Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth
Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-va...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2008-10, Vol.2008 (4), p.CD006843-CD006843 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | CD006843 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | CD006843 |
container_title | Cochrane database of systematic reviews |
container_volume | 2008 |
creator | Berghella, Vincenzo Hayes, Edward Visintine, John Baxter, Jason K |
description | Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-vaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth.
To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007) and all references in identified articles.
Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women between the gestational ages of 22 and 34 weeks screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.
All four authors assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted data.
We identified 13 trials, of which five were eligible for inclusion. The five included studies randomized 474 women, of which 235 were randomized to knowledge and 249 to no knowledge of FFN.Preterm birth less than 37 weeks was significantly decreased with management based on knowledge of FFN results (15.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (28.6%; risk ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.87). All other outcomes for which there were available data (preterm birth at less than 34, 32, or 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; and time to evaluate) were similar in the two groups. No other maternal or neonatal outcome was available for meaningful analysis.
Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/14651858.CD006843.pub2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6492504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69644079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1702331461968e116a0ee67650715a9ef5b6ce319cbc6fbfc22ebe2688f6ef5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMlOwzAQtRCIlsIvVDlxS_EWx74gUKGAVIkLSNysxB23gTQudoLE3-PQluU0M3rLzDyExgRPCMb0gnCREZnJyfQGYyE5m2y6kh6gYQRUyhV7Ofzus7RnDdBJCK8YM0WIPEYDIqMiZ3SIrmbQFnViq9K7BkxbNUkLIZZlYp1PPCw60w_tChJfhbfE2WTjoQW_TsrKt6tTdGSLOsDZro7Q8-z2aXqfzh_vHqbX89RwSduU5JgyFg8iSkggRBQYQOQiwznJCgU2K4UBRpQpjbClNZRCCVRIaUUEgY3Q5dY3_rmGhYGm9UWtN75aF_5Tu6LS_5GmWuml-9CCK5phHg3OdwbevXfxR72ugoG6LhpwXdBCCc5xriJRbInGuxA82J8lBOs-fL0PX-_D71fTKBz_PfFXtkubfQERY4KI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69644079</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berghella, Vincenzo ; Hayes, Edward ; Visintine, John ; Baxter, Jason K</creator><creatorcontrib>Berghella, Vincenzo ; Hayes, Edward ; Visintine, John ; Baxter, Jason K</creatorcontrib><description>Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-vaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth.
To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007) and all references in identified articles.
Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women between the gestational ages of 22 and 34 weeks screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.
All four authors assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted data.
We identified 13 trials, of which five were eligible for inclusion. The five included studies randomized 474 women, of which 235 were randomized to knowledge and 249 to no knowledge of FFN.Preterm birth less than 37 weeks was significantly decreased with management based on knowledge of FFN results (15.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (28.6%; risk ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.87). All other outcomes for which there were available data (preterm birth at less than 34, 32, or 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; and time to evaluate) were similar in the two groups. No other maternal or neonatal outcome was available for meaningful analysis.
Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006843.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18843732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomarkers - analysis ; Female ; Fetus ; Fibronectins - analysis ; Humans ; Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth - prevention & control ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008-10, Vol.2008 (4), p.CD006843-CD006843</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1702331461968e116a0ee67650715a9ef5b6ce319cbc6fbfc22ebe2688f6ef5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1702331461968e116a0ee67650715a9ef5b6ce319cbc6fbfc22ebe2688f6ef5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18843732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berghella, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visintine, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Jason K</creatorcontrib><title>Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-vaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth.
To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007) and all references in identified articles.
Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women between the gestational ages of 22 and 34 weeks screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.
All four authors assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted data.
We identified 13 trials, of which five were eligible for inclusion. The five included studies randomized 474 women, of which 235 were randomized to knowledge and 249 to no knowledge of FFN.Preterm birth less than 37 weeks was significantly decreased with management based on knowledge of FFN results (15.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (28.6%; risk ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.87). All other outcomes for which there were available data (preterm birth at less than 34, 32, or 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; and time to evaluate) were similar in the two groups. No other maternal or neonatal outcome was available for meaningful analysis.
Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged.</description><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Fibronectins - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - prevention & control</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMlOwzAQtRCIlsIvVDlxS_EWx74gUKGAVIkLSNysxB23gTQudoLE3-PQluU0M3rLzDyExgRPCMb0gnCREZnJyfQGYyE5m2y6kh6gYQRUyhV7Ofzus7RnDdBJCK8YM0WIPEYDIqMiZ3SIrmbQFnViq9K7BkxbNUkLIZZlYp1PPCw60w_tChJfhbfE2WTjoQW_TsrKt6tTdGSLOsDZro7Q8-z2aXqfzh_vHqbX89RwSduU5JgyFg8iSkggRBQYQOQiwznJCgU2K4UBRpQpjbClNZRCCVRIaUUEgY3Q5dY3_rmGhYGm9UWtN75aF_5Tu6LS_5GmWuml-9CCK5phHg3OdwbevXfxR72ugoG6LhpwXdBCCc5xriJRbInGuxA82J8lBOs-fL0PX-_D71fTKBz_PfFXtkubfQERY4KI</recordid><startdate>20081008</startdate><enddate>20081008</enddate><creator>Berghella, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Hayes, Edward</creator><creator>Visintine, John</creator><creator>Baxter, Jason K</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081008</creationdate><title>Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth</title><author>Berghella, Vincenzo ; Hayes, Edward ; Visintine, John ; Baxter, Jason K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-1702331461968e116a0ee67650715a9ef5b6ce319cbc6fbfc22ebe2688f6ef5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Fibronectins - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - prevention & control</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berghella, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visintine, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baxter, Jason K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berghella, Vincenzo</au><au>Hayes, Edward</au><au>Visintine, John</au><au>Baxter, Jason K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2008-10-08</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>2008</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>CD006843</spage><epage>CD006843</epage><pages>CD006843-CD006843</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><abstract>Fetal fibronectin (FFN) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein localized at the maternal-fetal interface of the amniotic membranes, between chorion and decidua, where it is concentrated in this area between decidua and trophoblast. In normal conditions, FFN is found at very low levels in cervico-vaginal secretions. Levels greater than or equal to 50 ng/mL at or after 22 weeks have been associated with an increased risk of spontaneous preterm birth. In fact, FFN is one of the best predictors of preterm birth in all populations studied so far, and can help selecting which women are at significant risk for preterm birth.
To assess the effectiveness of management based on knowledge of FFN testing results for preventing preterm birth.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2007) and all references in identified articles.
Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women between the gestational ages of 22 and 34 weeks screened with FFN for risk of preterm birth. Studies included are based exclusively on knowledge of FFN results versus no such knowledge, and we have excluded studies including women with only positive or only negative FFN results.
All four authors assessed studies for inclusion and quality and extracted data.
We identified 13 trials, of which five were eligible for inclusion. The five included studies randomized 474 women, of which 235 were randomized to knowledge and 249 to no knowledge of FFN.Preterm birth less than 37 weeks was significantly decreased with management based on knowledge of FFN results (15.6%) versus controls without such knowledge (28.6%; risk ratio 0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 0.87). All other outcomes for which there were available data (preterm birth at less than 34, 32, or 28 weeks; gestational age at delivery; birthweight less than 2500 grams; perinatal death; maternal hospitalization; tocolysis; steroids for fetal lung maturity; and time to evaluate) were similar in the two groups. No other maternal or neonatal outcome was available for meaningful analysis.
Although FFN is commonly used in labor and delivery units to help in the management of women with symptoms of preterm labor, currently there is not sufficient evidence to recommend its use. Since this review found an association between knowledge of FFN results and a lower incidence of preterm birth before 37 weeks, further research should be encouraged.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>18843732</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD006843.pub2</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1465-1858 |
ispartof | Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2008-10, Vol.2008 (4), p.CD006843-CD006843 |
issn | 1465-1858 1469-493X 1465-1858 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6492504 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomarkers - analysis Female Fetus Fibronectins - analysis Humans Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences Pregnancy Premature Birth - prevention & control Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic |
title | Fetal fibronectin testing for reducing the risk of preterm birth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fetal%20fibronectin%20testing%20for%20reducing%20the%20risk%20of%20preterm%20birth&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Berghella,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2008-10-08&rft.volume=2008&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=CD006843&rft.epage=CD006843&rft.pages=CD006843-CD006843&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006843.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69644079%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69644079&rft_id=info:pmid/18843732&rfr_iscdi=true |