, using a video camera and a formaldehyde detector, we attempted to visually educate workers about how much formaldehyde is emitted from the sample container based on the type of action undertaken. Results After the first intervention, the workplace improved to control class II. Control class II indicates that the workplace condition is between classes I and III; a good workplace condition is classified as class I. Although the work environment was still categorized as control class II after the second intervention, this intervention led to the further improvements. Conclusions The hardware and software interventions and safe working habits were effective in improving the work environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1341-9145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-9585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1348-9585.12018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30698343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis ; Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control ; Air quality ; Aldehydes ; Computer programs ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Field Study ; Formaldehyde ; Formaldehyde - analysis ; Hardware ; Humans ; Indoor air pollution ; Indoor air quality ; Indoor environments ; Intervention ; Japan ; Laboratories ; Laboratories, Hospital ; occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational health ; pathological laboratory ; Pathology ; Pathology Department, Hospital ; Software ; Ventilation ; Work environment ; Workers ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Journal of occupational health, 2019-01, Vol.61 (1), p.135-142</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Occupational Health published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japan Society for Occupational Health.</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-b4ee75f31ef86c19199dc3752fe47be4722e91b5227ac44d102b75f4996314aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-b4ee75f31ef86c19199dc3752fe47be4722e91b5227ac44d102b75f4996314aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8391-9925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499338/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6499338/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30698343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabe, Isamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terauchi, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><title>A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory</title><title>Journal of occupational health</title><addtitle>J Occup Health</addtitle><description>Objectives Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations in the workplace is imperative. The purpose of this study was to reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in a hospital pathology laboratory, in which approximately 15 000 pathological diagnoses are conducted yearly, using hardware and software interventions. Methods Although this laboratory had various ventilation systems, the formaldehyde concentration was high. Based on the Japanese work environment measurement system, the workplace was categorized as control class III, suggesting that improvements to workplace conditions were required. First, engineering controls were implemented and workers were asked not to block the ventilation system and not to keep waste fluid tanks open. However, the workplace required further improvement. Next, using a video camera and a formaldehyde detector, we attempted to visually educate workers about how much formaldehyde is emitted from the sample container based on the type of action undertaken. Results After the first intervention, the workplace improved to control class II. Control class II indicates that the workplace condition is between classes I and III; a good workplace condition is classified as class I. Although the work environment was still categorized as control class II after the second intervention, this intervention led to the further improvements. Conclusions The hardware and software interventions and safe working habits were effective in improving the work environment.</description><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</subject><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Aldehydes</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Field Study</subject><subject>Formaldehyde</subject><subject>Formaldehyde - analysis</subject><subject>Hardware</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor air pollution</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratories, Hospital</subject><subject>occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>pathological laboratory</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pathology Department, Hospital</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1348-9585</issn><issn>1341-9145</issn><issn>1348-9585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1LwzAYxoMoblbP3iTguVu--pGLMIY6ZbCLHiWkabp2dE1NW6X_vamdQ08eQsL7_vK8D-8DwDVGM4wQmWPKYp8HcTDDBOH4BEyPldNf7wm4aJodQpTQmJ6DCUUhjymjU_C2gE1rZau3PcyMhW2uodVpp9rCVNBkQ3Evy1TnfaqhMpXS1cAP3aKCEuamqYtWlrCWbW5K43RKmRiHGNtfgrNMlo2-OtweeH24f1mu_PXm8Wm5WPsqxEHsJ0zrKMgo1lkcKswx56miUUAyzaLEHUI0x0lASCQVYylGJHE84zykmElJPXA36tZdstfp6LEUtS320vbCyEL87VRFLrbmQ4ROg7qdeOD2IGDNe6ebVuxMZyvnWRCCQ8JI5DgPzEdKWdM0VmfHCRiJIQ8xbFwMGxffebgfN7-NHfmfABwQjsBnUer-Pz3xvFmRUfkLYCGW2g</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Ogawa, Masanori</creator><creator>Kabe, Isamu</creator><creator>Terauchi, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Tanaka, Shigeru</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-9925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory</title><author>Ogawa, Masanori ; Kabe, Isamu ; Terauchi, Yasuhiro ; Tanaka, Shigeru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6158-b4ee75f31ef86c19199dc3752fe47be4722e91b5227ac44d102b75f4996314aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</topic><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Aldehydes</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Field Study</topic><topic>Formaldehyde</topic><topic>Formaldehyde - analysis</topic><topic>Hardware</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor air pollution</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratories, Hospital</topic><topic>occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>pathological laboratory</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pathology Department, Hospital</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabe, Isamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terauchi, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of occupational health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogawa, Masanori</au><au>Kabe, Isamu</au><au>Terauchi, Yasuhiro</au><au>Tanaka, Shigeru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory</atitle><jtitle>Journal of occupational health</jtitle><addtitle>J Occup Health</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>135-142</pages><issn>1348-9585</issn><issn>1341-9145</issn><eissn>1348-9585</eissn><abstract>Objectives Formaldehyde is routinely used in pathology laboratories. The threshold limit value of formaldehyde determined by American and Japanese organizations is 0.1 ppm, which is similar to the indoor air quality guideline value (0.08 ppm). Therefore, maintaining low formaldehyde concentrations in the workplace is imperative. The purpose of this study was to reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in a hospital pathology laboratory, in which approximately 15 000 pathological diagnoses are conducted yearly, using hardware and software interventions. Methods Although this laboratory had various ventilation systems, the formaldehyde concentration was high. Based on the Japanese work environment measurement system, the workplace was categorized as control class III, suggesting that improvements to workplace conditions were required. First, engineering controls were implemented and workers were asked not to block the ventilation system and not to keep waste fluid tanks open. However, the workplace required further improvement. Next, using a video camera and a formaldehyde detector, we attempted to visually educate workers about how much formaldehyde is emitted from the sample container based on the type of action undertaken. Results After the first intervention, the workplace improved to control class II. Control class II indicates that the workplace condition is between classes I and III; a good workplace condition is classified as class I. Although the work environment was still categorized as control class II after the second intervention, this intervention led to the further improvements. Conclusions The hardware and software interventions and safe working habits were effective in improving the work environment.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30698343</pmid><doi>10.1002/1348-9585.12018</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-9925</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1348-9585
ispartof Journal of occupational health, 2019-01, Vol.61 (1), p.135-142
issn 1348-9585
1341-9145
1348-9585
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6499338
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Air Pollution, Indoor - prevention & control
Air quality
Aldehydes
Computer programs
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Field Study
Formaldehyde
Formaldehyde - analysis
Hardware
Humans
Indoor air pollution
Indoor air quality
Indoor environments
Intervention
Japan
Laboratories
Laboratories, Hospital
occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - analysis
Occupational Exposure - prevention & control
Occupational health
pathological laboratory
Pathology
Pathology Department, Hospital
Software
Ventilation
Work environment
Workers
Working conditions
title A strategy for the reduction of formaldehyde concentration in a hospital pathology laboratory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A31%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20strategy%20for%20the%20reduction%20of%20formaldehyde%20concentration%20in%20a%20hospital%20pathology%20laboratory&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20occupational%20health&rft.au=Ogawa,%20Masanori&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=135-142&rft.issn=1348-9585&rft.eissn=1348-9585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1348-9585.12018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2216242793%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2216242793&rft_id=info:pmid/30698343&rfr_iscdi=true