A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer
Purpose To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS). Methods Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer survivorship 2019-02, Vol.13 (1), p.75-96 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 75 |
| container_title | Journal of cancer survivorship |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Forbes, Cynthia C. Finlay, Amy McIntosh, Megan Siddiquee, Shihab Short, Camille E. |
| description | Purpose
To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS).
Methods
Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
Results
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care.
Conclusion
We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2164103924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-165c69d0a6c9a29de18abafd85448989ac26a47f7fd3a691e6f9ad988056492c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAGyQJTYsCNiO48QbpKriT6rEBtbWHed6xlViB9uZap6lL4vDlOFHYmVb9zvn3utTVc8ZfcMo7d4mxjopasr6mnZc1exBdc5Uw2vOZffwdG_VWfUkpRtKW64Yf1ydNVQy2jXyvLq7JOmQMk6QnSER9w5vSbAk75BYhOQ2bnT58JqAMThnOD39QNBaZ8AcVj740XkkaZnnELPbIzEQkTifMe7RZxd8IhniFrPzWzKhJ7cu7wiQnUs5xJ8mcwwpQ1613mB8Wj2yMCZ8dn9eVN8-vP969am-_vLx89XldW1ER3PNZGukGihIo4CrAVkPG7BD3wrRq16B4RJEZzs7NCAVQ2kVDKrvaSuF4qa5qN4dfedlM-FgyrgRRj1HN0E86ABO_13xbqe3Ya9lo4SQbTF4dW8Qw_cFU9aTSwbHETyGJWnOpGC0UVwU9OU_6E1Yoi_rrVTDeyEZLxQ7Uqb8SIpoT8Mwqtfo9TF6XaLXa_SaFc2LP7c4KX5lXQB-BFIp-S3G363_7_oDcSq9qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2163284612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Forbes, Cynthia C. ; Finlay, Amy ; McIntosh, Megan ; Siddiquee, Shihab ; Short, Camille E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Cynthia C. ; Finlay, Amy ; McIntosh, Megan ; Siddiquee, Shihab ; Short, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS).
Methods
Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
Results
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care.
Conclusion
We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30610736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer Survivors - psychology ; Cancer Survivors - statistics & numerical data ; Clinical trials ; Decision Support Techniques ; Effectiveness ; Feasibility Studies ; Health Informatics ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Internet ; Internet-Based Intervention - statistics & numerical data ; Intervention ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Palliative Care - methods ; Palliative Care - psychology ; Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Primary Care Medicine ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Reviews ; Systematic review ; Translation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer survivorship, 2019-02, Vol.13 (1), p.75-96</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Cancer Survivorship is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-165c69d0a6c9a29de18abafd85448989ac26a47f7fd3a691e6f9ad988056492c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-165c69d0a6c9a29de18abafd85448989ac26a47f7fd3a691e6f9ad988056492c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3259-1832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30610736$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Cynthia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlay, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiquee, Shihab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer</title><title>Journal of cancer survivorship</title><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><description>Purpose
To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS).
Methods
Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
Results
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care.
Conclusion
We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Cancer Survivors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet-Based Intervention - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Palliative Care - methods</subject><subject>Palliative Care - psychology</subject><subject>Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1932-2259</issn><issn>1932-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAUhSMEoqXwAGyQJTYsCNiO48QbpKriT6rEBtbWHed6xlViB9uZap6lL4vDlOFHYmVb9zvn3utTVc8ZfcMo7d4mxjopasr6mnZc1exBdc5Uw2vOZffwdG_VWfUkpRtKW64Yf1ydNVQy2jXyvLq7JOmQMk6QnSER9w5vSbAk75BYhOQ2bnT58JqAMThnOD39QNBaZ8AcVj740XkkaZnnELPbIzEQkTifMe7RZxd8IhniFrPzWzKhJ7cu7wiQnUs5xJ8mcwwpQ1613mB8Wj2yMCZ8dn9eVN8-vP969am-_vLx89XldW1ER3PNZGukGihIo4CrAVkPG7BD3wrRq16B4RJEZzs7NCAVQ2kVDKrvaSuF4qa5qN4dfedlM-FgyrgRRj1HN0E86ABO_13xbqe3Ya9lo4SQbTF4dW8Qw_cFU9aTSwbHETyGJWnOpGC0UVwU9OU_6E1Yoi_rrVTDeyEZLxQ7Uqb8SIpoT8Mwqtfo9TF6XaLXa_SaFc2LP7c4KX5lXQB-BFIp-S3G363_7_oDcSq9qg</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Forbes, Cynthia C.</creator><creator>Finlay, Amy</creator><creator>McIntosh, Megan</creator><creator>Siddiquee, Shihab</creator><creator>Short, Camille E.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-1832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer</title><author>Forbes, Cynthia C. ; Finlay, Amy ; McIntosh, Megan ; Siddiquee, Shihab ; Short, Camille E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-165c69d0a6c9a29de18abafd85448989ac26a47f7fd3a691e6f9ad988056492c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Cancer Survivors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet-Based Intervention - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Palliative Care - methods</topic><topic>Palliative Care - psychology</topic><topic>Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forbes, Cynthia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlay, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiquee, Shihab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, Camille E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forbes, Cynthia C.</au><au>Finlay, Amy</au><au>McIntosh, Megan</au><au>Siddiquee, Shihab</au><au>Short, Camille E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Surviv</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>75-96</pages><issn>1932-2259</issn><eissn>1932-2267</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting prostate cancer survivors (PCS).
Methods
Studies were identified through structured searches of PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, and bibliographic review. Inclusion criteria were (1) examined feasibility, acceptability, or efficacy of an online intervention designed to improve supportive care outcomes for PCS; (2) presented outcome data collected from PCS separately (if mixed cancer); and (3) evaluated efficacy outcomes using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.
Results
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria; ten were classified as RCTs. Overall, 2446 men (average age 64 years) were included. Studies reported on the following outcomes: feasibility and acceptability of an online intervention (e.g., patient support, online medical record/follow-ups, or decision aids); reducing decisional conflict/distress; improving cancer-related distress and health-related quality of life; and satisfaction with cancer care.
Conclusion
We found good preliminary evidence for online supportive care among PCS, but little high level evidence. Generally, the samples were small and unrepresentative. Further, inadequate acceptability measures made it difficult to determine actual PCS acceptability and satisfaction, and lack of control groups precluded strong conclusions regarding efficacy. Translation also appears minimal; few interventions are still publicly available. Larger trials with appropriate control groups and greater emphasis on translation of effective interventions is recommended.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Prostate cancer survivors have a variety of unmet supportive care needs. Using online delivery to improve the reach of high-quality supportive care programs could have a positive impact on health-related quality of life among PCS.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30610736</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-1832</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1932-2259 |
| ispartof | Journal of cancer survivorship, 2019-02, Vol.13 (1), p.75-96 |
| issn | 1932-2259 1932-2267 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6394465 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Acceptability Aged Cancer Cancer Survivors - psychology Cancer Survivors - statistics & numerical data Clinical trials Decision Support Techniques Effectiveness Feasibility Studies Health Informatics Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Humans Internet Internet-Based Intervention - statistics & numerical data Intervention Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Oncology Palliative Care - methods Palliative Care - psychology Palliative Care - statistics & numerical data Patient Acceptance of Health Care - psychology Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Primary Care Medicine Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology Prostatic Neoplasms - psychology Prostatic Neoplasms - therapy Public Health Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Reviews Systematic review Translation Treatment Outcome |
| title | A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20feasibility,%20acceptability,%20and%20efficacy%20of%20online%20supportive%20care%20interventions%20targeting%20men%20with%20a%20history%20of%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20survivorship&rft.au=Forbes,%20Cynthia%20C.&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=75-96&rft.issn=1932-2259&rft.eissn=1932-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2164103924%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2163284612&rft_id=info:pmid/30610736&rfr_iscdi=true |