Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients
COPD self-management reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, whilst most patients are managed in primary care, the majority of self-management trials have recruited participants with more severe disease from secondary care. We report the findings of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | NPJ primary care respiratory medicine 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.44-8, Article 44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | NPJ primary care respiratory medicine |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Jolly, K. Sidhu, M. S. Bates, E. Majothi, S. Sitch, A. Bayliss, S. Kim, H. J. Samuel Jordan, R. E. |
description | COPD self-management reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, whilst most patients are managed in primary care, the majority of self-management trials have recruited participants with more severe disease from secondary care. We report the findings of a systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions in primary care patients with COPD. We systematically searched eleven electronic databases and identified 12 eligible randomised controlled trials with seven included in meta-analyses for HRQoL, anxiety and depression. We report no difference in HRQoL at final follow-up (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score −0.29; 95%CI −2.09, 1.51;
I
2
0%), nor any difference in anxiety or depression. In conclusion, supported self-management interventions delivered in the community to patients from primary care do not appear to be effective. Further research is recommended to identify effective self-management interventions suitable for primary care populations, particularly those with milder disease.
Chronic Lung Disease: Towards effective self-management in primary care
Further work is needed to ensure that self-management of chronic lung disease in primary care settings actively improves patients’ quality of life. While self-management is beneficial to patients in secondary care with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), few studies have examined self-management effectiveness in primary care patients with milder COPD. Kate Jolly at the University of Birmingham, UK, and co-workers identified only 12 studies out of over 12,500 that specifically examined self-management in primary care. Of these, seven were suitable for metanalysis. The team found that community-based interventions to support self-management did not make a significant difference to patients’ perceived quality of life, or in reducing anxiety and depression. They call for further research to identify specific support that will help patients with mild to moderate COPD cope and adapt to the progressive condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41533-018-0111-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6251904</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2137122301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f346db06ace5fd10e006f1a7a0b582551e2b875a53d376b21aa3bcbe9e43512c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSNERavSH8AFWeLCJTBjx8nmgoS2tCBVaqWWs-U4k62rxF5sZ2H_PV52KQWJg2XL8817M3pF8QrhHYJYvI8VSiFKwEU-iGX7rDjhIGWJgPD8yfu4OIvxAQCQy6bh_EVxLKBqoKnwpPhxu42JJp2sYYE2lr4zP7B0T4yGgUyyG3IU4-7T-GmanU3bstORehZpHMpJO72iiVxi1iUKGU_Wu8j05N2KrYOddNgyowOx5fXNOVtnq8zEl8XRoMdIZ4f7tPh68elu-bm8ur78svx4VZo8YioHUdV9B7U2JIcegQDqAXWjoZMLLiUS7xaN1FL0oqk7jlqLznTUUiUkciNOiw973fXcTdSb7B30qA6DKa-t-rvi7L1a-Y2qucQWqizw9iAQ_LeZYlKTjYbGUTvyc1QcRVPVreSQ0Tf_oA9-Di6v94tCzgVgpnBPmeBjDDQ8DoOgdtGqfbQqR6t20ao297x-usVjx-8gM8D3QMwlt6Lwx_r_qj8B_4uxFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137122301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Jolly, K. ; Sidhu, M. S. ; Bates, E. ; Majothi, S. ; Sitch, A. ; Bayliss, S. ; Kim, H. J. Samuel ; Jordan, R. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jolly, K. ; Sidhu, M. S. ; Bates, E. ; Majothi, S. ; Sitch, A. ; Bayliss, S. ; Kim, H. J. Samuel ; Jordan, R. E.</creatorcontrib><description>COPD self-management reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, whilst most patients are managed in primary care, the majority of self-management trials have recruited participants with more severe disease from secondary care. We report the findings of a systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions in primary care patients with COPD. We systematically searched eleven electronic databases and identified 12 eligible randomised controlled trials with seven included in meta-analyses for HRQoL, anxiety and depression. We report no difference in HRQoL at final follow-up (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score −0.29; 95%CI −2.09, 1.51;
I
2
0%), nor any difference in anxiety or depression. In conclusion, supported self-management interventions delivered in the community to patients from primary care do not appear to be effective. Further research is recommended to identify effective self-management interventions suitable for primary care populations, particularly those with milder disease.
Chronic Lung Disease: Towards effective self-management in primary care
Further work is needed to ensure that self-management of chronic lung disease in primary care settings actively improves patients’ quality of life. While self-management is beneficial to patients in secondary care with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), few studies have examined self-management effectiveness in primary care patients with milder COPD. Kate Jolly at the University of Birmingham, UK, and co-workers identified only 12 studies out of over 12,500 that specifically examined self-management in primary care. Of these, seven were suitable for metanalysis. The team found that community-based interventions to support self-management did not make a significant difference to patients’ perceived quality of life, or in reducing anxiety and depression. They call for further research to identify specific support that will help patients with mild to moderate COPD cope and adapt to the progressive condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-1010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-1010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41533-018-0111-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30470741</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699/1785/4037 ; 692/700/784 ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Primary care ; Primary Care Medicine ; Systematic review ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.44-8, Article 44</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f346db06ace5fd10e006f1a7a0b582551e2b875a53d376b21aa3bcbe9e43512c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f346db06ace5fd10e006f1a7a0b582551e2b875a53d376b21aa3bcbe9e43512c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6224-2115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251904/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251904/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27929,27930,41125,42194,51581,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470741$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jolly, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majothi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, H. J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, R. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients</title><title>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>npj Prim Care Resp Med</addtitle><addtitle>NPJ Prim Care Respir Med</addtitle><description>COPD self-management reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, whilst most patients are managed in primary care, the majority of self-management trials have recruited participants with more severe disease from secondary care. We report the findings of a systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions in primary care patients with COPD. We systematically searched eleven electronic databases and identified 12 eligible randomised controlled trials with seven included in meta-analyses for HRQoL, anxiety and depression. We report no difference in HRQoL at final follow-up (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score −0.29; 95%CI −2.09, 1.51;
I
2
0%), nor any difference in anxiety or depression. In conclusion, supported self-management interventions delivered in the community to patients from primary care do not appear to be effective. Further research is recommended to identify effective self-management interventions suitable for primary care populations, particularly those with milder disease.
Chronic Lung Disease: Towards effective self-management in primary care
Further work is needed to ensure that self-management of chronic lung disease in primary care settings actively improves patients’ quality of life. While self-management is beneficial to patients in secondary care with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), few studies have examined self-management effectiveness in primary care patients with milder COPD. Kate Jolly at the University of Birmingham, UK, and co-workers identified only 12 studies out of over 12,500 that specifically examined self-management in primary care. Of these, seven were suitable for metanalysis. The team found that community-based interventions to support self-management did not make a significant difference to patients’ perceived quality of life, or in reducing anxiety and depression. They call for further research to identify specific support that will help patients with mild to moderate COPD cope and adapt to the progressive condition.</description><subject>692/699/1785/4037</subject><subject>692/700/784</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>2055-1010</issn><issn>2055-1010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUFv1DAQhSNERavSH8AFWeLCJTBjx8nmgoS2tCBVaqWWs-U4k62rxF5sZ2H_PV52KQWJg2XL8817M3pF8QrhHYJYvI8VSiFKwEU-iGX7rDjhIGWJgPD8yfu4OIvxAQCQy6bh_EVxLKBqoKnwpPhxu42JJp2sYYE2lr4zP7B0T4yGgUyyG3IU4-7T-GmanU3bstORehZpHMpJO72iiVxi1iUKGU_Wu8j05N2KrYOddNgyowOx5fXNOVtnq8zEl8XRoMdIZ4f7tPh68elu-bm8ur78svx4VZo8YioHUdV9B7U2JIcegQDqAXWjoZMLLiUS7xaN1FL0oqk7jlqLznTUUiUkciNOiw973fXcTdSb7B30qA6DKa-t-rvi7L1a-Y2qucQWqizw9iAQ_LeZYlKTjYbGUTvyc1QcRVPVreSQ0Tf_oA9-Di6v94tCzgVgpnBPmeBjDDQ8DoOgdtGqfbQqR6t20ao297x-usVjx-8gM8D3QMwlt6Lwx_r_qj8B_4uxFg</recordid><startdate>20181123</startdate><enddate>20181123</enddate><creator>Jolly, K.</creator><creator>Sidhu, M. S.</creator><creator>Bates, E.</creator><creator>Majothi, S.</creator><creator>Sitch, A.</creator><creator>Bayliss, S.</creator><creator>Kim, H. J. Samuel</creator><creator>Jordan, R. E.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181123</creationdate><title>Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients</title><author>Jolly, K. ; Sidhu, M. S. ; Bates, E. ; Majothi, S. ; Sitch, A. ; Bayliss, S. ; Kim, H. J. Samuel ; Jordan, R. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-f346db06ace5fd10e006f1a7a0b582551e2b875a53d376b21aa3bcbe9e43512c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>692/699/1785/4037</topic><topic>692/700/784</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jolly, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bates, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majothi, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitch, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, H. J. Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, R. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jolly, K.</au><au>Sidhu, M. S.</au><au>Bates, E.</au><au>Majothi, S.</au><au>Sitch, A.</au><au>Bayliss, S.</au><au>Kim, H. J. Samuel</au><au>Jordan, R. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients</atitle><jtitle>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</jtitle><stitle>npj Prim Care Resp Med</stitle><addtitle>NPJ Prim Care Respir Med</addtitle><date>2018-11-23</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>44-8</pages><artnum>44</artnum><issn>2055-1010</issn><eissn>2055-1010</eissn><abstract>COPD self-management reduces hospital admissions and improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, whilst most patients are managed in primary care, the majority of self-management trials have recruited participants with more severe disease from secondary care. We report the findings of a systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions in primary care patients with COPD. We systematically searched eleven electronic databases and identified 12 eligible randomised controlled trials with seven included in meta-analyses for HRQoL, anxiety and depression. We report no difference in HRQoL at final follow-up (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score −0.29; 95%CI −2.09, 1.51;
I
2
0%), nor any difference in anxiety or depression. In conclusion, supported self-management interventions delivered in the community to patients from primary care do not appear to be effective. Further research is recommended to identify effective self-management interventions suitable for primary care populations, particularly those with milder disease.
Chronic Lung Disease: Towards effective self-management in primary care
Further work is needed to ensure that self-management of chronic lung disease in primary care settings actively improves patients’ quality of life. While self-management is beneficial to patients in secondary care with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), few studies have examined self-management effectiveness in primary care patients with milder COPD. Kate Jolly at the University of Birmingham, UK, and co-workers identified only 12 studies out of over 12,500 that specifically examined self-management in primary care. Of these, seven were suitable for metanalysis. The team found that community-based interventions to support self-management did not make a significant difference to patients’ perceived quality of life, or in reducing anxiety and depression. They call for further research to identify specific support that will help patients with mild to moderate COPD cope and adapt to the progressive condition.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30470741</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41533-018-0111-9</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2055-1010 |
ispartof | NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.44-8, Article 44 |
issn | 2055-1010 2055-1010 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6251904 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | 692/699/1785/4037 692/700/784 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Pneumology/Respiratory System Primary care Primary Care Medicine Systematic review Thoracic Surgery |
title | Systematic review of the effectiveness of community-based self-management interventions among primary care COPD patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T05%3A53%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20review%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20community-based%20self-management%20interventions%20among%20primary%20care%20COPD%20patients&rft.jtitle=NPJ%20primary%20care%20respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=Jolly,%20K.&rft.date=2018-11-23&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=44-8&rft.artnum=44&rft.issn=2055-1010&rft.eissn=2055-1010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41533-018-0111-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2137122301%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137122301&rft_id=info:pmid/30470741&rfr_iscdi=true |