Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule
Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. To inform future safety studies of this speculated association, a parent survey was conducted to examine the risk of misclassification of vaccination status in electronic heal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic pediatrics 2018-09, Vol.18 (7), p.754-762 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 762 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 754 |
container_title | Academic pediatrics |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Daley, Matthew F. Shoup, Jo Ann Newcomer, Sophia R. Jackson, Michael L. Groom, Holly C. Jacobsen, Steven J. McLean, Huong Q. Klein, Nicola P. Weintraub, Eric S. McNeil, Michael M. Glanz, Jason M. |
description | Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. To inform future safety studies of this speculated association, a parent survey was conducted to examine the risk of misclassification of vaccination status in electronic health record data, and to assess the potential for confounding if asthma risk factors varied by vaccination status.
A survey was conducted among parents of children 19 to 35 months old at 6 medical organizations within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Parents of children in 4 vaccination groups were surveyed: 1) no vaccines by 12 months of age and a diagnosis of parental vaccine refusal; 2) consistent vaccine limiting (≤2 vaccines per visit); 3) not consistently vaccine limiting but otherwise undervaccinated with a vaccine refusal diagnosis; and 4) fully vaccinated with no delays and no vaccine refusal. Parents were surveyed about their child's vaccination status and whether asthma risk factors existed.
Among a survey sample of 2043 parents, 1209 responded (59.2%). For receiving no vaccines, the observed agreement between parent report and electronic health record data was 94.0% (κ = 0.79); for receiving all vaccines with no delays, the observed agreement was 87.3% (κ = 0.73). Although most asthma risk factors (allergic rhinitis, eczema, food allergies, family asthma history) reported by parents did not differ significantly between children in the vaccination groups studied, several factors (aeroallergen sensitivity, breastfeeding) differed significantly between groups.
Measurement and control of disease risk factors should be carefully considered in observational studies of the safety of the immunization schedule. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6445249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1876285918301323</els_id><sourcerecordid>2020484926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3791f8cc3cabed3431db865bc96e5deb1dbfc80103ffaa91241f0566db1d00d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwB1ggL9lM8CseR0JI7YhHpSKQBsTScuzrxqPEHmKn0vTX4zBlBBtW9vX9zrF9T1W9JLgmmIg3u1obva8pJrLGrMZ4_ag6J3ItVlSK9ePTvmnPqmcp7TAWTErxtDqjrcCcC3Je3V-mBCn5cIu-xgwhez2gTQwuzsEupzpY9NknM-hCOW909jGgK68T-tFDQNs828MC5h7QVjvIBxTd72rT-8H2MVp0PY5z8PdH7db0YOcBnldPnB4SvHhYL6rvH95_23xa3Xz5eL25vFkZ3jR5xdYtcdIYZnQHlnFGbCdF05lWQGOhK6UzEhPMnNO6JZQThxshbOlgbBt2Ub07-u7nbgRryicnPaj95Ec9HVTUXv3bCb5Xt_FOCc4bytti8PrBYIo_Z0hZjWUgMAw6QJyTophiLnlLRUHpETVTTGkCd7qGYLWEpnZqCU0toSnMVAmtiF79_cCT5E9KBXh7BKCM6c7DpJLxEAxYP4HJykb_P_9fnCmsmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2020484926</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Daley, Matthew F. ; Shoup, Jo Ann ; Newcomer, Sophia R. ; Jackson, Michael L. ; Groom, Holly C. ; Jacobsen, Steven J. ; McLean, Huong Q. ; Klein, Nicola P. ; Weintraub, Eric S. ; McNeil, Michael M. ; Glanz, Jason M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F. ; Shoup, Jo Ann ; Newcomer, Sophia R. ; Jackson, Michael L. ; Groom, Holly C. ; Jacobsen, Steven J. ; McLean, Huong Q. ; Klein, Nicola P. ; Weintraub, Eric S. ; McNeil, Michael M. ; Glanz, Jason M.</creatorcontrib><description>Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. To inform future safety studies of this speculated association, a parent survey was conducted to examine the risk of misclassification of vaccination status in electronic health record data, and to assess the potential for confounding if asthma risk factors varied by vaccination status.
A survey was conducted among parents of children 19 to 35 months old at 6 medical organizations within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Parents of children in 4 vaccination groups were surveyed: 1) no vaccines by 12 months of age and a diagnosis of parental vaccine refusal; 2) consistent vaccine limiting (≤2 vaccines per visit); 3) not consistently vaccine limiting but otherwise undervaccinated with a vaccine refusal diagnosis; and 4) fully vaccinated with no delays and no vaccine refusal. Parents were surveyed about their child's vaccination status and whether asthma risk factors existed.
Among a survey sample of 2043 parents, 1209 responded (59.2%). For receiving no vaccines, the observed agreement between parent report and electronic health record data was 94.0% (κ = 0.79); for receiving all vaccines with no delays, the observed agreement was 87.3% (κ = 0.73). Although most asthma risk factors (allergic rhinitis, eczema, food allergies, family asthma history) reported by parents did not differ significantly between children in the vaccination groups studied, several factors (aeroallergen sensitivity, breastfeeding) differed significantly between groups.
Measurement and control of disease risk factors should be carefully considered in observational studies of the safety of the immunization schedule.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1876-2859</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1876-2867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-2867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29604461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>asthma ; Asthma - epidemiology ; Bias ; Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data ; child ; Child, Preschool ; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic ; Eczema - epidemiology ; Electronic Health Records ; Female ; Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology ; Humans ; immunization ; Immunization Schedule ; Infant ; Male ; Rhinitis, Allergic - epidemiology ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; undervaccination ; Vaccination - statistics & numerical data ; Vaccination Refusal - statistics & numerical data ; vaccine ; vaccine safety ; vaccine schedule</subject><ispartof>Academic pediatrics, 2018-09, Vol.18 (7), p.754-762</ispartof><rights>2018 Academic Pediatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Academic Pediatric Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3791f8cc3cabed3431db865bc96e5deb1dbfc80103ffaa91241f0566db1d00d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3791f8cc3cabed3431db865bc96e5deb1dbfc80103ffaa91241f0566db1d00d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2866-9788 ; 0000-0003-1309-4096 ; 0000-0002-2340-0256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285918301323$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29604461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoup, Jo Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomer, Sophia R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groom, Holly C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Huong Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Nicola P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanz, Jason M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule</title><title>Academic pediatrics</title><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><description>Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. To inform future safety studies of this speculated association, a parent survey was conducted to examine the risk of misclassification of vaccination status in electronic health record data, and to assess the potential for confounding if asthma risk factors varied by vaccination status.
A survey was conducted among parents of children 19 to 35 months old at 6 medical organizations within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Parents of children in 4 vaccination groups were surveyed: 1) no vaccines by 12 months of age and a diagnosis of parental vaccine refusal; 2) consistent vaccine limiting (≤2 vaccines per visit); 3) not consistently vaccine limiting but otherwise undervaccinated with a vaccine refusal diagnosis; and 4) fully vaccinated with no delays and no vaccine refusal. Parents were surveyed about their child's vaccination status and whether asthma risk factors existed.
Among a survey sample of 2043 parents, 1209 responded (59.2%). For receiving no vaccines, the observed agreement between parent report and electronic health record data was 94.0% (κ = 0.79); for receiving all vaccines with no delays, the observed agreement was 87.3% (κ = 0.73). Although most asthma risk factors (allergic rhinitis, eczema, food allergies, family asthma history) reported by parents did not differ significantly between children in the vaccination groups studied, several factors (aeroallergen sensitivity, breastfeeding) differed significantly between groups.
Measurement and control of disease risk factors should be carefully considered in observational studies of the safety of the immunization schedule.</description><subject>asthma</subject><subject>Asthma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic</subject><subject>Eczema - epidemiology</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Schedule</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Rhinitis, Allergic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>undervaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Vaccination Refusal - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>vaccine</subject><subject>vaccine safety</subject><subject>vaccine schedule</subject><issn>1876-2859</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwB1ggL9lM8CseR0JI7YhHpSKQBsTScuzrxqPEHmKn0vTX4zBlBBtW9vX9zrF9T1W9JLgmmIg3u1obva8pJrLGrMZ4_ag6J3ItVlSK9ePTvmnPqmcp7TAWTErxtDqjrcCcC3Je3V-mBCn5cIu-xgwhez2gTQwuzsEupzpY9NknM-hCOW909jGgK68T-tFDQNs828MC5h7QVjvIBxTd72rT-8H2MVp0PY5z8PdH7db0YOcBnldPnB4SvHhYL6rvH95_23xa3Xz5eL25vFkZ3jR5xdYtcdIYZnQHlnFGbCdF05lWQGOhK6UzEhPMnNO6JZQThxshbOlgbBt2Ub07-u7nbgRryicnPaj95Ec9HVTUXv3bCb5Xt_FOCc4bytti8PrBYIo_Z0hZjWUgMAw6QJyTophiLnlLRUHpETVTTGkCd7qGYLWEpnZqCU0toSnMVAmtiF79_cCT5E9KBXh7BKCM6c7DpJLxEAxYP4HJykb_P_9fnCmsmw</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Daley, Matthew F.</creator><creator>Shoup, Jo Ann</creator><creator>Newcomer, Sophia R.</creator><creator>Jackson, Michael L.</creator><creator>Groom, Holly C.</creator><creator>Jacobsen, Steven J.</creator><creator>McLean, Huong Q.</creator><creator>Klein, Nicola P.</creator><creator>Weintraub, Eric S.</creator><creator>McNeil, Michael M.</creator><creator>Glanz, Jason M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-9788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1309-4096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2340-0256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule</title><author>Daley, Matthew F. ; Shoup, Jo Ann ; Newcomer, Sophia R. ; Jackson, Michael L. ; Groom, Holly C. ; Jacobsen, Steven J. ; McLean, Huong Q. ; Klein, Nicola P. ; Weintraub, Eric S. ; McNeil, Michael M. ; Glanz, Jason M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-3791f8cc3cabed3431db865bc96e5deb1dbfc80103ffaa91241f0566db1d00d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>asthma</topic><topic>Asthma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic</topic><topic>Eczema - epidemiology</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Schedule</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Rhinitis, Allergic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>undervaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Vaccination Refusal - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>vaccine</topic><topic>vaccine safety</topic><topic>vaccine schedule</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoup, Jo Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newcomer, Sophia R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groom, Holly C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, Steven J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, Huong Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Nicola P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, Eric S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanz, Jason M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daley, Matthew F.</au><au>Shoup, Jo Ann</au><au>Newcomer, Sophia R.</au><au>Jackson, Michael L.</au><au>Groom, Holly C.</au><au>Jacobsen, Steven J.</au><au>McLean, Huong Q.</au><au>Klein, Nicola P.</au><au>Weintraub, Eric S.</au><au>McNeil, Michael M.</au><au>Glanz, Jason M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule</atitle><jtitle>Academic pediatrics</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Pediatr</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>754-762</pages><issn>1876-2859</issn><issn>1876-2867</issn><eissn>1876-2867</eissn><abstract>Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. To inform future safety studies of this speculated association, a parent survey was conducted to examine the risk of misclassification of vaccination status in electronic health record data, and to assess the potential for confounding if asthma risk factors varied by vaccination status.
A survey was conducted among parents of children 19 to 35 months old at 6 medical organizations within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Parents of children in 4 vaccination groups were surveyed: 1) no vaccines by 12 months of age and a diagnosis of parental vaccine refusal; 2) consistent vaccine limiting (≤2 vaccines per visit); 3) not consistently vaccine limiting but otherwise undervaccinated with a vaccine refusal diagnosis; and 4) fully vaccinated with no delays and no vaccine refusal. Parents were surveyed about their child's vaccination status and whether asthma risk factors existed.
Among a survey sample of 2043 parents, 1209 responded (59.2%). For receiving no vaccines, the observed agreement between parent report and electronic health record data was 94.0% (κ = 0.79); for receiving all vaccines with no delays, the observed agreement was 87.3% (κ = 0.73). Although most asthma risk factors (allergic rhinitis, eczema, food allergies, family asthma history) reported by parents did not differ significantly between children in the vaccination groups studied, several factors (aeroallergen sensitivity, breastfeeding) differed significantly between groups.
Measurement and control of disease risk factors should be carefully considered in observational studies of the safety of the immunization schedule.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29604461</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-9788</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1309-4096</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2340-0256</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1876-2859 |
ispartof | Academic pediatrics, 2018-09, Vol.18 (7), p.754-762 |
issn | 1876-2859 1876-2867 1876-2867 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6445249 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | asthma Asthma - epidemiology Bias Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data child Child, Preschool Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic Eczema - epidemiology Electronic Health Records Female Food Hypersensitivity - epidemiology Humans immunization Immunization Schedule Infant Male Rhinitis, Allergic - epidemiology Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires undervaccination Vaccination - statistics & numerical data Vaccination Refusal - statistics & numerical data vaccine vaccine safety vaccine schedule |
title | Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A12%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Potential%20Confounding%20and%20Misclassification%20Bias%20When%20Studying%20the%20Safety%20of%20the%20Childhood%20Immunization%20Schedule&rft.jtitle=Academic%20pediatrics&rft.au=Daley,%20Matthew%20F.&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=754-762&rft.issn=1876-2859&rft.eissn=1876-2867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acap.2018.03.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2020484926%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2020484926&rft_id=info:pmid/29604461&rft_els_id=S1876285918301323&rfr_iscdi=true |