Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1

Abstract Objective swere to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to diet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144
Hauptverfasser: Prezotto, L. D., Gilbery, T. C., Bauer, M. L., Islas, A., Swanson, K. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5144
container_issue 11
container_start_page 5137
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Prezotto, L. D.
Gilbery, T. C.
Bauer, M. L.
Islas, A.
Swanson, K. C.
description Abstract Objective swere to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601–1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800–0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LF-S). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P < 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limit-feeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas2017.1925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6292335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.2527/jas2017.1925</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.2527/jas2017.1925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2055-fe4469f5c9fdb1fa32d43dc812c29993ed178cd41fbff1147161dea8a12658bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EouWx4wO8Y0NKxo6TeIOEEC8JiQ2so4kfraskjpw0qB_BP5PQgsSG1Uhz7xzNzCXkAuIFEyy7XmPHYsgWIJk4IHMQTEQcUn5I5nHMIMpzYDNy0nXrOAYmpDgmMyaZ5Bkkc_L53NhqYxplqLe0crXrI2uMds2SYqNp7-pvReN2KpNEcUBXYekq129p7-ky-I_Jr7AaTEd9893pV7Q1wfpQ40SfYD_g0qxwcD5Q11DlK00_DPYrE-CMHFmsOnO-r6fk_eH-7e4penl9fL67fYkUi4UYF0ySVFqhpNUlWORMJ1yr8VDFpJTcaMhypROwpbUASQYpaIM5AktFXlp-Sm523HZT1kYr0_QBq6INrsawLTy64q_SuFWx9EORjp_jXIyAqx1ABd91wdjfWYiLKZZiH0sxxTLaL3d2v2n_d34Bu7-PGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Prezotto, L. D. ; Gilbery, T. C. ; Bauer, M. L. ; Islas, A. ; Swanson, K. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L. D. ; Gilbery, T. C. ; Bauer, M. L. ; Islas, A. ; Swanson, K. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective swere to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601–1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800–0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LF-S). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P &lt; 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limit-feeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29293714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ruminant Nutrition</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144</ispartof><rights>American Society of Animal Science 2017</rights><rights>2017 American Society of Animal Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2055-fe4469f5c9fdb1fa32d43dc812c29993ed178cd41fbff1147161dea8a12658bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2055-fe4469f5c9fdb1fa32d43dc812c29993ed178cd41fbff1147161dea8a12658bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292335/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6292335/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbery, T. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, K. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract Objective swere to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601–1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800–0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LF-S). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P &lt; 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limit-feeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</description><subject>Ruminant Nutrition</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EouWx4wO8Y0NKxo6TeIOEEC8JiQ2so4kfraskjpw0qB_BP5PQgsSG1Uhz7xzNzCXkAuIFEyy7XmPHYsgWIJk4IHMQTEQcUn5I5nHMIMpzYDNy0nXrOAYmpDgmMyaZ5Bkkc_L53NhqYxplqLe0crXrI2uMds2SYqNp7-pvReN2KpNEcUBXYekq129p7-ky-I_Jr7AaTEd9893pV7Q1wfpQ40SfYD_g0qxwcD5Q11DlK00_DPYrE-CMHFmsOnO-r6fk_eH-7e4penl9fL67fYkUi4UYF0ySVFqhpNUlWORMJ1yr8VDFpJTcaMhypROwpbUASQYpaIM5AktFXlp-Sm523HZT1kYr0_QBq6INrsawLTy64q_SuFWx9EORjp_jXIyAqx1ABd91wdjfWYiLKZZiH0sxxTLaL3d2v2n_d34Bu7-PGw</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Prezotto, L. D.</creator><creator>Gilbery, T. C.</creator><creator>Bauer, M. L.</creator><creator>Islas, A.</creator><creator>Swanson, K. C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1</title><author>Prezotto, L. D. ; Gilbery, T. C. ; Bauer, M. L. ; Islas, A. ; Swanson, K. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2055-fe4469f5c9fdb1fa32d43dc812c29993ed178cd41fbff1147161dea8a12658bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ruminant Nutrition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbery, T. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, K. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prezotto, L. D.</au><au>Gilbery, T. C.</au><au>Bauer, M. L.</au><au>Islas, A.</au><au>Swanson, K. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5137</spage><epage>5144</epage><pages>5137-5144</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective swere to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601–1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800–0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LF-S). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P &lt; 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limit-feeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>29293714</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1925</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6292335
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central
subjects Ruminant Nutrition
title Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20limit-feeding%20and%20time%20of%20day%20of%20feed%20availability%20to%20growing%20calves%20on%20growth%20performance%20and%20feeding%20behavior%20in%20cold%20weather1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Prezotto,%20L.%20D.&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5137&rft.epage=5144&rft.pages=5137-5144&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1925&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.2527/jas2017.1925%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/29293714&rft_oup_id=10.2527/jas2017.1925&rfr_iscdi=true