Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study
Obstructive anuria can be managed by primary ureteroscopy (URS) or deferred URS after initial ureteral stenting. We want to compare the primary URS and deferred URS in the management of calculus anuria regarding the feasibility and clinical outcome. Between January 2012 and December 2014, 150 patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Central European journal of urology 2018-01, Vol.71 (4), p.462-466 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 466 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 462 |
container_title | Central European journal of urology |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Elderwy, Ahmad A Gadelmoula, Mohamed Elgammal, Mohammed A Hameed, Diaa A Behnsawy, Hosny M Osman, Mahmoud M Kurkar, Adel |
description | Obstructive anuria can be managed by primary ureteroscopy (URS) or deferred URS after initial ureteral stenting. We want to compare the primary URS and deferred URS in the management of calculus anuria regarding the feasibility and clinical outcome.
Between January 2012 and December 2014, 150 patients with anuria due to ureteral calculi were prospectively randomized according to the timing of ureteroscopic intervention into two groups; deferred URS group (69 patients who were treated initially by ureteral stenting) and primary URS group (81 patients who were treated by emergency URS). Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.
Complete stone clearance was 87 % and 75.3% for deferred and primary URS groups, respectively (p = 0.097). Renal function normalized in 94.2% of deferred URS vs. 97.5% of primary URS (p = 0.414). Deferred URS group had a 2.9 % overall complication rate in comparison to 9.9 % for the primary URS group (p = 0.109). Ureteral perforation/pyelonephritis was noted in 6.2% of the primary URS group only (p = 0.043). The median number of maneuvers required until stone clearance was one (range 1-5) for primary URS vs. two (range 2-3) for deferred URS (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.5173/ceju.2018.1768 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6338810</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2172622367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-6b1c78891098455eb102a64ab07136af6e28e2e647fcdf8a959ba218e54219063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaEKSa49F0Esvu9WXZbmHQgltEwikh_YsxvIo9WJbrmQtbP76ymy6tJ3LDOg3j3l6hLzmbFvxWr53uMtbwbjZ8lqbF-RCMMM2ytTy5Wlm-pxcp7RjpbRRuqpekXNZRiaUuCD-W-xHiAe6x5hyoh16jBE7miMuGENyYT5QHyIdYYJHHHFaaPDUweDyUBZgyrGHDxToXOgZ3dLvkUaYujD2T0UoLbk7XJEzD0PC6-d-SX58-fz95nZz__D17ubT_cYpbpaNbrmrjWk4a4yqKmw5E6AVtKzmUoPXKAwK1Kr2rvMGmqppQXCDlRK8YVpeko9H3Tm3I3auXBthsPPRpA3Q239fpv6nfQx7q6U0hrMi8O5ZIIZfGdNixz45HAaYMORkBa8bpWSjRUHf_ofuQo5TsbdSQgshdV2o7ZFy5XtSRH86hjO7pmjXFO2aol1TLAtv_rZwwv9kJn8DaQ6aYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2172622367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Elderwy, Ahmad A ; Gadelmoula, Mohamed ; Elgammal, Mohammed A ; Hameed, Diaa A ; Behnsawy, Hosny M ; Osman, Mahmoud M ; Kurkar, Adel</creator><creatorcontrib>Elderwy, Ahmad A ; Gadelmoula, Mohamed ; Elgammal, Mohammed A ; Hameed, Diaa A ; Behnsawy, Hosny M ; Osman, Mahmoud M ; Kurkar, Adel</creatorcontrib><description>Obstructive anuria can be managed by primary ureteroscopy (URS) or deferred URS after initial ureteral stenting. We want to compare the primary URS and deferred URS in the management of calculus anuria regarding the feasibility and clinical outcome.
Between January 2012 and December 2014, 150 patients with anuria due to ureteral calculi were prospectively randomized according to the timing of ureteroscopic intervention into two groups; deferred URS group (69 patients who were treated initially by ureteral stenting) and primary URS group (81 patients who were treated by emergency URS). Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.
Complete stone clearance was 87 % and 75.3% for deferred and primary URS groups, respectively (p = 0.097). Renal function normalized in 94.2% of deferred URS vs. 97.5% of primary URS (p = 0.414). Deferred URS group had a 2.9 % overall complication rate in comparison to 9.9 % for the primary URS group (p = 0.109). Ureteral perforation/pyelonephritis was noted in 6.2% of the primary URS group only (p = 0.043). The median number of maneuvers required until stone clearance was one (range 1-5) for primary URS vs. two (range 2-3) for deferred URS (p <0.001). The cost of primary URS was significantly less (p <0.001). On a multivariate analysis, lower ureteral calculi (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.07- 41.7, p <0.001) and deferred URS (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.07-7.49, p = 0.035) were independent predictors for an eventless and successful URS.
Primary URS for calculus anuria is feasible and cost-effective. It has a short hospital stay, but is still technically demanding. The perioperative complications are comparable to URS in normouric patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2080-4806</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2080-4873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2080-4873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30680242</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Polish Urological Association</publisher><subject>Costs ; Endoscopy ; Laboratories ; Lasers ; Lithotripsy ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Central European journal of urology, 2018-01, Vol.71 (4), p.462-466</ispartof><rights>Copyright Polish Urological Association 2018</rights><rights>Copyright by Polish Urological Association 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-6b1c78891098455eb102a64ab07136af6e28e2e647fcdf8a959ba218e54219063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338810/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6338810/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30680242$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elderwy, Ahmad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadelmoula, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elgammal, Mohammed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hameed, Diaa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnsawy, Hosny M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurkar, Adel</creatorcontrib><title>Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study</title><title>Central European journal of urology</title><addtitle>Cent European J Urol</addtitle><description>Obstructive anuria can be managed by primary ureteroscopy (URS) or deferred URS after initial ureteral stenting. We want to compare the primary URS and deferred URS in the management of calculus anuria regarding the feasibility and clinical outcome.
Between January 2012 and December 2014, 150 patients with anuria due to ureteral calculi were prospectively randomized according to the timing of ureteroscopic intervention into two groups; deferred URS group (69 patients who were treated initially by ureteral stenting) and primary URS group (81 patients who were treated by emergency URS). Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.
Complete stone clearance was 87 % and 75.3% for deferred and primary URS groups, respectively (p = 0.097). Renal function normalized in 94.2% of deferred URS vs. 97.5% of primary URS (p = 0.414). Deferred URS group had a 2.9 % overall complication rate in comparison to 9.9 % for the primary URS group (p = 0.109). Ureteral perforation/pyelonephritis was noted in 6.2% of the primary URS group only (p = 0.043). The median number of maneuvers required until stone clearance was one (range 1-5) for primary URS vs. two (range 2-3) for deferred URS (p <0.001). The cost of primary URS was significantly less (p <0.001). On a multivariate analysis, lower ureteral calculi (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.07- 41.7, p <0.001) and deferred URS (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.07-7.49, p = 0.035) were independent predictors for an eventless and successful URS.
Primary URS for calculus anuria is feasible and cost-effective. It has a short hospital stay, but is still technically demanding. The perioperative complications are comparable to URS in normouric patients.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2080-4806</issn><issn>2080-4873</issn><issn>2080-4873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1r3DAQxUVpaEKSa49F0Esvu9WXZbmHQgltEwikh_YsxvIo9WJbrmQtbP76ymy6tJ3LDOg3j3l6hLzmbFvxWr53uMtbwbjZ8lqbF-RCMMM2ytTy5Wlm-pxcp7RjpbRRuqpekXNZRiaUuCD-W-xHiAe6x5hyoh16jBE7miMuGENyYT5QHyIdYYJHHHFaaPDUweDyUBZgyrGHDxToXOgZ3dLvkUaYujD2T0UoLbk7XJEzD0PC6-d-SX58-fz95nZz__D17ubT_cYpbpaNbrmrjWk4a4yqKmw5E6AVtKzmUoPXKAwK1Kr2rvMGmqppQXCDlRK8YVpeko9H3Tm3I3auXBthsPPRpA3Q239fpv6nfQx7q6U0hrMi8O5ZIIZfGdNixz45HAaYMORkBa8bpWSjRUHf_ofuQo5TsbdSQgshdV2o7ZFy5XtSRH86hjO7pmjXFO2aol1TLAtv_rZwwv9kJn8DaQ6aYw</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Elderwy, Ahmad A</creator><creator>Gadelmoula, Mohamed</creator><creator>Elgammal, Mohammed A</creator><creator>Hameed, Diaa A</creator><creator>Behnsawy, Hosny M</creator><creator>Osman, Mahmoud M</creator><creator>Kurkar, Adel</creator><general>Polish Urological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study</title><author>Elderwy, Ahmad A ; Gadelmoula, Mohamed ; Elgammal, Mohammed A ; Hameed, Diaa A ; Behnsawy, Hosny M ; Osman, Mahmoud M ; Kurkar, Adel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-6b1c78891098455eb102a64ab07136af6e28e2e647fcdf8a959ba218e54219063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elderwy, Ahmad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadelmoula, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elgammal, Mohammed A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hameed, Diaa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behnsawy, Hosny M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mahmoud M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurkar, Adel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Central European journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elderwy, Ahmad A</au><au>Gadelmoula, Mohamed</au><au>Elgammal, Mohammed A</au><au>Hameed, Diaa A</au><au>Behnsawy, Hosny M</au><au>Osman, Mahmoud M</au><au>Kurkar, Adel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Central European journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Cent European J Urol</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>462</spage><epage>466</epage><pages>462-466</pages><issn>2080-4806</issn><issn>2080-4873</issn><eissn>2080-4873</eissn><abstract>Obstructive anuria can be managed by primary ureteroscopy (URS) or deferred URS after initial ureteral stenting. We want to compare the primary URS and deferred URS in the management of calculus anuria regarding the feasibility and clinical outcome.
Between January 2012 and December 2014, 150 patients with anuria due to ureteral calculi were prospectively randomized according to the timing of ureteroscopic intervention into two groups; deferred URS group (69 patients who were treated initially by ureteral stenting) and primary URS group (81 patients who were treated by emergency URS). Follow-up was at least 6 months postoperatively.
Complete stone clearance was 87 % and 75.3% for deferred and primary URS groups, respectively (p = 0.097). Renal function normalized in 94.2% of deferred URS vs. 97.5% of primary URS (p = 0.414). Deferred URS group had a 2.9 % overall complication rate in comparison to 9.9 % for the primary URS group (p = 0.109). Ureteral perforation/pyelonephritis was noted in 6.2% of the primary URS group only (p = 0.043). The median number of maneuvers required until stone clearance was one (range 1-5) for primary URS vs. two (range 2-3) for deferred URS (p <0.001). The cost of primary URS was significantly less (p <0.001). On a multivariate analysis, lower ureteral calculi (OR 13.03, 95% CI 4.07- 41.7, p <0.001) and deferred URS (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.07-7.49, p = 0.035) were independent predictors for an eventless and successful URS.
Primary URS for calculus anuria is feasible and cost-effective. It has a short hospital stay, but is still technically demanding. The perioperative complications are comparable to URS in normouric patients.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Polish Urological Association</pub><pmid>30680242</pmid><doi>10.5173/ceju.2018.1768</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2080-4806 |
ispartof | Central European journal of urology, 2018-01, Vol.71 (4), p.462-466 |
issn | 2080-4806 2080-4873 2080-4873 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6338810 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Costs Endoscopy Laboratories Lasers Lithotripsy Original Paper Patients Ultrasonic imaging Urology |
title | Primary versus deferred ureteroscopy for management of calculus anuria: a prospective randomized study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T04%3A36%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20versus%20deferred%20ureteroscopy%20for%20management%20of%20calculus%20anuria:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Central%20European%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Elderwy,%20Ahmad%20A&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=462&rft.epage=466&rft.pages=462-466&rft.issn=2080-4806&rft.eissn=2080-4873&rft_id=info:doi/10.5173/ceju.2018.1768&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2172622367%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2172622367&rft_id=info:pmid/30680242&rfr_iscdi=true |