Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?
Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of surgical oncology 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Indian journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | S, Nikhil Halder, P. J. R, Santhosh N, Ravindra |
description | Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s
t
test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm (
P
= 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm (
P
= 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm (
P
= 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6414556</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2190581923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OFTEUxidGIwR5ADemiRs3I6fTP9PZaAiIkBBhgXHZ9HZOuQNz27HtmLDzNXw9n8RyLyKQ2E1Pc37fd3ryVdVrCu8pQLuXKKMdq4GqGlre1uJZtQ1dK2vZieb5uhZ1KwXdqnZTuoJyWMc4dC-rLQYdV0qq7er6MGAieYlk35scVjckuPXzIhqf0GbsybnxNqLJgyVf0F6TE-_GGb1Fch5SJt-WwzSN-Pvnr0TOJowFDP6h6GhIeR7Nx1fVC2fGhLt390719ejTxcFxfXr2-eRg_7S2vIVcC9ZSgz23jKleulI7u1i0FLmVChyAEQ4luKZXSgHnHAvEwAmBRSIk26k-bHynebHC3qLP0Yx6isPKxBsdzKAfd_yw1Jfhh5accrE2eHdnEMP3GVPWqyFZHEfjMcxJNw1w2VHZqIK-fYJehTn6sp5uaAdC0a5hhaIbysaQUkR3_xkK-jZNvUlTlzT1bZpaFM2bh1vcK_5mV4BmA6TS8pcY_43-v-sfQzasLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2190581923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</creator><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><description>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s
t
test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm (
P
= 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm (
P
= 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm (
P
= 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct < 3 mm diameter, < 3 mm from posterior border, < 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness < 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0975-7651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-6952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30948868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Cancer surgery ; Fistula ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neck ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Pancreas ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36</ispartof><rights>Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414556/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6414556/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30948868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><title>Indian journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s
t
test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm (
P
= 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm (
P
= 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm (
P
= 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct < 3 mm diameter, < 3 mm from posterior border, < 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness < 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</description><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>0975-7651</issn><issn>0976-6952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9OFTEUxidGIwR5ADemiRs3I6fTP9PZaAiIkBBhgXHZ9HZOuQNz27HtmLDzNXw9n8RyLyKQ2E1Pc37fd3ryVdVrCu8pQLuXKKMdq4GqGlre1uJZtQ1dK2vZieb5uhZ1KwXdqnZTuoJyWMc4dC-rLQYdV0qq7er6MGAieYlk35scVjckuPXzIhqf0GbsybnxNqLJgyVf0F6TE-_GGb1Fch5SJt-WwzSN-Pvnr0TOJowFDP6h6GhIeR7Nx1fVC2fGhLt390719ejTxcFxfXr2-eRg_7S2vIVcC9ZSgz23jKleulI7u1i0FLmVChyAEQ4luKZXSgHnHAvEwAmBRSIk26k-bHynebHC3qLP0Yx6isPKxBsdzKAfd_yw1Jfhh5accrE2eHdnEMP3GVPWqyFZHEfjMcxJNw1w2VHZqIK-fYJehTn6sp5uaAdC0a5hhaIbysaQUkR3_xkK-jZNvUlTlzT1bZpaFM2bh1vcK_5mV4BmA6TS8pcY_43-v-sfQzasLQ</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>S, Nikhil</creator><creator>Halder, P. J.</creator><creator>R, Santhosh</creator><creator>N, Ravindra</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</title><author>S, Nikhil ; Halder, P. J. ; R, Santhosh ; N, Ravindra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-5371aed4c338d6f1aefcbb71e4c680f00a5fe60f2d8880444e6f130f55ec33563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>S, Nikhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halder, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Santhosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Ravindra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>S, Nikhil</au><au>Halder, P. J.</au><au>R, Santhosh</au><au>N, Ravindra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula?</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>31-36</pages><issn>0975-7651</issn><eissn>0976-6952</eissn><abstract>Few studies correlate anatomical parameters of the transected pancreatic neck to occurrence of the dangerous complication—post Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula. To evaluate the correlation between anatomical details of the transected neck of the pancreas and post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy. Observational study. The study included 66 patients undergoing Whipple’s pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy at tertiary care centre between December 2009 and December 2014. Student’s
t
test, Fisher’s exact test, Pearson’s chi-squared test and forward stepwise. Clinically relevant POPF (grade B and C) was noted in 12 patients. Morbidity/mortality was 30.30% and 4.54% respectively. Among the fistula v/s no fistula groups, (a) mean thickness of the pancreatic stump was 12.17 ± 1.40 mm v/s 14.94 ± 1.87 mm (
P
= 0.000), (b) mean width of the pancreatic stump was 24.33 ± 4.14 mm v/s 25.87 ± 4.02 mm (
P
= 0.238) and (c) mean pancreatic duct (PD) diameter was 2.92 ± 0.79 mm v/s 4.27 ± 1.39 mm (
P
= 0.001). Mean distances of PD from anterior, posterior, superior and inferior pancreatic borders in the fistula group v/s no fistula group were 6.08 ± 1.62 mm, 3.17 ± 0.72 mm, 9.92 ± 2.15 mm, and 11.42 ± 3.45 mm v/s 5.93 ± 1.71 mm, 4.83 ± 1.26 mm, 11.83 ± 2.79 mm and 9.96 ± 3.25 mm respectively. Eleven of 38 patients (28.9%) with soft pancreas developed POPF. Pancreatic duct < 3 mm diameter, < 3 mm from posterior border, < 12 mm from superior border, pancreatic neck thickness < 12 mm and soft pancreas consistency were significantly associated with POPF.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>30948868</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0975-7651 |
ispartof | Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2019-03, Vol.10 (1), p.31-36 |
issn | 0975-7651 0976-6952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6414556 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Cancer surgery Fistula Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neck Oncology Original Original Article Pancreas Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | Does the Anatomy of the Transected Pancreatic Neck Influence Post Whipple’s Operation Pancreatic Fistula? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A27%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Anatomy%20of%20the%20Transected%20Pancreatic%20Neck%20Influence%20Post%20Whipple%E2%80%99s%20Operation%20Pancreatic%20Fistula?&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=S,%20Nikhil&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=31-36&rft.issn=0975-7651&rft.eissn=0976-6952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13193-018-0747-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2190581923%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2190581923&rft_id=info:pmid/30948868&rfr_iscdi=true |