Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set
Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 628 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | Radiology |
container_volume | 290 |
creator | Drukker, Karen Giger, Maryellen L Joe, Bonnie N Kerlikowske, Karla Greenwood, Heather Drukteinis, Jennifer S Niell, Bethany Fan, Bo Malkov, Serghei Avila, Jesus Kazemi, Leila Shepherd, John |
description | Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV
) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV
for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV
of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P < .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P < .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/radiol.2018180608 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2155149747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9uEzEQxi1ERdPAA3BBPnLZ4j_r3fUFqU0pVGqFgHK2JrvjxGjXDrZTKW_Do-KQUOhpJM9vvvnGHyGvOTvnvO7eRRhcGM8F4x3vWMO6Z2TGlWgrLrl6TmaMSVl1Nden5CylH4zxWnXtC3IqmRKNVHpGfi3CtHQeB3qJHq3LNFj6ZQs-uwzZPSC9X0fEqmAbiHlCn-llREiZ3kywQnrhYdwllyj4gd7BNIVVhM16R7_uzU2uT9R5mtdIFyOk5Kzri27w-z1Hobvyjn8wKJDzhRjpFWSg3zC_JCcWxoSvjnVOvl9_uF98qm4_f7xZXNxWvdQ6V8BBS8GFUK1GzrVlgxBt1wipW9lh3VjF63ppe9GXH1KqZkMz2GbZ2lo1nQI5J-8PupvtcsKhL4dGGM0mugnizgRw5mnHu7VZhQfTSF23UhSBt0eBGH5uMWUzudTjOILHsE1GcFUs6LbAc8IPaB9DShHt4xrOzD5Zc0jW_Eu2zLz539_jxN8o5W-fH6Km</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155149747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Radiological Society of North America</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV
) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV
for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV
of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P < .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P < .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180608</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30526359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9333-1463 ; 0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4002,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giger, Maryellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerlikowske, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkov, Serghei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV
) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV
for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV
of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P < .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P < .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9uEzEQxi1ERdPAA3BBPnLZ4j_r3fUFqU0pVGqFgHK2JrvjxGjXDrZTKW_Do-KQUOhpJM9vvvnGHyGvOTvnvO7eRRhcGM8F4x3vWMO6Z2TGlWgrLrl6TmaMSVl1Nden5CylH4zxWnXtC3IqmRKNVHpGfi3CtHQeB3qJHq3LNFj6ZQs-uwzZPSC9X0fEqmAbiHlCn-llREiZ3kywQnrhYdwllyj4gd7BNIVVhM16R7_uzU2uT9R5mtdIFyOk5Kzri27w-z1Hobvyjn8wKJDzhRjpFWSg3zC_JCcWxoSvjnVOvl9_uF98qm4_f7xZXNxWvdQ6V8BBS8GFUK1GzrVlgxBt1wipW9lh3VjF63ppe9GXH1KqZkMz2GbZ2lo1nQI5J-8PupvtcsKhL4dGGM0mugnizgRw5mnHu7VZhQfTSF23UhSBt0eBGH5uMWUzudTjOILHsE1GcFUs6LbAc8IPaB9DShHt4xrOzD5Zc0jW_Eu2zLz539_jxN8o5W-fH6Km</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Drukker, Karen</creator><creator>Giger, Maryellen L</creator><creator>Joe, Bonnie N</creator><creator>Kerlikowske, Karla</creator><creator>Greenwood, Heather</creator><creator>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creator><creator>Niell, Bethany</creator><creator>Fan, Bo</creator><creator>Malkov, Serghei</creator><creator>Avila, Jesus</creator><creator>Kazemi, Leila</creator><creator>Shepherd, John</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-1463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><author>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giger, Maryellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerlikowske, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkov, Serghei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drukker, Karen</au><au>Giger, Maryellen L</au><au>Joe, Bonnie N</au><au>Kerlikowske, Karla</au><au>Greenwood, Heather</au><au>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</au><au>Niell, Bethany</au><au>Fan, Bo</au><au>Malkov, Serghei</au><au>Avila, Jesus</au><au>Kazemi, Leila</au><au>Shepherd, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>621-628</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV
) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV
for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV
of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P < .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P < .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>30526359</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2018180608</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-1463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8419 |
ispartof | Radiology, 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628 |
issn | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394732 |
source | MEDLINE; Radiological Society of North America; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biopsy Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging Breast Diseases - pathology Diagnosis, Differential Female Humans Mammography - methods Middle Aged Original Research Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A31%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20Benefit%20of%20Quantitative%20Three-Compartment%20Breast%20Image%20Analysis%20and%20Mammography%20Radiomics%20in%20the%20Classification%20of%20Breast%20Masses%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Data%20Set&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Drukker,%20Karen&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=621-628&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2018180608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2155149747%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155149747&rft_id=info:pmid/30526359&rfr_iscdi=true |