Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?
Background The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of orthopaedics 2018-11, Vol.52 (6), p.657-664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 657 |
container_title | Indian journal of orthopaedics |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Ketenci, Ismail Emre Yanik, Hakan Serhat Ulusoy, Ayhan Demiroz, Serdar Erdem, Sevki |
description | Background
The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LEV-1, if possible.
Materials and Methods
Forty-two patients with mild to moderate Lenke 5 AIS that underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative goal was to stop the instrumentation at LEV-1 in all patients if possible. However, the final decision was made intraoperatively according to the alignment of the disc below lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). In 19 patients, this goal was achieved and LIV was LEV-1, whereas 23 patients were fused to LEV. Hence, two groups occurred and they were compared in terms of coronal, sagittal, and LIV related parameters at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Surgical times were also noted. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scoliosis research society (SRS-22) and Short Form-36 questionnaires.
Results
Two groups were well matched according to preoperative values. Postoperative radiographic results were also similar, except LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which were significantly higher in LEV-1 group at 1 and 3 years followup
(P <
0.05). Surgical times were significantly longer in LEV group
(P =
0.036). No significant correction loss was observed between 1 and 3 years followup. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative clinical outcomes except the activity domain of SRS-22, which was significantly higher in LEV-1 group, but the significance was weak
(P =
0.045).
Conclusions
Fusion to LEV-1was associated with the higher amount of LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance and decreased the quality of life scores. Hence, if intraoperatively a level disc below LIV can be achieved, fusion to LEV-1 may be an option in mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves, to save one more mobile segment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6241048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2129818271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552e-4aeecb0c19e0cee1e33fe7c376673ceaaa37d7b08c8fbe47e67068147534b63e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1uEzEUhUcIREPhDRCyxIbNFHs8Hs-woKoiCkFBqVR-lpbHudNM4_gG29PAK_GUOCQNlEVXtuzjz-fee7LsOaMnJaP8Nfq4wJPJx9l2VUI2ilUPshFrmjrnspAPsxGlrMlFyfhR9iSEa0pFIYvqcXbEqeAFp_Uo-zXFDYRIJi5EP6zARZiTr-AjtF4DuQQLJvboSIeeXGCI4Pu0Ox_C9hA7MgW3BCLG5GyOFoJJBDKZ97jWcdEbcmnQ9hj68IaMtSPfEjLimsQF3DJmDhLkBiy58PijX2lLIpKtLZ-D-2vm9Gn2qNM2wLP9epx9OX_3efwhn87eT8Zn09wIUUBeagDTUsMaoAaAAecdSMNlVUluQGvN5Vy2tDZ110IpoZK0qlkpBS_bigM_zt7uuOuhXcF8W5HXVq198uZ_KtS9unvj-oW6whtVFWkwZZ0Ar_YAj9-H1F216lNjrNUOcAiqYEIwQUXZJOnL_6TXOHiXykuqoqlZXUiWVOVOZTyG4KE7mGFUbcOg_oRB3Q1Devbi30IOj26nnwSfdoIN2jTYsLRD6rpK2qXDzb1wVQmpdtlR_T47iSd2vJC-clcJdajmXqO_AaQT5mQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2129818271</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ketenci, Ismail Emre ; Yanik, Hakan Serhat ; Ulusoy, Ayhan ; Demiroz, Serdar ; Erdem, Sevki</creator><creatorcontrib>Ketenci, Ismail Emre ; Yanik, Hakan Serhat ; Ulusoy, Ayhan ; Demiroz, Serdar ; Erdem, Sevki</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LEV-1, if possible.
Materials and Methods
Forty-two patients with mild to moderate Lenke 5 AIS that underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative goal was to stop the instrumentation at LEV-1 in all patients if possible. However, the final decision was made intraoperatively according to the alignment of the disc below lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). In 19 patients, this goal was achieved and LIV was LEV-1, whereas 23 patients were fused to LEV. Hence, two groups occurred and they were compared in terms of coronal, sagittal, and LIV related parameters at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Surgical times were also noted. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scoliosis research society (SRS-22) and Short Form-36 questionnaires.
Results
Two groups were well matched according to preoperative values. Postoperative radiographic results were also similar, except LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which were significantly higher in LEV-1 group at 1 and 3 years followup
(P <
0.05). Surgical times were significantly longer in LEV group
(P =
0.036). No significant correction loss was observed between 1 and 3 years followup. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative clinical outcomes except the activity domain of SRS-22, which was significantly higher in LEV-1 group, but the significance was weak
(P =
0.045).
Conclusions
Fusion to LEV-1was associated with the higher amount of LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance and decreased the quality of life scores. Hence, if intraoperatively a level disc below LIV can be achieved, fusion to LEV-1 may be an option in mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves, to save one more mobile segment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30532308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Conservative Orthopedics ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Patients ; Quality of life ; Scoliosis ; Studies ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2018-11, Vol.52 (6), p.657-664</ispartof><rights>Indian Orthopaedics Association 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552e-4aeecb0c19e0cee1e33fe7c376673ceaaa37d7b08c8fbe47e67068147534b63e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552e-4aeecb0c19e0cee1e33fe7c376673ceaaa37d7b08c8fbe47e67068147534b63e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241048/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6241048/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30532308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ketenci, Ismail Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanik, Hakan Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulusoy, Ayhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demiroz, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Sevki</creatorcontrib><title>Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?</title><title>Indian journal of orthopaedics</title><addtitle>IJOO</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><description>Background
The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LEV-1, if possible.
Materials and Methods
Forty-two patients with mild to moderate Lenke 5 AIS that underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative goal was to stop the instrumentation at LEV-1 in all patients if possible. However, the final decision was made intraoperatively according to the alignment of the disc below lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). In 19 patients, this goal was achieved and LIV was LEV-1, whereas 23 patients were fused to LEV. Hence, two groups occurred and they were compared in terms of coronal, sagittal, and LIV related parameters at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Surgical times were also noted. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scoliosis research society (SRS-22) and Short Form-36 questionnaires.
Results
Two groups were well matched according to preoperative values. Postoperative radiographic results were also similar, except LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which were significantly higher in LEV-1 group at 1 and 3 years followup
(P <
0.05). Surgical times were significantly longer in LEV group
(P =
0.036). No significant correction loss was observed between 1 and 3 years followup. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative clinical outcomes except the activity domain of SRS-22, which was significantly higher in LEV-1 group, but the significance was weak
(P =
0.045).
Conclusions
Fusion to LEV-1was associated with the higher amount of LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance and decreased the quality of life scores. Hence, if intraoperatively a level disc below LIV can be achieved, fusion to LEV-1 may be an option in mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves, to save one more mobile segment.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Conservative Orthopedics</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Scoliosis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0019-5413</issn><issn>1998-3727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1uEzEUhUcIREPhDRCyxIbNFHs8Hs-woKoiCkFBqVR-lpbHudNM4_gG29PAK_GUOCQNlEVXtuzjz-fee7LsOaMnJaP8Nfq4wJPJx9l2VUI2ilUPshFrmjrnspAPsxGlrMlFyfhR9iSEa0pFIYvqcXbEqeAFp_Uo-zXFDYRIJi5EP6zARZiTr-AjtF4DuQQLJvboSIeeXGCI4Pu0Ox_C9hA7MgW3BCLG5GyOFoJJBDKZ97jWcdEbcmnQ9hj68IaMtSPfEjLimsQF3DJmDhLkBiy58PijX2lLIpKtLZ-D-2vm9Gn2qNM2wLP9epx9OX_3efwhn87eT8Zn09wIUUBeagDTUsMaoAaAAecdSMNlVUluQGvN5Vy2tDZ110IpoZK0qlkpBS_bigM_zt7uuOuhXcF8W5HXVq198uZ_KtS9unvj-oW6whtVFWkwZZ0Ar_YAj9-H1F216lNjrNUOcAiqYEIwQUXZJOnL_6TXOHiXykuqoqlZXUiWVOVOZTyG4KE7mGFUbcOg_oRB3Q1Devbi30IOj26nnwSfdoIN2jTYsLRD6rpK2qXDzb1wVQmpdtlR_T47iSd2vJC-clcJdajmXqO_AaQT5mQ</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Ketenci, Ismail Emre</creator><creator>Yanik, Hakan Serhat</creator><creator>Ulusoy, Ayhan</creator><creator>Demiroz, Serdar</creator><creator>Erdem, Sevki</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?</title><author>Ketenci, Ismail Emre ; Yanik, Hakan Serhat ; Ulusoy, Ayhan ; Demiroz, Serdar ; Erdem, Sevki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552e-4aeecb0c19e0cee1e33fe7c376673ceaaa37d7b08c8fbe47e67068147534b63e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Conservative Orthopedics</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Scoliosis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ketenci, Ismail Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanik, Hakan Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulusoy, Ayhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demiroz, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Sevki</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ketenci, Ismail Emre</au><au>Yanik, Hakan Serhat</au><au>Ulusoy, Ayhan</au><au>Demiroz, Serdar</au><au>Erdem, Sevki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra?</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of orthopaedics</jtitle><stitle>IJOO</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Orthop</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>657</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>657-664</pages><issn>0019-5413</issn><eissn>1998-3727</eissn><abstract>Background
The most appropriate fusion levels remains challenging, especially in Lenke type 5 curves. In Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) generally fusion includes the lower end vertebra (LEV). This study determines whether it is appropriate to fuse mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves to LEV-1, if possible.
Materials and Methods
Forty-two patients with mild to moderate Lenke 5 AIS that underwent posterior fusion were retrospectively evaluated. The preoperative goal was to stop the instrumentation at LEV-1 in all patients if possible. However, the final decision was made intraoperatively according to the alignment of the disc below lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). In 19 patients, this goal was achieved and LIV was LEV-1, whereas 23 patients were fused to LEV. Hence, two groups occurred and they were compared in terms of coronal, sagittal, and LIV related parameters at 1 year and 3 years postoperatively. Surgical times were also noted. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scoliosis research society (SRS-22) and Short Form-36 questionnaires.
Results
Two groups were well matched according to preoperative values. Postoperative radiographic results were also similar, except LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which were significantly higher in LEV-1 group at 1 and 3 years followup
(P <
0.05). Surgical times were significantly longer in LEV group
(P =
0.036). No significant correction loss was observed between 1 and 3 years followup. There were no significant differences regarding postoperative clinical outcomes except the activity domain of SRS-22, which was significantly higher in LEV-1 group, but the significance was weak
(P =
0.045).
Conclusions
Fusion to LEV-1was associated with the higher amount of LIV disc angle and LIV translation, which did not cause coronal and sagittal imbalance and decreased the quality of life scores. Hence, if intraoperatively a level disc below LIV can be achieved, fusion to LEV-1 may be an option in mild to moderate Lenke 5 curves, to save one more mobile segment.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>30532308</pmid><doi>10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0019-5413 |
ispartof | Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2018-11, Vol.52 (6), p.657-664 |
issn | 0019-5413 1998-3727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6241048 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Back pain Conservative Orthopedics Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Orthopedics Patients Quality of life Scoliosis Studies Surgical Orthopedics Vertebrae |
title | Lowest Instrumented Vertebrae Selection for Posterior Fusion of Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Can We Stop the Fusion One Level Proximal to Lower-end Vertebra? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A41%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lowest%20Instrumented%20Vertebrae%20Selection%20for%20Posterior%20Fusion%20of%20Lenke%205C%20Adolescent%20Idiopathic%20Scoliosis:%20Can%20We%20Stop%20the%20Fusion%20One%20Level%20Proximal%20to%20Lower-end%20Vertebra?&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Ketenci,%20Ismail%20Emre&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=657&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=657-664&rft.issn=0019-5413&rft.eissn=1998-3727&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_579_16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2129818271%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2129818271&rft_id=info:pmid/30532308&rfr_iscdi=true |