Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis

Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiology research 2018-12, Vol.9 (6), p.335-342
Hauptverfasser: Sachdev, Sarina, Bardia, Nikky, Nguyen, Landai, Omar, Bassam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 342
container_issue 6
container_start_page 335
container_title Cardiology research
container_volume 9
creator Sachdev, Sarina
Bardia, Nikky
Nguyen, Landai
Omar, Bassam
description Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges.
doi_str_mv 10.14740/cr789
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6306127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179350399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed034e6a132c848a51fb78f7dbf5ed32d38ecd89582fdd8613353b5f0d4dc2a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotmj9CaUn8bKaZJJN9iJo8QsKXqrXkM2Hjew2NdkW_PcubS06lxmYh3fmfRG6IPiaMMHwjUlCVkdoSCoKBZUgjg8zrQZolPMn7otxXgp2igaASyp6bojG9yGuUszdwnXBTN51s3GT-SLFto455HN04nWT3Wjfz9Db48N8-lzMXp9epnezwgCwrnAWA3OlJkCNZFJz4mshvbC1584CtSCdsbLiknprZUkAONTcY8usoZrDGbrd6a7Wdeusccsu6UatUmh1-lZRB_V_swwL9RE3quytECp6gau9QIpfa5c71YZsXNPopYvrrCgRFXAMVdWjlzvU9L5zcv5whmC1zVNt8-zB8d-nDthvevADmUdv5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2179350399</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sachdev, Sarina ; Bardia, Nikky ; Nguyen, Landai ; Omar, Bassam</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Sarina ; Bardia, Nikky ; Nguyen, Landai ; Omar, Bassam</creatorcontrib><description>Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1923-2829</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1923-2837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14740/cr789</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30627283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Elmer Press</publisher><subject>Review</subject><ispartof>Cardiology research, 2018-12, Vol.9 (6), p.335-342</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2018, Sachdev et al. 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed034e6a132c848a51fb78f7dbf5ed32d38ecd89582fdd8613353b5f0d4dc2a53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306127/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6306127/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardia, Nikky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Landai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Bassam</creatorcontrib><title>Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis</title><title>Cardiology research</title><addtitle>Cardiol Res</addtitle><description>Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges.</description><subject>Review</subject><issn>1923-2829</issn><issn>1923-2837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotmj9CaUn8bKaZJJN9iJo8QsKXqrXkM2Hjew2NdkW_PcubS06lxmYh3fmfRG6IPiaMMHwjUlCVkdoSCoKBZUgjg8zrQZolPMn7otxXgp2igaASyp6bojG9yGuUszdwnXBTN51s3GT-SLFto455HN04nWT3Wjfz9Db48N8-lzMXp9epnezwgCwrnAWA3OlJkCNZFJz4mshvbC1584CtSCdsbLiknprZUkAONTcY8usoZrDGbrd6a7Wdeusccsu6UatUmh1-lZRB_V_swwL9RE3quytECp6gau9QIpfa5c71YZsXNPopYvrrCgRFXAMVdWjlzvU9L5zcv5whmC1zVNt8-zB8d-nDthvevADmUdv5g</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Sachdev, Sarina</creator><creator>Bardia, Nikky</creator><creator>Nguyen, Landai</creator><creator>Omar, Bassam</creator><general>Elmer Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis</title><author>Sachdev, Sarina ; Bardia, Nikky ; Nguyen, Landai ; Omar, Bassam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ed034e6a132c848a51fb78f7dbf5ed32d38ecd89582fdd8613353b5f0d4dc2a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachdev, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardia, Nikky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Landai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omar, Bassam</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cardiology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachdev, Sarina</au><au>Bardia, Nikky</au><au>Nguyen, Landai</au><au>Omar, Bassam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis</atitle><jtitle>Cardiology research</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiol Res</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>335-342</pages><issn>1923-2829</issn><eissn>1923-2837</eissn><abstract>Degenerative valve disease is on the rise with greater than 100,000 valve operations performed in the US alone per year. The majority of those procedures employ tissue bioprostheses to avoid the attendant risk of anticoagulation, especially in the elderly. Though traditionally this approach has been considered a superior option to avoid anticoagulation, more recent analyses have demonstrated a significant incidence of previously unrecognized thrombosis associated with bioprosthetic valves, especially with the more recent advent of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement implantations. Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a major cause of either acute or indolent bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and often has an elusive presentation causing delayed recognition and treatment. The literature has extensively addressed the risks and benefits of anticoagulation following bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent bioprosthetic valve thrombosis (BPVT), without conclusive evidence-based recommendations. The duration of anticoagulation following an episode of BPVT is unclear, and lifelong anticoagulation has been suggested. The increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement in various risk groups has introduced new challenges with regards to valve thrombosis, which have been poorly studied with regards to optimal treatment and prevention. The increasing use of valve-in-valve procedures is expected to bring on further uncharted challenges.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Elmer Press</pub><pmid>30627283</pmid><doi>10.14740/cr789</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1923-2829
ispartof Cardiology research, 2018-12, Vol.9 (6), p.335-342
issn 1923-2829
1923-2837
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6306127
source PubMed (Medline); Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Review
title Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioprosthetic%20Valve%20Thrombosis&rft.jtitle=Cardiology%20research&rft.au=Sachdev,%20Sarina&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=335-342&rft.issn=1923-2829&rft.eissn=1923-2837&rft_id=info:doi/10.14740/cr789&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2179350399%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2179350399&rft_id=info:pmid/30627283&rfr_iscdi=true