Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in two formulations, a test formulation (Saifukang 5% CEF, Hvsen) and a reference formulation (Excenel®RTU 5% CEF, Pfizer). Twenty-four healthy pigs were assigned to a two-period, two-treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2018, Vol.80(12), pp.1847-1852
Hauptverfasser: XIONG, Jincheng, ZHU, Qianqian, LEI, Zhixin, YANG, Shuaike, CHEN, Peiyuan, ZHAO, Yaxin, CAO, Jiyue, QIU, Yinsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1852
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1847
container_title Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
container_volume 80
creator XIONG, Jincheng
ZHU, Qianqian
LEI, Zhixin
YANG, Shuaike
CHEN, Peiyuan
ZHAO, Yaxin
CAO, Jiyue
QIU, Yinsheng
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in two formulations, a test formulation (Saifukang 5% CEF, Hvsen) and a reference formulation (Excenel®RTU 5% CEF, Pfizer). Twenty-four healthy pigs were assigned to a two-period, two-treatment crossover parallel trial, and both formulations were administered at a single intramuscular dose of 5 mg/kg weight, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected consecutively for up to 144 hr after administration. The concentrations of ceftiofur- and desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites in the plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the major pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were computed and compared via analysis of variance, with 90% confidence intervals. Bioequivalence evaluation of Tmax was statistically analyzed with the nonparametric test. The comparison values between test and reference formulation for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, and Tmax were 376.7 ± 75.3 µg·hr/ml, 390.5 ± 78.6 µg·hr/ml, 385.9 ± 79.2 µg·hr/ml, 402.7 ± 80.4 µg·hr/ml, 34.6 ± 5.5 µg/ml, 36.1 ± 6.2 µg/ml, 1.27 ± 0.18 hr, and 1.26 ± 0.21 hr, respectively, and we observed no significant differences between the two formulations. The 90% CI values were within the recommended range of 80–125% (P>0.05), and the relative bioavailability of the test product was 96.47 ± 10.92% according to AUC0-t values. Based on our results, the two formulations exhibit comparable pharmacokinetic profiles, and the test product is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1292/jvms.18-0470
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6305520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2239624345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-ddbe2ae1e1c6b007f24efc396335421a671022a4da0b3f929c3f9a4f5c0bcbee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7rh68ywNIniw18pHpyeXBR38ggUv6jWk05WZDD3JbNI9sv_etL0O6iUVUk8eqngJeU7hijLF3u5Ph3xF1zWIFh6QFeWirVvB1UOyAkVl3bIGLsiTnPcAjAqpHpMLDnxNZdusyI_3PuLt5E9mwGCxwnKZzOhjqKKrxp-xal5VFl15cVOqdnd9inY3xOR7rPKIyQ-lTvmIIc-ffKiOfpufkkfODBmf3ddL8v3jh2-bz_XN109fNu9uaiupGuu-75AZpEit7ABaxwQ6y5XkvBGMGtlSYMyI3kDHnWLKltMI11jobIfIL8n14j1O3QF7i2FMZtDH5A8m3elovP63E_xOb-NJSw5Nw6AIXt8LUrydMI_64LPFYTAB45Q1o6xVQimQBX35H7qPUwplPc1YmZkJLppCvVkom2LOCd15GAp6DkzPgWm61nNgBX_x9wJn-E9CBdgswD6PZotnwKTR2wEX23pW_z4X7blrdyZpDPwX-L-sHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2239624345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>XIONG, Jincheng ; ZHU, Qianqian ; LEI, Zhixin ; YANG, Shuaike ; CHEN, Peiyuan ; ZHAO, Yaxin ; CAO, Jiyue ; QIU, Yinsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>XIONG, Jincheng ; ZHU, Qianqian ; LEI, Zhixin ; YANG, Shuaike ; CHEN, Peiyuan ; ZHAO, Yaxin ; CAO, Jiyue ; QIU, Yinsheng</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in two formulations, a test formulation (Saifukang 5% CEF, Hvsen) and a reference formulation (Excenel®RTU 5% CEF, Pfizer). Twenty-four healthy pigs were assigned to a two-period, two-treatment crossover parallel trial, and both formulations were administered at a single intramuscular dose of 5 mg/kg weight, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected consecutively for up to 144 hr after administration. The concentrations of ceftiofur- and desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites in the plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the major pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were computed and compared via analysis of variance, with 90% confidence intervals. Bioequivalence evaluation of Tmax was statistically analyzed with the nonparametric test. The comparison values between test and reference formulation for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, and Tmax were 376.7 ± 75.3 µg·hr/ml, 390.5 ± 78.6 µg·hr/ml, 385.9 ± 79.2 µg·hr/ml, 402.7 ± 80.4 µg·hr/ml, 34.6 ± 5.5 µg/ml, 36.1 ± 6.2 µg/ml, 1.27 ± 0.18 hr, and 1.26 ± 0.21 hr, respectively, and we observed no significant differences between the two formulations. The 90% CI values were within the recommended range of 80–125% (P&gt;0.05), and the relative bioavailability of the test product was 96.47 ± 10.92% according to AUC0-t values. Based on our results, the two formulations exhibit comparable pharmacokinetic profiles, and the test product is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0916-7250</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1347-7439</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1292/jvms.18-0470</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30381675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</publisher><subject>Bioavailability ; bioequivalence ; ceftiofur ; confidence interval ; Crossovers ; Evaluation ; Formulations ; High performance liquid chromatography ; Liquid chromatography ; Metabolites ; pharmacokinetic ; Pharmacology ; pig ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2018, Vol.80(12), pp.1847-1852</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency Dec 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-ddbe2ae1e1c6b007f24efc396335421a671022a4da0b3f929c3f9a4f5c0bcbee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-ddbe2ae1e1c6b007f24efc396335421a671022a4da0b3f929c3f9a4f5c0bcbee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305520/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6305520/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1883,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30381675$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>XIONG, Jincheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHU, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEI, Zhixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANG, Shuaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, Peiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAO, Yaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAO, Jiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QIU, Yinsheng</creatorcontrib><title>Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs</title><title>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</title><addtitle>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in two formulations, a test formulation (Saifukang 5% CEF, Hvsen) and a reference formulation (Excenel®RTU 5% CEF, Pfizer). Twenty-four healthy pigs were assigned to a two-period, two-treatment crossover parallel trial, and both formulations were administered at a single intramuscular dose of 5 mg/kg weight, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected consecutively for up to 144 hr after administration. The concentrations of ceftiofur- and desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites in the plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the major pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were computed and compared via analysis of variance, with 90% confidence intervals. Bioequivalence evaluation of Tmax was statistically analyzed with the nonparametric test. The comparison values between test and reference formulation for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, and Tmax were 376.7 ± 75.3 µg·hr/ml, 390.5 ± 78.6 µg·hr/ml, 385.9 ± 79.2 µg·hr/ml, 402.7 ± 80.4 µg·hr/ml, 34.6 ± 5.5 µg/ml, 36.1 ± 6.2 µg/ml, 1.27 ± 0.18 hr, and 1.26 ± 0.21 hr, respectively, and we observed no significant differences between the two formulations. The 90% CI values were within the recommended range of 80–125% (P&gt;0.05), and the relative bioavailability of the test product was 96.47 ± 10.92% according to AUC0-t values. Based on our results, the two formulations exhibit comparable pharmacokinetic profiles, and the test product is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.</description><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>bioequivalence</subject><subject>ceftiofur</subject><subject>confidence interval</subject><subject>Crossovers</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>High performance liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>pharmacokinetic</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>pig</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0916-7250</issn><issn>1347-7439</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkU2LFDEQhoMo7rh68ywNIniw18pHpyeXBR38ggUv6jWk05WZDD3JbNI9sv_etL0O6iUVUk8eqngJeU7hijLF3u5Ph3xF1zWIFh6QFeWirVvB1UOyAkVl3bIGLsiTnPcAjAqpHpMLDnxNZdusyI_3PuLt5E9mwGCxwnKZzOhjqKKrxp-xal5VFl15cVOqdnd9inY3xOR7rPKIyQ-lTvmIIc-ffKiOfpufkkfODBmf3ddL8v3jh2-bz_XN109fNu9uaiupGuu-75AZpEit7ABaxwQ6y5XkvBGMGtlSYMyI3kDHnWLKltMI11jobIfIL8n14j1O3QF7i2FMZtDH5A8m3elovP63E_xOb-NJSw5Nw6AIXt8LUrydMI_64LPFYTAB45Q1o6xVQimQBX35H7qPUwplPc1YmZkJLppCvVkom2LOCd15GAp6DkzPgWm61nNgBX_x9wJn-E9CBdgswD6PZotnwKTR2wEX23pW_z4X7blrdyZpDPwX-L-sHw</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>XIONG, Jincheng</creator><creator>ZHU, Qianqian</creator><creator>LEI, Zhixin</creator><creator>YANG, Shuaike</creator><creator>CHEN, Peiyuan</creator><creator>ZHAO, Yaxin</creator><creator>CAO, Jiyue</creator><creator>QIU, Yinsheng</creator><general>JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><general>The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs</title><author>XIONG, Jincheng ; ZHU, Qianqian ; LEI, Zhixin ; YANG, Shuaike ; CHEN, Peiyuan ; ZHAO, Yaxin ; CAO, Jiyue ; QIU, Yinsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c619t-ddbe2ae1e1c6b007f24efc396335421a671022a4da0b3f929c3f9a4f5c0bcbee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>bioequivalence</topic><topic>ceftiofur</topic><topic>confidence interval</topic><topic>Crossovers</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>High performance liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>pharmacokinetic</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>pig</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>XIONG, Jincheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHU, Qianqian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEI, Zhixin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANG, Shuaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEN, Peiyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHAO, Yaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAO, Jiyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>QIU, Yinsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>XIONG, Jincheng</au><au>ZHU, Qianqian</au><au>LEI, Zhixin</au><au>YANG, Shuaike</au><au>CHEN, Peiyuan</au><au>ZHAO, Yaxin</au><au>CAO, Jiyue</au><au>QIU, Yinsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Veterinary Medical Science</jtitle><addtitle>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1847</spage><epage>1852</epage><pages>1847-1852</pages><issn>0916-7250</issn><eissn>1347-7439</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in two formulations, a test formulation (Saifukang 5% CEF, Hvsen) and a reference formulation (Excenel®RTU 5% CEF, Pfizer). Twenty-four healthy pigs were assigned to a two-period, two-treatment crossover parallel trial, and both formulations were administered at a single intramuscular dose of 5 mg/kg weight, with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected consecutively for up to 144 hr after administration. The concentrations of ceftiofur- and desfuroylceftiofur-related metabolites in the plasma were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the major pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞) were computed and compared via analysis of variance, with 90% confidence intervals. Bioequivalence evaluation of Tmax was statistically analyzed with the nonparametric test. The comparison values between test and reference formulation for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, and Tmax were 376.7 ± 75.3 µg·hr/ml, 390.5 ± 78.6 µg·hr/ml, 385.9 ± 79.2 µg·hr/ml, 402.7 ± 80.4 µg·hr/ml, 34.6 ± 5.5 µg/ml, 36.1 ± 6.2 µg/ml, 1.27 ± 0.18 hr, and 1.26 ± 0.21 hr, respectively, and we observed no significant differences between the two formulations. The 90% CI values were within the recommended range of 80–125% (P&gt;0.05), and the relative bioavailability of the test product was 96.47 ± 10.92% according to AUC0-t values. Based on our results, the two formulations exhibit comparable pharmacokinetic profiles, and the test product is bioequivalent to the reference formulation.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>JAPANESE SOCIETY OF VETERINARY SCIENCE</pub><pmid>30381675</pmid><doi>10.1292/jvms.18-0470</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0916-7250
ispartof Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2018, Vol.80(12), pp.1847-1852
issn 0916-7250
1347-7439
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6305520
source J-STAGE Free; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Bioavailability
bioequivalence
ceftiofur
confidence interval
Crossovers
Evaluation
Formulations
High performance liquid chromatography
Liquid chromatography
Metabolites
pharmacokinetic
Pharmacology
pig
Variance analysis
title Bioequivalence evaluation of two 5% ceftiofur hydrochloride sterile suspension in pigs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A43%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioequivalence%20evaluation%20of%20two%205%25%20ceftiofur%20hydrochloride%20sterile%20suspension%20in%20pigs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Veterinary%20Medical%20Science&rft.au=XIONG,%20Jincheng&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1847&rft.epage=1852&rft.pages=1847-1852&rft.issn=0916-7250&rft.eissn=1347-7439&rft_id=info:doi/10.1292/jvms.18-0470&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2239624345%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2239624345&rft_id=info:pmid/30381675&rfr_iscdi=true