Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method: Twent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2019-02, Vol.62 (2), p.318-323
Hauptverfasser: Fujiki, Robert Brinton, Oliver, Abby J, Sivasankar, M. Preeti, Craig, Bruce A, Malandraki, Georgia A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 2
container_start_page 318
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 62
creator Fujiki, Robert Brinton
Oliver, Abby J
Sivasankar, M. Preeti
Craig, Bruce A
Malandraki, Georgia A
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method: Twenty-seven healthy older adults (between 60 and 85 years of age) were randomized to perform either the RE or the HLE for a 6-week period. Isometric and isokinetic portions of the exercise were performed 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, postexercise, and following a 6-week detraining period. Acoustic outcome measures included the highest and lowest frequencies of vocal range on pitch glides (measured in hertz) and cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels and connected speech. Self-perceptual measures included perceived phonatory effort. Results: Twenty-two individuals completed their assigned exercise regimen. No significant differences between exercise groups were observed at baseline for age, body mass index, or body fat percentage. A significant postexercise increase was seen in the highest frequency of vocal range on pitch glide, t(2, 56.79) = -10.28, p = .0001, for both groups. This increase was not fully maintained following the 6-week detraining period; however, data remained significantly above baseline at this time point, t(2, 57.01) = -4.70, p = .0001. Seventeen of the individuals who made postexercise gains were followed postdetraining. On average, these 17 individuals maintained 51% of their postexercise gains in the highest frequency of vocal range. No differences were observed between exercise groups. In addition, no significant changes in the lowest frequency of vocal range, cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels or connected speech, or perceived phonatory effort were observed following the exercise regimens. Conclusions: Both the HLE and the RE produced gains in the highest frequency of vocal range in healthy older adults. This finding is promising; however, further research is required to understand how suprahyoid muscle strengthening influences upper pitch range and whether this relationship has potential clinical implications for patients with dysphonia.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6436891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A581311151</galeid><ericid>EJ1207481</ericid><sourcerecordid>A581311151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-64360fc00a7fb4c4b94cbbce0e91fbc8ff4ef5122ee490760b1b09ab2b59ebb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEYmPwDQBZQkK8ZLMTJ433gFRVhTFNFLWFV8t2Lq2HYxc7Acb34Pvi0NGtqLZkn3y_-9_ZviR5TvApwZSeZZhU_HJxdTFPFympUpzn1YPkmBRFlTKCs4fRxixLaV5VR8mTEK5xHISWj5OjHLMCj3B-nPxegHK2Fv4GfXFaAZr1nXItBOQaJNBc2Nq1-hfUaGK01UoYtPQ6rhPXboTXdoWWPxy6AFGffQT1FS06D3bVrcEOvulP8EqHKKftAJlufYNmpgaPxnVvunCOxuiTB6NbbYci5rBxvnuaPGqECfDsdj9JPr-bLicX6dXs_YfJ-CpVZYm7tKR5iRuFsRg1kioqGVVSKsDASCNV1TQUmoJkGQBleFRiSSRmQmayYCBlkZ8kb7e6m162UCuwnReGb7xuYzHcCc33PVav-cp950PmipEo8OZWwLtvPYSOtzooMEZYcH3gWYZpyTCrWERf_Ydeu97beL2BynGBK0LuqJUwwLVtXMyrBlE-LiqSE0KKgUoPUCuwEIt0Fhodj_f40wN8nDW0Wh0MeH0vYP3344IzfaedDfsg3YLKuxA8NLvHI5gPfcrv-pQveDSHPo1hL-8__C7oX2NG4MUWAK_Vzj29JBke0Zj9D8Da7bA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2203050811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fujiki, Robert Brinton ; Oliver, Abby J ; Sivasankar, M. Preeti ; Craig, Bruce A ; Malandraki, Georgia A</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujiki, Robert Brinton ; Oliver, Abby J ; Sivasankar, M. Preeti ; Craig, Bruce A ; Malandraki, Georgia A</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method: Twenty-seven healthy older adults (between 60 and 85 years of age) were randomized to perform either the RE or the HLE for a 6-week period. Isometric and isokinetic portions of the exercise were performed 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, postexercise, and following a 6-week detraining period. Acoustic outcome measures included the highest and lowest frequencies of vocal range on pitch glides (measured in hertz) and cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels and connected speech. Self-perceptual measures included perceived phonatory effort. Results: Twenty-two individuals completed their assigned exercise regimen. No significant differences between exercise groups were observed at baseline for age, body mass index, or body fat percentage. A significant postexercise increase was seen in the highest frequency of vocal range on pitch glide, t(2, 56.79) = -10.28, p = .0001, for both groups. This increase was not fully maintained following the 6-week detraining period; however, data remained significantly above baseline at this time point, t(2, 57.01) = -4.70, p = .0001. Seventeen of the individuals who made postexercise gains were followed postdetraining. On average, these 17 individuals maintained 51% of their postexercise gains in the highest frequency of vocal range. No differences were observed between exercise groups. In addition, no significant changes in the lowest frequency of vocal range, cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels or connected speech, or perceived phonatory effort were observed following the exercise regimens. Conclusions: Both the HLE and the RE produced gains in the highest frequency of vocal range in healthy older adults. This finding is promising; however, further research is required to understand how suprahyoid muscle strengthening influences upper pitch range and whether this relationship has potential clinical implications for patients with dysphonia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30950703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Adults ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging (Individuals) ; Body Composition ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Dysphagia ; Dysphonia ; Exercise ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Glides ; Head ; Health aspects ; Healthy Volunteers ; Human Body ; Humans ; Male ; Measurement Techniques ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Muscle Strength - physiology ; Muscular Strength ; Neck ; Neurophysiology ; Older Adults ; Older people ; Otology ; Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Perception ; Phonation - physiology ; Phonemes ; Physical Fitness ; Physiology ; Practitioner patient relationship ; Quality of life ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Resonants ; Self Concept ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech perception ; Statistical Analysis ; Strengthening exercises ; Swallowing ; Vocal range ; Voice Disorders ; Voice Quality - physiology ; Vowels</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-02, Vol.62 (2), p.318-323</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-64360fc00a7fb4c4b94cbbce0e91fbc8ff4ef5122ee490760b1b09ab2b59ebb53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-64360fc00a7fb4c4b94cbbce0e91fbc8ff4ef5122ee490760b1b09ab2b59ebb53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1207481$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30950703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujiki, Robert Brinton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Abby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivasankar, M. Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malandraki, Georgia A</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method: Twenty-seven healthy older adults (between 60 and 85 years of age) were randomized to perform either the RE or the HLE for a 6-week period. Isometric and isokinetic portions of the exercise were performed 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, postexercise, and following a 6-week detraining period. Acoustic outcome measures included the highest and lowest frequencies of vocal range on pitch glides (measured in hertz) and cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels and connected speech. Self-perceptual measures included perceived phonatory effort. Results: Twenty-two individuals completed their assigned exercise regimen. No significant differences between exercise groups were observed at baseline for age, body mass index, or body fat percentage. A significant postexercise increase was seen in the highest frequency of vocal range on pitch glide, t(2, 56.79) = -10.28, p = .0001, for both groups. This increase was not fully maintained following the 6-week detraining period; however, data remained significantly above baseline at this time point, t(2, 57.01) = -4.70, p = .0001. Seventeen of the individuals who made postexercise gains were followed postdetraining. On average, these 17 individuals maintained 51% of their postexercise gains in the highest frequency of vocal range. No differences were observed between exercise groups. In addition, no significant changes in the lowest frequency of vocal range, cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels or connected speech, or perceived phonatory effort were observed following the exercise regimens. Conclusions: Both the HLE and the RE produced gains in the highest frequency of vocal range in healthy older adults. This finding is promising; however, further research is required to understand how suprahyoid muscle strengthening influences upper pitch range and whether this relationship has potential clinical implications for patients with dysphonia.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Dysphonia</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glides</subject><subject>Head</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscle Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Muscular Strength</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Older Adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Otology</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Phonation - physiology</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Physical Fitness</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Practitioner patient relationship</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Resonants</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech perception</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Strengthening exercises</subject><subject>Swallowing</subject><subject>Vocal range</subject><subject>Voice Disorders</subject><subject>Voice Quality - physiology</subject><subject>Vowels</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptklFv0zAQxyMEYmPwDQBZQkK8ZLMTJ433gFRVhTFNFLWFV8t2Lq2HYxc7Acb34Pvi0NGtqLZkn3y_-9_ZviR5TvApwZSeZZhU_HJxdTFPFympUpzn1YPkmBRFlTKCs4fRxixLaV5VR8mTEK5xHISWj5OjHLMCj3B-nPxegHK2Fv4GfXFaAZr1nXItBOQaJNBc2Nq1-hfUaGK01UoYtPQ6rhPXboTXdoWWPxy6AFGffQT1FS06D3bVrcEOvulP8EqHKKftAJlufYNmpgaPxnVvunCOxuiTB6NbbYci5rBxvnuaPGqECfDsdj9JPr-bLicX6dXs_YfJ-CpVZYm7tKR5iRuFsRg1kioqGVVSKsDASCNV1TQUmoJkGQBleFRiSSRmQmayYCBlkZ8kb7e6m162UCuwnReGb7xuYzHcCc33PVav-cp950PmipEo8OZWwLtvPYSOtzooMEZYcH3gWYZpyTCrWERf_Ydeu97beL2BynGBK0LuqJUwwLVtXMyrBlE-LiqSE0KKgUoPUCuwEIt0Fhodj_f40wN8nDW0Wh0MeH0vYP3344IzfaedDfsg3YLKuxA8NLvHI5gPfcrv-pQveDSHPo1hL-8__C7oX2NG4MUWAK_Vzj29JBke0Zj9D8Da7bA</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Fujiki, Robert Brinton</creator><creator>Oliver, Abby J</creator><creator>Sivasankar, M. Preeti</creator><creator>Craig, Bruce A</creator><creator>Malandraki, Georgia A</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report</title><author>Fujiki, Robert Brinton ; Oliver, Abby J ; Sivasankar, M. Preeti ; Craig, Bruce A ; Malandraki, Georgia A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c660t-64360fc00a7fb4c4b94cbbce0e91fbc8ff4ef5122ee490760b1b09ab2b59ebb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Dysphonia</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glides</topic><topic>Head</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscle Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Muscular Strength</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Older Adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Otology</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Phonation - physiology</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Physical Fitness</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Practitioner patient relationship</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Resonants</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech perception</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Strengthening exercises</topic><topic>Swallowing</topic><topic>Vocal range</topic><topic>Voice Disorders</topic><topic>Voice Quality - physiology</topic><topic>Vowels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujiki, Robert Brinton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Abby J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sivasankar, M. Preeti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Bruce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malandraki, Georgia A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujiki, Robert Brinton</au><au>Oliver, Abby J</au><au>Sivasankar, M. Preeti</au><au>Craig, Bruce A</au><au>Malandraki, Georgia A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1207481</ericid><atitle>Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>318</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>318-323</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate secondary voice outcomes and detraining effects of 2 head and neck strengthening exercises, which have been used in swallowing rehabilitation, that is, the head-lift exercise (HLE) and the recline exercise (RE), in healthy older adults. Method: Twenty-seven healthy older adults (between 60 and 85 years of age) were randomized to perform either the RE or the HLE for a 6-week period. Isometric and isokinetic portions of the exercise were performed 3 times daily. Patients were evaluated at baseline, postexercise, and following a 6-week detraining period. Acoustic outcome measures included the highest and lowest frequencies of vocal range on pitch glides (measured in hertz) and cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels and connected speech. Self-perceptual measures included perceived phonatory effort. Results: Twenty-two individuals completed their assigned exercise regimen. No significant differences between exercise groups were observed at baseline for age, body mass index, or body fat percentage. A significant postexercise increase was seen in the highest frequency of vocal range on pitch glide, t(2, 56.79) = -10.28, p = .0001, for both groups. This increase was not fully maintained following the 6-week detraining period; however, data remained significantly above baseline at this time point, t(2, 57.01) = -4.70, p = .0001. Seventeen of the individuals who made postexercise gains were followed postdetraining. On average, these 17 individuals maintained 51% of their postexercise gains in the highest frequency of vocal range. No differences were observed between exercise groups. In addition, no significant changes in the lowest frequency of vocal range, cepstral peak prominence on sustained vowels or connected speech, or perceived phonatory effort were observed following the exercise regimens. Conclusions: Both the HLE and the RE produced gains in the highest frequency of vocal range in healthy older adults. This finding is promising; however, further research is required to understand how suprahyoid muscle strengthening influences upper pitch range and whether this relationship has potential clinical implications for patients with dysphonia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>30950703</pmid><doi>10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0338</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2019-02, Vol.62 (2), p.318-323
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6436891
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acoustics
Adults
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging (Individuals)
Body Composition
Care and treatment
Clinical trials
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Dysphagia
Dysphonia
Exercise
Exercise Therapy - methods
Female
Glides
Head
Health aspects
Healthy Volunteers
Human Body
Humans
Male
Measurement Techniques
Methods
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength - physiology
Muscular Strength
Neck
Neurophysiology
Older Adults
Older people
Otology
Outcome Measures
Patients
Perception
Phonation - physiology
Phonemes
Physical Fitness
Physiology
Practitioner patient relationship
Quality of life
Randomized Controlled Trials
Resonants
Self Concept
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech perception
Statistical Analysis
Strengthening exercises
Swallowing
Vocal range
Voice Disorders
Voice Quality - physiology
Vowels
title Secondary Voice Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Head/Neck Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: A Preliminary Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20Voice%20Outcomes%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20Comparing%20Two%20Head/Neck%20Strengthening%20Exercises%20in%20Healthy%20Older%20Adults:%20A%20Preliminary%20Report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Fujiki,%20Robert%20Brinton&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=318&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=318-323&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0338&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA581311151%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2203050811&rft_id=info:pmid/30950703&rft_galeid=A581311151&rft_ericid=EJ1207481&rfr_iscdi=true