Approach and Safety of Esophageal Dilation for Treatment of Strictures in Children With Epidermolysis Bullosa

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze a large series of esophageal balloon dilations in patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) to determine procedural approach and frequency of post‐endoscopic adverse events (AEs). Methods: Retrospective chart review for AE occurrence and clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition 2018-12, Vol.67 (6), p.701-705
Hauptverfasser: Anderson, Bradley T., Feinstein, James A., Kramer, Robert E., Narkewicz, Michael R., Bruckner, Anna L., Brumbaugh, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze a large series of esophageal balloon dilations in patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) to determine procedural approach and frequency of post‐endoscopic adverse events (AEs). Methods: Retrospective chart review for AE occurrence and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with EB, age 1 to 19, who underwent esophageal dilation for esophageal stricture(s) from January 2003 to April 2016 at an academic, tertiary care, free‐standing children's hospital. The primary outcome measure was occurrence of procedural AEs (defined as events occurring within 72 hours after endoscopic dilation procedure). Results: A total of 231 fluoroscopy‐guided esophageal balloon dilation procedures (209 anterograde, 20 retrograde, 2 both) were performed in 24 patients. Strictures were more common in the proximal portion of the esophagus with median stricture location 13 cm from the lips. From 2003 to 2012, 4.1% of dilations were retrograde. From 2013 to 2016, 20.2% of dilations were retrograde. AEs attributable to dilation occurred after 10.0% of procedures, and the most common AEs were vomiting, pain, and fever. No esophageal perforations, serious bleeding events, or deaths occurred secondary to dilation. The rate of post‐dilation hospitalization was 6.9%. Dilation approach (anterograde vs retrograde) did not impact the likelihood of AEs. Conclusions: The characteristic esophageal lesion in EB is a single, proximal esophageal stricture. EB patients can safely undergo repeat pneumatic esophageal balloon dilations with minimal risk for severe complication. We observed a trend towards increased use of retrograde esophageal dilation.
ISSN:0277-2116
1536-4801
DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002106