Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial
Purpose. To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial. Methods. Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2019-01, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2019 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | BioMed research international |
container_volume | 2019 |
creator | Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J. González-Méijome, J. M. van der Worp, Eef |
description | Purpose. To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial. Methods. Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (156 eyes), 122 eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 34 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group). All lenses were fitted by the same practitioner with minimal previous knowledge and practice on SL fitting. The first 156 consecutive fits were studied to estimate the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit and the number of reorders required. The results were divided into 8 chronological groups of 20 fittings (eyes) each. Results. There was a decrease in the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit from 2.35±0.18 lenses in the first 20 fittings to 1.56±0.13 in the last fittings (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2019/5737124 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6369499</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188208197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-73ab5e905499aca11035d33ee43df66158584f42e695dba80a4c5692ac6cc6d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq0KVBDk1nO1EpdKJeDvXV8qoagUpEigNpytiXc2GG281N6l6r_Hq6QBemIuHnmeeT3jl5BPjJ4xptQ5p8ycq1KUjMsP5JALJqeaSba3y4U4IJOUHmiOimlq9EdyIGglJNfmkLS3EVzve98FjMUcIQYfVsVsiE9Y-FBc-r4fL365FiO0mQgJ01i5jhFXQwuxgFAXP7f5rIsBIRV3aeyCXf8iemiPyX4DbcLJ9jwid5ffF7Or6fzmx_XsYj510uh-WgpYKjRUSWPAAWNUqFoIRCnqRmumKlXJRnLURtVLqChIp7Th4LRzutbiiHzb6D4OyzXWDkOfZ7eP0a8h_rUdePu2Evy9XXVPVgtt8qNZ4MtWIHa_B0y9XfvksG0hYDcky1lV8fydpszoyX_oQzfEkNfLVFlRI3Nk6nRDudilFLHZDcOoHZ20o5N262TGP79eYAf_8y0DXzfAvQ81_PHvlMPMYAMvNOOaUymeAej2r5E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178094444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J. ; González-Méijome, J. M. ; van der Worp, Eef</creator><contributor>Biswas, Susmito ; Susmito Biswas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J. ; González-Méijome, J. M. ; van der Worp, Eef ; Biswas, Susmito ; Susmito Biswas</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose. To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial. Methods. Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (156 eyes), 122 eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 34 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group). All lenses were fitted by the same practitioner with minimal previous knowledge and practice on SL fitting. The first 156 consecutive fits were studied to estimate the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit and the number of reorders required. The results were divided into 8 chronological groups of 20 fittings (eyes) each. Results. There was a decrease in the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit from 2.35±0.18 lenses in the first 20 fittings to 1.56±0.13 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). There were no statistically significant differences between IC and RC groups. Regarding the number of reorders, there was also a decrease from 0.95±0.17 in the first fittings to 0.25±0.11 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). Thought not statistically significant, there was an increase in the use of toric designs with increasing experience. Conclusions. Practitioner fitting experience reduced both the number of trial lenses required to achieve the best fit and the number of reorders with time. After the first 60 cases, there was a significant reduction in the trial lenses and reorders necessity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2019/5737124</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30834269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Adult ; Astigmatism ; Clinical medicine ; Contact angle ; Contact lenses ; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - standards ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Corneal Topography ; Curve fitting ; Female ; General Practitioners - standards ; Humans ; Keratoconus - physiopathology ; Keratoconus - therapy ; Learning Curve ; Learning curves ; Lenses ; Male ; Optometry ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Fitting - methods ; Science ; Sclera - physiopathology ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Topography ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2019-01, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Rute J. Macedo-de-Araújo et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Rute J. Macedo-de-Araújo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Rute J. Macedo-de-Araújo et al. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-73ab5e905499aca11035d33ee43df66158584f42e695dba80a4c5692ac6cc6d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-73ab5e905499aca11035d33ee43df66158584f42e695dba80a4c5692ac6cc6d63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9050-4170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369499/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369499/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30834269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Biswas, Susmito</contributor><contributor>Susmito Biswas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Méijome, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Worp, Eef</creatorcontrib><title>Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Purpose. To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial. Methods. Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (156 eyes), 122 eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 34 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group). All lenses were fitted by the same practitioner with minimal previous knowledge and practice on SL fitting. The first 156 consecutive fits were studied to estimate the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit and the number of reorders required. The results were divided into 8 chronological groups of 20 fittings (eyes) each. Results. There was a decrease in the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit from 2.35±0.18 lenses in the first 20 fittings to 1.56±0.13 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). There were no statistically significant differences between IC and RC groups. Regarding the number of reorders, there was also a decrease from 0.95±0.17 in the first fittings to 0.25±0.11 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). Thought not statistically significant, there was an increase in the use of toric designs with increasing experience. Conclusions. Practitioner fitting experience reduced both the number of trial lenses required to achieve the best fit and the number of reorders with time. After the first 60 cases, there was a significant reduction in the trial lenses and reorders necessity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Astigmatism</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - standards</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Corneal Topography</subject><subject>Curve fitting</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General Practitioners - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratoconus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Keratoconus - therapy</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Optometry</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Sclera - physiopathology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1PGzEQhq0KVBDk1nO1EpdKJeDvXV8qoagUpEigNpytiXc2GG281N6l6r_Hq6QBemIuHnmeeT3jl5BPjJ4xptQ5p8ycq1KUjMsP5JALJqeaSba3y4U4IJOUHmiOimlq9EdyIGglJNfmkLS3EVzve98FjMUcIQYfVsVsiE9Y-FBc-r4fL365FiO0mQgJ01i5jhFXQwuxgFAXP7f5rIsBIRV3aeyCXf8iemiPyX4DbcLJ9jwid5ffF7Or6fzmx_XsYj510uh-WgpYKjRUSWPAAWNUqFoIRCnqRmumKlXJRnLURtVLqChIp7Th4LRzutbiiHzb6D4OyzXWDkOfZ7eP0a8h_rUdePu2Evy9XXVPVgtt8qNZ4MtWIHa_B0y9XfvksG0hYDcky1lV8fydpszoyX_oQzfEkNfLVFlRI3Nk6nRDudilFLHZDcOoHZ20o5N262TGP79eYAf_8y0DXzfAvQ81_PHvlMPMYAMvNOOaUymeAej2r5E</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J.</creator><creator>González-Méijome, J. M.</creator><creator>van der Worp, Eef</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-4170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial</title><author>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J. ; González-Méijome, J. M. ; van der Worp, Eef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-73ab5e905499aca11035d33ee43df66158584f42e695dba80a4c5692ac6cc6d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Astigmatism</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - standards</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Corneal Topography</topic><topic>Curve fitting</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General Practitioners - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratoconus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Keratoconus - therapy</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Optometry</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Sclera - physiopathology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Méijome, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Worp, Eef</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Macedo-de-Araújo, Rute J.</au><au>González-Méijome, J. M.</au><au>van der Worp, Eef</au><au>Biswas, Susmito</au><au>Susmito Biswas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>2019</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Purpose. To assess the learning curve of a novel practitioner with minor previous experience with scleral lenses (SL) fitting in the initial 156 consecutive fittings in irregular and regular corneas using a fitting trial. Methods. Prospective dispensing case series involving a total of 85 subjects (156 eyes), 122 eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 34 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group). All lenses were fitted by the same practitioner with minimal previous knowledge and practice on SL fitting. The first 156 consecutive fits were studied to estimate the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit and the number of reorders required. The results were divided into 8 chronological groups of 20 fittings (eyes) each. Results. There was a decrease in the number of trial lenses required to achieve the optimal fit from 2.35±0.18 lenses in the first 20 fittings to 1.56±0.13 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). There were no statistically significant differences between IC and RC groups. Regarding the number of reorders, there was also a decrease from 0.95±0.17 in the first fittings to 0.25±0.11 in the last fittings (p<0.05, Wilcoxon). Thought not statistically significant, there was an increase in the use of toric designs with increasing experience. Conclusions. Practitioner fitting experience reduced both the number of trial lenses required to achieve the best fit and the number of reorders with time. After the first 60 cases, there was a significant reduction in the trial lenses and reorders necessity.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>30834269</pmid><doi>10.1155/2019/5737124</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-4170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
ispartof | BioMed research international, 2019-01, Vol.2019 (2019), p.1-11 |
issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6369499 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Astigmatism Clinical medicine Contact angle Contact lenses Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - standards Cornea - physiopathology Corneal Topography Curve fitting Female General Practitioners - standards Humans Keratoconus - physiopathology Keratoconus - therapy Learning Curve Learning curves Lenses Male Optometry Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Fitting - methods Science Sclera - physiopathology Statistical analysis Statistical significance Surgery Tomography Topography Visual Acuity - physiology |
title | Practitioner Learning Curve in Fitting Scleral Lenses in Irregular and Regular Corneas Using a Fitting Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practitioner%20Learning%20Curve%20in%20Fitting%20Scleral%20Lenses%20in%20Irregular%20and%20Regular%20Corneas%20Using%20a%20Fitting%20Trial&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Macedo-de-Ara%C3%BAjo,%20Rute%20J.&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=2019&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2019/5737124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2188208197%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178094444&rft_id=info:pmid/30834269&rfr_iscdi=true |