Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone
Purpose To retrospectively determine the optimal b‐value(s) of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) associated with intermediate–high risk cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate. Materials and Methods Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent multi b‐value (16 evenly spaced b‐values between 0...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.125-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 131 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 125 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Agarwal, Harsh K. Mertan, Francesca V. Sankineni, Sandeep Bernardo, Marcelino Senegas, Julien Keupp, Jochen Daar, Dagane Merino, Maria Wood, Bradford J. Pinto, Peter A. Choyke, Peter L. Turkbey, Baris |
description | Purpose
To retrospectively determine the optimal b‐value(s) of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) associated with intermediate–high risk cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate.
Materials and Methods
Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent multi b‐value (16 evenly spaced b‐values between 0 and 2000 s/mm2) DWI along with multi‐parametric MRI (MP‐MRI) of the prostate at 3 Tesla followed by trans‐rectal ultrasound/MRI fusion guided targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions detected at MP‐MRI. Computed DWI images up to a simulated b‐value of 4000 s/mm2 were also obtained using a pair of b‐values (b = 133 and 400 or 667 or 933 s/mm2) from the multi b‐value DWI. The contrast ratio of average intensity of the targeted lesions and the background PZ was determined. Receiver operator characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUCs) were obtained for separating patients eligible for active surveillance with low risk prostate cancers from intermediate–high risk prostate cancers as per the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) scoring system.
Results
The AUC first increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching maximum at b = 1600 s/mm2 (0.74) with no statistically significant different AUC of DWI with b‐values 1067–2000 s/mm2. The AUC of computed DWI increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching a maximum of 0.75 around b = 2000 s/mm2. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUC of optimal acquired DWI and either of optimal computed DWI.
Conclusion
The optimal b‐value for acquired DWI in differentiating intermediate–high from low risk prostate cancers in the PZ is b = 1600 s/mm2. The computed DWI has similar performance as that of acquired DWI with the optimal performance around b = 2000 s/mm2.
Level of Evidence: 4
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:125–131. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.25353 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6364696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4281508261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-a01e2823f43a9779d6fdad106cc028258c4ac41046859076bf9c2d3a16c616433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIyuPCByBLnAN-J7kgIcRTICQEZ8t1nMaltVM7aQUnPoFv5EtwKSA4eeWZnd2dAWAfoyOMEDkeT4M9IpxyugYGmBOSEV6I9VQjTjNcoHwLbMc4RgiVJeObYIvktKAckQGY3bednaoJbOyogcOPt_e5mvQG1j7AytZ1H613cGES2pkK3j1cQ-sSokbOR-tGq75g4zNsg4-d6gzUymkT4pLYNQa2Jti2MSENefXO7IKNWk2i2ft-d8DTxfnj2VV2e395fXZ6m2nGBM0UwoYUhNaMqjLPy0rUlaowElqj9M8LzZRmGDFR8BLlYliXmlRUYaEFFozSHXCy0m374dRU2rgurSDbkM4NL9IrK_8jzjZy5OdSUMFEKZLA4bdA8LPexE6OfR9c2lnigifjqaA4sQ7-jvnV_7E4EfCKsLAT8_KLYySX4cllePIrPHmT3P2q6CdURo7V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1850023631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Agarwal, Harsh K. ; Mertan, Francesca V. ; Sankineni, Sandeep ; Bernardo, Marcelino ; Senegas, Julien ; Keupp, Jochen ; Daar, Dagane ; Merino, Maria ; Wood, Bradford J. ; Pinto, Peter A. ; Choyke, Peter L. ; Turkbey, Baris</creator><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Harsh K. ; Mertan, Francesca V. ; Sankineni, Sandeep ; Bernardo, Marcelino ; Senegas, Julien ; Keupp, Jochen ; Daar, Dagane ; Merino, Maria ; Wood, Bradford J. ; Pinto, Peter A. ; Choyke, Peter L. ; Turkbey, Baris</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To retrospectively determine the optimal b‐value(s) of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) associated with intermediate–high risk cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate.
Materials and Methods
Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent multi b‐value (16 evenly spaced b‐values between 0 and 2000 s/mm2) DWI along with multi‐parametric MRI (MP‐MRI) of the prostate at 3 Tesla followed by trans‐rectal ultrasound/MRI fusion guided targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions detected at MP‐MRI. Computed DWI images up to a simulated b‐value of 4000 s/mm2 were also obtained using a pair of b‐values (b = 133 and 400 or 667 or 933 s/mm2) from the multi b‐value DWI. The contrast ratio of average intensity of the targeted lesions and the background PZ was determined. Receiver operator characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUCs) were obtained for separating patients eligible for active surveillance with low risk prostate cancers from intermediate–high risk prostate cancers as per the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) scoring system.
Results
The AUC first increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching maximum at b = 1600 s/mm2 (0.74) with no statistically significant different AUC of DWI with b‐values 1067–2000 s/mm2. The AUC of computed DWI increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching a maximum of 0.75 around b = 2000 s/mm2. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUC of optimal acquired DWI and either of optimal computed DWI.
Conclusion
The optimal b‐value for acquired DWI in differentiating intermediate–high from low risk prostate cancers in the PZ is b = 1600 s/mm2. The computed DWI has similar performance as that of acquired DWI with the optimal performance around b = 2000 s/mm2.
Level of Evidence: 4
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:125–131.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25353</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27383502</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Diffusion ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; DWI ; high b‐value ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Prostate ; prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.125-131</ispartof><rights>2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-a01e2823f43a9779d6fdad106cc028258c4ac41046859076bf9c2d3a16c616433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.25353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.25353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,1432,27923,27924,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27383502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Harsh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertan, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankineni, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Marcelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senegas, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keupp, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daar, Dagane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merino, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Bradford J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choyke, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkbey, Baris</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
To retrospectively determine the optimal b‐value(s) of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) associated with intermediate–high risk cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate.
Materials and Methods
Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent multi b‐value (16 evenly spaced b‐values between 0 and 2000 s/mm2) DWI along with multi‐parametric MRI (MP‐MRI) of the prostate at 3 Tesla followed by trans‐rectal ultrasound/MRI fusion guided targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions detected at MP‐MRI. Computed DWI images up to a simulated b‐value of 4000 s/mm2 were also obtained using a pair of b‐values (b = 133 and 400 or 667 or 933 s/mm2) from the multi b‐value DWI. The contrast ratio of average intensity of the targeted lesions and the background PZ was determined. Receiver operator characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUCs) were obtained for separating patients eligible for active surveillance with low risk prostate cancers from intermediate–high risk prostate cancers as per the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) scoring system.
Results
The AUC first increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching maximum at b = 1600 s/mm2 (0.74) with no statistically significant different AUC of DWI with b‐values 1067–2000 s/mm2. The AUC of computed DWI increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching a maximum of 0.75 around b = 2000 s/mm2. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUC of optimal acquired DWI and either of optimal computed DWI.
Conclusion
The optimal b‐value for acquired DWI in differentiating intermediate–high from low risk prostate cancers in the PZ is b = 1600 s/mm2. The computed DWI has similar performance as that of acquired DWI with the optimal performance around b = 2000 s/mm2.
Level of Evidence: 4
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:125–131.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>DWI</subject><subject>high b‐value</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBAIyuPCByBLnAN-J7kgIcRTICQEZ8t1nMaltVM7aQUnPoFv5EtwKSA4eeWZnd2dAWAfoyOMEDkeT4M9IpxyugYGmBOSEV6I9VQjTjNcoHwLbMc4RgiVJeObYIvktKAckQGY3bednaoJbOyogcOPt_e5mvQG1j7AytZ1H613cGES2pkK3j1cQ-sSokbOR-tGq75g4zNsg4-d6gzUymkT4pLYNQa2Jti2MSENefXO7IKNWk2i2ft-d8DTxfnj2VV2e395fXZ6m2nGBM0UwoYUhNaMqjLPy0rUlaowElqj9M8LzZRmGDFR8BLlYliXmlRUYaEFFozSHXCy0m374dRU2rgurSDbkM4NL9IrK_8jzjZy5OdSUMFEKZLA4bdA8LPexE6OfR9c2lnigifjqaA4sQ7-jvnV_7E4EfCKsLAT8_KLYySX4cllePIrPHmT3P2q6CdURo7V</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Agarwal, Harsh K.</creator><creator>Mertan, Francesca V.</creator><creator>Sankineni, Sandeep</creator><creator>Bernardo, Marcelino</creator><creator>Senegas, Julien</creator><creator>Keupp, Jochen</creator><creator>Daar, Dagane</creator><creator>Merino, Maria</creator><creator>Wood, Bradford J.</creator><creator>Pinto, Peter A.</creator><creator>Choyke, Peter L.</creator><creator>Turkbey, Baris</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone</title><author>Agarwal, Harsh K. ; Mertan, Francesca V. ; Sankineni, Sandeep ; Bernardo, Marcelino ; Senegas, Julien ; Keupp, Jochen ; Daar, Dagane ; Merino, Maria ; Wood, Bradford J. ; Pinto, Peter A. ; Choyke, Peter L. ; Turkbey, Baris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4463-a01e2823f43a9779d6fdad106cc028258c4ac41046859076bf9c2d3a16c616433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>DWI</topic><topic>high b‐value</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Harsh K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertan, Francesca V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankineni, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Marcelino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senegas, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keupp, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daar, Dagane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merino, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Bradford J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choyke, Peter L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turkbey, Baris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agarwal, Harsh K.</au><au>Mertan, Francesca V.</au><au>Sankineni, Sandeep</au><au>Bernardo, Marcelino</au><au>Senegas, Julien</au><au>Keupp, Jochen</au><au>Daar, Dagane</au><au>Merino, Maria</au><au>Wood, Bradford J.</au><au>Pinto, Peter A.</au><au>Choyke, Peter L.</au><au>Turkbey, Baris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>131</epage><pages>125-131</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To retrospectively determine the optimal b‐value(s) of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) associated with intermediate–high risk cancer in the peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate.
Materials and Methods
Forty‐two consecutive patients underwent multi b‐value (16 evenly spaced b‐values between 0 and 2000 s/mm2) DWI along with multi‐parametric MRI (MP‐MRI) of the prostate at 3 Tesla followed by trans‐rectal ultrasound/MRI fusion guided targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions detected at MP‐MRI. Computed DWI images up to a simulated b‐value of 4000 s/mm2 were also obtained using a pair of b‐values (b = 133 and 400 or 667 or 933 s/mm2) from the multi b‐value DWI. The contrast ratio of average intensity of the targeted lesions and the background PZ was determined. Receiver operator characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUCs) were obtained for separating patients eligible for active surveillance with low risk prostate cancers from intermediate–high risk prostate cancers as per the cancer of the prostate risk assessment (CAPRA) scoring system.
Results
The AUC first increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching maximum at b = 1600 s/mm2 (0.74) with no statistically significant different AUC of DWI with b‐values 1067–2000 s/mm2. The AUC of computed DWI increased then decreased with the increase in b‐values reaching a maximum of 0.75 around b = 2000 s/mm2. There was no statistically significant difference between the AUC of optimal acquired DWI and either of optimal computed DWI.
Conclusion
The optimal b‐value for acquired DWI in differentiating intermediate–high from low risk prostate cancers in the PZ is b = 1600 s/mm2. The computed DWI has similar performance as that of acquired DWI with the optimal performance around b = 2000 s/mm2.
Level of Evidence: 4
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:125–131.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27383502</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.25353</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2017-01, Vol.45 (1), p.125-131 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6364696 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Algorithms Diffusion Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods DWI high b‐value Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Magnetic resonance imaging Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Prostate prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Optimal high b‐value for diffusion weighted MRI in diagnosing high risk prostate cancers in the peripheral zone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T19%3A44%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20high%20b%E2%80%90value%20for%20diffusion%20weighted%20MRI%20in%20diagnosing%20high%20risk%20prostate%20cancers%20in%20the%20peripheral%20zone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Agarwal,%20Harsh%20K.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=131&rft.pages=125-131&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.25353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4281508261%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1850023631&rft_id=info:pmid/27383502&rfr_iscdi=true |