Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications

To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666
Hauptverfasser: Seager, Matthew J, Patel, Uday, Anderson, Christopher J, Gonsalves, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20170666
container_issue 1085
container_start_page 20170666
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 91
creator Seager, Matthew J
Patel, Uday
Anderson, Christopher J
Gonsalves, Michael
description To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, >2 to- ≤3 cm, >3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior). 94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, >2-≤3 , >3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p < 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant. Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20170666
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6190758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001911854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdFqFTEQhoNY7Gn1zmvJZQW3JtnsbtYLQYraQqE3Ct6FSTJ7mpJsjsmuUJ9A38Mn65O4x3NaKmQIw3zzzzA_IS85O-Wi6d-am3wqGO9Y27ZPyIp3UlVKsW9PyYox1lVcqOaQHJVys02bnj0jh6KXdaukWpFfFxHWWK1n79BR49Om3NI00BIhBHpy9_uPpDa-phlHCDRCKVje0ekaKQ4D2ukf638ihdEtAVOK3i5kSBYmn0a6vL1qma3FUmiGaYfbFDfB77jynBwMEAq-2P_H5Ounj1_OzqvLq88XZx8uKysbNlUgeV0LY3rLOmVdD5wLVoOTwgjWO2mskkaB6ZSwzhlYmrgTCKKxDUAn62Pyfqe7mU1EZ3GcMgS9yT5CvtUJvP6_MvprvU4_dMv75XxqETjZC-T0fcYy6eiLxRBgxDQXLRjjPeeq2c56s0NtTqVkHB7GcKa35unFPH1v3oK_erzaA3zvVv0XOWKZPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001911854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, &gt;2 to- ≤3 cm, &gt;3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior). 94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, &gt;2-≤3 , &gt;3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p &lt; 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant. Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170666</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29436848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Female ; General urinary tract ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Interventional procedures ; Interventional radiology ; Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology ; Kidney - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract ; Radiography, Interventional - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tumor Burden ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2018 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Uday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, &gt;2 to- ≤3 cm, &gt;3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior). 94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, &gt;2-≤3 , &gt;3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p &lt; 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant. Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General urinary tract</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Interventional procedures</subject><subject>Interventional radiology</subject><subject>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdFqFTEQhoNY7Gn1zmvJZQW3JtnsbtYLQYraQqE3Ct6FSTJ7mpJsjsmuUJ9A38Mn65O4x3NaKmQIw3zzzzA_IS85O-Wi6d-am3wqGO9Y27ZPyIp3UlVKsW9PyYox1lVcqOaQHJVys02bnj0jh6KXdaukWpFfFxHWWK1n79BR49Om3NI00BIhBHpy9_uPpDa-phlHCDRCKVje0ekaKQ4D2ukf638ihdEtAVOK3i5kSBYmn0a6vL1qma3FUmiGaYfbFDfB77jynBwMEAq-2P_H5Ounj1_OzqvLq88XZx8uKysbNlUgeV0LY3rLOmVdD5wLVoOTwgjWO2mskkaB6ZSwzhlYmrgTCKKxDUAn62Pyfqe7mU1EZ3GcMgS9yT5CvtUJvP6_MvprvU4_dMv75XxqETjZC-T0fcYy6eiLxRBgxDQXLRjjPeeq2c56s0NtTqVkHB7GcKa35unFPH1v3oK_erzaA3zvVv0XOWKZPA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Seager, Matthew J</creator><creator>Patel, Uday</creator><creator>Anderson, Christopher J</creator><creator>Gonsalves, Michael</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><author>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General urinary tract</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Interventional procedures</topic><topic>Interventional radiology</topic><topic>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Uday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seager, Matthew J</au><au>Patel, Uday</au><au>Anderson, Christopher J</au><au>Gonsalves, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1085</issue><spage>20170666</spage><epage>20170666</epage><pages>20170666-20170666</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, &gt;2 to- ≤3 cm, &gt;3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior). 94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, &gt;2-≤3 , &gt;3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p &lt; 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant. Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>29436848</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20170666</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6190758
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diagnostic Radiology
Female
General urinary tract
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Interventional procedures
Interventional radiology
Kidney - anatomy & histology
Kidney - diagnostic imaging
Kidney - pathology
Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract
Radiography, Interventional - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Tumor Burden
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
Ultrasound
Young Adult
title Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image-guided%20biopsy%20of%20small%20(%E2%89%A44%20cm)%20renal%20masses:%20the%20effect%20of%20size%20and%20anatomical%20location%20on%20biopsy%20success%20rate%20and%20complications&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Seager,%20Matthew%20J&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1085&rft.spage=20170666&rft.epage=20170666&rft.pages=20170666-20170666&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20170666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2001911854%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001911854&rft_id=info:pmid/29436848&rfr_iscdi=true