In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition
Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.909-909, Article 909 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 909 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 909 |
| container_title | Scientific reports |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Maheshwari, Vaibhav Thijssen, Stephan Tao, Xia Fuertinger, Doris H. Kappel, Franz Kotanko, Peter |
| description | Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6351554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2172667988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-5c54b37bb145f83fab9e45655334528093c2c17970ab2c72113f22534239a2383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtFARrUp_gAWyxIZFA34m8QYJVfQhVWIDa8t2nNtTJXawk6r3G_rT-DZ9waLe-NhnzpwZDUIfKPlCCW-_ZkGlaitC24o3VMmKvkEHjAhZMc7Y3ot6Hx3lfE3KkUwJqt6hfU5qVbeNOEB3FwFnGMBF7OI4mQQ5Bhx7PKU4ewiVjUvo8JL8CA7P8RYCLnW8MQO2W3xVyg7MsM2Qjx9fPQxzMjPEcIxHP9pkgsemyzFN66cpjBZCB2Fzv9XPsGu8R297M2R_9HAfot-nP36dnFeXP88uTr5fVk5SPlfSSWF5Yy0Vsm95b6zyQtZSci4ka4nijjnaqIYYy1zDKOU9Y5ILxpVhvOWH6NvKOy129J3zocgd9JRgNGmrowH9byfAld7EG11zSaUUheDzA0GKfxafZz1Cdn4YitG4ZM3K9qKoJnWBfvoPeh2XFIq9HYrVdaPanSK2olyKOSffP4mhRO_i1mvcusSt7-PWtAx9fGnjaeQx3ALgKyCXVtj49Lz7Fdq_OYu38A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2172667988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Maheshwari, Vaibhav ; Thijssen, Stephan ; Tao, Xia ; Fuertinger, Doris H. ; Kappel, Franz ; Kotanko, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Maheshwari, Vaibhav ; Thijssen, Stephan ; Tao, Xia ; Fuertinger, Doris H. ; Kappel, Franz ; Kotanko, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30696874</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/114/2397 ; 692/4022/1950 ; Adsorption ; Binding sites ; Dialysis ; Hemodialysis ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Ibuprofen ; Mathematical models ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sulfates ; Toxins ; Tryptophan</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.909-909, Article 909</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-5c54b37bb145f83fab9e45655334528093c2c17970ab2c72113f22534239a2383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-5c54b37bb145f83fab9e45655334528093c2c17970ab2c72113f22534239a2383</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6321-2367 ; 0000-0002-9369-6777</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6351554/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,41101,42170,51557,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30696874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maheshwari, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijssen, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuertinger, Doris H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappel, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotanko, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal.</description><subject>631/114/2397</subject><subject>692/4022/1950</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Binding sites</subject><subject>Dialysis</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Ibuprofen</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Toxins</subject><subject>Tryptophan</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uctu1TAUtFARrUp_gAWyxIZFA34m8QYJVfQhVWIDa8t2nNtTJXawk6r3G_rT-DZ9waLe-NhnzpwZDUIfKPlCCW-_ZkGlaitC24o3VMmKvkEHjAhZMc7Y3ot6Hx3lfE3KkUwJqt6hfU5qVbeNOEB3FwFnGMBF7OI4mQQ5Bhx7PKU4ewiVjUvo8JL8CA7P8RYCLnW8MQO2W3xVyg7MsM2Qjx9fPQxzMjPEcIxHP9pkgsemyzFN66cpjBZCB2Fzv9XPsGu8R297M2R_9HAfot-nP36dnFeXP88uTr5fVk5SPlfSSWF5Yy0Vsm95b6zyQtZSci4ka4nijjnaqIYYy1zDKOU9Y5ILxpVhvOWH6NvKOy129J3zocgd9JRgNGmrowH9byfAld7EG11zSaUUheDzA0GKfxafZz1Cdn4YitG4ZM3K9qKoJnWBfvoPeh2XFIq9HYrVdaPanSK2olyKOSffP4mhRO_i1mvcusSt7-PWtAx9fGnjaeQx3ALgKyCXVtj49Lz7Fdq_OYu38A</recordid><startdate>20190129</startdate><enddate>20190129</enddate><creator>Maheshwari, Vaibhav</creator><creator>Thijssen, Stephan</creator><creator>Tao, Xia</creator><creator>Fuertinger, Doris H.</creator><creator>Kappel, Franz</creator><creator>Kotanko, Peter</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-2367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-6777</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190129</creationdate><title>In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition</title><author>Maheshwari, Vaibhav ; Thijssen, Stephan ; Tao, Xia ; Fuertinger, Doris H. ; Kappel, Franz ; Kotanko, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-5c54b37bb145f83fab9e45655334528093c2c17970ab2c72113f22534239a2383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>631/114/2397</topic><topic>692/4022/1950</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Binding sites</topic><topic>Dialysis</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Ibuprofen</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Toxins</topic><topic>Tryptophan</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maheshwari, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijssen, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuertinger, Doris H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kappel, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotanko, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maheshwari, Vaibhav</au><au>Thijssen, Stephan</au><au>Tao, Xia</au><au>Fuertinger, Doris H.</au><au>Kappel, Franz</au><au>Kotanko, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-01-29</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>909</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>909-909</pages><artnum>909</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs) are poorly removed during hemodialysis (HD) due to their low free (dialyzable) plasma concentration. We compared PBUT removal between HD, hemodiafiltration (HDF), membrane adsorption, and PBUT displacement in HD. The latter involves infusing a binding competitor pre-dialyzer, which competes with PBUTs for their albumin binding sites and increases their free fraction. We used a mathematical model of PBUT/displacer kinetics in dialysis comprising a three-compartment patient model, an arterial/venous tube segment model, and a dialyzer model. Compared to HD, improvements in removal of prototypical PBUTs indoxyl sulfate (initial concentration 100 µM, 7% free) and p-cresyl sulfate (150 µM, 5% free) were: 5.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for pre-dilution HDF with 20 L replacement fluid; 8.1% and 9.1% for post-dilution HDF 20 L; 15.6% and 18.3% for pre-dilution HDF 60 L; 19.4% and 22.2% for complete membrane adsorption; 35.0% and 41.9% for displacement with tryptophan (2000 mg in 500 mL saline); 26.7% and 32.4% for displacement with ibuprofen (800 mg in 200 mL saline). Prolonged (one-month) use of tryptophan reduces the IS and pCS time-averaged concentration by 28.1% and 29.9%, respectively, compared to conventional HD. We conclude that competitive binding can be a pragmatic approach for improving PBUT removal.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30696874</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-2367</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-6777</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
| ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.909-909, Article 909 |
| issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6351554 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | 631/114/2397 692/4022/1950 Adsorption Binding sites Dialysis Hemodialysis Humanities and Social Sciences Ibuprofen Mathematical models multidisciplinary Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sulfates Toxins Tryptophan |
| title | In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T09%3A16%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20silico%20comparison%20of%20protein-bound%20uremic%20toxin%20removal%20by%20hemodialysis,%20hemodiafiltration,%20membrane%20adsorption,%20and%20binding%20competition&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Maheshwari,%20Vaibhav&rft.date=2019-01-29&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=909&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=909-909&rft.artnum=909&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-37195-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2172667988%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2172667988&rft_id=info:pmid/30696874&rfr_iscdi=true |