Randomized trial comparing standard vs sequential high-dose chemotherapy for inducing early CR in adult AML

Here we evaluated whether sequential high-dose chemotherapy (sHD) increased the early complete remission (CR) rate in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) compared with standard-intensity idarubicin-cytarabine-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy. This study enrolled 574 patients (age, 16-73 years; median, 52 y...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood advances 2019-04, Vol.3 (7), p.1103-1117
Hauptverfasser: Bassan, Renato, Intermesoli, Tamara, Masciulli, Arianna, Pavoni, Chiara, Boschini, Cristina, Gianfaldoni, Giacomo, Marmont, Filippo, Cavattoni, Irene, Mattei, Daniele, Terruzzi, Elisabetta, De Paoli, Lorella, Cattaneo, Chiara, Borlenghi, Erika, Ciceri, Fabio, Bernardi, Massimo, Scattolin, Anna M., Todisco, Elisabetta, Campiotti, Leonardo, Corradini, Paolo, Cortelezzi, Agostino, Ferrero, Dario, Zanghì, Pamela, Oldani, Elena, Spinelli, Orietta, Audisio, Ernesta, Cortelazzo, Sergio, Bosi, Alberto, Falini, Brunangelo, Pogliani, Enrico M., Rambaldi, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Here we evaluated whether sequential high-dose chemotherapy (sHD) increased the early complete remission (CR) rate in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) compared with standard-intensity idarubicin-cytarabine-etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy. This study enrolled 574 patients (age, 16-73 years; median, 52 years) who were randomly assigned to ICE (n = 286 evaluable) or sHD (2 weekly 3-day blocks with cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice a day for 2 days plus idarubicin; n = 286 evaluable). Responsive patients were risk-stratified for a second randomization. Standard-risk patients received autograft or repetitive blood stem cell-supported high-dose courses. High-risk patients (and standard-risk patients not mobilizing stem cells) underwent allotransplantation. CR rates after 2 induction courses were comparable between ICE (80.8%) and sHD (83.6%; P = .38). sHD yielded a higher single-induction CR rate (69.2% vs 81.5%; P = .0007) with lower resistance risk (P < .0001), comparable mortality (P = .39), and improved 5-year overall survival (39% vs 49%; P = .045) and relapse-free survival (36% vs 48%; P = .028), despite greater hematotoxicity delaying or reducing consolidation blocks. sHD improved the early CR rate in high-risk AML (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.74; P = .0008) and in patients aged 60 years and less with de novo AML (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .003), and also improved overall/relapse-free survival in the latter group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.52-0.94; P = .01), in standard-risk AML, and postallograft (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P = .03). sHD was feasible, effectively achieved rapid CR, and improved outcomes in AML subsets. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00495287. •High-dose chemotherapy increased early remission and overall and relapse-free survival compared with conventional-dose chemotherapy.•Allograft performance in high-risk patients and some standard-risk patients significantly improved survival. [Display omitted]
ISSN:2473-9529
2473-9537
DOI:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018026625