Stem cells and neurological diseases
. Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreov...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cell proliferation 2008-02, Vol.41 (s1), p.94-114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114 |
---|---|
container_issue | s1 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Cell proliferation |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Hess, D. C. Borlongan, C. V. |
description | . Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreover, there are reports of bone marrow‐derived cells developing neuronal and vascular phenotypes and aiding in repair of injured brain. These findings have fuelled excitement and interest in regenerative medicine for neurological diseases, arguably the most difficult diseases to treat. There are numerous proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases. These include cell therapy approaches in which cells are delivered intracerebrally or are infused by an intravenous or intra‐arterial route; stem cell mobilization approaches in which endogenous stem and progenitor cells are mobilized by cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulatory factor (GCSF) or chemokines such as SDF‐1; trophic and growth factor support, such as delivering brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) into the brain to support injured neurones; these approaches may be used together to maximize recovery. While initially, it was thought that cell therapy might work by a ‘cell replacement’ mechanism, a large body of evidence is emerging that cell therapy works by providing trophic or ‘chaperone’ support to the injured tissue and brain. Angiogenesis and neurogenesis are coupled in the brain. Increasing angiogenesis with adult stem cell approaches in rodent models of stroke leads to preservation of neurones and improved functional outcome. A number of stem and progenitor cell types has been proposed as therapy for neurological disease ranging from neural stem cells to bone marrow derived stem cells to embryonic stem cells. Any cell therapy approach to neurological disease will have to be scalable and easily commercialized if it will have the necessary impact on public health. Currently, bone marrow‐derived cell populations such as the marrow stromal cell, multipotential progenitor cells, umbilical cord stem cells and neural stem cells meet these criteria the best. Of great clinical significance, initial evidence suggests these cell types may be delivered by an allogeneic approach, so strict tissue matching may not be necessary. The most immediate impact on patients will be achieved by making use of the trophic support capability of cell therapy and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00486.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6496373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>70195319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-9d612fc3f62d36de1d5ce72794eb0e3fc1e50d75b14dc26c636da375c95dcdf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobn78BemFeNeaNE3Sgggy_ERU5lDvDllyOju7VptN5783dWPqnTkXCZz3fXPOQ0jAaMT8ORxHjEsRxixNopjSNKI0SWU0XyPdVWOddGkmaahUHHfIlnNjShlnSm6SDkt9ZYJ1yf79FCeBwbJ0ga5sUOGsqct6VBhdBrZwqB26HbKR69Lh7vLeJoOz00HvIry-Pb_snVyHRighw8xKFueG5zK2XFpkVhhUscoSHFLkuWEoqFViyBJrYmmkF2muhMmENTbn2-R4Efs6G07QGqymjS7htSkmuvmEWhfwt1MVzzCq30EmmeSK-4CDZUBTv83QTWFSuHY3XWE9c6CoX5qzzAvThdA0tXMN5qtPGIWWMIyhBQktSGgJwzdhmHvr3u8hf4xLpF5wtBB8FCV-_jsYend9__D2cGEv3BTnK7tuXkAqDwseb87hSfSvmLyR8MC_AD6hmZo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70195319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stem cells and neurological diseases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hess, D. C. ; Borlongan, C. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hess, D. C. ; Borlongan, C. V.</creatorcontrib><description>. Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreover, there are reports of bone marrow‐derived cells developing neuronal and vascular phenotypes and aiding in repair of injured brain. These findings have fuelled excitement and interest in regenerative medicine for neurological diseases, arguably the most difficult diseases to treat. There are numerous proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases. These include cell therapy approaches in which cells are delivered intracerebrally or are infused by an intravenous or intra‐arterial route; stem cell mobilization approaches in which endogenous stem and progenitor cells are mobilized by cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulatory factor (GCSF) or chemokines such as SDF‐1; trophic and growth factor support, such as delivering brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) into the brain to support injured neurones; these approaches may be used together to maximize recovery. While initially, it was thought that cell therapy might work by a ‘cell replacement’ mechanism, a large body of evidence is emerging that cell therapy works by providing trophic or ‘chaperone’ support to the injured tissue and brain. Angiogenesis and neurogenesis are coupled in the brain. Increasing angiogenesis with adult stem cell approaches in rodent models of stroke leads to preservation of neurones and improved functional outcome. A number of stem and progenitor cell types has been proposed as therapy for neurological disease ranging from neural stem cells to bone marrow derived stem cells to embryonic stem cells. Any cell therapy approach to neurological disease will have to be scalable and easily commercialized if it will have the necessary impact on public health. Currently, bone marrow‐derived cell populations such as the marrow stromal cell, multipotential progenitor cells, umbilical cord stem cells and neural stem cells meet these criteria the best. Of great clinical significance, initial evidence suggests these cell types may be delivered by an allogeneic approach, so strict tissue matching may not be necessary. The most immediate impact on patients will be achieved by making use of the trophic support capability of cell therapy and not by a cell replacement mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00486.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18181951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult Stem Cells - cytology ; Bone Marrow Transplantation ; Brain - pathology ; Cell Differentiation ; Central Nervous System Diseases - pathology ; Central Nervous System Diseases - therapy ; Humans ; Metabolism, Inborn Errors - pathology ; Metabolism, Inborn Errors - therapy ; Multiple Sclerosis - pathology ; Multiple Sclerosis - therapy ; Parkinson Disease - pathology ; Parkinson Disease - therapy ; Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Stem Cells - cytology ; Stroke - pathology ; Stroke - therapy ; Therapeutic Applications</subject><ispartof>Cell proliferation, 2008-02, Vol.41 (s1), p.94-114</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-9d612fc3f62d36de1d5ce72794eb0e3fc1e50d75b14dc26c636da375c95dcdf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-9d612fc3f62d36de1d5ce72794eb0e3fc1e50d75b14dc26c636da375c95dcdf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6496373/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6496373/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18181951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hess, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borlongan, C. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Stem cells and neurological diseases</title><title>Cell proliferation</title><addtitle>Cell Prolif</addtitle><description>. Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreover, there are reports of bone marrow‐derived cells developing neuronal and vascular phenotypes and aiding in repair of injured brain. These findings have fuelled excitement and interest in regenerative medicine for neurological diseases, arguably the most difficult diseases to treat. There are numerous proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases. These include cell therapy approaches in which cells are delivered intracerebrally or are infused by an intravenous or intra‐arterial route; stem cell mobilization approaches in which endogenous stem and progenitor cells are mobilized by cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulatory factor (GCSF) or chemokines such as SDF‐1; trophic and growth factor support, such as delivering brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) into the brain to support injured neurones; these approaches may be used together to maximize recovery. While initially, it was thought that cell therapy might work by a ‘cell replacement’ mechanism, a large body of evidence is emerging that cell therapy works by providing trophic or ‘chaperone’ support to the injured tissue and brain. Angiogenesis and neurogenesis are coupled in the brain. Increasing angiogenesis with adult stem cell approaches in rodent models of stroke leads to preservation of neurones and improved functional outcome. A number of stem and progenitor cell types has been proposed as therapy for neurological disease ranging from neural stem cells to bone marrow derived stem cells to embryonic stem cells. Any cell therapy approach to neurological disease will have to be scalable and easily commercialized if it will have the necessary impact on public health. Currently, bone marrow‐derived cell populations such as the marrow stromal cell, multipotential progenitor cells, umbilical cord stem cells and neural stem cells meet these criteria the best. Of great clinical significance, initial evidence suggests these cell types may be delivered by an allogeneic approach, so strict tissue matching may not be necessary. The most immediate impact on patients will be achieved by making use of the trophic support capability of cell therapy and not by a cell replacement mechanism.</description><subject>Adult Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Bone Marrow Transplantation</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Central Nervous System Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolism, Inborn Errors - pathology</subject><subject>Metabolism, Inborn Errors - therapy</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - therapy</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - pathology</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Stem Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Stroke - pathology</subject><subject>Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Therapeutic Applications</subject><issn>0960-7722</issn><issn>1365-2184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobn78BemFeNeaNE3Sgggy_ERU5lDvDllyOju7VptN5783dWPqnTkXCZz3fXPOQ0jAaMT8ORxHjEsRxixNopjSNKI0SWU0XyPdVWOddGkmaahUHHfIlnNjShlnSm6SDkt9ZYJ1yf79FCeBwbJ0ga5sUOGsqct6VBhdBrZwqB26HbKR69Lh7vLeJoOz00HvIry-Pb_snVyHRighw8xKFueG5zK2XFpkVhhUscoSHFLkuWEoqFViyBJrYmmkF2muhMmENTbn2-R4Efs6G07QGqymjS7htSkmuvmEWhfwt1MVzzCq30EmmeSK-4CDZUBTv83QTWFSuHY3XWE9c6CoX5qzzAvThdA0tXMN5qtPGIWWMIyhBQktSGgJwzdhmHvr3u8hf4xLpF5wtBB8FCV-_jsYend9__D2cGEv3BTnK7tuXkAqDwseb87hSfSvmLyR8MC_AD6hmZo</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Hess, D. C.</creator><creator>Borlongan, C. V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Stem cells and neurological diseases</title><author>Hess, D. C. ; Borlongan, C. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5756-9d612fc3f62d36de1d5ce72794eb0e3fc1e50d75b14dc26c636da375c95dcdf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adult Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Bone Marrow Transplantation</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Central Nervous System Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolism, Inborn Errors - pathology</topic><topic>Metabolism, Inborn Errors - therapy</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - therapy</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - pathology</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Stem Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Stroke - pathology</topic><topic>Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Therapeutic Applications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hess, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borlongan, C. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cell proliferation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hess, D. C.</au><au>Borlongan, C. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stem cells and neurological diseases</atitle><jtitle>Cell proliferation</jtitle><addtitle>Cell Prolif</addtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>94-114</pages><issn>0960-7722</issn><eissn>1365-2184</eissn><abstract>. Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreover, there are reports of bone marrow‐derived cells developing neuronal and vascular phenotypes and aiding in repair of injured brain. These findings have fuelled excitement and interest in regenerative medicine for neurological diseases, arguably the most difficult diseases to treat. There are numerous proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases. These include cell therapy approaches in which cells are delivered intracerebrally or are infused by an intravenous or intra‐arterial route; stem cell mobilization approaches in which endogenous stem and progenitor cells are mobilized by cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulatory factor (GCSF) or chemokines such as SDF‐1; trophic and growth factor support, such as delivering brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) into the brain to support injured neurones; these approaches may be used together to maximize recovery. While initially, it was thought that cell therapy might work by a ‘cell replacement’ mechanism, a large body of evidence is emerging that cell therapy works by providing trophic or ‘chaperone’ support to the injured tissue and brain. Angiogenesis and neurogenesis are coupled in the brain. Increasing angiogenesis with adult stem cell approaches in rodent models of stroke leads to preservation of neurones and improved functional outcome. A number of stem and progenitor cell types has been proposed as therapy for neurological disease ranging from neural stem cells to bone marrow derived stem cells to embryonic stem cells. Any cell therapy approach to neurological disease will have to be scalable and easily commercialized if it will have the necessary impact on public health. Currently, bone marrow‐derived cell populations such as the marrow stromal cell, multipotential progenitor cells, umbilical cord stem cells and neural stem cells meet these criteria the best. Of great clinical significance, initial evidence suggests these cell types may be delivered by an allogeneic approach, so strict tissue matching may not be necessary. The most immediate impact on patients will be achieved by making use of the trophic support capability of cell therapy and not by a cell replacement mechanism.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>18181951</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00486.x</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7722 |
ispartof | Cell proliferation, 2008-02, Vol.41 (s1), p.94-114 |
issn | 0960-7722 1365-2184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6496373 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Stem Cells - cytology Bone Marrow Transplantation Brain - pathology Cell Differentiation Central Nervous System Diseases - pathology Central Nervous System Diseases - therapy Humans Metabolism, Inborn Errors - pathology Metabolism, Inborn Errors - therapy Multiple Sclerosis - pathology Multiple Sclerosis - therapy Parkinson Disease - pathology Parkinson Disease - therapy Stem Cell Transplantation - methods Stem Cells - cytology Stroke - pathology Stroke - therapy Therapeutic Applications |
title | Stem cells and neurological diseases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A43%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stem%20cells%20and%20neurological%20diseases&rft.jtitle=Cell%20proliferation&rft.au=Hess,%20D.%20C.&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=94-114&rft.issn=0960-7722&rft.eissn=1365-2184&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00486.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E70195319%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70195319&rft_id=info:pmid/18181951&rfr_iscdi=true |