Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective

Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrients 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465
Hauptverfasser: Pulker, Claire Elizabeth, Trapp, Georgina S A, Scott, Jane Anne, Pollard, Christina Mary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1465
container_title Nutrients
container_volume 10
creator Pulker, Claire Elizabeth
Trapp, Georgina S A
Scott, Jane Anne
Pollard, Christina Mary
description Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/nu10101465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6213021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2286906066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMotmx74wNI7hRh6slkNjPrhbAW1wqrrajXIZM52cbOJtv8aekz9KXN0nZbr8whJCE_Ps53PkJeMTjifAbvXWZQqhHTZ2S_hrauhGj48yf3PXIY4x_YrhZawV-SPQ4cmg7afXI7H-3KrdEl6g39mTcY1ipcYKKn145-CsoNdOH9EN_QRfAuVd5UZ0pf0O85BZusd3SpehxH61b02qZz-g1VzAHjVm8HqZH-yGq06eYDnTs6zzGF8lSOnmGIG9TJXuEBeWHUGPHw_pyQ34vPv45PquXpl6_H82WlG8ZSNbRM4TAoXTxzLXozA2WYYt3Qc8N6ZPWUdQyHHoRpBWKDTd9xJpjppmKmOZ-Qj3e6m9yvcdDFfGlGboIt1m-kV1b---PsuVz5KylqxqHsCXl7LxD8ZcaY5NpGXYagHPocZV13YgYChPg_yljHQXSwVX13h-rgYwxodh0xkNus5WPWBX791MMOfUiW_wXFRqby</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118306801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu10101465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30304807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>audits ; Commerce ; food choices ; Food Industry - methods ; Food Industry - standards ; Food Labeling - methods ; Food Labeling - standards ; Food Preferences - psychology ; food processing ; foods ; healthy diet ; healthy eating habits ; Humans ; nutrition labeling ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutritional Requirements ; Nutritive Value ; supermarkets ; Western Australia</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0262-4135 ; 0000-0003-0765-9054 ; 0000-0003-4261-4601 ; 0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213021/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213021/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27913,27914,53780,53782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Georgina S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><title>Nutrients</title><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><description>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</description><subject>audits</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>food choices</subject><subject>Food Industry - methods</subject><subject>Food Industry - standards</subject><subject>Food Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Food Labeling - standards</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>food processing</subject><subject>foods</subject><subject>healthy diet</subject><subject>healthy eating habits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>nutrition labeling</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>supermarkets</subject><subject>Western Australia</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMotmx74wNI7hRh6slkNjPrhbAW1wqrrajXIZM52cbOJtv8aekz9KXN0nZbr8whJCE_Ps53PkJeMTjifAbvXWZQqhHTZ2S_hrauhGj48yf3PXIY4x_YrhZawV-SPQ4cmg7afXI7H-3KrdEl6g39mTcY1ipcYKKn145-CsoNdOH9EN_QRfAuVd5UZ0pf0O85BZusd3SpehxH61b02qZz-g1VzAHjVm8HqZH-yGq06eYDnTs6zzGF8lSOnmGIG9TJXuEBeWHUGPHw_pyQ34vPv45PquXpl6_H82WlG8ZSNbRM4TAoXTxzLXozA2WYYt3Qc8N6ZPWUdQyHHoRpBWKDTd9xJpjppmKmOZ-Qj3e6m9yvcdDFfGlGboIt1m-kV1b---PsuVz5KylqxqHsCXl7LxD8ZcaY5NpGXYagHPocZV13YgYChPg_yljHQXSwVX13h-rgYwxodh0xkNus5WPWBX791MMOfUiW_wXFRqby</recordid><startdate>20181009</startdate><enddate>20181009</enddate><creator>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creator><creator>Trapp, Georgina S A</creator><creator>Scott, Jane Anne</creator><creator>Pollard, Christina Mary</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181009</creationdate><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><author>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>audits</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>food choices</topic><topic>Food Industry - methods</topic><topic>Food Industry - standards</topic><topic>Food Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Food Labeling - standards</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>food processing</topic><topic>foods</topic><topic>healthy diet</topic><topic>healthy eating habits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>nutrition labeling</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>supermarkets</topic><topic>Western Australia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Georgina S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</au><au>Trapp, Georgina S A</au><au>Scott, Jane Anne</au><au>Pollard, Christina Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><date>2018-10-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1465</spage><pages>1465-</pages><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>30304807</pmid><doi>10.3390/nu10101465</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6643
ispartof Nutrients, 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465
issn 2072-6643
2072-6643
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6213021
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects audits
Commerce
food choices
Food Industry - methods
Food Industry - standards
Food Labeling - methods
Food Labeling - standards
Food Preferences - psychology
food processing
foods
healthy diet
healthy eating habits
Humans
nutrition labeling
Nutrition Policy
Nutritional Requirements
Nutritive Value
supermarkets
Western Australia
title Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alignment%20of%20Supermarket%20Own%20Brand%20Foods'%20Front-of-Pack%20Nutrition%20Labelling%20with%20Measures%20of%20Nutritional%20Quality:%20An%20Australian%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Pulker,%20Claire%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2018-10-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1465&rft.pages=1465-&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu10101465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2286906066%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118306801&rft_id=info:pmid/30304807&rfr_iscdi=true