Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp

The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different soci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New media & society 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831
Hauptverfasser: Waterloo, Sophie F, Baumgartner, Susanne E, Peter, Jochen, Valkenburg, Patti M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1831
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1813
container_title New media & society
container_volume 20
creator Waterloo, Sophie F
Baumgartner, Susanne E
Peter, Jochen
Valkenburg, Patti M
description The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1461444817707349
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6256717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444817707349</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2160152179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFO3DAQtVBRodA7p8rHHjYwjhNPwgEJrbplJQQXEBcky2smS7aJndpZ2v49WXZZUSRO8zTvzZvRPMaOBBwLgXgiMiWyLCsGDCizcoftr1oJSpF_2uAVv8e-xLgAECrD8jPbk5AXQubFPru_8qGN3Ffcu6Z2xOlvFyjG2ruXLrW-H_ApH_u2M6F2cz4xlmbe_xrxmz9131MY8amLvZkH0464cQ_87tH08bzrDtluZZpIXzf1gN1OftyML5LL65_T8fllYnOAPimwtFJJxFJVsyKlzJpSpqhmooSiAiUJwSrE4XabWQRlFFiUFVQEqYJKHrCztW-3nLX0YMn1wTS6C3Vrwj_tTa3_Z1z9qOf-Sas0VyhwMPi-MQj-95Jir9s6Wmoa48gvo06FApGnAstBCmupDT7GQNV2jQC9CkW_D2UY-fb2vO3AawqDIFkLopmTXvhlcMO7PjZ8BilelCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160152179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</creator><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><description>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444817707349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30581358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media &amp; society, 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444817707349$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444817707349$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><title>New media &amp; society</title><addtitle>New Media Soc</addtitle><description>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFO3DAQtVBRodA7p8rHHjYwjhNPwgEJrbplJQQXEBcky2smS7aJndpZ2v49WXZZUSRO8zTvzZvRPMaOBBwLgXgiMiWyLCsGDCizcoftr1oJSpF_2uAVv8e-xLgAECrD8jPbk5AXQubFPru_8qGN3Ffcu6Z2xOlvFyjG2ruXLrW-H_ApH_u2M6F2cz4xlmbe_xrxmz9131MY8amLvZkH0464cQ_87tH08bzrDtluZZpIXzf1gN1OftyML5LL65_T8fllYnOAPimwtFJJxFJVsyKlzJpSpqhmooSiAiUJwSrE4XabWQRlFFiUFVQEqYJKHrCztW-3nLX0YMn1wTS6C3Vrwj_tTa3_Z1z9qOf-Sas0VyhwMPi-MQj-95Jir9s6Wmoa48gvo06FApGnAstBCmupDT7GQNV2jQC9CkW_D2UY-fb2vO3AawqDIFkLopmTXvhlcMO7PjZ8BilelCs</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Waterloo, Sophie F</creator><creator>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creator><creator>Peter, Jochen</creator><creator>Valkenburg, Patti M</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><author>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waterloo, Sophie F</au><au>Baumgartner, Susanne E</au><au>Peter, Jochen</au><au>Valkenburg, Patti M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</atitle><jtitle>New media &amp; society</jtitle><addtitle>New Media Soc</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1813</spage><epage>1831</epage><pages>1813-1831</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30581358</pmid><doi>10.1177/1461444817707349</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-4448
ispartof New media & society, 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831
issn 1461-4448
1461-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6256717
source SAGE Complete
title Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Norms%20of%20online%20expressions%20of%20emotion:%20Comparing%20Facebook,%20Twitter,%20Instagram,%20and%20WhatsApp&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Waterloo,%20Sophie%20F&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1813&rft.epage=1831&rft.pages=1813-1831&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444817707349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2160152179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160152179&rft_id=info:pmid/30581358&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444817707349&rfr_iscdi=true