Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report
Key Clinical Message Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical case reports 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.90-93 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 93 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 90 |
| container_title | Clinical case reports |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Park, Ji E. Park, Ji K. Kang, Min Y. Cho, In A. Baek, Jong C. |
| description | Key Clinical Message
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccr3.1812 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6332828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2166992999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-79d279f68100aadcd2d83aacde64d534702501948a63760cd0784e9565aaaf1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1OAyEURonRqFEXvoAhceWieoEZZtiYNONv0mhidOWCUGAqZhwqTDXd9RFc-IQ-idSqqQtXXMLh8F0uQrsEDgkAPdI6sENSErqCNink0AMB2epSvYF2YnwEAAIFzQmsow0GPOdA-Ca6r_yk7Vw7-pi9DVW0BmvbNGlTB2vxyVUfR52qNhG4s7HDtXJNxJ3Hzth0sZ7iLrhx452Zfsze-1gnCQ527EO3jdZq1US7871uobuz09vqoje4Pr-s-oOeZjSnvUIYWoial6kdpYw21JRMKW0sz0zOsgJoDkRkpeKs4KANFGVmRc5zpVRNDNtCxwvveDJ8skanXEE1chzckwpT6ZWTf09a9yBH_kVyxmhJyyTY_xYE_zxJXcpHPwltyiwp4VwIKoRI1MGC0sHHGGz9-wIBOR-FnI9CzkeR2L3lSL_kz8cn4GgBvLrGTv83yaq6YV_KTzlAleg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166992999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Park, Ji E. ; Park, Ji K. ; Kang, Min Y. ; Cho, In A. ; Baek, Jong C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji E. ; Park, Ji K. ; Kang, Min Y. ; Cho, In A. ; Baek, Jong C.</creatorcontrib><description>Key Clinical Message
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1812</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30656016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>69,XXX ; Case Report ; Case Reports ; Medical screening ; Medical tests ; noninvasive prenatal testing ; Prenatal care ; ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Clinical case reports, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.90-93</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-79d279f68100aadcd2d83aacde64d534702501948a63760cd0784e9565aaaf1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-79d279f68100aadcd2d83aacde64d534702501948a63760cd0784e9565aaaf1d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9731-190X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332828/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332828/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Min Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, In A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Jong C.</creatorcontrib><title>Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report</title><title>Clinical case reports</title><addtitle>Clin Case Rep</addtitle><description>Key Clinical Message
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.</description><subject>69,XXX</subject><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Case Reports</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>noninvasive prenatal testing</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>ultrasound</subject><issn>2050-0904</issn><issn>2050-0904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1OAyEURonRqFEXvoAhceWieoEZZtiYNONv0mhidOWCUGAqZhwqTDXd9RFc-IQ-idSqqQtXXMLh8F0uQrsEDgkAPdI6sENSErqCNink0AMB2epSvYF2YnwEAAIFzQmsow0GPOdA-Ca6r_yk7Vw7-pi9DVW0BmvbNGlTB2vxyVUfR52qNhG4s7HDtXJNxJ3Hzth0sZ7iLrhx452Zfsze-1gnCQ527EO3jdZq1US7871uobuz09vqoje4Pr-s-oOeZjSnvUIYWoial6kdpYw21JRMKW0sz0zOsgJoDkRkpeKs4KANFGVmRc5zpVRNDNtCxwvveDJ8skanXEE1chzckwpT6ZWTf09a9yBH_kVyxmhJyyTY_xYE_zxJXcpHPwltyiwp4VwIKoRI1MGC0sHHGGz9-wIBOR-FnI9CzkeR2L3lSL_kz8cn4GgBvLrGTv83yaq6YV_KTzlAleg</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Park, Ji E.</creator><creator>Park, Ji K.</creator><creator>Kang, Min Y.</creator><creator>Cho, In A.</creator><creator>Baek, Jong C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-190X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report</title><author>Park, Ji E. ; Park, Ji K. ; Kang, Min Y. ; Cho, In A. ; Baek, Jong C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-79d279f68100aadcd2d83aacde64d534702501948a63760cd0784e9565aaaf1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>69,XXX</topic><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Case Reports</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>noninvasive prenatal testing</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ji K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Min Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, In A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Jong C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical case reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Ji E.</au><au>Park, Ji K.</au><au>Kang, Min Y.</au><au>Cho, In A.</au><au>Baek, Jong C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report</atitle><jtitle>Clinical case reports</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Case Rep</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>90-93</pages><issn>2050-0904</issn><eissn>2050-0904</eissn><abstract>Key Clinical Message
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.
Although noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a good test with high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21, 18, and 13, it remains a screening test and cannot be used for diagnostic purposes. It is important to consider the outcomes of this test and interpret the results and offer consultation accordingly.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30656016</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccr3.1812</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-190X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2050-0904 |
| ispartof | Clinical case reports, 2019-01, Vol.7 (1), p.90-93 |
| issn | 2050-0904 2050-0904 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6332828 |
| source | Wiley Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central |
| subjects | 69,XXX Case Report Case Reports Medical screening Medical tests noninvasive prenatal testing Prenatal care ultrasound |
| title | Counting‐based cell‐free DNA screening test fails to identify triploidy—A case report |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T09%3A53%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Counting%E2%80%90based%20cell%E2%80%90free%20DNA%20screening%20test%20fails%20to%20identify%20triploidy%E2%80%94A%20case%20report&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20case%20reports&rft.au=Park,%20Ji%20E.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=90-93&rft.issn=2050-0904&rft.eissn=2050-0904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccr3.1812&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2166992999%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166992999&rft_id=info:pmid/30656016&rfr_iscdi=true |