Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance
Aims/Introduction Limited data are available regarding the performance of non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non‐HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut‐off point of non‐HDL for discriminati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of diabetes investigation 2018-11, Vol.9 (6), p.1304-1311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1304 |
container_title | Journal of diabetes investigation |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Liu, Lu Li, Qiu Yuan, Zhongshang Zhao, Meng Zhang, Xu Zhang, Haiqing Zheng, Dongmei Xu, Jin Gao, Ling Guan, Qingbo Zhao, Jiajun Proud, Christopher G Wang, Xuemin Hou, Xu |
description | Aims/Introduction
Limited data are available regarding the performance of non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non‐HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut‐off point of non‐HDL for discriminating incident diabetes in people with normal glucose tolerance.
Materials and Methods
Of 3,653 middle‐aged and elderly Chinese with normal glucose tolerance at enrollment, 1,025 men and 1,805 women returned to the 3‐year follow up and were involved in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between cholesterol indices and incident diabetes, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify the optimal cut‐off of each cholesterol variable for incident diabetes.
Results
Non‐HDL was an independent risk factor for diabetes for women, but not for men. In women, a 1‐standard deviation increment in non‐HDL was associated with a 1.43‐fold higher risk of diabetes (95% confidence interval 1.14–1.79; P = 0.002), whereas odds ratios for total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.67; P = 0.015) and 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.04–1.64; P = 0.024), respectively. The discriminatory power and the optimal cut‐off value of non‐HDL for incident diabetes increased across body mass index categories. For women with obesity, the threshold of non‐HDL for screening of diabetes was estimated as 3.51 mmol/L.
Conclusions
Non‐HDL had better performance than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes in women, but not in men. A body mass index‐specific threshold value for a non‐HDL‐controlling target is required in the prevention of type 2 diabetes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jdi.12837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6215933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2129354141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-cb3c27e9997646862463486a5f740db82484c9b81249818615a1a03d889c8efd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQgCMEolXpgRdAlrjAYdvYcRL7goTKX1EFFzhbjjPZeHHsYDtd7Y1H4DV4LZ6EKVtWFIm5jGV__jQeT1E8puUZxTjf9PaMMlG194pjVvJyRSnj9w9r2hwVpyltSoxKiKZpHxZHTNacMSGOix8fgv_57fto1yOmHnyyeUecncMcQwbriRmDg5QhBkdsIlOIQKwfQpx0ttdA8qg9yVH3Ntvgtbt7wffWQMJM5gi4ztavSW91Bxm3o01fCKrINkzgydbmkfgbsyNrt5iQUI-yqL2BR8WDQbsEp7f5pPj85vWni3erq49vLy9eXq0Ml3W7Ml1lWAtSyrbhjWgYbyouGl0PLS_7TjAuuJGdwCZJQUVDa011WfVCSCNg6KuT4sXeOy_dBL0Bj49zao520nGngrbq7om3o1qHa9UwWsuqQsGzW0EMXxfshJpsMuCc9hCWpFhJOeVMyhLRp_-gm7BEbCJSlMmqRpAi9XxPmRhSijAciqGlupkBhTOgfs8Ask_-rv5A_vlxBM73wNY62P3fpN6_utwrfwFUecFE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2129354141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Lu ; Li, Qiu ; Yuan, Zhongshang ; Zhao, Meng ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhang, Haiqing ; Zheng, Dongmei ; Xu, Jin ; Gao, Ling ; Guan, Qingbo ; Zhao, Jiajun ; Proud, Christopher G ; Wang, Xuemin ; Hou, Xu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu ; Li, Qiu ; Yuan, Zhongshang ; Zhao, Meng ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhang, Haiqing ; Zheng, Dongmei ; Xu, Jin ; Gao, Ling ; Guan, Qingbo ; Zhao, Jiajun ; Proud, Christopher G ; Wang, Xuemin ; Hou, Xu ; REACTION Study Group ; The REACTION Study Group</creatorcontrib><description>Aims/Introduction
Limited data are available regarding the performance of non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non‐HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut‐off point of non‐HDL for discriminating incident diabetes in people with normal glucose tolerance.
Materials and Methods
Of 3,653 middle‐aged and elderly Chinese with normal glucose tolerance at enrollment, 1,025 men and 1,805 women returned to the 3‐year follow up and were involved in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between cholesterol indices and incident diabetes, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify the optimal cut‐off of each cholesterol variable for incident diabetes.
Results
Non‐HDL was an independent risk factor for diabetes for women, but not for men. In women, a 1‐standard deviation increment in non‐HDL was associated with a 1.43‐fold higher risk of diabetes (95% confidence interval 1.14–1.79; P = 0.002), whereas odds ratios for total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.67; P = 0.015) and 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.04–1.64; P = 0.024), respectively. The discriminatory power and the optimal cut‐off value of non‐HDL for incident diabetes increased across body mass index categories. For women with obesity, the threshold of non‐HDL for screening of diabetes was estimated as 3.51 mmol/L.
Conclusions
Non‐HDL had better performance than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes in women, but not in men. A body mass index‐specific threshold value for a non‐HDL‐controlling target is required in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-1116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-1124</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29542288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Cholesterol ; Cholesterol - analysis ; Cholesterol - blood ; Confidence intervals ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetes Mellitus - blood ; Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis ; Female ; Geriatrics ; Glucose tolerance ; Health risk assessment ; High density lipoprotein ; Humans ; Lipoproteins ; Lipoproteins - analysis ; Lipoproteins - blood ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ; Original ; Primary prevention ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Journal of diabetes investigation, 2018-11, Vol.9 (6), p.1304-1311</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-cb3c27e9997646862463486a5f740db82484c9b81249818615a1a03d889c8efd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-cb3c27e9997646862463486a5f740db82484c9b81249818615a1a03d889c8efd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9884-584X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215933/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6215933/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29542288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhongshang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Dongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Qingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jiajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, Christopher G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REACTION Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The REACTION Study Group</creatorcontrib><title>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance</title><title>Journal of diabetes investigation</title><addtitle>J Diabetes Investig</addtitle><description>Aims/Introduction
Limited data are available regarding the performance of non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non‐HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut‐off point of non‐HDL for discriminating incident diabetes in people with normal glucose tolerance.
Materials and Methods
Of 3,653 middle‐aged and elderly Chinese with normal glucose tolerance at enrollment, 1,025 men and 1,805 women returned to the 3‐year follow up and were involved in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between cholesterol indices and incident diabetes, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify the optimal cut‐off of each cholesterol variable for incident diabetes.
Results
Non‐HDL was an independent risk factor for diabetes for women, but not for men. In women, a 1‐standard deviation increment in non‐HDL was associated with a 1.43‐fold higher risk of diabetes (95% confidence interval 1.14–1.79; P = 0.002), whereas odds ratios for total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.67; P = 0.015) and 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.04–1.64; P = 0.024), respectively. The discriminatory power and the optimal cut‐off value of non‐HDL for incident diabetes increased across body mass index categories. For women with obesity, the threshold of non‐HDL for screening of diabetes was estimated as 3.51 mmol/L.
Conclusions
Non‐HDL had better performance than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes in women, but not in men. A body mass index‐specific threshold value for a non‐HDL‐controlling target is required in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cholesterol</subject><subject>Cholesterol - analysis</subject><subject>Cholesterol - blood</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Glucose tolerance</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>High density lipoprotein</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lipoproteins</subject><subject>Lipoproteins - analysis</subject><subject>Lipoproteins - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Primary prevention</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>2040-1116</issn><issn>2040-1124</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQgCMEolXpgRdAlrjAYdvYcRL7goTKX1EFFzhbjjPZeHHsYDtd7Y1H4DV4LZ6EKVtWFIm5jGV__jQeT1E8puUZxTjf9PaMMlG194pjVvJyRSnj9w9r2hwVpyltSoxKiKZpHxZHTNacMSGOix8fgv_57fto1yOmHnyyeUecncMcQwbriRmDg5QhBkdsIlOIQKwfQpx0ttdA8qg9yVH3Ntvgtbt7wffWQMJM5gi4ztavSW91Bxm3o01fCKrINkzgydbmkfgbsyNrt5iQUI-yqL2BR8WDQbsEp7f5pPj85vWni3erq49vLy9eXq0Ml3W7Ml1lWAtSyrbhjWgYbyouGl0PLS_7TjAuuJGdwCZJQUVDa011WfVCSCNg6KuT4sXeOy_dBL0Bj49zao520nGngrbq7om3o1qHa9UwWsuqQsGzW0EMXxfshJpsMuCc9hCWpFhJOeVMyhLRp_-gm7BEbCJSlMmqRpAi9XxPmRhSijAciqGlupkBhTOgfs8Ask_-rv5A_vlxBM73wNY62P3fpN6_utwrfwFUecFE</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Liu, Lu</creator><creator>Li, Qiu</creator><creator>Yuan, Zhongshang</creator><creator>Zhao, Meng</creator><creator>Zhang, Xu</creator><creator>Zhang, Haiqing</creator><creator>Zheng, Dongmei</creator><creator>Xu, Jin</creator><creator>Gao, Ling</creator><creator>Guan, Qingbo</creator><creator>Zhao, Jiajun</creator><creator>Proud, Christopher G</creator><creator>Wang, Xuemin</creator><creator>Hou, Xu</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-584X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance</title><author>Liu, Lu ; Li, Qiu ; Yuan, Zhongshang ; Zhao, Meng ; Zhang, Xu ; Zhang, Haiqing ; Zheng, Dongmei ; Xu, Jin ; Gao, Ling ; Guan, Qingbo ; Zhao, Jiajun ; Proud, Christopher G ; Wang, Xuemin ; Hou, Xu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4957-cb3c27e9997646862463486a5f740db82484c9b81249818615a1a03d889c8efd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cholesterol</topic><topic>Cholesterol - analysis</topic><topic>Cholesterol - blood</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - blood</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Glucose tolerance</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>High density lipoprotein</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lipoproteins</topic><topic>Lipoproteins - analysis</topic><topic>Lipoproteins - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Primary prevention</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Zhongshang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Haiqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Dongmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guan, Qingbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jiajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proud, Christopher G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REACTION Study Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The REACTION Study Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of diabetes investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Lu</au><au>Li, Qiu</au><au>Yuan, Zhongshang</au><au>Zhao, Meng</au><au>Zhang, Xu</au><au>Zhang, Haiqing</au><au>Zheng, Dongmei</au><au>Xu, Jin</au><au>Gao, Ling</au><au>Guan, Qingbo</au><au>Zhao, Jiajun</au><au>Proud, Christopher G</au><au>Wang, Xuemin</au><au>Hou, Xu</au><aucorp>REACTION Study Group</aucorp><aucorp>The REACTION Study Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of diabetes investigation</jtitle><addtitle>J Diabetes Investig</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1304</spage><epage>1311</epage><pages>1304-1311</pages><issn>2040-1116</issn><eissn>2040-1124</eissn><abstract>Aims/Introduction
Limited data are available regarding the performance of non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (non‐HDL) in predicting incident diabetes. We aimed to analyze the association between non‐HDL and development of diabetes, and to estimate the cut‐off point of non‐HDL for discriminating incident diabetes in people with normal glucose tolerance.
Materials and Methods
Of 3,653 middle‐aged and elderly Chinese with normal glucose tolerance at enrollment, 1,025 men and 1,805 women returned to the 3‐year follow up and were involved in the final analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between cholesterol indices and incident diabetes, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify the optimal cut‐off of each cholesterol variable for incident diabetes.
Results
Non‐HDL was an independent risk factor for diabetes for women, but not for men. In women, a 1‐standard deviation increment in non‐HDL was associated with a 1.43‐fold higher risk of diabetes (95% confidence interval 1.14–1.79; P = 0.002), whereas odds ratios for total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol were 1.33 (95% confidence interval 1.06–1.67; P = 0.015) and 1.30 (95% confidence interval 1.04–1.64; P = 0.024), respectively. The discriminatory power and the optimal cut‐off value of non‐HDL for incident diabetes increased across body mass index categories. For women with obesity, the threshold of non‐HDL for screening of diabetes was estimated as 3.51 mmol/L.
Conclusions
Non‐HDL had better performance than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes in women, but not in men. A body mass index‐specific threshold value for a non‐HDL‐controlling target is required in the prevention of type 2 diabetes.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>29542288</pmid><doi>10.1111/jdi.12837</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9884-584X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2040-1116 |
ispartof | Journal of diabetes investigation, 2018-11, Vol.9 (6), p.1304-1311 |
issn | 2040-1116 2040-1124 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6215933 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Body mass index Cholesterol Cholesterol - analysis Cholesterol - blood Confidence intervals Diabetes Diabetes mellitus Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) Diabetes Mellitus - blood Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis Female Geriatrics Glucose tolerance Health risk assessment High density lipoprotein Humans Lipoproteins Lipoproteins - analysis Lipoproteins - blood Male Middle Aged Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol Original Primary prevention Prospective Studies Risk Factors ROC Curve Type 2 diabetes |
title | Non‐high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol is more informative than traditional cholesterol indices in predicting diabetes risk for women with normal glucose tolerance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non%E2%80%90high%E2%80%90density%20lipoprotein%20cholesterol%20is%20more%20informative%20than%20traditional%20cholesterol%20indices%20in%20predicting%20diabetes%20risk%20for%20women%20with%20normal%20glucose%20tolerance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20diabetes%20investigation&rft.au=Liu,%20Lu&rft.aucorp=REACTION%20Study%20Group&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1304&rft.epage=1311&rft.pages=1304-1311&rft.issn=2040-1116&rft.eissn=2040-1124&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jdi.12837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2129354141%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2129354141&rft_id=info:pmid/29542288&rfr_iscdi=true |