Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?

Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of surgical oncology 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36
Hauptverfasser: S, Nikhil, Halder, P. J., R, Santhosh, N, Ravindra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Indian journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 10
creator S, Nikhil
Halder, P. J.
R, Santhosh
N, Ravindra
description Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm ( P  = 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm ( P  = 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm ( P  = 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6414556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2190581923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OFTEUxidGIwR5ADemiRs3I6fTP9PZaAiIkBBhgXHZ9HZOuQNz27HtmLDzNXw9n8RyLyKQ2E1Pc37fd3ryVdVrCu8pQLuXKKMdq4GqGlre1uJZtQ1dK2vZieb5uhZ1KwXdqnZTuoJyWMc4dC-rLQYdV0qq7er6MGAieYlk35scVjckuPXzIhqf0GbsybnxNqLJgyVf0F6TE-_GGb1Fch5SJt-WwzSN-Pvnr0TOJowFDP6h6GhIeR7Nx1fVC2fGhLt390719ejTxcFxfXr2-eRg_7S2vIVcC9ZSgz23jKleulI7u1i0FLmVChyAEQ4luKZXSgHnHAvEwAmBRSIk26k-bHynebHC3qLP0Yx6isPKxBsdzKAfd_yw1Jfhh5accrE2eHdnEMP3GVPWqyFZHEfjMcxJNw1w2VHZqIK-fYJehTn6sp5uaAdC0a5hhaIbysaQUkR3_xkK-jZNvUlTlzT1bZpaFM2bh1vcK_5mV4BmA6TS8pcY_43-v-sfQzasLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2190581923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</creator><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm ( P  = 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm ( P  = 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm ( P  = 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct &lt; 3 mm diameter, &lt; 3 mm from posterior border, &lt; 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness &lt; 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-7651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-6952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30948868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Cancer surgery ; Fistula ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neck ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Pancreas ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36</ispartof><rights>Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414556/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414556/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><title>Indian journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm ( P  = 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm ( P  = 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm ( P  = 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct &lt; 3 mm diameter, &lt; 3 mm from posterior border, &lt; 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness &lt; 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</description><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0975-7651</issn><issn>0976-6952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9OFTEUxidGIwR5ADemiRs3I6fTP9PZaAiIkBBhgXHZ9HZOuQNz27HtmLDzNXw9n8RyLyKQ2E1Pc37fd3ryVdVrCu8pQLuXKKMdq4GqGlre1uJZtQ1dK2vZieb5uhZ1KwXdqnZTuoJyWMc4dC-rLQYdV0qq7er6MGAieYlk35scVjckuPXzIhqf0GbsybnxNqLJgyVf0F6TE-_GGb1Fch5SJt-WwzSN-Pvnr0TOJowFDP6h6GhIeR7Nx1fVC2fGhLt390719ejTxcFxfXr2-eRg_7S2vIVcC9ZSgz23jKleulI7u1i0FLmVChyAEQ4luKZXSgHnHAvEwAmBRSIk26k-bHynebHC3qLP0Yx6isPKxBsdzKAfd_yw1Jfhh5accrE2eHdnEMP3GVPWqyFZHEfjMcxJNw1w2VHZqIK-fYJehTn6sp5uaAdC0a5hhaIbysaQUkR3_xkK-jZNvUlTlzT1bZpaFM2bh1vcK_5mV4BmA6TS8pcY_43-v-sfQzasLQ</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>S, Nikhil</creator><creator>Halder, P. J.</creator><creator>R, Santhosh</creator><creator>N, Ravindra</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><author>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>S, Nikhil</au><au>Halder, P. J.</au><au>R, Santhosh</au><au>N, Ravindra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>31-36</pages><issn>0975-7651</issn><eissn>0976-6952</eissn><abstract>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s t test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm ( P  = 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm ( P  = 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm ( P  = 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct &lt; 3 mm diameter, &lt; 3 mm from posterior border, &lt; 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness &lt; 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>30948868</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0975-7651
ispartof Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36
issn 0975-7651
0976-6952
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6414556
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Cancer surgery
Fistula
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neck
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Pancreas
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
title Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A27%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Anatomy%20of%20the%20Transected%20Pancreatic%20Neck%20Influence%20Post%20Whipple%E2%80%99s%20Operation%20Pancreatic%20Fistula?&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=S,%20Nikhil&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=31-36&rft.issn=0975-7651&rft.eissn=0976-6952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2190581923%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2190581923&rft_id=info:pmid/30948868&rfr_iscdi=true