Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective
Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF)....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrients 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1465 |
container_title | Nutrients |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Pulker, Claire Elizabeth Trapp, Georgina S A Scott, Jane Anne Pollard, Christina Mary |
description | Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/nu10101465 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6213021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2286906066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMotmx74wNI7hRh6slkNjPrhbAW1wqrrajXIZM52cbOJtv8aekz9KXN0nZbr8whJCE_Ps53PkJeMTjifAbvXWZQqhHTZ2S_hrauhGj48yf3PXIY4x_YrhZawV-SPQ4cmg7afXI7H-3KrdEl6g39mTcY1ipcYKKn145-CsoNdOH9EN_QRfAuVd5UZ0pf0O85BZusd3SpehxH61b02qZz-g1VzAHjVm8HqZH-yGq06eYDnTs6zzGF8lSOnmGIG9TJXuEBeWHUGPHw_pyQ34vPv45PquXpl6_H82WlG8ZSNbRM4TAoXTxzLXozA2WYYt3Qc8N6ZPWUdQyHHoRpBWKDTd9xJpjppmKmOZ-Qj3e6m9yvcdDFfGlGboIt1m-kV1b---PsuVz5KylqxqHsCXl7LxD8ZcaY5NpGXYagHPocZV13YgYChPg_yljHQXSwVX13h-rgYwxodh0xkNus5WPWBX791MMOfUiW_wXFRqby</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118306801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><description>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu10101465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30304807</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>audits ; Commerce ; food choices ; Food Industry - methods ; Food Industry - standards ; Food Labeling - methods ; Food Labeling - standards ; Food Preferences - psychology ; food processing ; foods ; healthy diet ; healthy eating habits ; Humans ; nutrition labeling ; Nutrition Policy ; Nutritional Requirements ; Nutritive Value ; supermarkets ; Western Australia</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0262-4135 ; 0000-0003-0765-9054 ; 0000-0003-4261-4601 ; 0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213021/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6213021/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27913,27914,53780,53782</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304807$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Georgina S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><title>Nutrients</title><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><description>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</description><subject>audits</subject><subject>Commerce</subject><subject>food choices</subject><subject>Food Industry - methods</subject><subject>Food Industry - standards</subject><subject>Food Labeling - methods</subject><subject>Food Labeling - standards</subject><subject>Food Preferences - psychology</subject><subject>food processing</subject><subject>foods</subject><subject>healthy diet</subject><subject>healthy eating habits</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>nutrition labeling</subject><subject>Nutrition Policy</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>supermarkets</subject><subject>Western Australia</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9qFDEUxoMotmx74wNI7hRh6slkNjPrhbAW1wqrrajXIZM52cbOJtv8aekz9KXN0nZbr8whJCE_Ps53PkJeMTjifAbvXWZQqhHTZ2S_hrauhGj48yf3PXIY4x_YrhZawV-SPQ4cmg7afXI7H-3KrdEl6g39mTcY1ipcYKKn145-CsoNdOH9EN_QRfAuVd5UZ0pf0O85BZusd3SpehxH61b02qZz-g1VzAHjVm8HqZH-yGq06eYDnTs6zzGF8lSOnmGIG9TJXuEBeWHUGPHw_pyQ34vPv45PquXpl6_H82WlG8ZSNbRM4TAoXTxzLXozA2WYYt3Qc8N6ZPWUdQyHHoRpBWKDTd9xJpjppmKmOZ-Qj3e6m9yvcdDFfGlGboIt1m-kV1b---PsuVz5KylqxqHsCXl7LxD8ZcaY5NpGXYagHPocZV13YgYChPg_yljHQXSwVX13h-rgYwxodh0xkNus5WPWBX791MMOfUiW_wXFRqby</recordid><startdate>20181009</startdate><enddate>20181009</enddate><creator>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creator><creator>Trapp, Georgina S A</creator><creator>Scott, Jane Anne</creator><creator>Pollard, Christina Mary</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181009</creationdate><title>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</title><author>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth ; Trapp, Georgina S A ; Scott, Jane Anne ; Pollard, Christina Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-d71aeddac4653c6bf90af1a18db3f1be125181edb06f76ee4e4b83161f8569c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>audits</topic><topic>Commerce</topic><topic>food choices</topic><topic>Food Industry - methods</topic><topic>Food Industry - standards</topic><topic>Food Labeling - methods</topic><topic>Food Labeling - standards</topic><topic>Food Preferences - psychology</topic><topic>food processing</topic><topic>foods</topic><topic>healthy diet</topic><topic>healthy eating habits</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>nutrition labeling</topic><topic>Nutrition Policy</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>supermarkets</topic><topic>Western Australia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Georgina S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Jane Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollard, Christina Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pulker, Claire Elizabeth</au><au>Trapp, Georgina S A</au><au>Scott, Jane Anne</au><au>Pollard, Christina Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><addtitle>Nutrients</addtitle><date>2018-10-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1465</spage><pages>1465-</pages><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>Two voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPNL) are present in Australia: the government-led Health Star Ratings (HSR) and food industry-led Daily Intake Guide (DIG). Australia's two largest supermarkets are key supporters of HSR, pledging uptake on all supermarket own brand foods (SOBF). This study aimed to examine prevalence of FOPNL on SOBF, and alignment with patterns of nutritional quality. Photographic audits of all SOBF present in three large supermarkets were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, in 2017. Foods were classified as nutritious or nutrient-poor based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating (AGTHE), NOVA level of food processing, and HSR score. Most (81.5%) SOBF featured FOPNL, with only 55.1% displaying HSR. HSR was present on 69.2% of Coles, 54.0% of Woolworths, and none of IGA SOBF. Half (51.3%) of SOBF were classified as nutritious using the AGTHE, but using NOVA, 56.9% were ultra-processed foods. Nutrient-poor and ultra-processed SOBF were more likely than nutritious foods to include HSR, yet many of these foods achieved HSR scores of 2.5 stars or above, implying they were a healthy choice. Supermarkets have a powerful position in the Australian food system, and they could do more to support healthy food selection through responsible FOPNL.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>30304807</pmid><doi>10.3390/nu10101465</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0262-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-9054</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4261-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-4260</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6643 |
ispartof | Nutrients, 2018-10, Vol.10 (10), p.1465 |
issn | 2072-6643 2072-6643 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6213021 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | audits Commerce food choices Food Industry - methods Food Industry - standards Food Labeling - methods Food Labeling - standards Food Preferences - psychology food processing foods healthy diet healthy eating habits Humans nutrition labeling Nutrition Policy Nutritional Requirements Nutritive Value supermarkets Western Australia |
title | Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T09%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alignment%20of%20Supermarket%20Own%20Brand%20Foods'%20Front-of-Pack%20Nutrition%20Labelling%20with%20Measures%20of%20Nutritional%20Quality:%20An%20Australian%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Pulker,%20Claire%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2018-10-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1465&rft.pages=1465-&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu10101465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2286906066%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118306801&rft_id=info:pmid/30304807&rfr_iscdi=true |