Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning

A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimensi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.26 (3), p.84-92
Hauptverfasser: Broschard, Matthew B, Kim, Jangjin, Love, Bradley C, Wasserman, Edward A, Freeman, John H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 3
container_start_page 84
container_title Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)
container_volume 26
creator Broschard, Matthew B
Kim, Jangjin
Love, Bradley C
Wasserman, Edward A
Freeman, John H
description A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates.
doi_str_mv 10.1101/lm.048942.118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6380202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1206316</ericid><sourcerecordid>2189532519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-38801089676bd0d3f3be627e545da6e90d2e54520276d1870611202a1a26be463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlLJEEQhRNxUKfHo0elwMtcSiNyq6yL0DRuQ4PgzHhNsqui25RaNLNK8N-b0tqop3iP-HjEwtgBwgki4GnTnoA0peTJmi22h0qWuZJGbScNBc9BAd9lP2N8AICikLjDdkUSILXaY-IvNVQN_pmy6TBQN_i-y3yX3bohu_NxdE02cwOt-vCSzcmFznerX-zH0jWR9t_rhP2_OP83u8rnN5fXs-k8r6QohlwYAwim1IVe1FCLpViQ5gUpqWqnqYSav2kOvNA1mgI0YjIOHdcLklpM2Nk693FctFRXabrgGvsYfOvCi-2dt187nb-3q_7ZamEgJaWA3-8BoX8aKQ629bGipnEd9WO0HE2pBFdYJvT4G_rQj6FL61nOEUSJOqETlq-pKvQxBlpuhkGwb--wTWvX70jWJP7o8wYb-uP-CThcAxR8tWmf_0mH0AK1eAVkE4yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210391695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Broschard, Matthew B ; Kim, Jangjin ; Love, Bradley C ; Wasserman, Edward A ; Freeman, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Broschard, Matthew B ; Kim, Jangjin ; Love, Bradley C ; Wasserman, Edward A ; Freeman, John H</creatorcontrib><description>A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-0502</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1549-5485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-5485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1101/lm.048942.118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30770465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</publisher><subject>Animal Behavior ; Animals ; Attention ; Attention Control ; Birds ; Brain Hemisphere Functions ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer applications ; Decision Making ; Learning Processes ; Prefrontal cortex ; Somatosensory cortex ; Task Analysis ; Teaching Methods ; Visual cortex ; Visual discrimination learning ; Visual Learning ; Visual pathways ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Learning &amp; memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.26 (3), p.84-92</ispartof><rights>2019 Broschard et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Mar 2019</rights><rights>2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-38801089676bd0d3f3be627e545da6e90d2e54520276d1870611202a1a26be463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-38801089676bd0d3f3be627e545da6e90d2e54520276d1870611202a1a26be463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380202/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6380202/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1206316$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broschard, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jangjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Bradley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, John H</creatorcontrib><title>Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning</title><title>Learning &amp; memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Learn Mem</addtitle><description>A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates.</description><subject>Animal Behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Control</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brain Hemisphere Functions</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Somatosensory cortex</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Visual cortex</subject><subject>Visual discrimination learning</subject><subject>Visual Learning</subject><subject>Visual pathways</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>1072-0502</issn><issn>1549-5485</issn><issn>1549-5485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUlLJEEQhRNxUKfHo0elwMtcSiNyq6yL0DRuQ4PgzHhNsqui25RaNLNK8N-b0tqop3iP-HjEwtgBwgki4GnTnoA0peTJmi22h0qWuZJGbScNBc9BAd9lP2N8AICikLjDdkUSILXaY-IvNVQN_pmy6TBQN_i-y3yX3bohu_NxdE02cwOt-vCSzcmFznerX-zH0jWR9t_rhP2_OP83u8rnN5fXs-k8r6QohlwYAwim1IVe1FCLpViQ5gUpqWqnqYSav2kOvNA1mgI0YjIOHdcLklpM2Nk693FctFRXabrgGvsYfOvCi-2dt187nb-3q_7ZamEgJaWA3-8BoX8aKQ629bGipnEd9WO0HE2pBFdYJvT4G_rQj6FL61nOEUSJOqETlq-pKvQxBlpuhkGwb--wTWvX70jWJP7o8wYb-uP-CThcAxR8tWmf_0mH0AK1eAVkE4yQ</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Broschard, Matthew B</creator><creator>Kim, Jangjin</creator><creator>Love, Bradley C</creator><creator>Wasserman, Edward A</creator><creator>Freeman, John H</creator><general>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning</title><author>Broschard, Matthew B ; Kim, Jangjin ; Love, Bradley C ; Wasserman, Edward A ; Freeman, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-38801089676bd0d3f3be627e545da6e90d2e54520276d1870611202a1a26be463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Control</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brain Hemisphere Functions</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Somatosensory cortex</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Visual cortex</topic><topic>Visual discrimination learning</topic><topic>Visual Learning</topic><topic>Visual pathways</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broschard, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jangjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, Bradley C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasserman, Edward A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Learning &amp; memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broschard, Matthew B</au><au>Kim, Jangjin</au><au>Love, Bradley C</au><au>Wasserman, Edward A</au><au>Freeman, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1206316</ericid><atitle>Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning</atitle><jtitle>Learning &amp; memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Learn Mem</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>84-92</pages><issn>1072-0502</issn><issn>1549-5485</issn><eissn>1549-5485</eissn><abstract>A prominent theory of category learning, COVIS, posits that new categories are learned with either a declarative or procedural system, depending on the task. The declarative system uses the prefrontal cortex (PFC) to learn rule-based (RB) category tasks in which there is one relevant sensory dimension that can be used to establish a rule for solving the task, whereas the procedural system uses corticostriatal circuits for information integration (II) tasks in which there are multiple relevant dimensions, precluding use of explicit rules. Previous studies have found faster learning of RB versus II tasks in humans and monkeys but not in pigeons. The absence of a learning rate difference in pigeons has been attributed to their lacking a PFC. A major gap in this comparative analysis, however, is the lack of data from a nonprimate mammalian species, such as rats, that have a PFC but a less differentiated PFC than primates. Here, we investigated RB and II category learning in rats. Similar to pigeons, RB and II tasks were learned at the same rate. After reaching a learning criterion, wider distributions of stimuli were presented to examine generalization. A second experiment found equivalent RB and II learning with wider category distributions. Computational modeling revealed that rats extract and selectively attend to category-relevant information but do not consistently use rules to solve the RB task. These findings suggest rats are on a continuum of PFC function between birds and primates, with selective attention but limited ability to utilize rules relative to primates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press</pub><pmid>30770465</pmid><doi>10.1101/lm.048942.118</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-0502
ispartof Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2019-03, Vol.26 (3), p.84-92
issn 1072-0502
1549-5485
1549-5485
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6380202
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animal Behavior
Animals
Attention
Attention Control
Birds
Brain Hemisphere Functions
Comparative Analysis
Computer applications
Decision Making
Learning Processes
Prefrontal cortex
Somatosensory cortex
Task Analysis
Teaching Methods
Visual cortex
Visual discrimination learning
Visual Learning
Visual pathways
Visual perception
title Selective Attention in Rat Visual Category Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20Attention%20in%20Rat%20Visual%20Category%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Learning%20&%20memory%20(Cold%20Spring%20Harbor,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Broschard,%20Matthew%20B&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=84-92&rft.issn=1072-0502&rft.eissn=1549-5485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1101/lm.048942.118&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2189532519%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210391695&rft_id=info:pmid/30770465&rft_ericid=EJ1206316&rfr_iscdi=true