Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp
The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different soci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | New media & society 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1831 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1813 |
container_title | New media & society |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Waterloo, Sophie F Baumgartner, Susanne E Peter, Jochen Valkenburg, Patti M |
description | The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1461444817707349 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6256717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1461444817707349</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2160152179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UcFO3DAQtVBRodA7p8rHHjYwjhNPwgEJrbplJQQXEBcky2smS7aJndpZ2v49WXZZUSRO8zTvzZvRPMaOBBwLgXgiMiWyLCsGDCizcoftr1oJSpF_2uAVv8e-xLgAECrD8jPbk5AXQubFPru_8qGN3Ffcu6Z2xOlvFyjG2ruXLrW-H_ApH_u2M6F2cz4xlmbe_xrxmz9131MY8amLvZkH0464cQ_87tH08bzrDtluZZpIXzf1gN1OftyML5LL65_T8fllYnOAPimwtFJJxFJVsyKlzJpSpqhmooSiAiUJwSrE4XabWQRlFFiUFVQEqYJKHrCztW-3nLX0YMn1wTS6C3Vrwj_tTa3_Z1z9qOf-Sas0VyhwMPi-MQj-95Jir9s6Wmoa48gvo06FApGnAstBCmupDT7GQNV2jQC9CkW_D2UY-fb2vO3AawqDIFkLopmTXvhlcMO7PjZ8BilelCs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160152179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</creator><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><description>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1461444817707349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30581358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>New media & society, 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017 2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461444817707349$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461444817707349$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><title>New media & society</title><addtitle>New Media Soc</addtitle><description>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</description><issn>1461-4448</issn><issn>1461-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UcFO3DAQtVBRodA7p8rHHjYwjhNPwgEJrbplJQQXEBcky2smS7aJndpZ2v49WXZZUSRO8zTvzZvRPMaOBBwLgXgiMiWyLCsGDCizcoftr1oJSpF_2uAVv8e-xLgAECrD8jPbk5AXQubFPru_8qGN3Ffcu6Z2xOlvFyjG2ruXLrW-H_ApH_u2M6F2cz4xlmbe_xrxmz9131MY8amLvZkH0464cQ_87tH08bzrDtluZZpIXzf1gN1OftyML5LL65_T8fllYnOAPimwtFJJxFJVsyKlzJpSpqhmooSiAiUJwSrE4XabWQRlFFiUFVQEqYJKHrCztW-3nLX0YMn1wTS6C3Vrwj_tTa3_Z1z9qOf-Sas0VyhwMPi-MQj-95Jir9s6Wmoa48gvo06FApGnAstBCmupDT7GQNV2jQC9CkW_D2UY-fb2vO3AawqDIFkLopmTXvhlcMO7PjZ8BilelCs</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Waterloo, Sophie F</creator><creator>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creator><creator>Peter, Jochen</creator><creator>Valkenburg, Patti M</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</title><author>Waterloo, Sophie F ; Baumgartner, Susanne E ; Peter, Jochen ; Valkenburg, Patti M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-879c3637796fb82e4ca93276b1908f063e70c677479c4c706a60c73f0fe0260f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Waterloo, Sophie F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Susanne E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Patti M</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Waterloo, Sophie F</au><au>Baumgartner, Susanne E</au><au>Peter, Jochen</au><au>Valkenburg, Patti M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp</atitle><jtitle>New media & society</jtitle><addtitle>New Media Soc</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1813</spage><epage>1831</epage><pages>1813-1831</pages><issn>1461-4448</issn><eissn>1461-7315</eissn><abstract>The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30581358</pmid><doi>10.1177/1461444817707349</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-4448 |
ispartof | New media & society, 2018-05, Vol.20 (5), p.1813-1831 |
issn | 1461-4448 1461-7315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6256717 |
source | SAGE Complete |
title | Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Norms%20of%20online%20expressions%20of%20emotion:%20Comparing%20Facebook,%20Twitter,%20Instagram,%20and%20WhatsApp&rft.jtitle=New%20media%20&%20society&rft.au=Waterloo,%20Sophie%20F&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1813&rft.epage=1831&rft.pages=1813-1831&rft.issn=1461-4448&rft.eissn=1461-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1461444817707349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2160152179%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160152179&rft_id=info:pmid/30581358&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1461444817707349&rfr_iscdi=true |