The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study
Introduction. The perception of psychosocial risks exposes workers to develop work-related stress. Recently the attention of scientific research has focused on a psychosocial risk already identified as “job insecurity” that regards the “overall concern about the continued existence of the job in the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-6 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2018 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | BioMed research international |
| container_volume | 2018 |
| creator | Perri, Roberto Buomprisco, Giuseppe Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo Cedrone, Fabrizio De Sio, Simone Greco, Emilio |
| description | Introduction. The perception of psychosocial risks exposes workers to develop work-related stress. Recently the attention of scientific research has focused on a psychosocial risk already identified as “job insecurity” that regards the “overall concern about the continued existence of the job in the future” and that also depends on worker’s perception, different for each gender. Aim of the Study. The aim of this cross sectional study is to show if job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, can influence the perception of psychosocial risks and therefore increase worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and how the magnitude of this effect differs between genders. Materials and Methods. 338 administrative technical workers (113 males and 225 females) were administered a questionnaire, enquiring contract typology (permanent or temporary contracts), and the Health Safety Executive questionnaire to assess work-related stress. The Health Safety Executive Analysis Tool software was used to process collected questionnaires and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences obtained. Results. Workers with temporary contracts obtained lower scores than workers with permanent contracts in all the domains explored by the Health Safety Executive Analysis questionnaire, statistically significant (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2018/7649085 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6313986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A621799118</galeid><sourcerecordid>A621799118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-46e8b7c265fc5fa21cb04d1187f8abda507818b0faffd8e40cd93fc58c34e00c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvFCEcxSdGY5vam2dD4lHHwjAwjAeTzaq1TRObbo1HwsCfLu0srDCj2a_gp5bprlt7kwsEfu_x4BXFS4LfEcLYSYWJOGl43WLBnhSHFSV1yUlNnu7XlB4Uxynd4jwE4bjlz4sDijmvWlIfFr-vl4AuIWpYDy54FCy6TBu9DClop3p05dJdQsob9D3Eu_IKejWAQYshQkrIeXS_MymHgM5Dh858Aj1GN2zuVafgDUT00VkLEbyG9B7N0DyGlMoF6EmZb1kMo9m8KJ5Z1Sc43s1HxbfPn67nX8qLr6dn89lFqRlnQ1lzEF2jK86sZlZVRHe4NoSIxgrVGcVwI4josFXWGgE11qalGRWa1oCxpkfFh63veuxWYDT4IaperqNbqbiRQTn5-MS7pbwJPyWnhLaCZ4PXO4MYfoyQBnkbxpjfkWRFOOE1bQR7oG5UD9J5G7KZXrmk5YxXpGnbnDlTb7eUnr4kgt3nIFhOFcupYrmrOOOv_s2-h_8WmoE3W2DpvFG_3H_aQWbAqgeaVIKzhv4BH125Ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161643785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Perri, Roberto ; Buomprisco, Giuseppe ; Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo ; Cedrone, Fabrizio ; De Sio, Simone ; Greco, Emilio</creator><contributor>Mucci, Nicola ; Nicola Mucci</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perri, Roberto ; Buomprisco, Giuseppe ; Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo ; Cedrone, Fabrizio ; De Sio, Simone ; Greco, Emilio ; Mucci, Nicola ; Nicola Mucci</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. The perception of psychosocial risks exposes workers to develop work-related stress. Recently the attention of scientific research has focused on a psychosocial risk already identified as “job insecurity” that regards the “overall concern about the continued existence of the job in the future” and that also depends on worker’s perception, different for each gender. Aim of the Study. The aim of this cross sectional study is to show if job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, can influence the perception of psychosocial risks and therefore increase worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and how the magnitude of this effect differs between genders. Materials and Methods. 338 administrative technical workers (113 males and 225 females) were administered a questionnaire, enquiring contract typology (permanent or temporary contracts), and the Health Safety Executive questionnaire to assess work-related stress. The Health Safety Executive Analysis Tool software was used to process collected questionnaires and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences obtained. Results. Workers with temporary contracts obtained lower scores than workers with permanent contracts in all the domains explored by the Health Safety Executive Analysis questionnaire, statistically significant (P<0,05). The female workers obtained lower scores than male workers in all domains explored by the Health Safety Executive questionnaire. Conclusions. Authors conclude that perception of psychosocial risks can be influenced by job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, and increases worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and differs between genders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2018/7649085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30662914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Adult ; Contracts ; Coping ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Domains ; Employment ; Employment - psychology ; Family medical history ; Female ; Females ; Gender aspects ; Gender differences ; Health ; Humans ; Job Satisfaction ; Job stress ; Male ; Males ; Occupational health ; Occupational safety ; Occupational stress ; Occupational Stress - psychology ; Organizational change ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Population ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological stress ; Questionnaires ; Safety ; Sex differences ; Sex Factors ; Social aspects ; Social interactions ; Social psychology ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical significance ; Stress, Psychological - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systematic review ; Typology ; Workers ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Simone De Sio et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Simone De Sio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Simone De Sio et al. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-46e8b7c265fc5fa21cb04d1187f8abda507818b0faffd8e40cd93fc58c34e00c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-46e8b7c265fc5fa21cb04d1187f8abda507818b0faffd8e40cd93fc58c34e00c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4538-3941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313986/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313986/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30662914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Mucci, Nicola</contributor><contributor>Nicola Mucci</contributor><creatorcontrib>Perri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buomprisco, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedrone, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Sio, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Emilio</creatorcontrib><title>The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>Introduction. The perception of psychosocial risks exposes workers to develop work-related stress. Recently the attention of scientific research has focused on a psychosocial risk already identified as “job insecurity” that regards the “overall concern about the continued existence of the job in the future” and that also depends on worker’s perception, different for each gender. Aim of the Study. The aim of this cross sectional study is to show if job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, can influence the perception of psychosocial risks and therefore increase worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and how the magnitude of this effect differs between genders. Materials and Methods. 338 administrative technical workers (113 males and 225 females) were administered a questionnaire, enquiring contract typology (permanent or temporary contracts), and the Health Safety Executive questionnaire to assess work-related stress. The Health Safety Executive Analysis Tool software was used to process collected questionnaires and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences obtained. Results. Workers with temporary contracts obtained lower scores than workers with permanent contracts in all the domains explored by the Health Safety Executive Analysis questionnaire, statistically significant (P<0,05). The female workers obtained lower scores than male workers in all domains explored by the Health Safety Executive questionnaire. Conclusions. Authors conclude that perception of psychosocial risks can be influenced by job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, and increases worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and differs between genders.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment - psychology</subject><subject>Family medical history</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Job stress</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Occupational Stress - psychology</subject><subject>Organizational change</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological stress</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvFCEcxSdGY5vam2dD4lHHwjAwjAeTzaq1TRObbo1HwsCfLu0srDCj2a_gp5bprlt7kwsEfu_x4BXFS4LfEcLYSYWJOGl43WLBnhSHFSV1yUlNnu7XlB4Uxynd4jwE4bjlz4sDijmvWlIfFr-vl4AuIWpYDy54FCy6TBu9DClop3p05dJdQsob9D3Eu_IKejWAQYshQkrIeXS_MymHgM5Dh858Aj1GN2zuVafgDUT00VkLEbyG9B7N0DyGlMoF6EmZb1kMo9m8KJ5Z1Sc43s1HxbfPn67nX8qLr6dn89lFqRlnQ1lzEF2jK86sZlZVRHe4NoSIxgrVGcVwI4josFXWGgE11qalGRWa1oCxpkfFh63veuxWYDT4IaperqNbqbiRQTn5-MS7pbwJPyWnhLaCZ4PXO4MYfoyQBnkbxpjfkWRFOOE1bQR7oG5UD9J5G7KZXrmk5YxXpGnbnDlTb7eUnr4kgt3nIFhOFcupYrmrOOOv_s2-h_8WmoE3W2DpvFG_3H_aQWbAqgeaVIKzhv4BH125Ow</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Perri, Roberto</creator><creator>Buomprisco, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo</creator><creator>Cedrone, Fabrizio</creator><creator>De Sio, Simone</creator><creator>Greco, Emilio</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-3941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study</title><author>Perri, Roberto ; Buomprisco, Giuseppe ; Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo ; Cedrone, Fabrizio ; De Sio, Simone ; Greco, Emilio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-46e8b7c265fc5fa21cb04d1187f8abda507818b0faffd8e40cd93fc58c34e00c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment - psychology</topic><topic>Family medical history</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Job stress</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Occupational Stress - psychology</topic><topic>Organizational change</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological stress</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perri, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buomprisco, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cedrone, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Sio, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greco, Emilio</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perri, Roberto</au><au>Buomprisco, Giuseppe</au><au>Trovato Battagliola, Edoardo</au><au>Cedrone, Fabrizio</au><au>De Sio, Simone</au><au>Greco, Emilio</au><au>Mucci, Nicola</au><au>Nicola Mucci</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2018</volume><issue>2018</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>Introduction. The perception of psychosocial risks exposes workers to develop work-related stress. Recently the attention of scientific research has focused on a psychosocial risk already identified as “job insecurity” that regards the “overall concern about the continued existence of the job in the future” and that also depends on worker’s perception, different for each gender. Aim of the Study. The aim of this cross sectional study is to show if job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, can influence the perception of psychosocial risks and therefore increase worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and how the magnitude of this effect differs between genders. Materials and Methods. 338 administrative technical workers (113 males and 225 females) were administered a questionnaire, enquiring contract typology (permanent or temporary contracts), and the Health Safety Executive questionnaire to assess work-related stress. The Health Safety Executive Analysis Tool software was used to process collected questionnaires and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences obtained. Results. Workers with temporary contracts obtained lower scores than workers with permanent contracts in all the domains explored by the Health Safety Executive Analysis questionnaire, statistically significant (P<0,05). The female workers obtained lower scores than male workers in all domains explored by the Health Safety Executive questionnaire. Conclusions. Authors conclude that perception of psychosocial risks can be influenced by job insecurity, in the form of temporary contracts, and increases worker’s vulnerability to work-related stress and differs between genders.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>30662914</pmid><doi>10.1155/2018/7649085</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-3941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
| ispartof | BioMed research international, 2018-01, Vol.2018 (2018), p.1-6 |
| issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6313986 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Adult Contracts Coping Cross-Sectional Studies Domains Employment Employment - psychology Family medical history Female Females Gender aspects Gender differences Health Humans Job Satisfaction Job stress Male Males Occupational health Occupational safety Occupational stress Occupational Stress - psychology Organizational change Perception Perceptions Population Psychological aspects Psychological stress Questionnaires Safety Sex differences Sex Factors Social aspects Social interactions Social psychology Software Statistical analysis Statistical significance Stress, Psychological - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Systematic review Typology Workers Working conditions |
| title | The Perception of Psychosocial Risks and Work-Related Stress in Relation to Job Insecurity and Gender Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Perception%20of%20Psychosocial%20Risks%20and%20Work-Related%20Stress%20in%20Relation%20to%20Job%20Insecurity%20and%20Gender%20Differences:%20A%20Cross-Sectional%20Study&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Perri,%20Roberto&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=2018&rft.issue=2018&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2018/7649085&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA621799118%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161643785&rft_id=info:pmid/30662914&rft_galeid=A621799118&rfr_iscdi=true |