Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice

Efficacy trials, designed to gain regulatory marketing approval, evaluate drugs in optimally selected patients under advantageous conditions for relatively short time periods. Effectiveness trials, designed to evaluate use in usual practice, assess treatments among more typical patients in real‐worl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics 2019-04, Vol.105 (4), p.857-866
Hauptverfasser: Selker, Harry P., Eichler, Hans‐Georg, Stockbridge, Norman L., McElwee, Newell E., Dere, Willard H., Cohen, Theodora, Erban, John K., Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L., Honig, Peter K., Kaitin, Kenneth I., Oye, Kenneth A., D'Agostino, Ralph B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 866
container_issue 4
container_start_page 857
container_title Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
container_volume 105
creator Selker, Harry P.
Eichler, Hans‐Georg
Stockbridge, Norman L.
McElwee, Newell E.
Dere, Willard H.
Cohen, Theodora
Erban, John K.
Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L.
Honig, Peter K.
Kaitin, Kenneth I.
Oye, Kenneth A.
D'Agostino, Ralph B.
description Efficacy trials, designed to gain regulatory marketing approval, evaluate drugs in optimally selected patients under advantageous conditions for relatively short time periods. Effectiveness trials, designed to evaluate use in usual practice, assess treatments among more typical patients in real‐world conditions with longer follow‐up periods. In “efficacy‐to‐effectiveness (E2E) trials,” if the initial efficacy trial component is positive, the trial seamlessly transitions to an effectiveness trial component to efficiently yield both types of evidence. Yet more time could be saved by simultaneously addressing efficacy and effectiveness in an “efficacy and effectiveness too (EE2) trial.” Additionally, hybrids of the E2E and EE2 approaches with differing degrees of overlap of the two components could allow flexibility for specific drug development needs. In planning EE2 trials, each stakeholder's current and future needs, incentives, and perspective must be considered. Although challenging, the ultimate benefits to stakeholders, the health system, and the public should justify this effort.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cpt.1347
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6422692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2164104886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-b0db3b9ecf1579d9192e2320a51eef8e89378a92428de0a6018cdfbb5e42186b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtrGzEUhUVpqB03kF9QtOxmHD1mZKmLQnGcBwSShUuWQqO5k6iMJVcaO3ifHx45zsuLrMS5-jj3cA9Cx5SMKSHsxC77MeXl5Asa0oqzQlS8-oqGhBBVKMbFAB2m9C_LUkn5DQ04EZRMSjFEj7O2ddbYDTa-wVmA7d0aPKSE5yHgeXSmS7_wtHM-c91ugE8huTufcB_weYaj6QHP1q4BbwEHj_dcd_qDsfP4NrP4Jpo8tPAdHbR5Cxy9vCP092w2n14UV9fnl9M_V4Utc9yiJk3NawW2pdVENYoqBowzYioK0EqQik-kUaxksgFiBKHSNm1dV1AyKkXNR-j3zne5qhfQWPB9NJ1eRrcwcaODcXr_x7t7fRfWWpSMiXzIEfr5YhDD_xWkXi9cstB1xkNYJc2oyElLKcU7amNIKUL7toYSvS1N59L0trSM_vgY6w18bSkDxQ54cB1sPjXS05v5s-EThG6igA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164104886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Selker, Harry P. ; Eichler, Hans‐Georg ; Stockbridge, Norman L. ; McElwee, Newell E. ; Dere, Willard H. ; Cohen, Theodora ; Erban, John K. ; Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L. ; Honig, Peter K. ; Kaitin, Kenneth I. ; Oye, Kenneth A. ; D'Agostino, Ralph B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Selker, Harry P. ; Eichler, Hans‐Georg ; Stockbridge, Norman L. ; McElwee, Newell E. ; Dere, Willard H. ; Cohen, Theodora ; Erban, John K. ; Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L. ; Honig, Peter K. ; Kaitin, Kenneth I. ; Oye, Kenneth A. ; D'Agostino, Ralph B.</creatorcontrib><description>Efficacy trials, designed to gain regulatory marketing approval, evaluate drugs in optimally selected patients under advantageous conditions for relatively short time periods. Effectiveness trials, designed to evaluate use in usual practice, assess treatments among more typical patients in real‐world conditions with longer follow‐up periods. In “efficacy‐to‐effectiveness (E2E) trials,” if the initial efficacy trial component is positive, the trial seamlessly transitions to an effectiveness trial component to efficiently yield both types of evidence. Yet more time could be saved by simultaneously addressing efficacy and effectiveness in an “efficacy and effectiveness too (EE2) trial.” Additionally, hybrids of the E2E and EE2 approaches with differing degrees of overlap of the two components could allow flexibility for specific drug development needs. In planning EE2 trials, each stakeholder's current and future needs, incentives, and perspective must be considered. Although challenging, the ultimate benefits to stakeholders, the health system, and the public should justify this effort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1347</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30610746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Development - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Marketing - legislation & jurisprudence ; Patient Selection ; Research Design - legislation & jurisprudence ; Reviews ; State of the Art ; Treatment Outcome]]></subject><ispartof>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019-04, Vol.105 (4), p.857-866</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-b0db3b9ecf1579d9192e2320a51eef8e89378a92428de0a6018cdfbb5e42186b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-b0db3b9ecf1579d9192e2320a51eef8e89378a92428de0a6018cdfbb5e42186b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcpt.1347$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcpt.1347$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30610746$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Selker, Harry P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Hans‐Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockbridge, Norman L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwee, Newell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dere, Willard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erban, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honig, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaitin, Kenneth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oye, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Agostino, Ralph B.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice</title><title>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><description>Efficacy trials, designed to gain regulatory marketing approval, evaluate drugs in optimally selected patients under advantageous conditions for relatively short time periods. Effectiveness trials, designed to evaluate use in usual practice, assess treatments among more typical patients in real‐world conditions with longer follow‐up periods. In “efficacy‐to‐effectiveness (E2E) trials,” if the initial efficacy trial component is positive, the trial seamlessly transitions to an effectiveness trial component to efficiently yield both types of evidence. Yet more time could be saved by simultaneously addressing efficacy and effectiveness in an “efficacy and effectiveness too (EE2) trial.” Additionally, hybrids of the E2E and EE2 approaches with differing degrees of overlap of the two components could allow flexibility for specific drug development needs. In planning EE2 trials, each stakeholder's current and future needs, incentives, and perspective must be considered. Although challenging, the ultimate benefits to stakeholders, the health system, and the public should justify this effort.</description><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Approval - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Development - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marketing - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Research Design - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>State of the Art</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-9236</issn><issn>1532-6535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtrGzEUhUVpqB03kF9QtOxmHD1mZKmLQnGcBwSShUuWQqO5k6iMJVcaO3ifHx45zsuLrMS5-jj3cA9Cx5SMKSHsxC77MeXl5Asa0oqzQlS8-oqGhBBVKMbFAB2m9C_LUkn5DQ04EZRMSjFEj7O2ddbYDTa-wVmA7d0aPKSE5yHgeXSmS7_wtHM-c91ugE8huTufcB_weYaj6QHP1q4BbwEHj_dcd_qDsfP4NrP4Jpo8tPAdHbR5Cxy9vCP092w2n14UV9fnl9M_V4Utc9yiJk3NawW2pdVENYoqBowzYioK0EqQik-kUaxksgFiBKHSNm1dV1AyKkXNR-j3zne5qhfQWPB9NJ1eRrcwcaODcXr_x7t7fRfWWpSMiXzIEfr5YhDD_xWkXi9cstB1xkNYJc2oyElLKcU7amNIKUL7toYSvS1N59L0trSM_vgY6w18bSkDxQ54cB1sPjXS05v5s-EThG6igA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Selker, Harry P.</creator><creator>Eichler, Hans‐Georg</creator><creator>Stockbridge, Norman L.</creator><creator>McElwee, Newell E.</creator><creator>Dere, Willard H.</creator><creator>Cohen, Theodora</creator><creator>Erban, John K.</creator><creator>Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L.</creator><creator>Honig, Peter K.</creator><creator>Kaitin, Kenneth I.</creator><creator>Oye, Kenneth A.</creator><creator>D'Agostino, Ralph B.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice</title><author>Selker, Harry P. ; Eichler, Hans‐Georg ; Stockbridge, Norman L. ; McElwee, Newell E. ; Dere, Willard H. ; Cohen, Theodora ; Erban, John K. ; Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L. ; Honig, Peter K. ; Kaitin, Kenneth I. ; Oye, Kenneth A. ; D'Agostino, Ralph B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-b0db3b9ecf1579d9192e2320a51eef8e89378a92428de0a6018cdfbb5e42186b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Approval - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Development - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marketing - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Research Design - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>State of the Art</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Selker, Harry P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichler, Hans‐Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockbridge, Norman L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElwee, Newell E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dere, Willard H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erban, John K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honig, Peter K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaitin, Kenneth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oye, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Agostino, Ralph B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Selker, Harry P.</au><au>Eichler, Hans‐Georg</au><au>Stockbridge, Norman L.</au><au>McElwee, Newell E.</au><au>Dere, Willard H.</au><au>Cohen, Theodora</au><au>Erban, John K.</au><au>Seyfert‐Margolis, Vicki L.</au><au>Honig, Peter K.</au><au>Kaitin, Kenneth I.</au><au>Oye, Kenneth A.</au><au>D'Agostino, Ralph B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice</atitle><jtitle>Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Pharmacol Ther</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>857</spage><epage>866</epage><pages>857-866</pages><issn>0009-9236</issn><eissn>1532-6535</eissn><abstract>Efficacy trials, designed to gain regulatory marketing approval, evaluate drugs in optimally selected patients under advantageous conditions for relatively short time periods. Effectiveness trials, designed to evaluate use in usual practice, assess treatments among more typical patients in real‐world conditions with longer follow‐up periods. In “efficacy‐to‐effectiveness (E2E) trials,” if the initial efficacy trial component is positive, the trial seamlessly transitions to an effectiveness trial component to efficiently yield both types of evidence. Yet more time could be saved by simultaneously addressing efficacy and effectiveness in an “efficacy and effectiveness too (EE2) trial.” Additionally, hybrids of the E2E and EE2 approaches with differing degrees of overlap of the two components could allow flexibility for specific drug development needs. In planning EE2 trials, each stakeholder's current and future needs, incentives, and perspective must be considered. Although challenging, the ultimate benefits to stakeholders, the health system, and the public should justify this effort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>30610746</pmid><doi>10.1002/cpt.1347</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9236
ispartof Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019-04, Vol.105 (4), p.857-866
issn 0009-9236
1532-6535
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6422692
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Clinical Trials as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence
Cost-Benefit Analysis - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug Approval - legislation & jurisprudence
Drug Development - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Marketing - legislation & jurisprudence
Patient Selection
Research Design - legislation & jurisprudence
Reviews
State of the Art
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and Effectiveness Too Trials: Clinical Trial Designs to Generate Evidence on Efficacy and on Effectiveness in Wide Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A18%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Effectiveness%20Too%20Trials:%20Clinical%20Trial%20Designs%20to%20Generate%20Evidence%20on%20Efficacy%20and%20on%20Effectiveness%20in%20Wide%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20pharmacology%20and%20therapeutics&rft.au=Selker,%20Harry%20P.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=857&rft.epage=866&rft.pages=857-866&rft.issn=0009-9236&rft.eissn=1532-6535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cpt.1347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2164104886%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164104886&rft_id=info:pmid/30610746&rfr_iscdi=true