Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process

Providing clinical performance data to health professionals, a process known as audit and feedback, can play an important role in health system improvement. However, audit and feedback tools can only be effective if the targeted health professionals access and actively review their data. Email is us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JMIR human factors 2018-09, Vol.5 (3), p.e25-e25
Hauptverfasser: Bravo, Caroline A, Llovet, Diego, Witteman, Holly O, Desveaux, Laura, Presseau, Justin, Saragosa, Marianne, Vaisson, Gratianne, Umar, Shama, Tinmouth, Jill, Ivers, Noah M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e25
container_issue 3
container_start_page e25
container_title JMIR human factors
container_volume 5
creator Bravo, Caroline A
Llovet, Diego
Witteman, Holly O
Desveaux, Laura
Presseau, Justin
Saragosa, Marianne
Vaisson, Gratianne
Umar, Shama
Tinmouth, Jill
Ivers, Noah M
description Providing clinical performance data to health professionals, a process known as audit and feedback, can play an important role in health system improvement. However, audit and feedback tools can only be effective if the targeted health professionals access and actively review their data. Email is used by Cancer Care Ontario, a provincial cancer agency, to promote access to a Web-based audit and feedback tool called the Screening Activity Report (SAR); however, current emails that lack behavior change content have been ineffective at encouraging log-in to the SAR. The objective of our study was to describe the process and experience of developing email content that incorporates user input and behavior change techniques (BCTs) to promote the use of the SAR among Ontario primary care providers. Our interdisciplinary research team first identified BCTs shown to be effective in other settings that could be adapted to promote use of the SAR. We then developed draft BCT-informed email content. Next, we conducted cocreation workshops with physicians who had logged in to the SAR more than once over the past year. Participants provided reactions to researcher-developed BCT-informed content and helped to develop an email that they believed would prompt their colleagues to use the SAR. Content from cocreation workshops was brought to focus groups with physicians who had not used the SAR in the past year. We analyzed notes from the cocreation workshops and focus groups to inform decisions about content. Finally, 8 emails were created to test BCT-informed content in a 2×2×2 factorial randomized experiment. We identified 3 key tensions during the development of the email that required us to balance user input with scientific evidence, organizational policies, and our scientific objectives, which are as follows: conflict between user preference and scientific evidence, privacy constraints around personalizing unencrypted emails with performance data, and using cocreation methods in a study with the objective of developing an email that featured BCT-informed content. Teams tasked with developing content to promote health professional engagement with audit and feedback or other quality improvement tools might consider cocreation processes for developing communications that are informed by both users and BCTs. Teams should be cautious about making decisions solely based on user reactions because what users seem to prefer is not always the same as what works. Furthermore, imp
doi_str_mv 10.2196/humanfactors.9875
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6231866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2099892669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-5c7a81562ca49e0d696cc90928d37a2d2108e3bed07e1a14c733e7bf2f04d8563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS0EolXpD-CCLHGAS4rtJI7NAWlZurBSJSpoxdGaOJNdl8Te2kml_Sf8XBJaqoWTLc1738zTI-QlZ2eCa_luO_bgW7BDiOlMq6p8Qo6F0CLThS6fHvyPyGlKN4wxLouykMVzcpQzrjhn6pj8-oTJbbzzG3reg-sSXbgeGwoDXXsbEdI8WkHvuj293O6Tsw58ekOvE9LQUqA_sM4-Qpo8i7FxAwXf0BViU4P9Sa9C6OgQ6LrfxXCHdAneYqTfJzL-WfoNBkzv6TLMuwYXPL2MwWJKL8izFrqEpw_vCblenV8tv2QXXz-vl4uLzBZclFlpK1C8lMJCoZE1UktrNdNCNXkFohFTSsxrbFiFHHhhqzzHqm5Fy4pGlTI_IR_uubuxnoJb9EOEzuyi6yHuTQBn_p14tzWbcGekyLmSM-DtAyCG2xHTYHqXLHYdeAxjMoJprbSQUk_S1_9Jb8IY_RTPiJJLVRVMzUB-r7IxpBSxfTyGMzNXbw6rN3P1k-fVYYpHx9-i89_vlq6F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516874086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Bravo, Caroline A ; Llovet, Diego ; Witteman, Holly O ; Desveaux, Laura ; Presseau, Justin ; Saragosa, Marianne ; Vaisson, Gratianne ; Umar, Shama ; Tinmouth, Jill ; Ivers, Noah M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Caroline A ; Llovet, Diego ; Witteman, Holly O ; Desveaux, Laura ; Presseau, Justin ; Saragosa, Marianne ; Vaisson, Gratianne ; Umar, Shama ; Tinmouth, Jill ; Ivers, Noah M</creatorcontrib><description>Providing clinical performance data to health professionals, a process known as audit and feedback, can play an important role in health system improvement. However, audit and feedback tools can only be effective if the targeted health professionals access and actively review their data. Email is used by Cancer Care Ontario, a provincial cancer agency, to promote access to a Web-based audit and feedback tool called the Screening Activity Report (SAR); however, current emails that lack behavior change content have been ineffective at encouraging log-in to the SAR. The objective of our study was to describe the process and experience of developing email content that incorporates user input and behavior change techniques (BCTs) to promote the use of the SAR among Ontario primary care providers. Our interdisciplinary research team first identified BCTs shown to be effective in other settings that could be adapted to promote use of the SAR. We then developed draft BCT-informed email content. Next, we conducted cocreation workshops with physicians who had logged in to the SAR more than once over the past year. Participants provided reactions to researcher-developed BCT-informed content and helped to develop an email that they believed would prompt their colleagues to use the SAR. Content from cocreation workshops was brought to focus groups with physicians who had not used the SAR in the past year. We analyzed notes from the cocreation workshops and focus groups to inform decisions about content. Finally, 8 emails were created to test BCT-informed content in a 2×2×2 factorial randomized experiment. We identified 3 key tensions during the development of the email that required us to balance user input with scientific evidence, organizational policies, and our scientific objectives, which are as follows: conflict between user preference and scientific evidence, privacy constraints around personalizing unencrypted emails with performance data, and using cocreation methods in a study with the objective of developing an email that featured BCT-informed content. Teams tasked with developing content to promote health professional engagement with audit and feedback or other quality improvement tools might consider cocreation processes for developing communications that are informed by both users and BCTs. Teams should be cautious about making decisions solely based on user reactions because what users seem to prefer is not always the same as what works. Furthermore, implementing user recommendations may not always be feasible. Teams may face challenges when using cocreation methods to develop a product with the simultaneous goal of having clearly defined variables to test in later studies. The expected role of users, evidence, and the implementation context all warrant consideration to determine whether and how cocreation methods could help to achieve design and scientific objectives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2292-9495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2292-9495</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.9875</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30181108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Audits ; Cancer ; Electronic mail systems ; Factorial experiments ; Focus groups ; Medical screening ; Multimedia ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Physicians ; Primary care ; Taxonomy ; User generated content ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>JMIR human factors, 2018-09, Vol.5 (3), p.e25-e25</ispartof><rights>Caroline A. Bravo, Diego Llovet, Holly O Witteman, Laura Desveaux, Justin Presseau, Marianne Saragosa, Gratianne Vaisson, Shama Umar, Jill Tinmouth, Noah M. Ivers. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 04.09.2018.</rights><rights>2018. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Caroline A. Bravo, Diego Llovet, Holly O Witteman, Laura Desveaux, Justin Presseau, Marianne Saragosa, Gratianne Vaisson, Shama Umar, Jill Tinmouth, Noah M. Ivers. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 04.09.2018. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-5c7a81562ca49e0d696cc90928d37a2d2108e3bed07e1a14c733e7bf2f04d8563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-5c7a81562ca49e0d696cc90928d37a2d2108e3bed07e1a14c733e7bf2f04d8563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2795-6083 ; 0000-0002-2132-0703 ; 0000-0002-6911-5143 ; 0000-0003-3429-1865 ; 0000-0003-3941-705X ; 0000-0002-9261-5971 ; 0000-0002-0264-2176 ; 0000-0002-3648-2430 ; 0000-0003-2500-2435 ; 0000-0003-4192-0682</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231866/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6231866/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Caroline A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llovet, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, Holly O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desveaux, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presseau, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragosa, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaisson, Gratianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umar, Shama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinmouth, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivers, Noah M</creatorcontrib><title>Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process</title><title>JMIR human factors</title><addtitle>JMIR Hum Factors</addtitle><description>Providing clinical performance data to health professionals, a process known as audit and feedback, can play an important role in health system improvement. However, audit and feedback tools can only be effective if the targeted health professionals access and actively review their data. Email is used by Cancer Care Ontario, a provincial cancer agency, to promote access to a Web-based audit and feedback tool called the Screening Activity Report (SAR); however, current emails that lack behavior change content have been ineffective at encouraging log-in to the SAR. The objective of our study was to describe the process and experience of developing email content that incorporates user input and behavior change techniques (BCTs) to promote the use of the SAR among Ontario primary care providers. Our interdisciplinary research team first identified BCTs shown to be effective in other settings that could be adapted to promote use of the SAR. We then developed draft BCT-informed email content. Next, we conducted cocreation workshops with physicians who had logged in to the SAR more than once over the past year. Participants provided reactions to researcher-developed BCT-informed content and helped to develop an email that they believed would prompt their colleagues to use the SAR. Content from cocreation workshops was brought to focus groups with physicians who had not used the SAR in the past year. We analyzed notes from the cocreation workshops and focus groups to inform decisions about content. Finally, 8 emails were created to test BCT-informed content in a 2×2×2 factorial randomized experiment. We identified 3 key tensions during the development of the email that required us to balance user input with scientific evidence, organizational policies, and our scientific objectives, which are as follows: conflict between user preference and scientific evidence, privacy constraints around personalizing unencrypted emails with performance data, and using cocreation methods in a study with the objective of developing an email that featured BCT-informed content. Teams tasked with developing content to promote health professional engagement with audit and feedback or other quality improvement tools might consider cocreation processes for developing communications that are informed by both users and BCTs. Teams should be cautious about making decisions solely based on user reactions because what users seem to prefer is not always the same as what works. Furthermore, implementing user recommendations may not always be feasible. Teams may face challenges when using cocreation methods to develop a product with the simultaneous goal of having clearly defined variables to test in later studies. The expected role of users, evidence, and the implementation context all warrant consideration to determine whether and how cocreation methods could help to achieve design and scientific objectives.</description><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Electronic mail systems</subject><subject>Factorial experiments</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>User generated content</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>2292-9495</issn><issn>2292-9495</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS0EolXpD-CCLHGAS4rtJI7NAWlZurBSJSpoxdGaOJNdl8Te2kml_Sf8XBJaqoWTLc1738zTI-QlZ2eCa_luO_bgW7BDiOlMq6p8Qo6F0CLThS6fHvyPyGlKN4wxLouykMVzcpQzrjhn6pj8-oTJbbzzG3reg-sSXbgeGwoDXXsbEdI8WkHvuj293O6Tsw58ekOvE9LQUqA_sM4-Qpo8i7FxAwXf0BViU4P9Sa9C6OgQ6LrfxXCHdAneYqTfJzL-WfoNBkzv6TLMuwYXPL2MwWJKL8izFrqEpw_vCblenV8tv2QXXz-vl4uLzBZclFlpK1C8lMJCoZE1UktrNdNCNXkFohFTSsxrbFiFHHhhqzzHqm5Fy4pGlTI_IR_uubuxnoJb9EOEzuyi6yHuTQBn_p14tzWbcGekyLmSM-DtAyCG2xHTYHqXLHYdeAxjMoJprbSQUk_S1_9Jb8IY_RTPiJJLVRVMzUB-r7IxpBSxfTyGMzNXbw6rN3P1k-fVYYpHx9-i89_vlq6F</recordid><startdate>20180904</startdate><enddate>20180904</enddate><creator>Bravo, Caroline A</creator><creator>Llovet, Diego</creator><creator>Witteman, Holly O</creator><creator>Desveaux, Laura</creator><creator>Presseau, Justin</creator><creator>Saragosa, Marianne</creator><creator>Vaisson, Gratianne</creator><creator>Umar, Shama</creator><creator>Tinmouth, Jill</creator><creator>Ivers, Noah M</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-6083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-705X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-5971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-2430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0682</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180904</creationdate><title>Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process</title><author>Bravo, Caroline A ; Llovet, Diego ; Witteman, Holly O ; Desveaux, Laura ; Presseau, Justin ; Saragosa, Marianne ; Vaisson, Gratianne ; Umar, Shama ; Tinmouth, Jill ; Ivers, Noah M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4125-5c7a81562ca49e0d696cc90928d37a2d2108e3bed07e1a14c733e7bf2f04d8563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Electronic mail systems</topic><topic>Factorial experiments</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>User generated content</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bravo, Caroline A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llovet, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witteman, Holly O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desveaux, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Presseau, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragosa, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaisson, Gratianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umar, Shama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinmouth, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivers, Noah M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JMIR human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bravo, Caroline A</au><au>Llovet, Diego</au><au>Witteman, Holly O</au><au>Desveaux, Laura</au><au>Presseau, Justin</au><au>Saragosa, Marianne</au><au>Vaisson, Gratianne</au><au>Umar, Shama</au><au>Tinmouth, Jill</au><au>Ivers, Noah M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process</atitle><jtitle>JMIR human factors</jtitle><addtitle>JMIR Hum Factors</addtitle><date>2018-09-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e25</spage><epage>e25</epage><pages>e25-e25</pages><issn>2292-9495</issn><eissn>2292-9495</eissn><abstract>Providing clinical performance data to health professionals, a process known as audit and feedback, can play an important role in health system improvement. However, audit and feedback tools can only be effective if the targeted health professionals access and actively review their data. Email is used by Cancer Care Ontario, a provincial cancer agency, to promote access to a Web-based audit and feedback tool called the Screening Activity Report (SAR); however, current emails that lack behavior change content have been ineffective at encouraging log-in to the SAR. The objective of our study was to describe the process and experience of developing email content that incorporates user input and behavior change techniques (BCTs) to promote the use of the SAR among Ontario primary care providers. Our interdisciplinary research team first identified BCTs shown to be effective in other settings that could be adapted to promote use of the SAR. We then developed draft BCT-informed email content. Next, we conducted cocreation workshops with physicians who had logged in to the SAR more than once over the past year. Participants provided reactions to researcher-developed BCT-informed content and helped to develop an email that they believed would prompt their colleagues to use the SAR. Content from cocreation workshops was brought to focus groups with physicians who had not used the SAR in the past year. We analyzed notes from the cocreation workshops and focus groups to inform decisions about content. Finally, 8 emails were created to test BCT-informed content in a 2×2×2 factorial randomized experiment. We identified 3 key tensions during the development of the email that required us to balance user input with scientific evidence, organizational policies, and our scientific objectives, which are as follows: conflict between user preference and scientific evidence, privacy constraints around personalizing unencrypted emails with performance data, and using cocreation methods in a study with the objective of developing an email that featured BCT-informed content. Teams tasked with developing content to promote health professional engagement with audit and feedback or other quality improvement tools might consider cocreation processes for developing communications that are informed by both users and BCTs. Teams should be cautious about making decisions solely based on user reactions because what users seem to prefer is not always the same as what works. Furthermore, implementing user recommendations may not always be feasible. Teams may face challenges when using cocreation methods to develop a product with the simultaneous goal of having clearly defined variables to test in later studies. The expected role of users, evidence, and the implementation context all warrant consideration to determine whether and how cocreation methods could help to achieve design and scientific objectives.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>30181108</pmid><doi>10.2196/humanfactors.9875</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2795-6083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2132-0703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6911-5143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3941-705X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-5971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-2176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-2430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2500-2435</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-0682</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2292-9495
ispartof JMIR human factors, 2018-09, Vol.5 (3), p.e25-e25
issn 2292-9495
2292-9495
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6231866
source PMC (PubMed Central); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Audits
Cancer
Electronic mail systems
Factorial experiments
Focus groups
Medical screening
Multimedia
Original Paper
Patients
Physicians
Primary care
Taxonomy
User generated content
Workshops
title Designing Emails Aimed at Increasing Family Physicians' Use of a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Tool to Improve Cancer Screening Rates: Cocreation Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A34%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20Emails%20Aimed%20at%20Increasing%20Family%20Physicians'%20Use%20of%20a%20Web-Based%20Audit%20and%20Feedback%20Tool%20to%20Improve%20Cancer%20Screening%20Rates:%20Cocreation%20Process&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20human%20factors&rft.au=Bravo,%20Caroline%20A&rft.date=2018-09-04&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e25&rft.epage=e25&rft.pages=e25-e25&rft.issn=2292-9495&rft.eissn=2292-9495&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/humanfactors.9875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2099892669%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516874086&rft_id=info:pmid/30181108&rfr_iscdi=true