Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications
To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy. Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20170666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1085 |
container_start_page | 20170666 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Seager, Matthew J Patel, Uday Anderson, Christopher J Gonsalves, Michael |
description | To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy.
Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, >2 to- ≤3 cm, >3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior).
94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, >2-≤3 , >3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p < 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant.
Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20170666 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6190758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001911854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdFqFTEQhoNY7Gn1zmvJZQW3JtnsbtYLQYraQqE3Ct6FSTJ7mpJsjsmuUJ9A38Mn65O4x3NaKmQIw3zzzzA_IS85O-Wi6d-am3wqGO9Y27ZPyIp3UlVKsW9PyYox1lVcqOaQHJVys02bnj0jh6KXdaukWpFfFxHWWK1n79BR49Om3NI00BIhBHpy9_uPpDa-phlHCDRCKVje0ekaKQ4D2ukf638ihdEtAVOK3i5kSBYmn0a6vL1qma3FUmiGaYfbFDfB77jynBwMEAq-2P_H5Ounj1_OzqvLq88XZx8uKysbNlUgeV0LY3rLOmVdD5wLVoOTwgjWO2mskkaB6ZSwzhlYmrgTCKKxDUAn62Pyfqe7mU1EZ3GcMgS9yT5CvtUJvP6_MvprvU4_dMv75XxqETjZC-T0fcYy6eiLxRBgxDQXLRjjPeeq2c56s0NtTqVkHB7GcKa35unFPH1v3oK_erzaA3zvVv0XOWKZPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001911854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy.
Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, >2 to- ≤3 cm, >3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior).
94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, >2-≤3 , >3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p < 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant.
Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170666</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29436848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Female ; General urinary tract ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Interventional procedures ; Interventional radiology ; Kidney - anatomy & histology ; Kidney - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract ; Radiography, Interventional - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tumor Burden ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2018 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Uday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy.
Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, >2 to- ≤3 cm, >3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior).
94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, >2-≤3 , >3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p < 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant.
Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General urinary tract</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Interventional procedures</subject><subject>Interventional radiology</subject><subject>Kidney - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdFqFTEQhoNY7Gn1zmvJZQW3JtnsbtYLQYraQqE3Ct6FSTJ7mpJsjsmuUJ9A38Mn65O4x3NaKmQIw3zzzzA_IS85O-Wi6d-am3wqGO9Y27ZPyIp3UlVKsW9PyYox1lVcqOaQHJVys02bnj0jh6KXdaukWpFfFxHWWK1n79BR49Om3NI00BIhBHpy9_uPpDa-phlHCDRCKVje0ekaKQ4D2ukf638ihdEtAVOK3i5kSBYmn0a6vL1qma3FUmiGaYfbFDfB77jynBwMEAq-2P_H5Ounj1_OzqvLq88XZx8uKysbNlUgeV0LY3rLOmVdD5wLVoOTwgjWO2mskkaB6ZSwzhlYmrgTCKKxDUAn62Pyfqe7mU1EZ3GcMgS9yT5CvtUJvP6_MvprvU4_dMv75XxqETjZC-T0fcYy6eiLxRBgxDQXLRjjPeeq2c56s0NtTqVkHB7GcKa35unFPH1v3oK_erzaA3zvVv0XOWKZPA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Seager, Matthew J</creator><creator>Patel, Uday</creator><creator>Anderson, Christopher J</creator><creator>Gonsalves, Michael</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</title><author>Seager, Matthew J ; Patel, Uday ; Anderson, Christopher J ; Gonsalves, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-a41332bb9c078cd9a11203ad42b209d4bc84b8ab782cddba4501d2ea25c5aa743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General urinary tract</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Interventional procedures</topic><topic>Interventional radiology</topic><topic>Kidney - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seager, Matthew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Uday</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonsalves, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seager, Matthew J</au><au>Patel, Uday</au><au>Anderson, Christopher J</au><au>Gonsalves, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1085</issue><spage>20170666</spage><epage>20170666</epage><pages>20170666-20170666</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To study the influence of tumour diameter and anatomy on the success and complication rates of small renal mass (SRM, ≤4 cm) core biopsy.
Retrospective analysis of SRMs that underwent ultrasound or CT-guided biopsy. Diagnostic and complication rates were compared according to tumour size (subcategorised as axial diameter ≤2 cm, >2 to- ≤3 cm, >3-≤4 cm) and anatomical disposition (exophytic/endophytic, centrality, polar location and anterior/posterior).
94 patients (54 male; age range 21.8-84.3 years) with 95 SRMs underwent biopsy. The first biopsy was diagnostic in 81/95 (85.3%). Seven patients underwent repeat biopsy (6/7 diagnostic), to give an overall diagnostic rate of 91.5%. The primary diagnostic rates in the ≤2, >2-≤3 , >3-≤4 cm groups were 21/25 (84%); 38/44 (86.4%) and 22/26 (84.6%) respectively and were similar (p = 1.00). Anterior and upper pole SRMs were more likely to fail initial biopsy (odds ratio 13.8, p < 0.01; and odds ratio 4.35, p = 0.04) respectively, but other anatomical factors were not relevant. Complications occurred in 14% (all conservatively managed perinephric haematomas; Clavien-Dindo Grade 1) and size or location were not relevant.
Image-guided biopsy of SRMs has a high diagnostic rate irrespective of tumour size. Anterior and upper pole location had lower diagnostic rates. Biopsy should be considered for all patients with SRMs, if the result will impact on management and we list specific scenarios where an SRM biopsy may be helpful. Advances in knowledge: SRM size does not affect the likelihood of a diagnostic biopsy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>29436848</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20170666</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-4341</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2018-05, Vol.91 (1085), p.20170666-20170666 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6190758 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Diagnostic Radiology Female General urinary tract Humans Image-Guided Biopsy - methods Interventional procedures Interventional radiology Kidney - anatomy & histology Kidney - diagnostic imaging Kidney - pathology Kidney Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Kidney Neoplasms - pathology Male Middle Aged RADIODIAGNOSIS - Genitourinary tract Radiography, Interventional - methods Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Tumor Burden Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods Ultrasound Young Adult |
title | Image-guided biopsy of small (≤4 cm) renal masses: the effect of size and anatomical location on biopsy success rate and complications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image-guided%20biopsy%20of%20small%20(%E2%89%A44%20cm)%20renal%20masses:%20the%20effect%20of%20size%20and%20anatomical%20location%20on%20biopsy%20success%20rate%20and%20complications&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Seager,%20Matthew%20J&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1085&rft.spage=20170666&rft.epage=20170666&rft.pages=20170666-20170666&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20170666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2001911854%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001911854&rft_id=info:pmid/29436848&rfr_iscdi=true |