Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding

Background Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high‐income countries, particularly among women in lower‐income groups. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2016-11, Vol.2016 (11), p.CD001688
Hauptverfasser: Balogun, Olukunmi O, O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J, McFadden, Alison, Ota, Erika, Gavine, Anna, Garner, Christine D, Renfrew, Mary J, MacGillivray, Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page CD001688
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume 2016
creator Balogun, Olukunmi O
O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J
McFadden, Alison
Ota, Erika
Gavine, Anna
Garner, Christine D
Renfrew, Mary J
MacGillivray, Stephen
Balogun, Olukunmi O
description Background Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high‐income countries, particularly among women in lower‐income groups. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. Objectives To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). Search methods We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Main results Twenty‐eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6464788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839128036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-e0fd722a6e466fef5aedde9dce0c1ca054e54e272a953122b4ec23837dd9ecb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUFtLwzAUDqK4Of0Lo4--bObSpimCoPM2GPiizyFNT7dI28ykm-zfm7IL0xfhQA58t5MPoSHBY4IxvSExT4hIxHjyiDHhQoyXq5ydoH4HjDrk9GjvoQvvPzFmPKPpOerRVNA0IUkf3U6bFtwamtbYxkelddHS2dq2pplH7QIi05jWqA6NbBnlDpRvS4Ai4JforFSVh6vdO0Afz0_vk9fR7O1lOrmfjXScMjYCXBYppYpDzHkJZaKgKCArNGBNtMJJDGFoSlWWMEJpHoOmTLC0KDLQecIG6G7rG75YQ9A1rVOVXDpTK7eRVhn5G2nMQs7tWvKYx6kQweB6Z-Ds1wp8K2vjNVSVasCuvCSCZYSKUE-g8i1VO-u9g_IQQ7Dsmpf75uW--S6cBeHw-MiDbF91IDxsCd-mgo3UVi9cyP_H90_KD7aXlj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839128036</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cochrane Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Balogun, Olukunmi O ; O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J ; McFadden, Alison ; Ota, Erika ; Gavine, Anna ; Garner, Christine D ; Renfrew, Mary J ; MacGillivray, Stephen ; Balogun, Olukunmi O</creator><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Olukunmi O ; O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J ; McFadden, Alison ; Ota, Erika ; Gavine, Anna ; Garner, Christine D ; Renfrew, Mary J ; MacGillivray, Stephen ; Balogun, Olukunmi O</creatorcontrib><description>Background Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high‐income countries, particularly among women in lower‐income groups. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. Objectives To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). Search methods We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Main results Twenty‐eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from five trials involving 564 women for improved rates ofbreastfeeding initiation among women who received healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support (average risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.92; Tau² = 0.07, I² = 62%, low‐quality evidence) compared to those women who received standard care. We downgraded evidence due to design limitations and heterogeneity. The outcome of early initiation of breastfeeding was not reported in the studies under this comparison. Non‐healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care There was evidence from eight trials of 5712 women for improved rates of breastfeeding initiation among women who received interventions from non‐healthcare professional counsellors and support groups (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; Tau² = 0.02, I² = 86%, low‐quality evidence) compared to women who received standard care. In three trials of 76,373 women, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of the number of women practicing early initiation of breastfeeding (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95; Tau² = 0.18, I² = 78%, very low‐quality evidence). We downgraded the evidence for a combination of design limitations, heterogeneity and imprecision (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect). Other comparisons Other comparisons in this review also looked at the rates of initiation of breastfeeding and there were no clear differences between groups for the following comparisons of combined healthcare professional‐led education with peer support or community educator versus standard care (2 studies, 1371 women) or attention control (1 study, 237 women), breastfeeding education using multimedia (a self‐help manual or a video) versus routine care (2 studies, 497 women); early mother‐infant contact versus standard care (2 studies, 309 women); and community‐based breastfeeding groups versus no breastfeeding groups (1 study, 18,603 women). None of these comparisons reported data on early initiation of breastfeeding. Authors' conclusions This review found low‐quality evidence that healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and non‐healthcare professional‐led counselling and peer support interventions can result in some improvements in the number of women beginning to breastfeed. The majority of the trials were conducted in the USA, among women on low incomes and who varied in ethnicity and feeding intention, thus limiting the generalisability of these results to other settings. Future studies would ideally be conducted in a range of low‐ and high‐income settings, with data on breastfeeding rates over various timeframes, and explore the effectiveness of interventions that are initiated prior to conception or during pregnancy. These might include well‐described interventions, including health education, early and continuing mother‐infant contact, and initiatives to help mothers overcome societal barriers to breastfeeding, all with clearly defined outcome measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-1858</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27827515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast Feeding ; Breast Feeding - psychology ; Breast Feeding - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Child health ; Counseling ; Counseling - methods ; Female ; Health Education ; Health Education - methods ; Humans ; Lactation ; Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences ; Peer Group ; Pregnancy &amp; childbirth ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Supporting breastfeeding mothers</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016-11, Vol.2016 (11), p.CD001688</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-e0fd722a6e466fef5aedde9dce0c1ca054e54e272a953122b4ec23837dd9ecb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-e0fd722a6e466fef5aedde9dce0c1ca054e54e272a953122b4ec23837dd9ecb53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27827515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavine, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGillivray, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creatorcontrib><title>Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Background Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high‐income countries, particularly among women in lower‐income groups. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. Objectives To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). Search methods We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Main results Twenty‐eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from five trials involving 564 women for improved rates ofbreastfeeding initiation among women who received healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support (average risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.92; Tau² = 0.07, I² = 62%, low‐quality evidence) compared to those women who received standard care. We downgraded evidence due to design limitations and heterogeneity. The outcome of early initiation of breastfeeding was not reported in the studies under this comparison. Non‐healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care There was evidence from eight trials of 5712 women for improved rates of breastfeeding initiation among women who received interventions from non‐healthcare professional counsellors and support groups (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; Tau² = 0.02, I² = 86%, low‐quality evidence) compared to women who received standard care. In three trials of 76,373 women, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of the number of women practicing early initiation of breastfeeding (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95; Tau² = 0.18, I² = 78%, very low‐quality evidence). We downgraded the evidence for a combination of design limitations, heterogeneity and imprecision (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect). Other comparisons Other comparisons in this review also looked at the rates of initiation of breastfeeding and there were no clear differences between groups for the following comparisons of combined healthcare professional‐led education with peer support or community educator versus standard care (2 studies, 1371 women) or attention control (1 study, 237 women), breastfeeding education using multimedia (a self‐help manual or a video) versus routine care (2 studies, 497 women); early mother‐infant contact versus standard care (2 studies, 309 women); and community‐based breastfeeding groups versus no breastfeeding groups (1 study, 18,603 women). None of these comparisons reported data on early initiation of breastfeeding. Authors' conclusions This review found low‐quality evidence that healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and non‐healthcare professional‐led counselling and peer support interventions can result in some improvements in the number of women beginning to breastfeed. The majority of the trials were conducted in the USA, among women on low incomes and who varied in ethnicity and feeding intention, thus limiting the generalisability of these results to other settings. Future studies would ideally be conducted in a range of low‐ and high‐income settings, with data on breastfeeding rates over various timeframes, and explore the effectiveness of interventions that are initiated prior to conception or during pregnancy. These might include well‐described interventions, including health education, early and continuing mother‐infant contact, and initiatives to help mothers overcome societal barriers to breastfeeding, all with clearly defined outcome measures.</description><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Child health</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Counseling - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Health Education - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Pregnancy &amp; childbirth</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Supporting breastfeeding mothers</subject><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RWY</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUFtLwzAUDqK4Of0Lo4--bObSpimCoPM2GPiizyFNT7dI28ykm-zfm7IL0xfhQA58t5MPoSHBY4IxvSExT4hIxHjyiDHhQoyXq5ydoH4HjDrk9GjvoQvvPzFmPKPpOerRVNA0IUkf3U6bFtwamtbYxkelddHS2dq2pplH7QIi05jWqA6NbBnlDpRvS4Ai4JforFSVh6vdO0Afz0_vk9fR7O1lOrmfjXScMjYCXBYppYpDzHkJZaKgKCArNGBNtMJJDGFoSlWWMEJpHoOmTLC0KDLQecIG6G7rG75YQ9A1rVOVXDpTK7eRVhn5G2nMQs7tWvKYx6kQweB6Z-Ds1wp8K2vjNVSVasCuvCSCZYSKUE-g8i1VO-u9g_IQQ7Dsmpf75uW--S6cBeHw-MiDbF91IDxsCd-mgo3UVi9cyP_H90_KD7aXlj0</recordid><startdate>20161109</startdate><enddate>20161109</enddate><creator>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J</creator><creator>McFadden, Alison</creator><creator>Ota, Erika</creator><creator>Gavine, Anna</creator><creator>Garner, Christine D</creator><creator>Renfrew, Mary J</creator><creator>MacGillivray, Stephen</creator><creator>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>7PX</scope><scope>RWY</scope><scope>ZYTZH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161109</creationdate><title>Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding</title><author>Balogun, Olukunmi O ; O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J ; McFadden, Alison ; Ota, Erika ; Gavine, Anna ; Garner, Christine D ; Renfrew, Mary J ; MacGillivray, Stephen ; Balogun, Olukunmi O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4733-e0fd722a6e466fef5aedde9dce0c1ca054e54e272a953122b4ec23837dd9ecb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Child health</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Counseling - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Health Education - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Medicine General &amp; Introductory Medical Sciences</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Pregnancy &amp; childbirth</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Supporting breastfeeding mothers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavine, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Christine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renfrew, Mary J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacGillivray, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Olukunmi O</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library</collection><collection>Cochrane Library (Open Aceess)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balogun, Olukunmi O</au><au>O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J</au><au>McFadden, Alison</au><au>Ota, Erika</au><au>Gavine, Anna</au><au>Garner, Christine D</au><au>Renfrew, Mary J</au><au>MacGillivray, Stephen</au><au>Balogun, Olukunmi O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2016-11-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>2016</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>CD001688</spage><pages>CD001688-</pages><issn>1465-1858</issn><issn>1469-493X</issn><eissn>1465-1858</eissn><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Background Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high‐income countries, particularly among women in lower‐income groups. In low‐ and middle‐income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. Objectives To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding. To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). Search methods We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. Main results Twenty‐eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from five trials involving 564 women for improved rates ofbreastfeeding initiation among women who received healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support (average risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.92; Tau² = 0.07, I² = 62%, low‐quality evidence) compared to those women who received standard care. We downgraded evidence due to design limitations and heterogeneity. The outcome of early initiation of breastfeeding was not reported in the studies under this comparison. Non‐healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care There was evidence from eight trials of 5712 women for improved rates of breastfeeding initiation among women who received interventions from non‐healthcare professional counsellors and support groups (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; Tau² = 0.02, I² = 86%, low‐quality evidence) compared to women who received standard care. In three trials of 76,373 women, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of the number of women practicing early initiation of breastfeeding (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95; Tau² = 0.18, I² = 78%, very low‐quality evidence). We downgraded the evidence for a combination of design limitations, heterogeneity and imprecision (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect). Other comparisons Other comparisons in this review also looked at the rates of initiation of breastfeeding and there were no clear differences between groups for the following comparisons of combined healthcare professional‐led education with peer support or community educator versus standard care (2 studies, 1371 women) or attention control (1 study, 237 women), breastfeeding education using multimedia (a self‐help manual or a video) versus routine care (2 studies, 497 women); early mother‐infant contact versus standard care (2 studies, 309 women); and community‐based breastfeeding groups versus no breastfeeding groups (1 study, 18,603 women). None of these comparisons reported data on early initiation of breastfeeding. Authors' conclusions This review found low‐quality evidence that healthcare professional‐led breastfeeding education and non‐healthcare professional‐led counselling and peer support interventions can result in some improvements in the number of women beginning to breastfeed. The majority of the trials were conducted in the USA, among women on low incomes and who varied in ethnicity and feeding intention, thus limiting the generalisability of these results to other settings. Future studies would ideally be conducted in a range of low‐ and high‐income settings, with data on breastfeeding rates over various timeframes, and explore the effectiveness of interventions that are initiated prior to conception or during pregnancy. These might include well‐described interventions, including health education, early and continuing mother‐infant contact, and initiatives to help mothers overcome societal barriers to breastfeeding, all with clearly defined outcome measures.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>27827515</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1465-1858
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016-11, Vol.2016 (11), p.CD001688
issn 1465-1858
1469-493X
1465-1858
1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6464788
source MEDLINE; Cochrane Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Breast Feeding
Breast Feeding - psychology
Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data
Child health
Counseling
Counseling - methods
Female
Health Education
Health Education - methods
Humans
Lactation
Medicine General & Introductory Medical Sciences
Peer Group
Pregnancy & childbirth
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Supporting breastfeeding mothers
title Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A39%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interventions%20for%20promoting%20the%20initiation%20of%20breastfeeding&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Balogun,%20Olukunmi%20O&rft.date=2016-11-09&rft.volume=2016&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=CD001688&rft.pages=CD001688-&rft.issn=1465-1858&rft.eissn=1465-1858&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1839128036%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839128036&rft_id=info:pmid/27827515&rfr_iscdi=true