Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK

ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2019-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e024324-e024324
Hauptverfasser: Bevan, David, White, Alicia, Marshall, John, Peckham, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e024324
container_issue 3
container_start_page e024324
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 9
creator Bevan, David
White, Alicia
Marshall, John
Peckham, Catherine
description ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters.DesignDeterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters.Setting and participantsA theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section).InterventionsCulture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling.Outcome measuresOutcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis.ResultsWith no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death.ConclusionsThe evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6475221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2197333085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-27774d4ad042ad736234f83159d19fea55a0681e0d4efb98217404921d7da5463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9vFSEUxYnR2Kb2E5gYEjd1MZW_w8zGxDZajW26qF0THlxe52UejMCY9NuX6Xs21ZVs4MLvnNzLQegtJaeU8vbjaruJE4SGEdo1hAnOxAt0yIgQTUukfPnsfICOc96QuoTspWSv0QEnPRGdJIcoXUUH4ziENS53gMF7sAVH_1gNoaToZluGGJY7EwoEU8yIs00AYVH5mPA6xXnCZ_imJJhKtNHaOeOTi7ObD9ialAazXswePW9_vEGvvBkzHO_3I3T79cvP82_N5fXF9_PPl81KKFYappQSThhHBDNO8ZZx4TtOZe9o78FIaUjbUSBOgF_1HaNKENEz6pQzUrT8CH3a-U7zagvOQp3GjHpKw9akex3NoP9-CcOdXsffuhVKMkarwcneIMVfM-Sit0O29bdMgDhnzWivOOekkxV9_w-6iXMKdbyFainrKF064jvKpphzAv_UDCV6iVXvY9VLrHoXa1W9ez7Hk-ZPiBU43QFV_V-OD0yhrdg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2196128116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Bevan, David ; White, Alicia ; Marshall, John ; Peckham, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Bevan, David ; White, Alicia ; Marshall, John ; Peckham, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters.DesignDeterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters.Setting and participantsA theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section).InterventionsCulture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling.Outcome measuresOutcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis.ResultsWith no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death.ConclusionsThe evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30904850</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Antibiotics ; Births ; Committees ; Consensus ; Cost analysis ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health surveillance ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infections ; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - prevention &amp; control ; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Infectious Diseases ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Mortality ; Newborn babies ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital ; Penicillin ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention &amp; control ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Public health ; Sepsis ; Streptococcal Infections - diagnosis ; Streptococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Streptococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification ; Streptococcus infections ; Systematic review ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2019-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e024324-e024324</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-27774d4ad042ad736234f83159d19fea55a0681e0d4efb98217404921d7da5463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-27774d4ad042ad736234f83159d19fea55a0681e0d4efb98217404921d7da5463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6239-774X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e024324.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e024324.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27540,27541,27915,27916,53782,53784,77362,77393</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904850$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bevan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters.DesignDeterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters.Setting and participantsA theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section).InterventionsCulture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling.Outcome measuresOutcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis.ResultsWith no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death.ConclusionsThe evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Infectious Diseases</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital</subject><subject>Penicillin</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Streptococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9vFSEUxYnR2Kb2E5gYEjd1MZW_w8zGxDZajW26qF0THlxe52UejMCY9NuX6Xs21ZVs4MLvnNzLQegtJaeU8vbjaruJE4SGEdo1hAnOxAt0yIgQTUukfPnsfICOc96QuoTspWSv0QEnPRGdJIcoXUUH4ziENS53gMF7sAVH_1gNoaToZluGGJY7EwoEU8yIs00AYVH5mPA6xXnCZ_imJJhKtNHaOeOTi7ObD9ialAazXswePW9_vEGvvBkzHO_3I3T79cvP82_N5fXF9_PPl81KKFYappQSThhHBDNO8ZZx4TtOZe9o78FIaUjbUSBOgF_1HaNKENEz6pQzUrT8CH3a-U7zagvOQp3GjHpKw9akex3NoP9-CcOdXsffuhVKMkarwcneIMVfM-Sit0O29bdMgDhnzWivOOekkxV9_w-6iXMKdbyFainrKF064jvKpphzAv_UDCV6iVXvY9VLrHoXa1W9ez7Hk-ZPiBU43QFV_V-OD0yhrdg</recordid><startdate>20190323</startdate><enddate>20190323</enddate><creator>Bevan, David</creator><creator>White, Alicia</creator><creator>Marshall, John</creator><creator>Peckham, Catherine</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-774X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190323</creationdate><title>Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK</title><author>Bevan, David ; White, Alicia ; Marshall, John ; Peckham, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-27774d4ad042ad736234f83159d19fea55a0681e0d4efb98217404921d7da5463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Infectious Diseases</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital</topic><topic>Penicillin</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Streptococcal Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bevan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Alicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peckham, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Journals (Open Access)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bevan, David</au><au>White, Alicia</au><au>Marshall, John</au><au>Peckham, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2019-03-23</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e024324</spage><epage>e024324</epage><pages>e024324-e024324</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectivesTo estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters.DesignDeterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters.Setting and participantsA theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section).InterventionsCulture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling.Outcome measuresOutcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis.ResultsWith no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death.ConclusionsThe evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>30904850</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-774X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2019-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e024324-e024324
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6475221
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals (Open Access); PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Antibiotics
Births
Committees
Consensus
Cost analysis
Female
Gynecology
Health surveillance
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infections
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - prevention & control
Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical - statistics & numerical data
Infectious Diseases
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Mortality
Newborn babies
Obstetrics
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital
Penicillin
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - epidemiology
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - microbiology
Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - prevention & control
Prenatal Diagnosis
Public health
Sepsis
Streptococcal Infections - diagnosis
Streptococcal Infections - drug therapy
Streptococcal Infections - epidemiology
Streptococcal Infections - prevention & control
Streptococcus agalactiae - isolation & purification
Streptococcus infections
Systematic review
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Womens health
title Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A13%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20the%20effect%20of%20the%20introduction%20of%20antenatal%20screening%20for%20group%20B%20Streptococcus%20(GBS)%20carriage%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Bevan,%20David&rft.date=2019-03-23&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e024324&rft.epage=e024324&rft.pages=e024324-e024324&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2197333085%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2196128116&rft_id=info:pmid/30904850&rfr_iscdi=true