Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions

Abstract Background  It remains unknown how much force a partially united scaphoid can sustain without refracturing. This is critical in determining when to discontinue immobilization in active individuals. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical strength of simulated partia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of wrist surgery 2018-11, Vol.7 (5), p.399-403
Hauptverfasser: Brekke, Adam C., Snoddy, Mark C., Lee, Donald H., Richard, Marc J., Desai, Mihir J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 403
container_issue 5
container_start_page 399
container_title Journal of wrist surgery
container_volume 7
creator Brekke, Adam C.
Snoddy, Mark C.
Lee, Donald H.
Richard, Marc J.
Desai, Mihir J.
description Abstract Background  It remains unknown how much force a partially united scaphoid can sustain without refracturing. This is critical in determining when to discontinue immobilization in active individuals. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical strength of simulated partially united scaphoids. We hypothesized that no difference would exist in load-to-failure or failure mechanism in scaphoids with 50% or more bone at the waist versus intact scaphoids. Materials and Methods  Forty-one cadaver scaphoids were divided into four groups, three experimental osteotomy groups (25, 50, and 75% of the scaphoid waist) and one control group. Each was subjected to a physiologic cantilever force of 80 to 120 N for 4,000 cycles, followed by load to failure. Permanent deformation during physiologic testing and stiffness, max force, work-to-failure, and failure mechanism during load to failure were recorded. Results  All scaphoids survived subfailure conditioning with no significant difference in permanent deformation. Intact scaphoids endured an average maximum load to failure of 334 versus 321, 297, and 342 N for 25, 50, and 75% groups, respectively, with no significant variance. There were no significant differences in stiffness or work to failure between intact, 25, 50, and 75% groups. One specimen from each osteotomy group failed by fracturing through the osteotomy; all others failed near the distal pole loading site. Conclusion  All groups behaved similarly under physiologic and load-to-failure testing, suggesting that inherent stability is maintained with at least 25% of the scaphoid waist intact. Clinical Relevance  The data provide valuable information regarding partial scaphoid union and supports mobilization once 25% union is achieved.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-0038-1661362
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6196095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2126901318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8279a8533fc59a504cd477d61c8da9dede6dd999547de7de6bf83c820c1378133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MobsxdPcqOXjqTpkmTi6DDXzBQmDuHLEnXjDaZSSv435uxOfRgeJDA-7zvCx8ALhGcIkjITcwgxCxDlCJM8xMwzBHFGeZ5cXp8IzoA4xg3MB2OOSvRORhgiAteEjwE6N761qhaOqtkM1l0wbh1V098NVkoua291ZM3GTqbmktnvYsX4KySTTTjwz0Cy8eH99lzNn99epndzTOFCesylpdcMoJxpQiXBBZKF2WpKVJMS66NNlRrzjkpSm1S0VXFsGI5VAiXDGE8Arf73G2_ao1WxnVBNmIbbCvDl_DSir8dZ2ux9p-CIk4hJyng-hAQ_EdvYidaG5VpGumM76PIUU45RBixhE73qAo-xmCq4xoExU61iGKnWhxUp4Gr35874j9iE5Dtga62pjVi4_vgkq7_Ar8BpLiHKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2126901318</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brekke, Adam C. ; Snoddy, Mark C. ; Lee, Donald H. ; Richard, Marc J. ; Desai, Mihir J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Adam C. ; Snoddy, Mark C. ; Lee, Donald H. ; Richard, Marc J. ; Desai, Mihir J.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background  It remains unknown how much force a partially united scaphoid can sustain without refracturing. This is critical in determining when to discontinue immobilization in active individuals. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical strength of simulated partially united scaphoids. We hypothesized that no difference would exist in load-to-failure or failure mechanism in scaphoids with 50% or more bone at the waist versus intact scaphoids. Materials and Methods  Forty-one cadaver scaphoids were divided into four groups, three experimental osteotomy groups (25, 50, and 75% of the scaphoid waist) and one control group. Each was subjected to a physiologic cantilever force of 80 to 120 N for 4,000 cycles, followed by load to failure. Permanent deformation during physiologic testing and stiffness, max force, work-to-failure, and failure mechanism during load to failure were recorded. Results  All scaphoids survived subfailure conditioning with no significant difference in permanent deformation. Intact scaphoids endured an average maximum load to failure of 334 versus 321, 297, and 342 N for 25, 50, and 75% groups, respectively, with no significant variance. There were no significant differences in stiffness or work to failure between intact, 25, 50, and 75% groups. One specimen from each osteotomy group failed by fracturing through the osteotomy; all others failed near the distal pole loading site. Conclusion  All groups behaved similarly under physiologic and load-to-failure testing, suggesting that inherent stability is maintained with at least 25% of the scaphoid waist intact. Clinical Relevance  The data provide valuable information regarding partial scaphoid union and supports mobilization once 25% union is achieved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-3916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1661362</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30349753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA: Thieme Medical Publishers</publisher><subject>Scientific ; Scientific Article</subject><ispartof>Journal of wrist surgery, 2018-11, Vol.7 (5), p.399-403</ispartof><rights>Thieme Medical Publishers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8279a8533fc59a504cd477d61c8da9dede6dd999547de7de6bf83c820c1378133</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196095/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196095/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30349753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoddy, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Marc J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mihir J.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions</title><title>Journal of wrist surgery</title><addtitle>Jnl Wrist Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background  It remains unknown how much force a partially united scaphoid can sustain without refracturing. This is critical in determining when to discontinue immobilization in active individuals. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical strength of simulated partially united scaphoids. We hypothesized that no difference would exist in load-to-failure or failure mechanism in scaphoids with 50% or more bone at the waist versus intact scaphoids. Materials and Methods  Forty-one cadaver scaphoids were divided into four groups, three experimental osteotomy groups (25, 50, and 75% of the scaphoid waist) and one control group. Each was subjected to a physiologic cantilever force of 80 to 120 N for 4,000 cycles, followed by load to failure. Permanent deformation during physiologic testing and stiffness, max force, work-to-failure, and failure mechanism during load to failure were recorded. Results  All scaphoids survived subfailure conditioning with no significant difference in permanent deformation. Intact scaphoids endured an average maximum load to failure of 334 versus 321, 297, and 342 N for 25, 50, and 75% groups, respectively, with no significant variance. There were no significant differences in stiffness or work to failure between intact, 25, 50, and 75% groups. One specimen from each osteotomy group failed by fracturing through the osteotomy; all others failed near the distal pole loading site. Conclusion  All groups behaved similarly under physiologic and load-to-failure testing, suggesting that inherent stability is maintained with at least 25% of the scaphoid waist intact. Clinical Relevance  The data provide valuable information regarding partial scaphoid union and supports mobilization once 25% union is achieved.</description><subject>Scientific</subject><subject>Scientific Article</subject><issn>2163-3916</issn><issn>2163-3924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4MobsxdPcqOXjqTpkmTi6DDXzBQmDuHLEnXjDaZSSv435uxOfRgeJDA-7zvCx8ALhGcIkjITcwgxCxDlCJM8xMwzBHFGeZ5cXp8IzoA4xg3MB2OOSvRORhgiAteEjwE6N761qhaOqtkM1l0wbh1V098NVkoua291ZM3GTqbmktnvYsX4KySTTTjwz0Cy8eH99lzNn99epndzTOFCesylpdcMoJxpQiXBBZKF2WpKVJMS66NNlRrzjkpSm1S0VXFsGI5VAiXDGE8Arf73G2_ao1WxnVBNmIbbCvDl_DSir8dZ2ux9p-CIk4hJyng-hAQ_EdvYidaG5VpGumM76PIUU45RBixhE73qAo-xmCq4xoExU61iGKnWhxUp4Gr35874j9iE5Dtga62pjVi4_vgkq7_Ar8BpLiHKw</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Brekke, Adam C.</creator><creator>Snoddy, Mark C.</creator><creator>Lee, Donald H.</creator><creator>Richard, Marc J.</creator><creator>Desai, Mihir J.</creator><general>Thieme Medical Publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions</title><author>Brekke, Adam C. ; Snoddy, Mark C. ; Lee, Donald H. ; Richard, Marc J. ; Desai, Mihir J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-8279a8533fc59a504cd477d61c8da9dede6dd999547de7de6bf83c820c1378133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Scientific</topic><topic>Scientific Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brekke, Adam C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoddy, Mark C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donald H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Marc J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Mihir J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of wrist surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brekke, Adam C.</au><au>Snoddy, Mark C.</au><au>Lee, Donald H.</au><au>Richard, Marc J.</au><au>Desai, Mihir J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wrist surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Jnl Wrist Surg</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>403</epage><pages>399-403</pages><issn>2163-3916</issn><eissn>2163-3924</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background  It remains unknown how much force a partially united scaphoid can sustain without refracturing. This is critical in determining when to discontinue immobilization in active individuals. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to test the biomechanical strength of simulated partially united scaphoids. We hypothesized that no difference would exist in load-to-failure or failure mechanism in scaphoids with 50% or more bone at the waist versus intact scaphoids. Materials and Methods  Forty-one cadaver scaphoids were divided into four groups, three experimental osteotomy groups (25, 50, and 75% of the scaphoid waist) and one control group. Each was subjected to a physiologic cantilever force of 80 to 120 N for 4,000 cycles, followed by load to failure. Permanent deformation during physiologic testing and stiffness, max force, work-to-failure, and failure mechanism during load to failure were recorded. Results  All scaphoids survived subfailure conditioning with no significant difference in permanent deformation. Intact scaphoids endured an average maximum load to failure of 334 versus 321, 297, and 342 N for 25, 50, and 75% groups, respectively, with no significant variance. There were no significant differences in stiffness or work to failure between intact, 25, 50, and 75% groups. One specimen from each osteotomy group failed by fracturing through the osteotomy; all others failed near the distal pole loading site. Conclusion  All groups behaved similarly under physiologic and load-to-failure testing, suggesting that inherent stability is maintained with at least 25% of the scaphoid waist intact. Clinical Relevance  The data provide valuable information regarding partial scaphoid union and supports mobilization once 25% union is achieved.</abstract><cop>333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA</cop><pub>Thieme Medical Publishers</pub><pmid>30349753</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0038-1661362</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2163-3916
ispartof Journal of wrist surgery, 2018-11, Vol.7 (5), p.399-403
issn 2163-3916
2163-3924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6196095
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Scientific
Scientific Article
title Biomechanical Strength of Scaphoid Partial Unions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Strength%20of%20Scaphoid%20Partial%20Unions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wrist%20surgery&rft.au=Brekke,%20Adam%20C.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=403&rft.pages=399-403&rft.issn=2163-3916&rft.eissn=2163-3924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0038-1661362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2126901318%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2126901318&rft_id=info:pmid/30349753&rfr_iscdi=true