Model checking: recent improvements and applications
Model checking (Baier and Katoen in Principles of model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2008 ; Clarke et al. in Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001 ) is an automatic technique to formally verify that a given specification of a concurrent system meets given functional properties. Its use has b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal on software tools for technology transfer 2018, Vol.20 (5), p.493-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 493 |
container_title | International journal on software tools for technology transfer |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Bošnački, Dragan Wijs, Anton |
description | Model checking (Baier and Katoen in Principles of model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2008
; Clarke et al. in Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2001
) is an automatic technique to formally verify that a given specification of a concurrent system meets given functional properties. Its use has been demonstrated many times over the years. Key characteristics that make the method so appealing are its level of automaticity, its ability to determine the absence of errors in the system (contrary to testing techniques) and the fact that it produces counter-examples when errors are detected, that clearly demonstrate not only that an error is present, but also how the error can be produced. The main drawback of model checking is its limited scalability, and for this reason, research on reducing the computational effort has received much attention over the last decades. Besides the verification of qualitative functional properties, the model checking technique can also be applied for other types of analyses, such as planning and the verification of quantitative properties. We briefly discuss several contributions in the model checking field that address both its scalability and its applicability to perform planning and quantitative analysis. In particular, we introduce six papers selected from the 23rd International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking Software (SPIN 2016). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6417378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2205414046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1fbda48cada71e3db62cf05b49434ef8e06c1595d20e3a5f5d452498f3e538983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8S8OIlOvuVTTwIUvwCxYuel-1mUlOTbNxtRf-9W6r1A7zMDMwz78zwErJP4ZgCqJMQIxQp0DwFCTR92yBDKjhPmcrV5rpWxYDshDADoCpTxTYZcChkJoUcEnHnSmwS-4T2ue6mp4lHi908qdveu1dsYx0S05WJ6fumtmZeuy7skq3KNAH3PvOIPF5ePIyv09v7q5vx-W1qJePzlFaT0ojcmtIoirycZMxWICeiEFxglSNklspClgyQG1nJUkgmirziKHle5HxEzla6_WLSYrk8zJtG975ujX_XztT6d6ern_TUvepMUMXVUuDoU8C7lwWGuW7rYLFpTIduETRjIAUVILKIHv5BZ27hu_ieZqAkYyJjKlJ0RVnvQvBYrY-hoJee6JUnOnqil57otzhz8POL9cSXCRFgKyDEVjdF_736f9UP-JyXmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2075224627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model checking: recent improvements and applications</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Bošnački, Dragan ; Wijs, Anton</creator><creatorcontrib>Bošnački, Dragan ; Wijs, Anton</creatorcontrib><description>Model checking (Baier and Katoen in Principles of model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2008
; Clarke et al. in Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2001
) is an automatic technique to formally verify that a given specification of a concurrent system meets given functional properties. Its use has been demonstrated many times over the years. Key characteristics that make the method so appealing are its level of automaticity, its ability to determine the absence of errors in the system (contrary to testing techniques) and the fact that it produces counter-examples when errors are detected, that clearly demonstrate not only that an error is present, but also how the error can be produced. The main drawback of model checking is its limited scalability, and for this reason, research on reducing the computational effort has received much attention over the last decades. Besides the verification of qualitative functional properties, the model checking technique can also be applied for other types of analyses, such as planning and the verification of quantitative properties. We briefly discuss several contributions in the model checking field that address both its scalability and its applicability to perform planning and quantitative analysis. In particular, we introduce six papers selected from the 23rd International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking Software (SPIN 2016).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1433-2779</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30956545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Computer Science ; Error detection ; Introduction ; Logic programming ; Properties (attributes) ; Quantitative analysis ; Software Engineering ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; Theory of Computation</subject><ispartof>International journal on software tools for technology transfer, 2018, Vol.20 (5), p.493-497</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved. © 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1fbda48cada71e3db62cf05b49434ef8e06c1595d20e3a5f5d452498f3e538983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1fbda48cada71e3db62cf05b49434ef8e06c1595d20e3a5f5d452498f3e538983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bošnački, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijs, Anton</creatorcontrib><title>Model checking: recent improvements and applications</title><title>International journal on software tools for technology transfer</title><addtitle>Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf</addtitle><description>Model checking (Baier and Katoen in Principles of model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2008
; Clarke et al. in Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2001
) is an automatic technique to formally verify that a given specification of a concurrent system meets given functional properties. Its use has been demonstrated many times over the years. Key characteristics that make the method so appealing are its level of automaticity, its ability to determine the absence of errors in the system (contrary to testing techniques) and the fact that it produces counter-examples when errors are detected, that clearly demonstrate not only that an error is present, but also how the error can be produced. The main drawback of model checking is its limited scalability, and for this reason, research on reducing the computational effort has received much attention over the last decades. Besides the verification of qualitative functional properties, the model checking technique can also be applied for other types of analyses, such as planning and the verification of quantitative properties. We briefly discuss several contributions in the model checking field that address both its scalability and its applicability to perform planning and quantitative analysis. In particular, we introduce six papers selected from the 23rd International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking Software (SPIN 2016).</description><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Error detection</subject><subject>Introduction</subject><subject>Logic programming</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Software Engineering</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><issn>1433-2779</issn><issn>1433-2787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-AC8S8OIlOvuVTTwIUvwCxYuel-1mUlOTbNxtRf-9W6r1A7zMDMwz78zwErJP4ZgCqJMQIxQp0DwFCTR92yBDKjhPmcrV5rpWxYDshDADoCpTxTYZcChkJoUcEnHnSmwS-4T2ue6mp4lHi908qdveu1dsYx0S05WJ6fumtmZeuy7skq3KNAH3PvOIPF5ePIyv09v7q5vx-W1qJePzlFaT0ojcmtIoirycZMxWICeiEFxglSNklspClgyQG1nJUkgmirziKHle5HxEzla6_WLSYrk8zJtG975ujX_XztT6d6ern_TUvepMUMXVUuDoU8C7lwWGuW7rYLFpTIduETRjIAUVILKIHv5BZ27hu_ieZqAkYyJjKlJ0RVnvQvBYrY-hoJee6JUnOnqil57otzhz8POL9cSXCRFgKyDEVjdF_736f9UP-JyXmw</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Bošnački, Dragan</creator><creator>Wijs, Anton</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Model checking: recent improvements and applications</title><author>Bošnački, Dragan ; Wijs, Anton</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1fbda48cada71e3db62cf05b49434ef8e06c1595d20e3a5f5d452498f3e538983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Error detection</topic><topic>Introduction</topic><topic>Logic programming</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Software Engineering</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bošnački, Dragan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijs, Anton</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal on software tools for technology transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bošnački, Dragan</au><au>Wijs, Anton</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model checking: recent improvements and applications</atitle><jtitle>International journal on software tools for technology transfer</jtitle><stitle>Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer</stitle><addtitle>Int J Softw Tools Technol Transf</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>493-497</pages><issn>1433-2779</issn><eissn>1433-2787</eissn><abstract>Model checking (Baier and Katoen in Principles of model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2008
; Clarke et al. in Model checking, MIT Press, Cambridge,
2001
) is an automatic technique to formally verify that a given specification of a concurrent system meets given functional properties. Its use has been demonstrated many times over the years. Key characteristics that make the method so appealing are its level of automaticity, its ability to determine the absence of errors in the system (contrary to testing techniques) and the fact that it produces counter-examples when errors are detected, that clearly demonstrate not only that an error is present, but also how the error can be produced. The main drawback of model checking is its limited scalability, and for this reason, research on reducing the computational effort has received much attention over the last decades. Besides the verification of qualitative functional properties, the model checking technique can also be applied for other types of analyses, such as planning and the verification of quantitative properties. We briefly discuss several contributions in the model checking field that address both its scalability and its applicability to perform planning and quantitative analysis. In particular, we introduce six papers selected from the 23rd International SPIN Symposium on Model Checking Software (SPIN 2016).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30956545</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1433-2779 |
ispartof | International journal on software tools for technology transfer, 2018, Vol.20 (5), p.493-497 |
issn | 1433-2779 1433-2787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6417378 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Computer Science Error detection Introduction Logic programming Properties (attributes) Quantitative analysis Software Engineering Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems Theory of Computation |
title | Model checking: recent improvements and applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A57%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model%20checking:%20recent%20improvements%20and%20applications&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20on%20software%20tools%20for%20technology%20transfer&rft.au=Bo%C5%A1na%C4%8Dki,%20Dragan&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=493-497&rft.issn=1433-2779&rft.eissn=1433-2787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10009-018-0501-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2205414046%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2075224627&rft_id=info:pmid/30956545&rfr_iscdi=true |