The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cartilage 2019-04, Vol.10 (2), p.196-204
Hauptverfasser: Chaudhry, Zaira S., Fram, Brianna, Henn, R. Frank, Sherman, Seth L., Hammoud, Sommer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 204
container_issue 2
container_start_page 196
container_title Cartilage
container_volume 10
creator Chaudhry, Zaira S.
Fram, Brianna
Henn, R. Frank
Sherman, Seth L.
Hammoud, Sommer
description Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, publication year, journal, institution, country of origin, article type, study design, and level of evidence. Citation density was calculated for each article. The correlation between citation density and publication year and the correlation between level of evidence and number of citations, citation density, and publication year were computed. Results The 50 most-cited articles were published in 12 journals between 1986 and 2011. The number of citations ranged from 59 to 290 (109.3 ± 48.6). Citation density ranged from 2.7 to 17.6 citations per year (7.0 ± 3.3). There was a positive correlation between citation density and publication year (r = +0.489, P < 0.001). Overall, 56% of the articles were clinical and 44% were basic science. Of the 28 clinical articles, 61% were level IV or V evidence. Level of evidence was not significantly correlated with number of citations (r = −0.059, P = 0.766), citation density (r = +0.030, P = 0.880), or publication year (r = −0.0009, P = 0.996). Conclusion This analysis provides the orthopedic community with a readily accessible list of the classic citations in MAT research and provides insight into the historical development of this procedure. Although there was a moderate positive correlation between citation density and publication year, articles with stronger levels of evidence were not more frequently cited despite the increasing trend toward evidence-based practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1947603517749922
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6425545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1947603517749922</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1983255863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-2627f306416b847fc16a8d3278dd1dde32a1d634bb7149ea4f364a06731bb3013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1rGzEQxUVoqJ2k95yKjr1soq-VdnsobEy-ICYQ3LPQ7s7aCvLKleRA_vvIODVtICc9pN-8mdFD6JySC0qVuqS1UJLwMmtR14wdoenuqpBE8C8HzcsJOonxmRAp66r8iiasZjVlSkxRu1gBLgme-5iKmU3Q4yYk2zmI2I54DqONnXG4cc4vgxkSXgQzxo0zYzLJ-hE_QQQTutVP3OAr2zrr15CC7XAzGvcabTxDx4NxEb69n6fo9831YnZXPDze3s-ah6ITXKSCSaYGTqSgsq2EGjoqTdVzpqq-p30PnBnaSy7aVlFRgxEDl8IQqThtW04oP0W_9r6bbbuGvoMxBeP0Jti1Ca_aG6v_fxntSi_9i5aClaUos8GPd4Pg_2whJr3Oy4PLu4LfRk3rimeykjyjZI92wccYYDi0oUTvotEfo8kl3_8d71DwN4sMFHsgmiXoZ78N-QPj54Zv5AqWeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983255863</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Chaudhry, Zaira S. ; Fram, Brianna ; Henn, R. Frank ; Sherman, Seth L. ; Hammoud, Sommer</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Zaira S. ; Fram, Brianna ; Henn, R. Frank ; Sherman, Seth L. ; Hammoud, Sommer</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, publication year, journal, institution, country of origin, article type, study design, and level of evidence. Citation density was calculated for each article. The correlation between citation density and publication year and the correlation between level of evidence and number of citations, citation density, and publication year were computed. Results The 50 most-cited articles were published in 12 journals between 1986 and 2011. The number of citations ranged from 59 to 290 (109.3 ± 48.6). Citation density ranged from 2.7 to 17.6 citations per year (7.0 ± 3.3). There was a positive correlation between citation density and publication year (r = +0.489, P &lt; 0.001). Overall, 56% of the articles were clinical and 44% were basic science. Of the 28 clinical articles, 61% were level IV or V evidence. Level of evidence was not significantly correlated with number of citations (r = −0.059, P = 0.766), citation density (r = +0.030, P = 0.880), or publication year (r = −0.0009, P = 0.996). Conclusion This analysis provides the orthopedic community with a readily accessible list of the classic citations in MAT research and provides insight into the historical development of this procedure. Although there was a moderate positive correlation between citation density and publication year, articles with stronger levels of evidence were not more frequently cited despite the increasing trend toward evidence-based practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-6035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-6043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1947603517749922</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29291274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Clinical Research ; Humans ; Meniscus - transplantation ; Orthopedics ; Transplantation, Homologous</subject><ispartof>Cartilage, 2019-04, Vol.10 (2), p.196-204</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-2627f306416b847fc16a8d3278dd1dde32a1d634bb7149ea4f364a06731bb3013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-2627f306416b847fc16a8d3278dd1dde32a1d634bb7149ea4f364a06731bb3013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425545/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6425545/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1947603517749922?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29291274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Zaira S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fram, Brianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henn, R. Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Seth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammoud, Sommer</creatorcontrib><title>The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis</title><title>Cartilage</title><addtitle>Cartilage</addtitle><description>Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, publication year, journal, institution, country of origin, article type, study design, and level of evidence. Citation density was calculated for each article. The correlation between citation density and publication year and the correlation between level of evidence and number of citations, citation density, and publication year were computed. Results The 50 most-cited articles were published in 12 journals between 1986 and 2011. The number of citations ranged from 59 to 290 (109.3 ± 48.6). Citation density ranged from 2.7 to 17.6 citations per year (7.0 ± 3.3). There was a positive correlation between citation density and publication year (r = +0.489, P &lt; 0.001). Overall, 56% of the articles were clinical and 44% were basic science. Of the 28 clinical articles, 61% were level IV or V evidence. Level of evidence was not significantly correlated with number of citations (r = −0.059, P = 0.766), citation density (r = +0.030, P = 0.880), or publication year (r = −0.0009, P = 0.996). Conclusion This analysis provides the orthopedic community with a readily accessible list of the classic citations in MAT research and provides insight into the historical development of this procedure. Although there was a moderate positive correlation between citation density and publication year, articles with stronger levels of evidence were not more frequently cited despite the increasing trend toward evidence-based practice.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Clinical Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meniscus - transplantation</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><issn>1947-6035</issn><issn>1947-6043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1rGzEQxUVoqJ2k95yKjr1soq-VdnsobEy-ICYQ3LPQ7s7aCvLKleRA_vvIODVtICc9pN-8mdFD6JySC0qVuqS1UJLwMmtR14wdoenuqpBE8C8HzcsJOonxmRAp66r8iiasZjVlSkxRu1gBLgme-5iKmU3Q4yYk2zmI2I54DqONnXG4cc4vgxkSXgQzxo0zYzLJ-hE_QQQTutVP3OAr2zrr15CC7XAzGvcabTxDx4NxEb69n6fo9831YnZXPDze3s-ah6ITXKSCSaYGTqSgsq2EGjoqTdVzpqq-p30PnBnaSy7aVlFRgxEDl8IQqThtW04oP0W_9r6bbbuGvoMxBeP0Jti1Ca_aG6v_fxntSi_9i5aClaUos8GPd4Pg_2whJr3Oy4PLu4LfRk3rimeykjyjZI92wccYYDi0oUTvotEfo8kl3_8d71DwN4sMFHsgmiXoZ78N-QPj54Zv5AqWeQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Chaudhry, Zaira S.</creator><creator>Fram, Brianna</creator><creator>Henn, R. Frank</creator><creator>Sherman, Seth L.</creator><creator>Hammoud, Sommer</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis</title><author>Chaudhry, Zaira S. ; Fram, Brianna ; Henn, R. Frank ; Sherman, Seth L. ; Hammoud, Sommer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-2627f306416b847fc16a8d3278dd1dde32a1d634bb7149ea4f364a06731bb3013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Clinical Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meniscus - transplantation</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Zaira S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fram, Brianna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henn, R. Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Seth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammoud, Sommer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cartilage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaudhry, Zaira S.</au><au>Fram, Brianna</au><au>Henn, R. Frank</au><au>Sherman, Seth L.</au><au>Hammoud, Sommer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Cartilage</jtitle><addtitle>Cartilage</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>196-204</pages><issn>1947-6035</issn><eissn>1947-6043</eissn><abstract>Objective To identify the 50 most-cited articles in meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) research and analyze their characteristics. Design In September 2017, the Scopus database was queried to identify the 50 most-cited articles in MAT research. Variables analyzed include number of citations, publication year, journal, institution, country of origin, article type, study design, and level of evidence. Citation density was calculated for each article. The correlation between citation density and publication year and the correlation between level of evidence and number of citations, citation density, and publication year were computed. Results The 50 most-cited articles were published in 12 journals between 1986 and 2011. The number of citations ranged from 59 to 290 (109.3 ± 48.6). Citation density ranged from 2.7 to 17.6 citations per year (7.0 ± 3.3). There was a positive correlation between citation density and publication year (r = +0.489, P &lt; 0.001). Overall, 56% of the articles were clinical and 44% were basic science. Of the 28 clinical articles, 61% were level IV or V evidence. Level of evidence was not significantly correlated with number of citations (r = −0.059, P = 0.766), citation density (r = +0.030, P = 0.880), or publication year (r = −0.0009, P = 0.996). Conclusion This analysis provides the orthopedic community with a readily accessible list of the classic citations in MAT research and provides insight into the historical development of this procedure. Although there was a moderate positive correlation between citation density and publication year, articles with stronger levels of evidence were not more frequently cited despite the increasing trend toward evidence-based practice.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29291274</pmid><doi>10.1177/1947603517749922</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1947-6035
ispartof Cartilage, 2019-04, Vol.10 (2), p.196-204
issn 1947-6035
1947-6043
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6425545
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
subjects Bibliometrics
Clinical Research
Humans
Meniscus - transplantation
Orthopedics
Transplantation, Homologous
title The 50 Most-Cited Articles in Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2050%20Most-Cited%20Articles%20in%20Meniscal%20Allograft%20Transplantation%20Research:%20A%20Bibliometric%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cartilage&rft.au=Chaudhry,%20Zaira%20S.&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=196-204&rft.issn=1947-6035&rft.eissn=1947-6043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1947603517749922&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E1983255863%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983255863&rft_id=info:pmid/29291274&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1947603517749922&rfr_iscdi=true