The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous peripheral blood is rich in platelets that release growth factors and cytokines. We determined the effects of topically applied autologous PRP in a partial thickness porcine burn model. Partial thickness burns were created on the backs and flanks of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of burns and fire disasters 2018-12, Vol.31 (4), p.298-305
Hauptverfasser: Singer, A J, Toussaint, J, Choi, W T, McClain, S A, Raut, V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 4
container_start_page 298
container_title Annals of burns and fire disasters
container_volume 31
creator Singer, A J
Toussaint, J
Choi, W T
McClain, S A
Raut, V
description Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous peripheral blood is rich in platelets that release growth factors and cytokines. We determined the effects of topically applied autologous PRP in a partial thickness porcine burn model. Partial thickness burns were created on the backs and flanks of six domestic pigs (24 burns each) using an aluminium bar preheated to 80° C for 20 seconds. After removing the necrotic epidermis, the burns were randomly treated with a topical antibiotic ointment or a single (day 2), double (days 2 and 7), or triple (days 2, 7, and 14) topical application of PRP that was prepared freshly before application. Periodic imaging and full thickness biopsies were conducted to monitor healing over 28 days. The percentage wound reepithelialization at days 11, 14, 18 and 21 did not differ significantly among the groups. By day 28 all wounds were completely (>95%) reepithelialized, and there were no differences among the groups. Time to complete healing (presented as mean, [SD]) did not differ among the groups (antibiotics, 17.1 [3.5]; single PRP, 17.6 [4.0]; double PRP, 18.4 [3.9]; and triple PRP, 17.7 [3.3] days; ANOVA P=0.43). Scar depth (presented as mean, [SD]) in mm at day 28 by treatment group was: antibiotic 5.0 [1.0], single PRP 5.5 [1.1], double PRP 5.4 [1.1], and triple PRP 5.5 [0.6], ANOVA P=0.026. We conclude that PRP results in similar rates of reepithelialization and scar depth to standard topical antibiotics in a partial thickness porcine burn model.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6441582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210003249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1112-97e92ef41c47a5744e1c398f74a948d3ac932bf785aa68d1a68256d4f9ad7293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLw0AQgIMoVqt_QfboJbDPJHsRpPiCgh56FMJ0M9usbnZjNhH897ZYi17mwQzfN8xRdsaU5rlWRXF8qFU1y85TeqNUUiXoaTYTVFdCC3qWva5aJGgtmjGRaMmLhxE9jvngTLvrUgckBtIieBc2u5UehtGBJ2PrzHvAlMh6GkIiLhAgfRyMC0i62KC_yE4s-ISX-zzPVvd3q8Vjvnx-eFrcLvOeMba9sETN0UpmZAmqlBKZEbqypQQtq0aA0YKvbVkpgKJq2DZwVTTSamhKrsU8u_nB9tO6w8ZgGAfwdT-4DoavOoKr_0-Ca-tN_KwLKZmq-BZwvQcM8WPCNNadSwa9h4BxSjXnjFIquNy5rv66DpLfj4pvFRN0Gw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210003249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Singer, A J ; Toussaint, J ; Choi, W T ; McClain, S A ; Raut, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Singer, A J ; Toussaint, J ; Choi, W T ; McClain, S A ; Raut, V</creatorcontrib><description>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous peripheral blood is rich in platelets that release growth factors and cytokines. We determined the effects of topically applied autologous PRP in a partial thickness porcine burn model. Partial thickness burns were created on the backs and flanks of six domestic pigs (24 burns each) using an aluminium bar preheated to 80° C for 20 seconds. After removing the necrotic epidermis, the burns were randomly treated with a topical antibiotic ointment or a single (day 2), double (days 2 and 7), or triple (days 2, 7, and 14) topical application of PRP that was prepared freshly before application. Periodic imaging and full thickness biopsies were conducted to monitor healing over 28 days. The percentage wound reepithelialization at days 11, 14, 18 and 21 did not differ significantly among the groups. By day 28 all wounds were completely (&gt;95%) reepithelialized, and there were no differences among the groups. Time to complete healing (presented as mean, [SD]) did not differ among the groups (antibiotics, 17.1 [3.5]; single PRP, 17.6 [4.0]; double PRP, 18.4 [3.9]; and triple PRP, 17.7 [3.3] days; ANOVA P=0.43). Scar depth (presented as mean, [SD]) in mm at day 28 by treatment group was: antibiotic 5.0 [1.0], single PRP 5.5 [1.1], double PRP 5.4 [1.1], and triple PRP 5.5 [0.6], ANOVA P=0.026. We conclude that PRP results in similar rates of reepithelialization and scar depth to standard topical antibiotics in a partial thickness porcine burn model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1592-9558</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1592-9566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30983930</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters - MBC</publisher><ispartof>Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2018-12, Vol.31 (4), p.298-305</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441582/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441582/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983930$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singer, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, W T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClain, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raut, V</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model</title><title>Annals of burns and fire disasters</title><addtitle>Ann Burns Fire Disasters</addtitle><description>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous peripheral blood is rich in platelets that release growth factors and cytokines. We determined the effects of topically applied autologous PRP in a partial thickness porcine burn model. Partial thickness burns were created on the backs and flanks of six domestic pigs (24 burns each) using an aluminium bar preheated to 80° C for 20 seconds. After removing the necrotic epidermis, the burns were randomly treated with a topical antibiotic ointment or a single (day 2), double (days 2 and 7), or triple (days 2, 7, and 14) topical application of PRP that was prepared freshly before application. Periodic imaging and full thickness biopsies were conducted to monitor healing over 28 days. The percentage wound reepithelialization at days 11, 14, 18 and 21 did not differ significantly among the groups. By day 28 all wounds were completely (&gt;95%) reepithelialized, and there were no differences among the groups. Time to complete healing (presented as mean, [SD]) did not differ among the groups (antibiotics, 17.1 [3.5]; single PRP, 17.6 [4.0]; double PRP, 18.4 [3.9]; and triple PRP, 17.7 [3.3] days; ANOVA P=0.43). Scar depth (presented as mean, [SD]) in mm at day 28 by treatment group was: antibiotic 5.0 [1.0], single PRP 5.5 [1.1], double PRP 5.4 [1.1], and triple PRP 5.5 [0.6], ANOVA P=0.026. We conclude that PRP results in similar rates of reepithelialization and scar depth to standard topical antibiotics in a partial thickness porcine burn model.</description><issn>1592-9558</issn><issn>1592-9566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLw0AQgIMoVqt_QfboJbDPJHsRpPiCgh56FMJ0M9usbnZjNhH897ZYi17mwQzfN8xRdsaU5rlWRXF8qFU1y85TeqNUUiXoaTYTVFdCC3qWva5aJGgtmjGRaMmLhxE9jvngTLvrUgckBtIieBc2u5UehtGBJ2PrzHvAlMh6GkIiLhAgfRyMC0i62KC_yE4s-ISX-zzPVvd3q8Vjvnx-eFrcLvOeMba9sETN0UpmZAmqlBKZEbqypQQtq0aA0YKvbVkpgKJq2DZwVTTSamhKrsU8u_nB9tO6w8ZgGAfwdT-4DoavOoKr_0-Ca-tN_KwLKZmq-BZwvQcM8WPCNNadSwa9h4BxSjXnjFIquNy5rv66DpLfj4pvFRN0Gw</recordid><startdate>20181231</startdate><enddate>20181231</enddate><creator>Singer, A J</creator><creator>Toussaint, J</creator><creator>Choi, W T</creator><creator>McClain, S A</creator><creator>Raut, V</creator><general>Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters - MBC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181231</creationdate><title>The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model</title><author>Singer, A J ; Toussaint, J ; Choi, W T ; McClain, S A ; Raut, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1112-97e92ef41c47a5744e1c398f74a948d3ac932bf785aa68d1a68256d4f9ad7293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singer, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toussaint, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, W T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClain, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raut, V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of burns and fire disasters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singer, A J</au><au>Toussaint, J</au><au>Choi, W T</au><au>McClain, S A</au><au>Raut, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model</atitle><jtitle>Annals of burns and fire disasters</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Burns Fire Disasters</addtitle><date>2018-12-31</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>298-305</pages><issn>1592-9558</issn><eissn>1592-9566</eissn><abstract>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from autologous peripheral blood is rich in platelets that release growth factors and cytokines. We determined the effects of topically applied autologous PRP in a partial thickness porcine burn model. Partial thickness burns were created on the backs and flanks of six domestic pigs (24 burns each) using an aluminium bar preheated to 80° C for 20 seconds. After removing the necrotic epidermis, the burns were randomly treated with a topical antibiotic ointment or a single (day 2), double (days 2 and 7), or triple (days 2, 7, and 14) topical application of PRP that was prepared freshly before application. Periodic imaging and full thickness biopsies were conducted to monitor healing over 28 days. The percentage wound reepithelialization at days 11, 14, 18 and 21 did not differ significantly among the groups. By day 28 all wounds were completely (&gt;95%) reepithelialized, and there were no differences among the groups. Time to complete healing (presented as mean, [SD]) did not differ among the groups (antibiotics, 17.1 [3.5]; single PRP, 17.6 [4.0]; double PRP, 18.4 [3.9]; and triple PRP, 17.7 [3.3] days; ANOVA P=0.43). Scar depth (presented as mean, [SD]) in mm at day 28 by treatment group was: antibiotic 5.0 [1.0], single PRP 5.5 [1.1], double PRP 5.4 [1.1], and triple PRP 5.5 [0.6], ANOVA P=0.026. We conclude that PRP results in similar rates of reepithelialization and scar depth to standard topical antibiotics in a partial thickness porcine burn model.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters - MBC</pub><pmid>30983930</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1592-9558
ispartof Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2018-12, Vol.31 (4), p.298-305
issn 1592-9558
1592-9566
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6441582
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title The effects of Platelet-rich Plasma on healing of partial thickness burns in a porcine model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20Platelet-rich%20Plasma%20on%20healing%20of%20partial%20thickness%20burns%20in%20a%20porcine%20model&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20burns%20and%20fire%20disasters&rft.au=Singer,%20A%20J&rft.date=2018-12-31&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=298-305&rft.issn=1592-9558&rft.eissn=1592-9566&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2210003249%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210003249&rft_id=info:pmid/30983930&rfr_iscdi=true