Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current oncology (Toronto) 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.e24-e29
Hauptverfasser: Bazarbashi, S, Hakoun, A M, Gad, A M, Elshenawy, M A, Aljubran, A, Alzahrani, A M, Eldali, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e29
container_issue 1
container_start_page e24
container_title Current oncology (Toronto)
container_volume 26
creator Bazarbashi, S
Hakoun, A M
Gad, A M
Elshenawy, M A
Aljubran, A
Alzahrani, A M
Eldali, A
description Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients who had received first-line triplet therapy. The medical records of patients treated on a prospective trial of first-line triplet therapy were reviewed for second-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish factors of prognostic significance. Of the 53 patients who received first-line triplet therapy, 28 (53%) received second-line chemotherapy [13 men; 8 with a colon primary; mutant in 10, wild-type in 15, and unknown status in 3; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ps) of 1 in 16 patients, ps 2 in 3, ps 3 in 2, and unknown in 7; involved organs: liver in 17 patients, lung in 16, and peritoneum in 8]. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of xelox or folfox in 13 patients, xeliri or folfiri in 12, and single-agent irinotecan in 3. Concurrent bevacizumab was given in 16 patients (57%), and cetuximab, in 2 (7%). Median survival was 28.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 22.8 months to 33.2 months] for patients receiving second-line therapy and 23.0 months (95% ci: 13.2 months to 32.8 months) for those not receiving it. Best response was partial in 6 patients (21%), stable disease in 11 (39%), and progressive disease in 11 (39%). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% ci: 2.4 months to 9.6 months), and overall survival was 15 months (95% ci: 9.6 months to 20.4 months). Second-line chemotherapy after first-line triplet therapy in mcrc is feasible and suggests efficacy comparable to that reported for second-line therapy after a doublet, regardless of the agent used.
doi_str_mv 10.3747/co.26.4217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6380651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2190088297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-cf50e96cf98d558cbb6d42f8dd6cc08337fc0d104075738de4076a1d41a557303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaL43vgBkqUIHZOmbdKNIOILBDe6DpmbGyfSNjXJKPP3dhgVXd3DuYdzH4eQE85mQlbyAsKsbGZVyeUW2eeSq0LKst3-g_fIQUpvjAkhpdwle4KpWijW7JP-xjkPBlY0OJoQwmCLzg9IYYF9yAuMZlxR4zJGaqjzMeVNP0c_dpipH-hosschJ_rp84L2mE3KEwUUQhciQjYdBTMAxiOy40yX8Pi7HpKX25vn6_vi8enu4frqsQBRlbkAVzNsG3CtsnWtYD5vbFU6ZW0DwNR0hQNmOauYrKVQFifQGG4rbuqJYOKQXG58x-W8RwvTdtF0eoy-N3Glg_H6f2fwC_0aPnSz_krNJ4Ozb4MY3peYsu59Auw6M2BYJl3yljGlylZO0vONFGJIKaL7HcOZXuejIeiy0et8JvHp38V-pT-BiC--R44j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2190088297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bazarbashi, S ; Hakoun, A M ; Gad, A M ; Elshenawy, M A ; Aljubran, A ; Alzahrani, A M ; Eldali, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bazarbashi, S ; Hakoun, A M ; Gad, A M ; Elshenawy, M A ; Aljubran, A ; Alzahrani, A M ; Eldali, A</creatorcontrib><description>Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients who had received first-line triplet therapy. The medical records of patients treated on a prospective trial of first-line triplet therapy were reviewed for second-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish factors of prognostic significance. Of the 53 patients who received first-line triplet therapy, 28 (53%) received second-line chemotherapy [13 men; 8 with a colon primary; mutant in 10, wild-type in 15, and unknown status in 3; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ps) of 1 in 16 patients, ps 2 in 3, ps 3 in 2, and unknown in 7; involved organs: liver in 17 patients, lung in 16, and peritoneum in 8]. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of xelox or folfox in 13 patients, xeliri or folfiri in 12, and single-agent irinotecan in 3. Concurrent bevacizumab was given in 16 patients (57%), and cetuximab, in 2 (7%). Median survival was 28.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 22.8 months to 33.2 months] for patients receiving second-line therapy and 23.0 months (95% ci: 13.2 months to 32.8 months) for those not receiving it. Best response was partial in 6 patients (21%), stable disease in 11 (39%), and progressive disease in 11 (39%). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% ci: 2.4 months to 9.6 months), and overall survival was 15 months (95% ci: 9.6 months to 20.4 months). Second-line chemotherapy after first-line triplet therapy in mcrc is feasible and suggests efficacy comparable to that reported for second-line therapy after a doublet, regardless of the agent used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1198-0052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1718-7729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30853806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Multimed Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Original ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Survival Analysis</subject><ispartof>Current oncology (Toronto), 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.e24-e29</ispartof><rights>2019 Multimed Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-cf50e96cf98d558cbb6d42f8dd6cc08337fc0d104075738de4076a1d41a557303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380651/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380651/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30853806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bazarbashi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakoun, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshenawy, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljubran, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldali, A</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer</title><title>Current oncology (Toronto)</title><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><description>Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients who had received first-line triplet therapy. The medical records of patients treated on a prospective trial of first-line triplet therapy were reviewed for second-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish factors of prognostic significance. Of the 53 patients who received first-line triplet therapy, 28 (53%) received second-line chemotherapy [13 men; 8 with a colon primary; mutant in 10, wild-type in 15, and unknown status in 3; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ps) of 1 in 16 patients, ps 2 in 3, ps 3 in 2, and unknown in 7; involved organs: liver in 17 patients, lung in 16, and peritoneum in 8]. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of xelox or folfox in 13 patients, xeliri or folfiri in 12, and single-agent irinotecan in 3. Concurrent bevacizumab was given in 16 patients (57%), and cetuximab, in 2 (7%). Median survival was 28.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 22.8 months to 33.2 months] for patients receiving second-line therapy and 23.0 months (95% ci: 13.2 months to 32.8 months) for those not receiving it. Best response was partial in 6 patients (21%), stable disease in 11 (39%), and progressive disease in 11 (39%). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% ci: 2.4 months to 9.6 months), and overall survival was 15 months (95% ci: 9.6 months to 20.4 months). Second-line chemotherapy after first-line triplet therapy in mcrc is feasible and suggests efficacy comparable to that reported for second-line therapy after a doublet, regardless of the agent used.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1198-0052</issn><issn>1718-7729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctKxDAUDaL43vgBkqUIHZOmbdKNIOILBDe6DpmbGyfSNjXJKPP3dhgVXd3DuYdzH4eQE85mQlbyAsKsbGZVyeUW2eeSq0LKst3-g_fIQUpvjAkhpdwle4KpWijW7JP-xjkPBlY0OJoQwmCLzg9IYYF9yAuMZlxR4zJGaqjzMeVNP0c_dpipH-hosschJ_rp84L2mE3KEwUUQhciQjYdBTMAxiOy40yX8Pi7HpKX25vn6_vi8enu4frqsQBRlbkAVzNsG3CtsnWtYD5vbFU6ZW0DwNR0hQNmOauYrKVQFifQGG4rbuqJYOKQXG58x-W8RwvTdtF0eoy-N3Glg_H6f2fwC_0aPnSz_krNJ4Ozb4MY3peYsu59Auw6M2BYJl3yljGlylZO0vONFGJIKaL7HcOZXuejIeiy0et8JvHp38V-pT-BiC--R44j</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Bazarbashi, S</creator><creator>Hakoun, A M</creator><creator>Gad, A M</creator><creator>Elshenawy, M A</creator><creator>Aljubran, A</creator><creator>Alzahrani, A M</creator><creator>Eldali, A</creator><general>Multimed Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer</title><author>Bazarbashi, S ; Hakoun, A M ; Gad, A M ; Elshenawy, M A ; Aljubran, A ; Alzahrani, A M ; Eldali, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-cf50e96cf98d558cbb6d42f8dd6cc08337fc0d104075738de4076a1d41a557303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bazarbashi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakoun, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshenawy, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aljubran, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldali, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bazarbashi, S</au><au>Hakoun, A M</au><au>Gad, A M</au><au>Elshenawy, M A</au><au>Aljubran, A</au><au>Alzahrani, A M</au><au>Eldali, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>Current oncology (Toronto)</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e24</spage><epage>e29</epage><pages>e24-e29</pages><issn>1718-7729</issn><issn>1198-0052</issn><eissn>1718-7729</eissn><abstract>Exposing patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mcrc) to all three active chemotherapeutic agents (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil) has improved survival. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet is not clearly defined. We evaluated the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients who had received first-line triplet therapy. The medical records of patients treated on a prospective trial of first-line triplet therapy were reviewed for second-line treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish factors of prognostic significance. Of the 53 patients who received first-line triplet therapy, 28 (53%) received second-line chemotherapy [13 men; 8 with a colon primary; mutant in 10, wild-type in 15, and unknown status in 3; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ps) of 1 in 16 patients, ps 2 in 3, ps 3 in 2, and unknown in 7; involved organs: liver in 17 patients, lung in 16, and peritoneum in 8]. Second-line chemotherapy consisted of xelox or folfox in 13 patients, xeliri or folfiri in 12, and single-agent irinotecan in 3. Concurrent bevacizumab was given in 16 patients (57%), and cetuximab, in 2 (7%). Median survival was 28.0 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 22.8 months to 33.2 months] for patients receiving second-line therapy and 23.0 months (95% ci: 13.2 months to 32.8 months) for those not receiving it. Best response was partial in 6 patients (21%), stable disease in 11 (39%), and progressive disease in 11 (39%). Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months (95% ci: 2.4 months to 9.6 months), and overall survival was 15 months (95% ci: 9.6 months to 20.4 months). Second-line chemotherapy after first-line triplet therapy in mcrc is feasible and suggests efficacy comparable to that reported for second-line therapy after a doublet, regardless of the agent used.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Multimed Inc</pub><pmid>30853806</pmid><doi>10.3747/co.26.4217</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1718-7729
ispartof Current oncology (Toronto), 2019-02, Vol.26 (1), p.e24-e29
issn 1718-7729
1198-0052
1718-7729
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6380651
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - pathology
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Original
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Survival Analysis
title Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after a first-line triplet in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20second-line%20chemotherapy%20after%20a%20first-line%20triplet%20in%20patients%20with%20metastatic%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Current%20oncology%20(Toronto)&rft.au=Bazarbashi,%20S&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e24&rft.epage=e29&rft.pages=e24-e29&rft.issn=1718-7729&rft.eissn=1718-7729&rft_id=info:doi/10.3747/co.26.4217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2190088297%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2190088297&rft_id=info:pmid/30853806&rfr_iscdi=true