The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation
Objective We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer‐rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G‐COMP) in the context of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders. Method Independent coders rated 744 sessions...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical psychology 2018-04, Vol.74 (4), p.649-664 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 664 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 649 |
| container_title | Journal of clinical psychology |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Brown, Ruth C. Southam‐Gerow, Michael A. McLeod, Bryce D. Wheat, Emily B. Tully, Carrie B. Reise, Steven P. Kendall, Philip C. Weisz, John R. |
| description | Objective
We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer‐rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G‐COMP) in the context of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders.
Method
Independent coders rated 744 sessions from a sample of 68 youth (mean age = 10.56 years) using the G‐COMP and the instruments of alliance, involvement, CBT adherence, CBT competence.
Results
Inter‐rater reliability coefficients, ICC(2,2), were greater than .60 for the 5 G‐COMP domain scores. G‐COMP scores yielded small to medium correlations with instruments of alliance (rs = .17–.44) and youth involvement in treatment (rs = .08–.53), and medium to large correlations with instruments of CBT competence and adherence (rs = .26–.63). Therapists in the research setting were rated higher compared to newly trained therapists in community clinics.
Conclusion
Preliminary reliability and validity of the G‐COMP are promising, but future research is needed with non‐CBT samples. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jclp.22537 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6314178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2017677280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4487-f0a2e2dc77054bd734f57ae7bc7c6659ad2abd16666ecaafe4e3243b7533e7653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozp3RjT9AAm5koGO-2rQuBuT6zQVdjOuQpqfTXNKmJumV--9NveOgLswmhPPk4T28CD2j5IoSwl7tjZuvGCu5fIA2lDSyEJVsHqJNHtKikRU7Q-cx7gkhgtDyMTpjdSPKhtMN2t8MgG-db7XDaYCgZxsTNn6cIcFkAEejHeDeB3z0SxrwHI9m8NEbu_4IoNMIU3qN38IBnJ_XB9ZTh-1k04octLOdTtZPT9CjXrsIT-_uC_Tt_bub7cdi9-XDp-2bXWGEqGXRE82AdUZKUoq2k1z0pdQgWyNNVZWN7phuO1rlA0brHgRwJngrS85BViW_QNcn77y0I3QmJwraqTnYUYej8tqqvyeTHdStP6iKU0FlnQUv7wTBf18gJjXaaMA5PYFfoqKN4KwWpWwy-uIfdO-XMOX1FCNUVlKymmTq8kSZ4GMM0N-HoUStFaq1QvWrwgw__zP-Pfq7swzQE_DDOjj-R6U-b3dfT9KfiGCprg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2017677280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Brown, Ruth C. ; Southam‐Gerow, Michael A. ; McLeod, Bryce D. ; Wheat, Emily B. ; Tully, Carrie B. ; Reise, Steven P. ; Kendall, Philip C. ; Weisz, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ruth C. ; Southam‐Gerow, Michael A. ; McLeod, Bryce D. ; Wheat, Emily B. ; Tully, Carrie B. ; Reise, Steven P. ; Kendall, Philip C. ; Weisz, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer‐rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G‐COMP) in the context of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders.
Method
Independent coders rated 744 sessions from a sample of 68 youth (mean age = 10.56 years) using the G‐COMP and the instruments of alliance, involvement, CBT adherence, CBT competence.
Results
Inter‐rater reliability coefficients, ICC(2,2), were greater than .60 for the 5 G‐COMP domain scores. G‐COMP scores yielded small to medium correlations with instruments of alliance (rs = .17–.44) and youth involvement in treatment (rs = .08–.53), and medium to large correlations with instruments of CBT competence and adherence (rs = .26–.63). Therapists in the research setting were rated higher compared to newly trained therapists in community clinics.
Conclusion
Preliminary reliability and validity of the G‐COMP are promising, but future research is needed with non‐CBT samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22537</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28945931</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Anxiety ; Anxiety Disorders - therapy ; assessment ; Child ; Child psychology ; Clinical Competence ; Clinical psychology ; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - standards ; Cognitive therapy ; cognitive‐behavioral treatment ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Process Assessment, Health Care ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Psychometrics - standards ; Psychosocial development ; Quantitative psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Therapeutic Alliance ; therapist competence ; Therapists ; treatment process ; youth anxiety</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical psychology, 2018-04, Vol.74 (4), p.649-664</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4487-f0a2e2dc77054bd734f57ae7bc7c6659ad2abd16666ecaafe4e3243b7533e7653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4487-f0a2e2dc77054bd734f57ae7bc7c6659ad2abd16666ecaafe4e3243b7533e7653</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8614-1645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjclp.22537$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjclp.22537$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28945931$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ruth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southam‐Gerow, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Bryce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tully, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reise, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation</title><title>Journal of clinical psychology</title><addtitle>J Clin Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective
We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer‐rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G‐COMP) in the context of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders.
Method
Independent coders rated 744 sessions from a sample of 68 youth (mean age = 10.56 years) using the G‐COMP and the instruments of alliance, involvement, CBT adherence, CBT competence.
Results
Inter‐rater reliability coefficients, ICC(2,2), were greater than .60 for the 5 G‐COMP domain scores. G‐COMP scores yielded small to medium correlations with instruments of alliance (rs = .17–.44) and youth involvement in treatment (rs = .08–.53), and medium to large correlations with instruments of CBT competence and adherence (rs = .26–.63). Therapists in the research setting were rated higher compared to newly trained therapists in community clinics.
Conclusion
Preliminary reliability and validity of the G‐COMP are promising, but future research is needed with non‐CBT samples.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Clinical psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>cognitive‐behavioral treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Process Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Psychometrics - standards</subject><subject>Psychosocial development</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Therapeutic Alliance</subject><subject>therapist competence</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>treatment process</subject><subject>youth anxiety</subject><issn>0021-9762</issn><issn>1097-4679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozp3RjT9AAm5koGO-2rQuBuT6zQVdjOuQpqfTXNKmJumV--9NveOgLswmhPPk4T28CD2j5IoSwl7tjZuvGCu5fIA2lDSyEJVsHqJNHtKikRU7Q-cx7gkhgtDyMTpjdSPKhtMN2t8MgG-db7XDaYCgZxsTNn6cIcFkAEejHeDeB3z0SxrwHI9m8NEbu_4IoNMIU3qN38IBnJ_XB9ZTh-1k04octLOdTtZPT9CjXrsIT-_uC_Tt_bub7cdi9-XDp-2bXWGEqGXRE82AdUZKUoq2k1z0pdQgWyNNVZWN7phuO1rlA0brHgRwJngrS85BViW_QNcn77y0I3QmJwraqTnYUYej8tqqvyeTHdStP6iKU0FlnQUv7wTBf18gJjXaaMA5PYFfoqKN4KwWpWwy-uIfdO-XMOX1FCNUVlKymmTq8kSZ4GMM0N-HoUStFaq1QvWrwgw__zP-Pfq7swzQE_DDOjj-R6U-b3dfT9KfiGCprg</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Brown, Ruth C.</creator><creator>Southam‐Gerow, Michael A.</creator><creator>McLeod, Bryce D.</creator><creator>Wheat, Emily B.</creator><creator>Tully, Carrie B.</creator><creator>Reise, Steven P.</creator><creator>Kendall, Philip C.</creator><creator>Weisz, John R.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-1645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation</title><author>Brown, Ruth C. ; Southam‐Gerow, Michael A. ; McLeod, Bryce D. ; Wheat, Emily B. ; Tully, Carrie B. ; Reise, Steven P. ; Kendall, Philip C. ; Weisz, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4487-f0a2e2dc77054bd734f57ae7bc7c6659ad2abd16666ecaafe4e3243b7533e7653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Clinical psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>cognitive‐behavioral treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Process Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Psychometrics - standards</topic><topic>Psychosocial development</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Therapeutic Alliance</topic><topic>therapist competence</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>treatment process</topic><topic>youth anxiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ruth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Southam‐Gerow, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Bryce D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheat, Emily B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tully, Carrie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reise, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Philip C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisz, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Ruth C.</au><au>Southam‐Gerow, Michael A.</au><au>McLeod, Bryce D.</au><au>Wheat, Emily B.</au><au>Tully, Carrie B.</au><au>Reise, Steven P.</au><au>Kendall, Philip C.</au><au>Weisz, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>649-664</pages><issn>0021-9762</issn><eissn>1097-4679</eissn><abstract>Objective
We describe the development and initial psychometric properties of the observer‐rated Global Therapist Competence Scale for Youth Psychosocial Treatment (G‐COMP) in the context of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) for youth anxiety disorders.
Method
Independent coders rated 744 sessions from a sample of 68 youth (mean age = 10.56 years) using the G‐COMP and the instruments of alliance, involvement, CBT adherence, CBT competence.
Results
Inter‐rater reliability coefficients, ICC(2,2), were greater than .60 for the 5 G‐COMP domain scores. G‐COMP scores yielded small to medium correlations with instruments of alliance (rs = .17–.44) and youth involvement in treatment (rs = .08–.53), and medium to large correlations with instruments of CBT competence and adherence (rs = .26–.63). Therapists in the research setting were rated higher compared to newly trained therapists in community clinics.
Conclusion
Preliminary reliability and validity of the G‐COMP are promising, but future research is needed with non‐CBT samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>28945931</pmid><doi>10.1002/jclp.22537</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8614-1645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9762 |
| ispartof | Journal of clinical psychology, 2018-04, Vol.74 (4), p.649-664 |
| issn | 0021-9762 1097-4679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6314178 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Adolescent Anxiety Anxiety Disorders - therapy assessment Child Child psychology Clinical Competence Clinical psychology Cognitive Behavioral Therapy - standards Cognitive therapy cognitive‐behavioral treatment Female Humans Male Process Assessment, Health Care Psychometrics - instrumentation Psychometrics - methods Psychometrics - standards Psychosocial development Quantitative psychology Reproducibility of Results Therapeutic Alliance therapist competence Therapists treatment process youth anxiety |
| title | The global therapist competence scale for youth psychosocial treatment: Development and initial validation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20global%20therapist%20competence%20scale%20for%20youth%20psychosocial%20treatment:%20Development%20and%20initial%20validation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20psychology&rft.au=Brown,%20Ruth%20C.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=649-664&rft.issn=0021-9762&rft.eissn=1097-4679&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jclp.22537&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2017677280%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2017677280&rft_id=info:pmid/28945931&rfr_iscdi=true |