"Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques
An Understanding Checkpoint (UC) presents students with previously-unseen figures from published scientific studies accompanied by questions about the study methods, results, and implications. The UCs incorporate content, concepts, and techniques previously discussed in class, although the figures a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education 2018, Vol.17 (1), p.E1-E3 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | E1 |
container_title | Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Schaefer, Jennifer E |
description | An Understanding Checkpoint (UC) presents students with previously-unseen figures from published scientific studies accompanied by questions about the study methods, results, and implications. The UCs incorporate content, concepts, and techniques previously discussed in class, although the figures and study from which they are taken are new to students. They are in-class, open-note, time-limited assessments that simultaneously assess course learning goals related to: neurobiology principles and content; process of scientific investigation, including neurobiological research tools and data interpretation; and reading and analyzing primary research literature. After students submit their work, they are provided the full publication and are asked to grade their own work, providing rationale for their evaluation. The self-evaluative portion of the assignment incentivizes students to identify and remediate ongoing weaknesses. It also provides spaced retrieval practice to enhance learning. The final grade for the UC incorporates the student's original answers and the accuracy of the self-assessment rationale. Student and instructor feedback indicates that the self - evaluative requirement develops a deeper understanding of the course material and enhances metacognitive effort, in addition to providing an opportunity to improve the UC grade. This strategy was originally presented as a teaching demonstration at the 2017 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience Workshop. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6312137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2165041745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1117-73c9519bde2ae4701721ed5f91837ff381ba6e51c7109454821502155901abd73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMFKw0AQDaJYrf6CLL3oJbCTzWaTi1BKq0LFQ9tz2Gwm7Wq6G7NJJR_gf5tqlXoY5s3M473HnHgXwMPQD-IkOj3CA-_SuVdKAxYk0bk3YDSCmFNx4X2OVibH2jXS5NqsyWSD6q2y2jRuRGa2LO0H5iTryALLwp_uZNnKRltDGkvGzqFzZNG0Ofb8W7JQuge60IrMdYO1VB3pdcmzdP3UEVuQiTVNz_leL1FtjH5v0V15Z4UsHV4f-tBbzabLyaM_f3l4moznfgUAwhdMJRySLMdAYigoiAAw50UCMRNFwWLIZIQclACahDyMA-C0L55QkFku2NC7_9Gt2myLueqT1LJMq1pvZd2lVur0_8XoTbq2uzRiEADbC9wdBGq7D96kW-0UlqU0aFuXBhBxGoIIeU-9Ofb6M_n9PfsC792C5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2165041745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schaefer, Jennifer E</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><description>An Understanding Checkpoint (UC) presents students with previously-unseen figures from published scientific studies accompanied by questions about the study methods, results, and implications. The UCs incorporate content, concepts, and techniques previously discussed in class, although the figures and study from which they are taken are new to students. They are in-class, open-note, time-limited assessments that simultaneously assess course learning goals related to: neurobiology principles and content; process of scientific investigation, including neurobiological research tools and data interpretation; and reading and analyzing primary research literature. After students submit their work, they are provided the full publication and are asked to grade their own work, providing rationale for their evaluation. The self-evaluative portion of the assignment incentivizes students to identify and remediate ongoing weaknesses. It also provides spaced retrieval practice to enhance learning. The final grade for the UC incorporates the student's original answers and the accuracy of the self-assessment rationale. Student and instructor feedback indicates that the self - evaluative requirement develops a deeper understanding of the course material and enhances metacognitive effort, in addition to providing an opportunity to improve the UC grade. This strategy was originally presented as a teaching demonstration at the 2017 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience Workshop.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1544-2896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1544-2896</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30618507</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience</publisher><ispartof>Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education, 2018, Vol.17 (1), p.E1-E3</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312137/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6312137/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30618507$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><title>"Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques</title><title>Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education</title><addtitle>J Undergrad Neurosci Educ</addtitle><description>An Understanding Checkpoint (UC) presents students with previously-unseen figures from published scientific studies accompanied by questions about the study methods, results, and implications. The UCs incorporate content, concepts, and techniques previously discussed in class, although the figures and study from which they are taken are new to students. They are in-class, open-note, time-limited assessments that simultaneously assess course learning goals related to: neurobiology principles and content; process of scientific investigation, including neurobiological research tools and data interpretation; and reading and analyzing primary research literature. After students submit their work, they are provided the full publication and are asked to grade their own work, providing rationale for their evaluation. The self-evaluative portion of the assignment incentivizes students to identify and remediate ongoing weaknesses. It also provides spaced retrieval practice to enhance learning. The final grade for the UC incorporates the student's original answers and the accuracy of the self-assessment rationale. Student and instructor feedback indicates that the self - evaluative requirement develops a deeper understanding of the course material and enhances metacognitive effort, in addition to providing an opportunity to improve the UC grade. This strategy was originally presented as a teaching demonstration at the 2017 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience Workshop.</description><issn>1544-2896</issn><issn>1544-2896</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUMFKw0AQDaJYrf6CLL3oJbCTzWaTi1BKq0LFQ9tz2Gwm7Wq6G7NJJR_gf5tqlXoY5s3M473HnHgXwMPQD-IkOj3CA-_SuVdKAxYk0bk3YDSCmFNx4X2OVibH2jXS5NqsyWSD6q2y2jRuRGa2LO0H5iTryALLwp_uZNnKRltDGkvGzqFzZNG0Ofb8W7JQuge60IrMdYO1VB3pdcmzdP3UEVuQiTVNz_leL1FtjH5v0V15Z4UsHV4f-tBbzabLyaM_f3l4moznfgUAwhdMJRySLMdAYigoiAAw50UCMRNFwWLIZIQclACahDyMA-C0L55QkFku2NC7_9Gt2myLueqT1LJMq1pvZd2lVur0_8XoTbq2uzRiEADbC9wdBGq7D96kW-0UlqU0aFuXBhBxGoIIeU-9Ofb6M_n9PfsC792C5g</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Schaefer, Jennifer E</creator><general>Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>"Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques</title><author>Schaefer, Jennifer E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1117-73c9519bde2ae4701721ed5f91837ff381ba6e51c7109454821502155901abd73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Jennifer E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaefer, Jennifer E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education</jtitle><addtitle>J Undergrad Neurosci Educ</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>E1</spage><epage>E3</epage><pages>E1-E3</pages><issn>1544-2896</issn><eissn>1544-2896</eissn><abstract>An Understanding Checkpoint (UC) presents students with previously-unseen figures from published scientific studies accompanied by questions about the study methods, results, and implications. The UCs incorporate content, concepts, and techniques previously discussed in class, although the figures and study from which they are taken are new to students. They are in-class, open-note, time-limited assessments that simultaneously assess course learning goals related to: neurobiology principles and content; process of scientific investigation, including neurobiological research tools and data interpretation; and reading and analyzing primary research literature. After students submit their work, they are provided the full publication and are asked to grade their own work, providing rationale for their evaluation. The self-evaluative portion of the assignment incentivizes students to identify and remediate ongoing weaknesses. It also provides spaced retrieval practice to enhance learning. The final grade for the UC incorporates the student's original answers and the accuracy of the self-assessment rationale. Student and instructor feedback indicates that the self - evaluative requirement develops a deeper understanding of the course material and enhances metacognitive effort, in addition to providing an opportunity to improve the UC grade. This strategy was originally presented as a teaching demonstration at the 2017 Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience Workshop.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience</pub><pmid>30618507</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1544-2896 |
ispartof | Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education, 2018, Vol.17 (1), p.E1-E3 |
issn | 1544-2896 1544-2896 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6312137 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | "Understanding Checkpoints" Followed by Self-Evaluation to Assess Students' Scientific Literacy and Mastery of Content and Techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A19%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Understanding%20Checkpoints%22%20Followed%20by%20Self-Evaluation%20to%20Assess%20Students'%20Scientific%20Literacy%20and%20Mastery%20of%20Content%20and%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20undergraduate%20neuroscience%20education&rft.au=Schaefer,%20Jennifer%20E&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=E1&rft.epage=E3&rft.pages=E1-E3&rft.issn=1544-2896&rft.eissn=1544-2896&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2165041745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2165041745&rft_id=info:pmid/30618507&rfr_iscdi=true |