Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report

Pelvic resections are challenging, and reconstruction of the resected acetabulum to restore mobility and stability is even more difficult. Extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT or extracorporeal irradiation) of autograft bone and reimplantation allows for a perfect size match and has been used with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2018-09, Vol.476 (9), p.1738-1748
Hauptverfasser: Agarwal, Manish G, Gundavda, Manit K, Gupta, Rajat, Reddy, Rajeev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1748
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1738
container_title Clinical orthopaedics and related research
container_volume 476
creator Agarwal, Manish G
Gundavda, Manit K
Gupta, Rajat
Reddy, Rajeev
description Pelvic resections are challenging, and reconstruction of the resected acetabulum to restore mobility and stability is even more difficult. Extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT or extracorporeal irradiation) of autograft bone and reimplantation allows for a perfect size match and has been used with some success in the extremities. Although the risk of wound complications in pelvic surgery has discouraged surgeons from using ECRT of autografts in that anatomic site, we believe it may be a reasonable option. In a small series, we asked: (1) What was the median surgical time and blood loss for these procedures, and what early complications were observed? (2) Is there evidence of osteonecrosis or cartilage loss at a minimum of 2 years after ECRT of acetabular autografts, and what functional scores were achieved? (3) What were the oncologic outcomes after ECRT? Between March 2007 and September 2016, one surgeon performed 12 ECRT acetabular autografts and reimplantations after resections of pelvic or acetabular tumors. Of those, 10 with minimum 2-year followup are reported on here with respect to oncologic, functional, and radiographic assessment; all 12 are reported on for purposes of surgical parameters and early complications. During that period, we generally performed this approach when we judged it possible to achieve a tumor-free margin, adequate bone stock, and sufficient remaining hip musculature to allow use of the bone as an autograft with restoration of hip mobility. We generally did not use this approach when we anticipated a difficult resection with uncertain margins or where remaining bone was judged of poor strength for use as a graft or if both iliopsoas and abductors were sacrificed. Since 2010, this series represents seven of the 21 pelvic resections with reconstruction that we performed (five patients in this series had the procedure performed before 2010). Followup was at a median of 65 months (range, 33-114 months) for nine patients whose functional outcomes were evaluated. The median patient age was 30 years (range, 10-64 years). Clinical parameters were recorded from chart review; radiographic analysis for assessment of cartilage was performed by looking for any obvious loss of joint space when compared with the opposite side. Functional scoring was done using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which was obtained from chart review. Oncologic assessment was determined for local recurrence as well as metastases. Median surgical time w
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6259792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185550728</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-cd0eda81ccfd698106e34a89c92844bea7acdea86c4d706d4888e14b538bf7933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1vFSEUJcbGPqt_QVm6mcrXDLDRvNTWNmnSptHEHWHgjmJmhikwje794fJ8tamyAe4599yPg9BrSo4pIfJtplRrfUweH0r4E7ShLVMNpZw9RZsa1I1m9Mshep7z9_rlomXP0CEnUgtG6Qb9-hAh49MfJVkX0xIT2BFfpGR9sCXEGdvZ4xsI0zLauexD26FAwlsHxfbraFPFM7gdlHfPdSw4VJaH29UWwOdhwWfr_IfwHm_xdYIxTGG26Wel15LlBToY7Jjh5f19hD6fnX46OW8urz5enGwvGyeoLI3zBLxV1LnBd1pR0gEXVmmnmRKiByut82BV54SXpPNCKQVU9C1X_SA150fo3V53WfsJvIO5jj2aJYWpNmOiDeZfZA7fzNd4ZzrWaqlZFXhzL5Di7Qq5mClkB2PdDcQ1G0ZV27ZEMlWpck91KeacYHgoQ4nZeWj2Hpr_PayZrx53-ZD31zT-G-f6m2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185550728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Agarwal, Manish G ; Gundavda, Manit K ; Gupta, Rajat ; Reddy, Rajeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Manish G ; Gundavda, Manit K ; Gupta, Rajat ; Reddy, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><description>Pelvic resections are challenging, and reconstruction of the resected acetabulum to restore mobility and stability is even more difficult. Extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT or extracorporeal irradiation) of autograft bone and reimplantation allows for a perfect size match and has been used with some success in the extremities. Although the risk of wound complications in pelvic surgery has discouraged surgeons from using ECRT of autografts in that anatomic site, we believe it may be a reasonable option. In a small series, we asked: (1) What was the median surgical time and blood loss for these procedures, and what early complications were observed? (2) Is there evidence of osteonecrosis or cartilage loss at a minimum of 2 years after ECRT of acetabular autografts, and what functional scores were achieved? (3) What were the oncologic outcomes after ECRT? Between March 2007 and September 2016, one surgeon performed 12 ECRT acetabular autografts and reimplantations after resections of pelvic or acetabular tumors. Of those, 10 with minimum 2-year followup are reported on here with respect to oncologic, functional, and radiographic assessment; all 12 are reported on for purposes of surgical parameters and early complications. During that period, we generally performed this approach when we judged it possible to achieve a tumor-free margin, adequate bone stock, and sufficient remaining hip musculature to allow use of the bone as an autograft with restoration of hip mobility. We generally did not use this approach when we anticipated a difficult resection with uncertain margins or where remaining bone was judged of poor strength for use as a graft or if both iliopsoas and abductors were sacrificed. Since 2010, this series represents seven of the 21 pelvic resections with reconstruction that we performed (five patients in this series had the procedure performed before 2010). Followup was at a median of 65 months (range, 33-114 months) for nine patients whose functional outcomes were evaluated. The median patient age was 30 years (range, 10-64 years). Clinical parameters were recorded from chart review; radiographic analysis for assessment of cartilage was performed by looking for any obvious loss of joint space when compared with the opposite side. Functional scoring was done using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which was obtained from chart review. Oncologic assessment was determined for local recurrence as well as metastases. Median surgical time was 8.6 hours and median blood loss was 2250 mL. There were no perioperative wound-related complications. Two patients underwent a second surgical procedure during the postoperative period, one for a femoral artery thrombus and another for a complete sciatic nerve deficit. No patients developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. None of the patients who underwent osteoarticular grafting showed radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 28 (range, 17-30). No fractures in the radiated segment of reimplanted bone were seen in this small series. Results from this small series suggest that ECRT is a potential option in selected patients who have good bone stock and adequate soft tissue coverage. Although technically challenging, ECRT is a low-cost alternative to prostheses in providing a mobile and stable hip. Although we did not observe cartilage wear on plain radiographs, followup here was short term; it may appear as we continue to follow these patients. Future studies from retrieval specimens may shed light on the actual status of cartilage on the acetabulum. Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0009-921X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30794211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer</publisher><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging ; Acetabulum - physiopathology ; Acetabulum - radiation effects ; Acetabulum - surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Bone Transplantation - adverse effects ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Child ; Female ; Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Joint - physiopathology ; Hip Joint - radiation effects ; Hip Joint - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Osteotomy - adverse effects ; Pelvic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvic Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Pelvic Neoplasms - therapy ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Preliminary Data ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recovery of Function ; Replantation - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Transplantation, Autologous ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018-09, Vol.476 (9), p.1738-1748</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-cd0eda81ccfd698106e34a89c92844bea7acdea86c4d706d4888e14b538bf7933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-cd0eda81ccfd698106e34a89c92844bea7acdea86c4d706d4888e14b538bf7933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259792/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6259792/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794211$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Manish G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundavda, Manit K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><title>Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report</title><title>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</title><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><description>Pelvic resections are challenging, and reconstruction of the resected acetabulum to restore mobility and stability is even more difficult. Extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT or extracorporeal irradiation) of autograft bone and reimplantation allows for a perfect size match and has been used with some success in the extremities. Although the risk of wound complications in pelvic surgery has discouraged surgeons from using ECRT of autografts in that anatomic site, we believe it may be a reasonable option. In a small series, we asked: (1) What was the median surgical time and blood loss for these procedures, and what early complications were observed? (2) Is there evidence of osteonecrosis or cartilage loss at a minimum of 2 years after ECRT of acetabular autografts, and what functional scores were achieved? (3) What were the oncologic outcomes after ECRT? Between March 2007 and September 2016, one surgeon performed 12 ECRT acetabular autografts and reimplantations after resections of pelvic or acetabular tumors. Of those, 10 with minimum 2-year followup are reported on here with respect to oncologic, functional, and radiographic assessment; all 12 are reported on for purposes of surgical parameters and early complications. During that period, we generally performed this approach when we judged it possible to achieve a tumor-free margin, adequate bone stock, and sufficient remaining hip musculature to allow use of the bone as an autograft with restoration of hip mobility. We generally did not use this approach when we anticipated a difficult resection with uncertain margins or where remaining bone was judged of poor strength for use as a graft or if both iliopsoas and abductors were sacrificed. Since 2010, this series represents seven of the 21 pelvic resections with reconstruction that we performed (five patients in this series had the procedure performed before 2010). Followup was at a median of 65 months (range, 33-114 months) for nine patients whose functional outcomes were evaluated. The median patient age was 30 years (range, 10-64 years). Clinical parameters were recorded from chart review; radiographic analysis for assessment of cartilage was performed by looking for any obvious loss of joint space when compared with the opposite side. Functional scoring was done using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which was obtained from chart review. Oncologic assessment was determined for local recurrence as well as metastases. Median surgical time was 8.6 hours and median blood loss was 2250 mL. There were no perioperative wound-related complications. Two patients underwent a second surgical procedure during the postoperative period, one for a femoral artery thrombus and another for a complete sciatic nerve deficit. No patients developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. None of the patients who underwent osteoarticular grafting showed radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 28 (range, 17-30). No fractures in the radiated segment of reimplanted bone were seen in this small series. Results from this small series suggest that ECRT is a potential option in selected patients who have good bone stock and adequate soft tissue coverage. Although technically challenging, ECRT is a low-cost alternative to prostheses in providing a mobile and stable hip. Although we did not observe cartilage wear on plain radiographs, followup here was short term; it may appear as we continue to follow these patients. Future studies from retrieval specimens may shed light on the actual status of cartilage on the acetabulum. Level IV, therapeutic study.</description><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Acetabulum - physiopathology</subject><subject>Acetabulum - radiation effects</subject><subject>Acetabulum - surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Blood Loss, Surgical</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hip Joint - radiation effects</subject><subject>Hip Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Osteotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pelvic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvic Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pelvic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Preliminary Data</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Replantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Transplantation, Autologous</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-921X</issn><issn>1528-1132</issn><issn>0009-921X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1vFSEUJcbGPqt_QVm6mcrXDLDRvNTWNmnSptHEHWHgjmJmhikwje794fJ8tamyAe4599yPg9BrSo4pIfJtplRrfUweH0r4E7ShLVMNpZw9RZsa1I1m9Mshep7z9_rlomXP0CEnUgtG6Qb9-hAh49MfJVkX0xIT2BFfpGR9sCXEGdvZ4xsI0zLauexD26FAwlsHxfbraFPFM7gdlHfPdSw4VJaH29UWwOdhwWfr_IfwHm_xdYIxTGG26Wel15LlBToY7Jjh5f19hD6fnX46OW8urz5enGwvGyeoLI3zBLxV1LnBd1pR0gEXVmmnmRKiByut82BV54SXpPNCKQVU9C1X_SA150fo3V53WfsJvIO5jj2aJYWpNmOiDeZfZA7fzNd4ZzrWaqlZFXhzL5Di7Qq5mClkB2PdDcQ1G0ZV27ZEMlWpck91KeacYHgoQ4nZeWj2Hpr_PayZrx53-ZD31zT-G-f6m2o</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Agarwal, Manish G</creator><creator>Gundavda, Manit K</creator><creator>Gupta, Rajat</creator><creator>Reddy, Rajeev</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report</title><author>Agarwal, Manish G ; Gundavda, Manit K ; Gupta, Rajat ; Reddy, Rajeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-cd0eda81ccfd698106e34a89c92844bea7acdea86c4d706d4888e14b538bf7933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Acetabulum - physiopathology</topic><topic>Acetabulum - radiation effects</topic><topic>Acetabulum - surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Blood Loss, Surgical</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hip Joint - radiation effects</topic><topic>Hip Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Osteotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pelvic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvic Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pelvic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Preliminary Data</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Replantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Transplantation, Autologous</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Manish G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gundavda, Manit K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Rajat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agarwal, Manish G</au><au>Gundavda, Manit K</au><au>Gupta, Rajat</au><au>Reddy, Rajeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report</atitle><jtitle>Clinical orthopaedics and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Orthop Relat Res</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>476</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1738</spage><epage>1748</epage><pages>1738-1748</pages><issn>0009-921X</issn><eissn>1528-1132</eissn><eissn>0009-921X</eissn><abstract>Pelvic resections are challenging, and reconstruction of the resected acetabulum to restore mobility and stability is even more difficult. Extracorporeal radiation therapy (ECRT or extracorporeal irradiation) of autograft bone and reimplantation allows for a perfect size match and has been used with some success in the extremities. Although the risk of wound complications in pelvic surgery has discouraged surgeons from using ECRT of autografts in that anatomic site, we believe it may be a reasonable option. In a small series, we asked: (1) What was the median surgical time and blood loss for these procedures, and what early complications were observed? (2) Is there evidence of osteonecrosis or cartilage loss at a minimum of 2 years after ECRT of acetabular autografts, and what functional scores were achieved? (3) What were the oncologic outcomes after ECRT? Between March 2007 and September 2016, one surgeon performed 12 ECRT acetabular autografts and reimplantations after resections of pelvic or acetabular tumors. Of those, 10 with minimum 2-year followup are reported on here with respect to oncologic, functional, and radiographic assessment; all 12 are reported on for purposes of surgical parameters and early complications. During that period, we generally performed this approach when we judged it possible to achieve a tumor-free margin, adequate bone stock, and sufficient remaining hip musculature to allow use of the bone as an autograft with restoration of hip mobility. We generally did not use this approach when we anticipated a difficult resection with uncertain margins or where remaining bone was judged of poor strength for use as a graft or if both iliopsoas and abductors were sacrificed. Since 2010, this series represents seven of the 21 pelvic resections with reconstruction that we performed (five patients in this series had the procedure performed before 2010). Followup was at a median of 65 months (range, 33-114 months) for nine patients whose functional outcomes were evaluated. The median patient age was 30 years (range, 10-64 years). Clinical parameters were recorded from chart review; radiographic analysis for assessment of cartilage was performed by looking for any obvious loss of joint space when compared with the opposite side. Functional scoring was done using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, which was obtained from chart review. Oncologic assessment was determined for local recurrence as well as metastases. Median surgical time was 8.6 hours and median blood loss was 2250 mL. There were no perioperative wound-related complications. Two patients underwent a second surgical procedure during the postoperative period, one for a femoral artery thrombus and another for a complete sciatic nerve deficit. No patients developed avascular necrosis of the femoral head. None of the patients who underwent osteoarticular grafting showed radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 28 (range, 17-30). No fractures in the radiated segment of reimplanted bone were seen in this small series. Results from this small series suggest that ECRT is a potential option in selected patients who have good bone stock and adequate soft tissue coverage. Although technically challenging, ECRT is a low-cost alternative to prostheses in providing a mobile and stable hip. Although we did not observe cartilage wear on plain radiographs, followup here was short term; it may appear as we continue to follow these patients. Future studies from retrieval specimens may shed light on the actual status of cartilage on the acetabulum. Level IV, therapeutic study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer</pub><pmid>30794211</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11999.0000000000000103</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-921X
ispartof Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018-09, Vol.476 (9), p.1738-1748
issn 0009-921X
1528-1132
0009-921X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6259792
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging
Acetabulum - physiopathology
Acetabulum - radiation effects
Acetabulum - surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Blood Loss, Surgical
Bone Transplantation - adverse effects
Bone Transplantation - methods
Child
Female
Hip Joint - diagnostic imaging
Hip Joint - physiopathology
Hip Joint - radiation effects
Hip Joint - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Osteotomy - adverse effects
Pelvic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Pelvic Neoplasms - physiopathology
Pelvic Neoplasms - therapy
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Preliminary Data
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Range of Motion, Articular
Recovery of Function
Replantation - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Transplantation, Autologous
Treatment Outcome
title Does Extracorporeal Irradiation and Reimplantation After Acetabular Resections Result in Adequate Hip Function? A Preliminary Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Extracorporeal%20Irradiation%20and%20Reimplantation%20After%20Acetabular%20Resections%20Result%20in%20Adequate%20Hip%20Function?%20A%20Preliminary%20Report&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20orthopaedics%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Agarwal,%20Manish%20G&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=476&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1738&rft.epage=1748&rft.pages=1738-1748&rft.issn=0009-921X&rft.eissn=1528-1132&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2185550728%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185550728&rft_id=info:pmid/30794211&rfr_iscdi=true