Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set

Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628
Hauptverfasser: Drukker, Karen, Giger, Maryellen L, Joe, Bonnie N, Kerlikowske, Karla, Greenwood, Heather, Drukteinis, Jennifer S, Niell, Bethany, Fan, Bo, Malkov, Serghei, Avila, Jesus, Kazemi, Leila, Shepherd, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 628
container_issue 3
container_start_page 621
container_title Radiology
container_volume 290
creator Drukker, Karen
Giger, Maryellen L
Joe, Bonnie N
Kerlikowske, Karla
Greenwood, Heather
Drukteinis, Jennifer S
Niell, Bethany
Fan, Bo
Malkov, Serghei
Avila, Jesus
Kazemi, Leila
Shepherd, John
description Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV ) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P < .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P < .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P < .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.2018180608
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2155149747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9uEzEQxi1ERdPAA3BBPnLZ4j_r3fUFqU0pVGqFgHK2JrvjxGjXDrZTKW_Do-KQUOhpJM9vvvnGHyGvOTvnvO7eRRhcGM8F4x3vWMO6Z2TGlWgrLrl6TmaMSVl1Nden5CylH4zxWnXtC3IqmRKNVHpGfi3CtHQeB3qJHq3LNFj6ZQs-uwzZPSC9X0fEqmAbiHlCn-llREiZ3kywQnrhYdwllyj4gd7BNIVVhM16R7_uzU2uT9R5mtdIFyOk5Kzri27w-z1Hobvyjn8wKJDzhRjpFWSg3zC_JCcWxoSvjnVOvl9_uF98qm4_f7xZXNxWvdQ6V8BBS8GFUK1GzrVlgxBt1wipW9lh3VjF63ppe9GXH1KqZkMz2GbZ2lo1nQI5J-8PupvtcsKhL4dGGM0mugnizgRw5mnHu7VZhQfTSF23UhSBt0eBGH5uMWUzudTjOILHsE1GcFUs6LbAc8IPaB9DShHt4xrOzD5Zc0jW_Eu2zLz539_jxN8o5W-fH6Km</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155149747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Radiological Society of North America</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV ) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P &lt; .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P &lt; .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P &lt; .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180608</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30526359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Radiological Society of North America</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy ; Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Diseases - pathology ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Female ; Humans ; Mammography - methods ; Middle Aged ; Original Research ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9333-1463 ; 0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4002,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giger, Maryellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerlikowske, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkov, Serghei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV ) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P &lt; .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P &lt; .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P &lt; .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9uEzEQxi1ERdPAA3BBPnLZ4j_r3fUFqU0pVGqFgHK2JrvjxGjXDrZTKW_Do-KQUOhpJM9vvvnGHyGvOTvnvO7eRRhcGM8F4x3vWMO6Z2TGlWgrLrl6TmaMSVl1Nden5CylH4zxWnXtC3IqmRKNVHpGfi3CtHQeB3qJHq3LNFj6ZQs-uwzZPSC9X0fEqmAbiHlCn-llREiZ3kywQnrhYdwllyj4gd7BNIVVhM16R7_uzU2uT9R5mtdIFyOk5Kzri27w-z1Hobvyjn8wKJDzhRjpFWSg3zC_JCcWxoSvjnVOvl9_uF98qm4_f7xZXNxWvdQ6V8BBS8GFUK1GzrVlgxBt1wipW9lh3VjF63ppe9GXH1KqZkMz2GbZ2lo1nQI5J-8PupvtcsKhL4dGGM0mugnizgRw5mnHu7VZhQfTSF23UhSBt0eBGH5uMWUzudTjOILHsE1GcFUs6LbAc8IPaB9DShHt4xrOzD5Zc0jW_Eu2zLz539_jxN8o5W-fH6Km</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Drukker, Karen</creator><creator>Giger, Maryellen L</creator><creator>Joe, Bonnie N</creator><creator>Kerlikowske, Karla</creator><creator>Greenwood, Heather</creator><creator>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creator><creator>Niell, Bethany</creator><creator>Fan, Bo</creator><creator>Malkov, Serghei</creator><creator>Avila, Jesus</creator><creator>Kazemi, Leila</creator><creator>Shepherd, John</creator><general>Radiological Society of North America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-1463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</title><author>Drukker, Karen ; Giger, Maryellen L ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Kerlikowske, Karla ; Greenwood, Heather ; Drukteinis, Jennifer S ; Niell, Bethany ; Fan, Bo ; Malkov, Serghei ; Avila, Jesus ; Kazemi, Leila ; Shepherd, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-a1a932122579e119f0d22786239738e46f5144bfc2c1525540d6df6b7f45685a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drukker, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giger, Maryellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerlikowske, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkov, Serghei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avila, Jesus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemi, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drukker, Karen</au><au>Giger, Maryellen L</au><au>Joe, Bonnie N</au><au>Kerlikowske, Karla</au><au>Greenwood, Heather</au><au>Drukteinis, Jennifer S</au><au>Niell, Bethany</au><au>Fan, Bo</au><au>Malkov, Serghei</au><au>Avila, Jesus</au><au>Kazemi, Leila</au><au>Shepherd, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>628</epage><pages>621-628</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate the combination of mammography radiomics and quantitative three-compartment breast (3CB) image analysis of dual-energy mammography to limit unnecessary benign breast biopsies. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, dual-energy craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique mammograms were obtained immediately before biopsy in 109 women (mean age, 51 years; range, 31-85 years) with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 breast masses (35 invasive cancers, 74 benign) from 2013 through 2017. The three quantitative compartments of water, lipid, and protein thickness at each pixel were calculated from the attenuation at high and low energy by using a within-image phantom. Masses were automatically segmented and features were extracted from the low-energy mammograms and the quantitative compartment images. Tenfold cross-validations using a linear discriminant classifier with predefined feature signatures helped differentiate between malignant and benign masses by means of (a) water-lipid-protein composition images alone, (b) mammography radiomics alone, and (c) a combined image analysis of both. Positive predictive value of biopsy performed (PPV ) at maximum sensitivity was the primary performance metric, and results were compared with those for conventional diagnostic digital mammography. Results The PPV for conventional diagnostic digital mammography in our data set was 32.1% (35 of 109; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23.9%, 41.3%), with a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, combined mammography radiomics plus quantitative 3CB image analysis had PPV of 49% (34 of 70; 95% CI: 36.5%, 58.9%; P &lt; .001), with a sensitivity of 97% (34 of 35; 95% CI: 90.3%, 100%; P &lt; .001) and 35.8% (39 of 109) fewer total biopsies (P &lt; .001). Conclusion Quantitative three-compartment breast image analysis of breast masses combined with mammography radiomics has the potential to reduce unnecessary breast biopsies. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Radiological Society of North America</pub><pmid>30526359</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.2018180608</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-1463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6544-3476</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2019-03, Vol.290 (3), p.621-628
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394732
source MEDLINE; Radiological Society of North America; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy
Breast Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Breast Diseases - pathology
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
Mammography - methods
Middle Aged
Original Research
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Combined Benefit of Quantitative Three-Compartment Breast Image Analysis and Mammography Radiomics in the Classification of Breast Masses in a Clinical Data Set
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A31%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20Benefit%20of%20Quantitative%20Three-Compartment%20Breast%20Image%20Analysis%20and%20Mammography%20Radiomics%20in%20the%20Classification%20of%20Breast%20Masses%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Data%20Set&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Drukker,%20Karen&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=628&rft.pages=621-628&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2018180608&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2155149747%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155149747&rft_id=info:pmid/30526359&rfr_iscdi=true