Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster

Sexual selection is an important agent of evolutionary change, but the strength and direction of selection often vary over space and time. One potential source of heterogeneity may lie in the opportunity for male–male and/or male–female interactions imposed by the spatial environment. It has been su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2019-03, Vol.9 (5), p.2651-2663
Hauptverfasser: Malek, Heather L., Long, Tristan A. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2663
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2651
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 9
creator Malek, Heather L.
Long, Tristan A. F.
description Sexual selection is an important agent of evolutionary change, but the strength and direction of selection often vary over space and time. One potential source of heterogeneity may lie in the opportunity for male–male and/or male–female interactions imposed by the spatial environment. It has been suggested that increased spatial complexity permits sexual selection to act in a complementary fashion with natural selection (hastening the loss of deleterious alleles and/or promoting the spread of beneficial alleles) via two (not mutually exclusive) pathways. In the first scenario, sexual selection potentially acts more strongly on males in complex environments, allowing males of greater genetic “quality” a greater chance of outcompeting rivals, with benefits manifested indirectly in offspring. In the second scenario, increased spatial complexity reduces opportunities for males to antagonistically harm females, allowing females (especially those of greater potential fecundities) to achieve greater reproductive success (direct fitness benefits). Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we explore the importance of these mechanisms by measuring direct and indirect fitness of females housed in simple vial environments or in vials in which spatial complexity has been increased. We find strong evidence in favor of the female conflict‐mediated pathway as individuals in complex environments remated less frequently and produced more offspring than those housed in a simpler spatial environment, but no difference in the fitness of sons or daughters. We discuss these results in the context of other recent studies and what they mean for our understanding of how sexual selection operates. Sexual interactions between male and female fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, are mediated by spatial environmental complexity. In more complex environments, females remate less frequently and produce more offspring than in simple envionments.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.4932
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6405486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188803938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-18f386bff0962e6294993f6c8961a1dc3a0edc65efe01a341afb96bc222edc643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9PHCEUxUljU431oV_ATOKLfVjl3zDwYmK2W21i0oe2z4RlL4phYIQZdb99WVeNbSIvwL0_Ts7lIPSF4BOCMT0FC-yEK0Y_oD2KeTvrulbuvDnvooNSbnFdAlOOu09ol2GpCMViD_lfgxm9CQ3Ee59T7CGO9WZTPwR49OO66WHlzQilKfA4PbWiC96OjYmrl1qBAHb0KTY-Nt9yKmm48cHUt8HEdG3KCPkz-uhMKHDwvO-jP98Xv-eXs6ufFz_m51czyzmjMyIdk2LpHFaCgqCKK8WcsFIJYsjKMoNhZUULDjAxjBPjlkosLaV0U-dsH51tdYdpWb3bOlA2QQ_Z9yavdTJe_9uJ_kZfp3stOG65FFXg-Fkgp7sJyqh7XyyEOgqkqWhKFG9lh3lX0aP_0Ns05VjHq5SUEjPFZKW-bilbf6ZkcK9mCNabDPUmQ73JsLKHb92_ki-JVeB0Czz4AOv3lfRivmBPkn8Blk-oaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188803938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Malek, Heather L. ; Long, Tristan A. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malek, Heather L. ; Long, Tristan A. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual selection is an important agent of evolutionary change, but the strength and direction of selection often vary over space and time. One potential source of heterogeneity may lie in the opportunity for male–male and/or male–female interactions imposed by the spatial environment. It has been suggested that increased spatial complexity permits sexual selection to act in a complementary fashion with natural selection (hastening the loss of deleterious alleles and/or promoting the spread of beneficial alleles) via two (not mutually exclusive) pathways. In the first scenario, sexual selection potentially acts more strongly on males in complex environments, allowing males of greater genetic “quality” a greater chance of outcompeting rivals, with benefits manifested indirectly in offspring. In the second scenario, increased spatial complexity reduces opportunities for males to antagonistically harm females, allowing females (especially those of greater potential fecundities) to achieve greater reproductive success (direct fitness benefits). Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we explore the importance of these mechanisms by measuring direct and indirect fitness of females housed in simple vial environments or in vials in which spatial complexity has been increased. We find strong evidence in favor of the female conflict‐mediated pathway as individuals in complex environments remated less frequently and produced more offspring than those housed in a simpler spatial environment, but no difference in the fitness of sons or daughters. We discuss these results in the context of other recent studies and what they mean for our understanding of how sexual selection operates. Sexual interactions between male and female fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, are mediated by spatial environmental complexity. In more complex environments, females remate less frequently and produce more offspring than in simple envionments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30891206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alleles ; Animal reproduction ; Breeding success ; Complexity ; Drosophila melanogaster ; environmental complexity ; Females ; Fitness ; Heterogeneity ; Insects ; Males ; mate choice ; mating systems ; Natural selection ; Offspring ; Original Research ; Reproduction ; Reproductive fitness ; sexual conflict ; Sexual selection ; spatial complexity</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2019-03, Vol.9 (5), p.2651-2663</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-18f386bff0962e6294993f6c8961a1dc3a0edc65efe01a341afb96bc222edc643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-18f386bff0962e6294993f6c8961a1dc3a0edc65efe01a341afb96bc222edc643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8708-2728 ; 0000-0002-1031-8616</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405486/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6405486/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malek, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Tristan A. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Sexual selection is an important agent of evolutionary change, but the strength and direction of selection often vary over space and time. One potential source of heterogeneity may lie in the opportunity for male–male and/or male–female interactions imposed by the spatial environment. It has been suggested that increased spatial complexity permits sexual selection to act in a complementary fashion with natural selection (hastening the loss of deleterious alleles and/or promoting the spread of beneficial alleles) via two (not mutually exclusive) pathways. In the first scenario, sexual selection potentially acts more strongly on males in complex environments, allowing males of greater genetic “quality” a greater chance of outcompeting rivals, with benefits manifested indirectly in offspring. In the second scenario, increased spatial complexity reduces opportunities for males to antagonistically harm females, allowing females (especially those of greater potential fecundities) to achieve greater reproductive success (direct fitness benefits). Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we explore the importance of these mechanisms by measuring direct and indirect fitness of females housed in simple vial environments or in vials in which spatial complexity has been increased. We find strong evidence in favor of the female conflict‐mediated pathway as individuals in complex environments remated less frequently and produced more offspring than those housed in a simpler spatial environment, but no difference in the fitness of sons or daughters. We discuss these results in the context of other recent studies and what they mean for our understanding of how sexual selection operates. Sexual interactions between male and female fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, are mediated by spatial environmental complexity. In more complex environments, females remate less frequently and produce more offspring than in simple envionments.</description><subject>Alleles</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>environmental complexity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>mate choice</subject><subject>mating systems</subject><subject>Natural selection</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive fitness</subject><subject>sexual conflict</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>spatial complexity</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9PHCEUxUljU431oV_ATOKLfVjl3zDwYmK2W21i0oe2z4RlL4phYIQZdb99WVeNbSIvwL0_Ts7lIPSF4BOCMT0FC-yEK0Y_oD2KeTvrulbuvDnvooNSbnFdAlOOu09ol2GpCMViD_lfgxm9CQ3Ee59T7CGO9WZTPwR49OO66WHlzQilKfA4PbWiC96OjYmrl1qBAHb0KTY-Nt9yKmm48cHUt8HEdG3KCPkz-uhMKHDwvO-jP98Xv-eXs6ufFz_m51czyzmjMyIdk2LpHFaCgqCKK8WcsFIJYsjKMoNhZUULDjAxjBPjlkosLaV0U-dsH51tdYdpWb3bOlA2QQ_Z9yavdTJe_9uJ_kZfp3stOG65FFXg-Fkgp7sJyqh7XyyEOgqkqWhKFG9lh3lX0aP_0Ns05VjHq5SUEjPFZKW-bilbf6ZkcK9mCNabDPUmQ73JsLKHb92_ki-JVeB0Czz4AOv3lfRivmBPkn8Blk-oaw</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Malek, Heather L.</creator><creator>Long, Tristan A. F.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-2728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-8616</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster</title><author>Malek, Heather L. ; Long, Tristan A. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4432-18f386bff0962e6294993f6c8961a1dc3a0edc65efe01a341afb96bc222edc643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alleles</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>environmental complexity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>mate choice</topic><topic>mating systems</topic><topic>Natural selection</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive fitness</topic><topic>sexual conflict</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>spatial complexity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malek, Heather L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Tristan A. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malek, Heather L.</au><au>Long, Tristan A. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2651</spage><epage>2663</epage><pages>2651-2663</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Sexual selection is an important agent of evolutionary change, but the strength and direction of selection often vary over space and time. One potential source of heterogeneity may lie in the opportunity for male–male and/or male–female interactions imposed by the spatial environment. It has been suggested that increased spatial complexity permits sexual selection to act in a complementary fashion with natural selection (hastening the loss of deleterious alleles and/or promoting the spread of beneficial alleles) via two (not mutually exclusive) pathways. In the first scenario, sexual selection potentially acts more strongly on males in complex environments, allowing males of greater genetic “quality” a greater chance of outcompeting rivals, with benefits manifested indirectly in offspring. In the second scenario, increased spatial complexity reduces opportunities for males to antagonistically harm females, allowing females (especially those of greater potential fecundities) to achieve greater reproductive success (direct fitness benefits). Here, using Drosophila melanogaster, we explore the importance of these mechanisms by measuring direct and indirect fitness of females housed in simple vial environments or in vials in which spatial complexity has been increased. We find strong evidence in favor of the female conflict‐mediated pathway as individuals in complex environments remated less frequently and produced more offspring than those housed in a simpler spatial environment, but no difference in the fitness of sons or daughters. We discuss these results in the context of other recent studies and what they mean for our understanding of how sexual selection operates. Sexual interactions between male and female fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, are mediated by spatial environmental complexity. In more complex environments, females remate less frequently and produce more offspring than in simple envionments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30891206</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.4932</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8708-2728</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-8616</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2019-03, Vol.9 (5), p.2651-2663
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6405486
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Alleles
Animal reproduction
Breeding success
Complexity
Drosophila melanogaster
environmental complexity
Females
Fitness
Heterogeneity
Insects
Males
mate choice
mating systems
Natural selection
Offspring
Original Research
Reproduction
Reproductive fitness
sexual conflict
Sexual selection
spatial complexity
title Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A25%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20environmental%20complexity%20mediates%20sexual%20conflict%20and%20sexual%20selection%20in%20Drosophila%20melanogaster&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Malek,%20Heather%20L.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2651&rft.epage=2663&rft.pages=2651-2663&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.4932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2188803938%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188803938&rft_id=info:pmid/30891206&rfr_iscdi=true