Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View
Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2018-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e3688-e3688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e3688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | e3688 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Bell, Chris Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana Cload, Bruce Stirling, Alena Davis, Philip J |
description | Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher's exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider "poor communication" as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.3688 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6368427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2183648051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-c7f0d1891e7b33b43c7deb4a45ca814e5f7d0aace933909b62937520206f4a253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1LwzAUhoMoKtMr76XghYJsnnw0Sb0QxvALJlOY3oY0SzWjbWbSTvbv7ZiKepWQPDy857wIHWEYCJFmF6YNto0DyqXcQvsEc9mXWLLtX_c9dBjjHAAwCAICdtEeBcExYbCPniaLxlVtlQxNp9JmlfgiedAxuqVNpkHXsWij83XyGHzjjS87sHFL3XRvl8n0zSaj0tXOOF2fxuTF2Y8DtFPoMtrDr7OHnm-up6O7_nhyez8ajvuGAmn6RhQwwzLDVuSU5owaMbM50yw1WmJm00LMQGtjM0ozyHJOMipSAgR4wTRJaQ9dbbyLNq_szNi6CbpUi-AqHVbKa6f-_tTuTb36peLdshgRneDsSxD8e2tjoyoXjS1LXVvfRkWwpJxJSHGHnvxD574NdTfemuJZSgVfC883lAk-xmCLnzAY1LottWlLrdvq6OPf-X_Y727oJ-qLkVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2186953767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bell, Chris ; Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana ; Cload, Bruce ; Stirling, Alena ; Davis, Philip J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Chris ; Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana ; Cload, Bruce ; Stirling, Alena ; Davis, Philip J</creatorcontrib><description>Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher's exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider "poor communication" as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3688</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30761240</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Critical care ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; General Surgery ; Hematology ; Laboratories ; Medicine ; Patients ; Physicians ; Polls & surveys ; Response rates ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2018-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e3688-e3688</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018, Bell et al. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018, Bell et al. 2018 Bell et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-c7f0d1891e7b33b43c7deb4a45ca814e5f7d0aace933909b62937520206f4a253</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368427/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368427/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761240$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cload, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirling, Alena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Philip J</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher's exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider "poor communication" as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1LwzAUhoMoKtMr76XghYJsnnw0Sb0QxvALJlOY3oY0SzWjbWbSTvbv7ZiKepWQPDy857wIHWEYCJFmF6YNto0DyqXcQvsEc9mXWLLtX_c9dBjjHAAwCAICdtEeBcExYbCPniaLxlVtlQxNp9JmlfgiedAxuqVNpkHXsWij83XyGHzjjS87sHFL3XRvl8n0zSaj0tXOOF2fxuTF2Y8DtFPoMtrDr7OHnm-up6O7_nhyez8ajvuGAmn6RhQwwzLDVuSU5owaMbM50yw1WmJm00LMQGtjM0ozyHJOMipSAgR4wTRJaQ9dbbyLNq_szNi6CbpUi-AqHVbKa6f-_tTuTb36peLdshgRneDsSxD8e2tjoyoXjS1LXVvfRkWwpJxJSHGHnvxD574NdTfemuJZSgVfC883lAk-xmCLnzAY1LottWlLrdvq6OPf-X_Y727oJ-qLkVM</recordid><startdate>20181205</startdate><enddate>20181205</enddate><creator>Bell, Chris</creator><creator>Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana</creator><creator>Cload, Bruce</creator><creator>Stirling, Alena</creator><creator>Davis, Philip J</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181205</creationdate><title>Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View</title><author>Bell, Chris ; Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana ; Cload, Bruce ; Stirling, Alena ; Davis, Philip J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-c7f0d1891e7b33b43c7deb4a45ca814e5f7d0aace933909b62937520206f4a253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cload, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stirling, Alena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Philip J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Chris</au><au>Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana</au><au>Cload, Bruce</au><au>Stirling, Alena</au><au>Davis, Philip J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2018-12-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e3688</spage><epage>e3688</epage><pages>e3688-e3688</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher's exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider "poor communication" as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>30761240</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.3688</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2018-12, Vol.10 (12), p.e3688-e3688 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6368427 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anesthesiology Clinical outcomes Collaboration Critical care Emergency medical care Emergency Medicine General Surgery Hematology Laboratories Medicine Patients Physicians Polls & surveys Response rates Statistical analysis Surgery |
title | Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician's View |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A11%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20Accuracy%20of%20Massive%20Transfusion%20Protocol%20Activation:%20The%20Clinician's%20View&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Bell,%20Chris&rft.date=2018-12-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e3688&rft.epage=e3688&rft.pages=e3688-e3688&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.3688&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2183648051%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2186953767&rft_id=info:pmid/30761240&rfr_iscdi=true |