Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test

The standard Arabic version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has never been previously evaluated in Arab countries. We studied its correlation in Arabic speaking children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with both the GINA assessment of asthma control and the resulting changes in asthm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NPJ primary care respiratory medicine 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.41-5, Article 41
Hauptverfasser: AlTeneiji, Majid, AlKalbani, Alia, Nasser, Huda, Iram, Durdana, Alblooshi, Afaf, Narchi, Hassib
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title NPJ primary care respiratory medicine
container_volume 28
creator AlTeneiji, Majid
AlKalbani, Alia
Nasser, Huda
Iram, Durdana
Alblooshi, Afaf
Narchi, Hassib
description The standard Arabic version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has never been previously evaluated in Arab countries. We studied its correlation in Arabic speaking children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with both the GINA assessment of asthma control and the resulting changes in asthma management. The Arabic C-ACT was completed by the children or by their parents when needed. A GINA based level of asthma control score was assigned by their managing physician. The correlation between the different cut- scores of the C-ACT and GINA were studied. A total of 105 eligible children with asthma (aged between 4 and 11.8 years, 61% boys) were enrolled. The Arabic translated C-ACT had a high reliability (Cronbach alpha 81%) and validity (as it correlated well with the GINA level of control). We found that using it with the traditional cut-score of 19 overestimated the degree of asthma control. Instead, a calculated optimal cut-score of 20 estimated more accurately the level of asthma control as assessed both by the GINA assessment and also by changes in asthma management. The current Arabic version of the C-ACT has a good reliability and validity. By using a single optimal cut-point of 20, it can be used to assess both the level of asthma control and of treatment control. It does not, however, accurately define asthma control when using the originally proposed cut-score of 19. Physicians need to recognise that the C-ACT cut-points may vary in different populations. We suggest that cut-scores of translated versions need to be modified in different geographical settings. Asthma: Improving test accuracy for different populations The cut-off score suggestive of poor disease management in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) may need to be changed for different geographical populations. Majid AlTeneiji at Tawam Hospital in Al-Ain, and co-workers across the United Arab Emirates compared the performance of the Arabic version of the C-ACT with the global asthma control test, GINA, in verifying levels of asthma and treatment control. The researchers enrolled 105 children aged 4 to 11 who completed both tests. The Arabic C-ACT performed with high reliability and validity, but the team found that the original English cut-point score of 19, indicating poor disease management, should be raised to 20 in their Arabic population to improve test accuracy. AlTeneiji’s team suggest that the C-ACT test points system may need to be revised for different geographical
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41533-018-0109-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6212419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2127936745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a7fcdc9ef2f930bfb9441477fdb62c33061b7a40b99b7adc00791767fab24f043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoKuoP8CIBL16q-WpjLoIsfoHgRc8hTZNtpW3WTCr4783u-g0ewiSZZ95M5kXokJJTSvj5GQhacl4Qep4XUQXfQLuMlGVB83Hzx34HHQA8E0IoK6VkbBvt8CxQylLuIj-LAaAAZ1MXRtNjSFPzhg2AA-jGOU6twwsXfYiDGa3Dwa-uLqOpO4tTNCP0JrkG27brmzaEJhendjDYhjHF0OPkIO2jLW96cAcfcQ89XV89zm6L-4ebu9nlfWGFJKkw0tvGKueZV5zUvlZCUCGlb-qKWc5JRWtpBKmVyrGxhEhFZSW9qZnwRPA9dLHWXUz14Brrcgum14vYDSa-6WA6_Tszdq2eh1ddMcoEVVng5EMghpcpd66HDqzrezO6MIHOmMpjp2KJHv9Bn8MU8wxXlFS8kqLMFF1Tdjno6PxXM5TopZF6baTORuqlkZrnmqOfv_iq-LQtA2wNQE6Ncxe_n_5f9R0E5Kqc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2127936745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test</title><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>AlTeneiji, Majid ; AlKalbani, Alia ; Nasser, Huda ; Iram, Durdana ; Alblooshi, Afaf ; Narchi, Hassib</creator><creatorcontrib>AlTeneiji, Majid ; AlKalbani, Alia ; Nasser, Huda ; Iram, Durdana ; Alblooshi, Afaf ; Narchi, Hassib</creatorcontrib><description>The standard Arabic version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has never been previously evaluated in Arab countries. We studied its correlation in Arabic speaking children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with both the GINA assessment of asthma control and the resulting changes in asthma management. The Arabic C-ACT was completed by the children or by their parents when needed. A GINA based level of asthma control score was assigned by their managing physician. The correlation between the different cut- scores of the C-ACT and GINA were studied. A total of 105 eligible children with asthma (aged between 4 and 11.8 years, 61% boys) were enrolled. The Arabic translated C-ACT had a high reliability (Cronbach alpha 81%) and validity (as it correlated well with the GINA level of control). We found that using it with the traditional cut-score of 19 overestimated the degree of asthma control. Instead, a calculated optimal cut-score of 20 estimated more accurately the level of asthma control as assessed both by the GINA assessment and also by changes in asthma management. The current Arabic version of the C-ACT has a good reliability and validity. By using a single optimal cut-point of 20, it can be used to assess both the level of asthma control and of treatment control. It does not, however, accurately define asthma control when using the originally proposed cut-score of 19. Physicians need to recognise that the C-ACT cut-points may vary in different populations. We suggest that cut-scores of translated versions need to be modified in different geographical settings. Asthma: Improving test accuracy for different populations The cut-off score suggestive of poor disease management in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) may need to be changed for different geographical populations. Majid AlTeneiji at Tawam Hospital in Al-Ain, and co-workers across the United Arab Emirates compared the performance of the Arabic version of the C-ACT with the global asthma control test, GINA, in verifying levels of asthma and treatment control. The researchers enrolled 105 children aged 4 to 11 who completed both tests. The Arabic C-ACT performed with high reliability and validity, but the team found that the original English cut-point score of 19, indicating poor disease management, should be raised to 20 in their Arabic population to improve test accuracy. AlTeneiji’s team suggest that the C-ACT test points system may need to be revised for different geographical settings around the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2055-1010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2055-1010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41533-018-0109-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30385757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308/3187 ; 692/308/409 ; 692/700/139/1735 ; Asthma ; Childhood ; Childrens health ; Cross-sectional studies ; Disease management ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Primary Care Medicine ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.41-5, Article 41</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a7fcdc9ef2f930bfb9441477fdb62c33061b7a40b99b7adc00791767fab24f043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a7fcdc9ef2f930bfb9441477fdb62c33061b7a40b99b7adc00791767fab24f043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5981-7133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212419/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6212419/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>AlTeneiji, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlKalbani, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Huda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iram, Durdana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alblooshi, Afaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narchi, Hassib</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test</title><title>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</title><addtitle>npj Prim Care Resp Med</addtitle><addtitle>NPJ Prim Care Respir Med</addtitle><description>The standard Arabic version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has never been previously evaluated in Arab countries. We studied its correlation in Arabic speaking children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with both the GINA assessment of asthma control and the resulting changes in asthma management. The Arabic C-ACT was completed by the children or by their parents when needed. A GINA based level of asthma control score was assigned by their managing physician. The correlation between the different cut- scores of the C-ACT and GINA were studied. A total of 105 eligible children with asthma (aged between 4 and 11.8 years, 61% boys) were enrolled. The Arabic translated C-ACT had a high reliability (Cronbach alpha 81%) and validity (as it correlated well with the GINA level of control). We found that using it with the traditional cut-score of 19 overestimated the degree of asthma control. Instead, a calculated optimal cut-score of 20 estimated more accurately the level of asthma control as assessed both by the GINA assessment and also by changes in asthma management. The current Arabic version of the C-ACT has a good reliability and validity. By using a single optimal cut-point of 20, it can be used to assess both the level of asthma control and of treatment control. It does not, however, accurately define asthma control when using the originally proposed cut-score of 19. Physicians need to recognise that the C-ACT cut-points may vary in different populations. We suggest that cut-scores of translated versions need to be modified in different geographical settings. Asthma: Improving test accuracy for different populations The cut-off score suggestive of poor disease management in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) may need to be changed for different geographical populations. Majid AlTeneiji at Tawam Hospital in Al-Ain, and co-workers across the United Arab Emirates compared the performance of the Arabic version of the C-ACT with the global asthma control test, GINA, in verifying levels of asthma and treatment control. The researchers enrolled 105 children aged 4 to 11 who completed both tests. The Arabic C-ACT performed with high reliability and validity, but the team found that the original English cut-point score of 19, indicating poor disease management, should be raised to 20 in their Arabic population to improve test accuracy. AlTeneiji’s team suggest that the C-ACT test points system may need to be revised for different geographical settings around the world.</description><subject>692/308/3187</subject><subject>692/308/409</subject><subject>692/700/139/1735</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>2055-1010</issn><issn>2055-1010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAQhoMoKuoP8CIBL16q-WpjLoIsfoHgRc8hTZNtpW3WTCr4783u-g0ewiSZZ95M5kXokJJTSvj5GQhacl4Qep4XUQXfQLuMlGVB83Hzx34HHQA8E0IoK6VkbBvt8CxQylLuIj-LAaAAZ1MXRtNjSFPzhg2AA-jGOU6twwsXfYiDGa3Dwa-uLqOpO4tTNCP0JrkG27brmzaEJhendjDYhjHF0OPkIO2jLW96cAcfcQ89XV89zm6L-4ebu9nlfWGFJKkw0tvGKueZV5zUvlZCUCGlb-qKWc5JRWtpBKmVyrGxhEhFZSW9qZnwRPA9dLHWXUz14Brrcgum14vYDSa-6WA6_Tszdq2eh1ddMcoEVVng5EMghpcpd66HDqzrezO6MIHOmMpjp2KJHv9Bn8MU8wxXlFS8kqLMFF1Tdjno6PxXM5TopZF6baTORuqlkZrnmqOfv_iq-LQtA2wNQE6Ncxe_n_5f9R0E5Kqc</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>AlTeneiji, Majid</creator><creator>AlKalbani, Alia</creator><creator>Nasser, Huda</creator><creator>Iram, Durdana</creator><creator>Alblooshi, Afaf</creator><creator>Narchi, Hassib</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-7133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test</title><author>AlTeneiji, Majid ; AlKalbani, Alia ; Nasser, Huda ; Iram, Durdana ; Alblooshi, Afaf ; Narchi, Hassib</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-a7fcdc9ef2f930bfb9441477fdb62c33061b7a40b99b7adc00791767fab24f043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>692/308/3187</topic><topic>692/308/409</topic><topic>692/700/139/1735</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AlTeneiji, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlKalbani, Alia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Huda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iram, Durdana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alblooshi, Afaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narchi, Hassib</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AlTeneiji, Majid</au><au>AlKalbani, Alia</au><au>Nasser, Huda</au><au>Iram, Durdana</au><au>Alblooshi, Afaf</au><au>Narchi, Hassib</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test</atitle><jtitle>NPJ primary care respiratory medicine</jtitle><stitle>npj Prim Care Resp Med</stitle><addtitle>NPJ Prim Care Respir Med</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>41-5</pages><artnum>41</artnum><issn>2055-1010</issn><eissn>2055-1010</eissn><abstract>The standard Arabic version of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has never been previously evaluated in Arab countries. We studied its correlation in Arabic speaking children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with both the GINA assessment of asthma control and the resulting changes in asthma management. The Arabic C-ACT was completed by the children or by their parents when needed. A GINA based level of asthma control score was assigned by their managing physician. The correlation between the different cut- scores of the C-ACT and GINA were studied. A total of 105 eligible children with asthma (aged between 4 and 11.8 years, 61% boys) were enrolled. The Arabic translated C-ACT had a high reliability (Cronbach alpha 81%) and validity (as it correlated well with the GINA level of control). We found that using it with the traditional cut-score of 19 overestimated the degree of asthma control. Instead, a calculated optimal cut-score of 20 estimated more accurately the level of asthma control as assessed both by the GINA assessment and also by changes in asthma management. The current Arabic version of the C-ACT has a good reliability and validity. By using a single optimal cut-point of 20, it can be used to assess both the level of asthma control and of treatment control. It does not, however, accurately define asthma control when using the originally proposed cut-score of 19. Physicians need to recognise that the C-ACT cut-points may vary in different populations. We suggest that cut-scores of translated versions need to be modified in different geographical settings. Asthma: Improving test accuracy for different populations The cut-off score suggestive of poor disease management in the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) may need to be changed for different geographical populations. Majid AlTeneiji at Tawam Hospital in Al-Ain, and co-workers across the United Arab Emirates compared the performance of the Arabic version of the C-ACT with the global asthma control test, GINA, in verifying levels of asthma and treatment control. The researchers enrolled 105 children aged 4 to 11 who completed both tests. The Arabic C-ACT performed with high reliability and validity, but the team found that the original English cut-point score of 19, indicating poor disease management, should be raised to 20 in their Arabic population to improve test accuracy. AlTeneiji’s team suggest that the C-ACT test points system may need to be revised for different geographical settings around the world.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>30385757</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41533-018-0109-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5981-7133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2055-1010
ispartof NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2018-11, Vol.28 (1), p.41-5, Article 41
issn 2055-1010
2055-1010
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6212419
source Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects 692/308/3187
692/308/409
692/700/139/1735
Asthma
Childhood
Childrens health
Cross-sectional studies
Disease management
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Primary Care Medicine
Thoracic Surgery
title Cross-sectional study assessing the performance of the Arabic translated childhood asthma control test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A34%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-sectional%20study%20assessing%20the%20performance%20of%20the%20Arabic%20translated%20childhood%20asthma%20control%20test&rft.jtitle=NPJ%20primary%20care%20respiratory%20medicine&rft.au=AlTeneiji,%20Majid&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=41-5&rft.artnum=41&rft.issn=2055-1010&rft.eissn=2055-1010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41533-018-0109-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2127936745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2127936745&rft_id=info:pmid/30385757&rfr_iscdi=true