Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies
Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.157-157, Article 157 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 157 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 157 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Oliver, Matthew J. Kohut, Josh T. Bernard, Kim Fraser, William Winsor, Peter Statscewich, Hank Fredj, Erick Cimino, Megan Patterson-Fraser, Donna Carvalho, Filipa |
description | Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either physically or biologically concentrated to support upper trophic levels. In the Western Antarctic Peninsula, recent climate change has created new foraging sympatry between Adélie (
Pygoscelis adeliae
) and gentoo (
P. papua
) penguins in a known biological hotspot near Palmer Deep canyon. We used this recent sympatry as an opportunity to investigate how dynamic local oceanographic features affect aspects of the foraging ecology of these two species. Simulated particle trajectories from measured surface currents were used to investigate the co-occurrence of convergent ocean features and penguin foraging locations. Adélie penguin diving activity was restricted to the upper mixed layer, while gentoo penguins often foraged much deeper than the mixed layer, suggesting that Adélie penguins may be more responsive to dynamic surface convergent features compared to gentoo penguins. We found that, despite large differences in diving and foraging behavior, both shallow-diving Adélie and deeper-diving gentoo penguins strongly selected for surface convergent features. Furthermore, there was no difference in selectivity for shallow- versus deep-diving gentoo penguins. Our results suggest that these two mesopredators are selecting surface convergent features, however, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-018-35901-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6336854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179409541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-42594fca0e23062cf72a679f0c3cf6882e3eaf92e758197ae56fa141bee188db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhoMoKuof8CANe9lLr_nsTi4LMqi7IHjRc8hkKm1LT6dNdQv77zdjj58Hc0lBPfWm3ryEnDL6i1Ghz1EyZXRJmS6FMpSV9Q455FSqkgvOdz_UB-QE8ZHmo7iRzOyTA0ErpZQ0hwQW0I_JdcXQOQ9FiMk1kLBA6MCPRfTg-gKnFDZdH_tnSE2eKAK4cUqAxQpwaEcoVm0IkNq-mTU2BWbhEZoW8JjsBdchnGzvI3J_dXm3-FPe3F7_XVzclF4JPpaSKyODdxR43pD7UHNX1SZQL3yotOYgwAXDoVaamdqBqoJjki0BmNarpTgiv2fdYVquYeVnb3ZI7dqlfza61n7u9O2DbeKzrYSotJJZ4OdWIMWnCXC06xY9dJ3rIU5oOauNpEZJltEfX9DHOKU-28tUpZmsK2UyxWfKp4iYILwtw6jdBGnnIG0O0r4Eaes8dPbRxtvIa2wZEDOAw-bLIb2__Y3sf3VAq1k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2168147659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies</title><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Oliver, Matthew J. ; Kohut, Josh T. ; Bernard, Kim ; Fraser, William ; Winsor, Peter ; Statscewich, Hank ; Fredj, Erick ; Cimino, Megan ; Patterson-Fraser, Donna ; Carvalho, Filipa</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew J. ; Kohut, Josh T. ; Bernard, Kim ; Fraser, William ; Winsor, Peter ; Statscewich, Hank ; Fredj, Erick ; Cimino, Megan ; Patterson-Fraser, Donna ; Carvalho, Filipa</creatorcontrib><description>Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either physically or biologically concentrated to support upper trophic levels. In the Western Antarctic Peninsula, recent climate change has created new foraging sympatry between Adélie (
Pygoscelis adeliae
) and gentoo (
P. papua
) penguins in a known biological hotspot near Palmer Deep canyon. We used this recent sympatry as an opportunity to investigate how dynamic local oceanographic features affect aspects of the foraging ecology of these two species. Simulated particle trajectories from measured surface currents were used to investigate the co-occurrence of convergent ocean features and penguin foraging locations. Adélie penguin diving activity was restricted to the upper mixed layer, while gentoo penguins often foraged much deeper than the mixed layer, suggesting that Adélie penguins may be more responsive to dynamic surface convergent features compared to gentoo penguins. We found that, despite large differences in diving and foraging behavior, both shallow-diving Adélie and deeper-diving gentoo penguins strongly selected for surface convergent features. Furthermore, there was no difference in selectivity for shallow- versus deep-diving gentoo penguins. Our results suggest that these two mesopredators are selecting surface convergent features, however, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35901-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30655549</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/2445 ; 704/172 ; Animal behavior ; Canyons ; Climate change ; Diving ; Food resources ; Forage ; Foraging behavior ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Marine systems ; multidisciplinary ; Predators ; Prey ; Pygoscelis adeliae ; Pygoscelis papua ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sympatry ; Trophic levels</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.157-157, Article 157</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-42594fca0e23062cf72a679f0c3cf6882e3eaf92e758197ae56fa141bee188db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-42594fca0e23062cf72a679f0c3cf6882e3eaf92e758197ae56fa141bee188db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0509-2744 ; 0000-0002-8355-4329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336854/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6336854/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohut, Josh T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Statscewich, Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredj, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimino, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson-Fraser, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Filipa</creatorcontrib><title>Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either physically or biologically concentrated to support upper trophic levels. In the Western Antarctic Peninsula, recent climate change has created new foraging sympatry between Adélie (
Pygoscelis adeliae
) and gentoo (
P. papua
) penguins in a known biological hotspot near Palmer Deep canyon. We used this recent sympatry as an opportunity to investigate how dynamic local oceanographic features affect aspects of the foraging ecology of these two species. Simulated particle trajectories from measured surface currents were used to investigate the co-occurrence of convergent ocean features and penguin foraging locations. Adélie penguin diving activity was restricted to the upper mixed layer, while gentoo penguins often foraged much deeper than the mixed layer, suggesting that Adélie penguins may be more responsive to dynamic surface convergent features compared to gentoo penguins. We found that, despite large differences in diving and foraging behavior, both shallow-diving Adélie and deeper-diving gentoo penguins strongly selected for surface convergent features. Furthermore, there was no difference in selectivity for shallow- versus deep-diving gentoo penguins. Our results suggest that these two mesopredators are selecting surface convergent features, however, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown.</description><subject>631/158/2445</subject><subject>704/172</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Canyons</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Diving</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Marine systems</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Pygoscelis adeliae</subject><subject>Pygoscelis papua</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sympatry</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhoMoKuof8CANe9lLr_nsTi4LMqi7IHjRc8hkKm1LT6dNdQv77zdjj58Hc0lBPfWm3ryEnDL6i1Ghz1EyZXRJmS6FMpSV9Q455FSqkgvOdz_UB-QE8ZHmo7iRzOyTA0ErpZQ0hwQW0I_JdcXQOQ9FiMk1kLBA6MCPRfTg-gKnFDZdH_tnSE2eKAK4cUqAxQpwaEcoVm0IkNq-mTU2BWbhEZoW8JjsBdchnGzvI3J_dXm3-FPe3F7_XVzclF4JPpaSKyODdxR43pD7UHNX1SZQL3yotOYgwAXDoVaamdqBqoJjki0BmNarpTgiv2fdYVquYeVnb3ZI7dqlfza61n7u9O2DbeKzrYSotJJZ4OdWIMWnCXC06xY9dJ3rIU5oOauNpEZJltEfX9DHOKU-28tUpZmsK2UyxWfKp4iYILwtw6jdBGnnIG0O0r4Eaes8dPbRxtvIa2wZEDOAw-bLIb2__Y3sf3VAq1k</recordid><startdate>20190117</startdate><enddate>20190117</enddate><creator>Oliver, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Kohut, Josh T.</creator><creator>Bernard, Kim</creator><creator>Fraser, William</creator><creator>Winsor, Peter</creator><creator>Statscewich, Hank</creator><creator>Fredj, Erick</creator><creator>Cimino, Megan</creator><creator>Patterson-Fraser, Donna</creator><creator>Carvalho, Filipa</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-2744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-4329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190117</creationdate><title>Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies</title><author>Oliver, Matthew J. ; Kohut, Josh T. ; Bernard, Kim ; Fraser, William ; Winsor, Peter ; Statscewich, Hank ; Fredj, Erick ; Cimino, Megan ; Patterson-Fraser, Donna ; Carvalho, Filipa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c532t-42594fca0e23062cf72a679f0c3cf6882e3eaf92e758197ae56fa141bee188db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>631/158/2445</topic><topic>704/172</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Canyons</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Diving</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Marine systems</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Pygoscelis adeliae</topic><topic>Pygoscelis papua</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sympatry</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohut, Josh T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernard, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winsor, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Statscewich, Hank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredj, Erick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cimino, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson-Fraser, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Filipa</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliver, Matthew J.</au><au>Kohut, Josh T.</au><au>Bernard, Kim</au><au>Fraser, William</au><au>Winsor, Peter</au><au>Statscewich, Hank</au><au>Fredj, Erick</au><au>Cimino, Megan</au><au>Patterson-Fraser, Donna</au><au>Carvalho, Filipa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2019-01-17</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>157</epage><pages>157-157</pages><artnum>157</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Discovering the predictors of foraging locations can be challenging, and is often the critical missing piece for interpreting the ecological significance of observed movement patterns of predators. This is especially true in dynamic coastal marine systems, where planktonic food resources are diffuse and must be either physically or biologically concentrated to support upper trophic levels. In the Western Antarctic Peninsula, recent climate change has created new foraging sympatry between Adélie (
Pygoscelis adeliae
) and gentoo (
P. papua
) penguins in a known biological hotspot near Palmer Deep canyon. We used this recent sympatry as an opportunity to investigate how dynamic local oceanographic features affect aspects of the foraging ecology of these two species. Simulated particle trajectories from measured surface currents were used to investigate the co-occurrence of convergent ocean features and penguin foraging locations. Adélie penguin diving activity was restricted to the upper mixed layer, while gentoo penguins often foraged much deeper than the mixed layer, suggesting that Adélie penguins may be more responsive to dynamic surface convergent features compared to gentoo penguins. We found that, despite large differences in diving and foraging behavior, both shallow-diving Adélie and deeper-diving gentoo penguins strongly selected for surface convergent features. Furthermore, there was no difference in selectivity for shallow- versus deep-diving gentoo penguins. Our results suggest that these two mesopredators are selecting surface convergent features, however, how these surface signals are related to subsurface prey fields is unknown.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30655549</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-018-35901-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-2744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8355-4329</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2019-01, Vol.9 (1), p.157-157, Article 157 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6336854 |
source | Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 631/158/2445 704/172 Animal behavior Canyons Climate change Diving Food resources Forage Foraging behavior Humanities and Social Sciences Marine systems multidisciplinary Predators Prey Pygoscelis adeliae Pygoscelis papua Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sympatry Trophic levels |
title | Central place foragers select ocean surface convergent features despite differing foraging strategies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Central%20place%20foragers%20select%20ocean%20surface%20convergent%20features%20despite%20differing%20foraging%20strategies&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Oliver,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2019-01-17&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=157&rft.pages=157-157&rft.artnum=157&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-018-35901-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2179409541%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2168147659&rft_id=info:pmid/30655549&rfr_iscdi=true |