Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
ObjectiveTo characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2019-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e025783-e025783 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e025783 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e025783 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo |
description | ObjectiveTo characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingThe United States.ParticipantsThe subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric.Results16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy.ConclusionsFindings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6368156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2175759535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-1cf19c0990c52d80da15f85d2ebeb6586c539d0ca1538ba420d1b86260b1a3ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1rGzEQFSWhCa5_QaEIesllE32stNoeCsWkSSAlh8RnoZVmY7lryZG8gfz7arEbkp4qBBpm3nuamYfQZ0rOKeXyotus4xZCxQhVFWGiUfwDOmWkritJhDh6E5-gec5rUk4tWiHYR3TCSaNYW9NTpH-Z3z484hUYN_gA-Rs2oVwzvGSfcezx8h4_xmdIYQNhV_VjcOCwNcFCwgkymGRXeKr5GErFBxzDpFRyzptP6Lg3Q4b54Z2h5c_Lh8V1dXt3dbP4cVt1dcN2FbU9bS1pW2IFc4o4Q0WvhGPQQSeFklbw1hFb0lx1pmbE0U5JJklHDTfAZ-j7Xnc7duVjW_pJZtDb5DcmvehovH5fCX6ly1xacqmokEXg7CCQ4tMIeac3PlsYBhMgjlkzqmrKFS3bn6Gv_0DXcUxlZROqEU3ZMhcFxfcom2LOCfrXZijRk4f64KGePNR7Dwvry9s5Xjl_HSuA8z2gsP9L8Q9bLqjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2175759535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maggio, Lauren A ; Ratcliff, Chelsea L ; Krakow, Melinda ; Moorhead, Laura L ; Enkhbayar, Asura ; Alperin, Juan Pablo</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Lauren A ; Ratcliff, Chelsea L ; Krakow, Melinda ; Moorhead, Laura L ; Enkhbayar, Asura ; Alperin, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveTo characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingThe United States.ParticipantsThe subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric.Results16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy.ConclusionsFindings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30782941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US ; Bibliometrics ; Biomedical Research - economics ; Breast cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Endocrine therapy ; Financing, Government ; Funding ; Humans ; Informetrics ; Internet ; Journal Impact Factor ; Lung cancer ; Medical Publishing and Peer Review ; Medical research ; Melanoma ; Neoplasms - therapy ; News media ; Personal health ; Prevention ; Prostate cancer ; Science ; Thyroid gland ; Tumors ; United States</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2019-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e025783-e025783</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-1cf19c0990c52d80da15f85d2ebeb6586c539d0ca1538ba420d1b86260b1a3ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-1cf19c0990c52d80da15f85d2ebeb6586c539d0ca1538ba420d1b86260b1a3ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2997-6133 ; 0000-0002-3934-026X ; 0000-0002-9344-7439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/bmjopen-2018-025783.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/bmjopen-2018-025783.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27549,27550,27924,27925,53791,53793,77601,77632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliff, Chelsea L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakow, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorhead, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enkhbayar, Asura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperin, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><title>Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>ObjectiveTo characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingThe United States.ParticipantsThe subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric.Results16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy.ConclusionsFindings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination.</description><subject>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - economics</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Endocrine therapy</subject><subject>Financing, Government</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informetrics</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Journal Impact Factor</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Medical Publishing and Peer Review</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Personal health</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUU1rGzEQFSWhCa5_QaEIesllE32stNoeCsWkSSAlh8RnoZVmY7lryZG8gfz7arEbkp4qBBpm3nuamYfQZ0rOKeXyotus4xZCxQhVFWGiUfwDOmWkritJhDh6E5-gec5rUk4tWiHYR3TCSaNYW9NTpH-Z3z484hUYN_gA-Rs2oVwzvGSfcezx8h4_xmdIYQNhV_VjcOCwNcFCwgkymGRXeKr5GErFBxzDpFRyzptP6Lg3Q4b54Z2h5c_Lh8V1dXt3dbP4cVt1dcN2FbU9bS1pW2IFc4o4Q0WvhGPQQSeFklbw1hFb0lx1pmbE0U5JJklHDTfAZ-j7Xnc7duVjW_pJZtDb5DcmvehovH5fCX6ly1xacqmokEXg7CCQ4tMIeac3PlsYBhMgjlkzqmrKFS3bn6Gv_0DXcUxlZROqEU3ZMhcFxfcom2LOCfrXZijRk4f64KGePNR7Dwvry9s5Xjl_HSuA8z2gsP9L8Q9bLqjw</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Maggio, Lauren A</creator><creator>Ratcliff, Chelsea L</creator><creator>Krakow, Melinda</creator><creator>Moorhead, Laura L</creator><creator>Enkhbayar, Asura</creator><creator>Alperin, Juan Pablo</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media</title><author>Maggio, Lauren A ; Ratcliff, Chelsea L ; Krakow, Melinda ; Moorhead, Laura L ; Enkhbayar, Asura ; Alperin, Juan Pablo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-1cf19c0990c52d80da15f85d2ebeb6586c539d0ca1538ba420d1b86260b1a3ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - economics</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Endocrine therapy</topic><topic>Financing, Government</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informetrics</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Journal Impact Factor</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Medical Publishing and Peer Review</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Personal health</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Lauren A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliff, Chelsea L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakow, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moorhead, Laura L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enkhbayar, Asura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperin, Juan Pablo</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggio, Lauren A</au><au>Ratcliff, Chelsea L</au><au>Krakow, Melinda</au><au>Moorhead, Laura L</au><au>Enkhbayar, Asura</au><au>Alperin, Juan Pablo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e025783</spage><epage>e025783</epage><pages>e025783-e025783</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveTo characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives.DesignA cross-sectional study.SettingThe United States.ParticipantsThe subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric.Results16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy.ConclusionsFindings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>30782941</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-6133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7439</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2019-02, Vol.9 (2), p.e025783-e025783 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6368156 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | American Recovery & Reinvestment Act 2009-US Bibliometrics Biomedical Research - economics Breast cancer Cancer therapies Cross-Sectional Studies Endocrine therapy Financing, Government Funding Humans Informetrics Internet Journal Impact Factor Lung cancer Medical Publishing and Peer Review Medical research Melanoma Neoplasms - therapy News media Personal health Prevention Prostate cancer Science Thyroid gland Tumors United States |
title | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20headlines:%20an%20analysis%20of%20US%20government-funded%20cancer%20research%20mentioned%20in%20online%20media&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Maggio,%20Lauren%20A&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e025783&rft.epage=e025783&rft.pages=e025783-e025783&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2175759535%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2175759535&rft_id=info:pmid/30782941&rfr_iscdi=true |