Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like”
This paper studies the effect of channel coating hydrophobicity and analyte polarity on the gas detection capability of a microfluidic-based gas detector. Two detectors with two different channel surface coating combinations (resulting in different levels of hydrophobicity) are fabricated and tested...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.161-161, Article 161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Paknahad, Mohammad Mcintosh, Carmen Hoorfar, Mina |
description | This paper studies the effect of channel coating hydrophobicity and analyte polarity on the gas detection capability of a microfluidic-based gas detector. Two detectors with two different channel surface coating combinations (resulting in different levels of hydrophobicity) are fabricated and tested against seven analytes with different polarities (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-pentanol, acetone, pentane, and hexane). A feature extraction method is utilized to compare the discrimination capability of each of the fabricated detector. The analysis of the combined feature space presented for both detectors reveals that the Euclidean distance, which is an indicator of the device discrimination capability between different gases, between the feature vectors of the two sensors are greater for non-polar gases compared to those obtained for the polar ones. This shows that the analyte discrimination in microfluidic gas detectors is not a purely diffusion-based process, and there are analyte/channel surface interaction parameters involved in enhancing/impeding sensor selectivity. To understand these effects, the surface free energy of each fabricated channel was determined. It is shown that the difference between the solid-liquid surface tension values estimated for the two channel surfaces is higher for the non-polar analytes as compared to the polar analytes. This effect along with the low diffusion coefficients of non-polar analyte magnifies adsorption of the analytes in the diffusion-physisorption process, resulting in a greater difference in Euclidean distances between the features obtained from the two detectors responses against non-polar analytes as compared to the polar ones. This shows that the choice of the detector
’
s channel coating material plays a key role in the selectivity of the device between different gases. As a result, non-polar channel coating surfaces are suggested for better classification of the non-polar gases, and it is shown in the cases of polar gases changing the coating surface has less effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-018-36615-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6336886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2168145453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-44b309ca08d29019d9d628b77a2aae9fdbcff2734d1a707510a4960273767983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIlGSC7BAltiwafD7sUFCEQSkSFkke8ttuwcHd3uwu0fKLgeBy-Uk8TBDSFjgjcuur35X-QfgFUbvMKLqfWWYa9UhrDoqBOadeAYOCWK8I5SQ54_iA3BS6zVqixPNsH4JDigSnHOhD0G5DCm4OW4C9GHeRnmCeYCbnOwcU4C5rOwUHXR5XOdl8hXGCY7RlTykJfqWWdm6r82lwt7W4GETubv9meL3JhtrzWkTKtwe725_HYMXg001nOz3I3D1-dPV6Zfu_OLs6-nH885xjOeOsZ4i7SxSnmiEtddeENVLaYm1QQ--d8NAJGUeW4kkx8gyLVC7kUJqRY_Ah53seunH4F2Y5mKTWZc42nJjso3maWaK38wqb4ygVCglmsDbvUDJP5ZQZzPG6kJKdgp5qYZgqRlSkpOGvvkHvc5Lmdp0jRIKM844bRTZUe3zai1heGgGI7M11exMNc1U89tUs-3i9eMxHkr-WNgAugNqS02rUP6-_R_Ze1hlsHY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168145453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like”</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Paknahad, Mohammad ; Mcintosh, Carmen ; Hoorfar, Mina</creator><creatorcontrib>Paknahad, Mohammad ; Mcintosh, Carmen ; Hoorfar, Mina</creatorcontrib><description>This paper studies the effect of channel coating hydrophobicity and analyte polarity on the gas detection capability of a microfluidic-based gas detector. Two detectors with two different channel surface coating combinations (resulting in different levels of hydrophobicity) are fabricated and tested against seven analytes with different polarities (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-pentanol, acetone, pentane, and hexane). A feature extraction method is utilized to compare the discrimination capability of each of the fabricated detector. The analysis of the combined feature space presented for both detectors reveals that the Euclidean distance, which is an indicator of the device discrimination capability between different gases, between the feature vectors of the two sensors are greater for non-polar gases compared to those obtained for the polar ones. This shows that the analyte discrimination in microfluidic gas detectors is not a purely diffusion-based process, and there are analyte/channel surface interaction parameters involved in enhancing/impeding sensor selectivity. To understand these effects, the surface free energy of each fabricated channel was determined. It is shown that the difference between the solid-liquid surface tension values estimated for the two channel surfaces is higher for the non-polar analytes as compared to the polar analytes. This effect along with the low diffusion coefficients of non-polar analyte magnifies adsorption of the analytes in the diffusion-physisorption process, resulting in a greater difference in Euclidean distances between the features obtained from the two detectors responses against non-polar analytes as compared to the polar ones. This shows that the choice of the detector
’
s channel coating material plays a key role in the selectivity of the device between different gases. As a result, non-polar channel coating surfaces are suggested for better classification of the non-polar gases, and it is shown in the cases of polar gases changing the coating surface has less effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36615-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30655569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/166/987 ; 639/301/1005/1009 ; Acetone ; Coatings ; Diffusion ; Diffusion coefficient ; Ethanol ; Free energy ; Gas detectors ; Gases ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hydrophobicity ; Microfluidics ; multidisciplinary ; Organic compounds ; Pentane ; Polarity ; Propanol ; Protective coatings ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Surface tension ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.161-161, Article 161</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-44b309ca08d29019d9d628b77a2aae9fdbcff2734d1a707510a4960273767983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-44b309ca08d29019d9d628b77a2aae9fdbcff2734d1a707510a4960273767983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336886/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336886/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,41119,42188,51575,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paknahad, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcintosh, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoorfar, Mina</creatorcontrib><title>Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like”</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>This paper studies the effect of channel coating hydrophobicity and analyte polarity on the gas detection capability of a microfluidic-based gas detector. Two detectors with two different channel surface coating combinations (resulting in different levels of hydrophobicity) are fabricated and tested against seven analytes with different polarities (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-pentanol, acetone, pentane, and hexane). A feature extraction method is utilized to compare the discrimination capability of each of the fabricated detector. The analysis of the combined feature space presented for both detectors reveals that the Euclidean distance, which is an indicator of the device discrimination capability between different gases, between the feature vectors of the two sensors are greater for non-polar gases compared to those obtained for the polar ones. This shows that the analyte discrimination in microfluidic gas detectors is not a purely diffusion-based process, and there are analyte/channel surface interaction parameters involved in enhancing/impeding sensor selectivity. To understand these effects, the surface free energy of each fabricated channel was determined. It is shown that the difference between the solid-liquid surface tension values estimated for the two channel surfaces is higher for the non-polar analytes as compared to the polar analytes. This effect along with the low diffusion coefficients of non-polar analyte magnifies adsorption of the analytes in the diffusion-physisorption process, resulting in a greater difference in Euclidean distances between the features obtained from the two detectors responses against non-polar analytes as compared to the polar ones. This shows that the choice of the detector
’
s channel coating material plays a key role in the selectivity of the device between different gases. As a result, non-polar channel coating surfaces are suggested for better classification of the non-polar gases, and it is shown in the cases of polar gases changing the coating surface has less effect.</description><subject>639/166/987</subject><subject>639/301/1005/1009</subject><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Free energy</subject><subject>Gas detectors</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Microfluidics</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Pentane</subject><subject>Polarity</subject><subject>Propanol</subject><subject>Protective coatings</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Surface tension</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIlGSC7BAltiwafD7sUFCEQSkSFkke8ttuwcHd3uwu0fKLgeBy-Uk8TBDSFjgjcuur35X-QfgFUbvMKLqfWWYa9UhrDoqBOadeAYOCWK8I5SQ54_iA3BS6zVqixPNsH4JDigSnHOhD0G5DCm4OW4C9GHeRnmCeYCbnOwcU4C5rOwUHXR5XOdl8hXGCY7RlTykJfqWWdm6r82lwt7W4GETubv9meL3JhtrzWkTKtwe725_HYMXg001nOz3I3D1-dPV6Zfu_OLs6-nH885xjOeOsZ4i7SxSnmiEtddeENVLaYm1QQ--d8NAJGUeW4kkx8gyLVC7kUJqRY_Ah53seunH4F2Y5mKTWZc42nJjso3maWaK38wqb4ygVCglmsDbvUDJP5ZQZzPG6kJKdgp5qYZgqRlSkpOGvvkHvc5Lmdp0jRIKM844bRTZUe3zai1heGgGI7M11exMNc1U89tUs-3i9eMxHkr-WNgAugNqS02rUP6-_R_Ze1hlsHY</recordid><startdate>20190117</startdate><enddate>20190117</enddate><creator>Paknahad, Mohammad</creator><creator>Mcintosh, Carmen</creator><creator>Hoorfar, Mina</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190117</creationdate><title>Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like”</title><author>Paknahad, Mohammad ; Mcintosh, Carmen ; Hoorfar, Mina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-44b309ca08d29019d9d628b77a2aae9fdbcff2734d1a707510a4960273767983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>639/166/987</topic><topic>639/301/1005/1009</topic><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Free energy</topic><topic>Gas detectors</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Microfluidics</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Pentane</topic><topic>Polarity</topic><topic>Propanol</topic><topic>Protective coatings</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Surface tension</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paknahad, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcintosh, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoorfar, Mina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paknahad, Mohammad</au><au>Mcintosh, Carmen</au><au>Hoorfar, Mina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like”</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-01-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>161-161</pages><artnum>161</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>This paper studies the effect of channel coating hydrophobicity and analyte polarity on the gas detection capability of a microfluidic-based gas detector. Two detectors with two different channel surface coating combinations (resulting in different levels of hydrophobicity) are fabricated and tested against seven analytes with different polarities (methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-pentanol, acetone, pentane, and hexane). A feature extraction method is utilized to compare the discrimination capability of each of the fabricated detector. The analysis of the combined feature space presented for both detectors reveals that the Euclidean distance, which is an indicator of the device discrimination capability between different gases, between the feature vectors of the two sensors are greater for non-polar gases compared to those obtained for the polar ones. This shows that the analyte discrimination in microfluidic gas detectors is not a purely diffusion-based process, and there are analyte/channel surface interaction parameters involved in enhancing/impeding sensor selectivity. To understand these effects, the surface free energy of each fabricated channel was determined. It is shown that the difference between the solid-liquid surface tension values estimated for the two channel surfaces is higher for the non-polar analytes as compared to the polar analytes. This effect along with the low diffusion coefficients of non-polar analyte magnifies adsorption of the analytes in the diffusion-physisorption process, resulting in a greater difference in Euclidean distances between the features obtained from the two detectors responses against non-polar analytes as compared to the polar ones. This shows that the choice of the detector
’
s channel coating material plays a key role in the selectivity of the device between different gases. As a result, non-polar channel coating surfaces are suggested for better classification of the non-polar gases, and it is shown in the cases of polar gases changing the coating surface has less effect.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30655569</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-36615-6</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.161-161, Article 161 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6336886 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | 639/166/987 639/301/1005/1009 Acetone Coatings Diffusion Diffusion coefficient Ethanol Free energy Gas detectors Gases Humanities and Social Sciences Hydrophobicity Microfluidics multidisciplinary Organic compounds Pentane Polarity Propanol Protective coatings Science Science (multidisciplinary) Surface tension VOCs Volatile organic compounds |
title | Selective detection of volatile organic compounds in microfluidic gas detectors based on “like dissolves like” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A01%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20detection%20of%20volatile%20organic%20compounds%20in%20microfluidic%20gas%20detectors%20based%20on%20%E2%80%9Clike%20dissolves%20like%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Paknahad,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2019-01-17&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=161-161&rft.artnum=161&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-36615-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2168145453%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168145453&rft_id=info:pmid/30655569&rfr_iscdi=true |