DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES

The Administration for Community Living (ACL), seeking to ensure that the policies and practices of Adult Protective Services Programs (APS) are consistent nationwide, opened a process of public and stakeholder input on draft Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for State APS Systems in 2015. This draft w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation in aging 2017-07, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.1087-1087
Hauptverfasser: Kuhne, J., Bobitt, J., Twomey, M., Carter, J., Whittier Eliason, S., Mabe, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1087
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page 1087
container_title Innovation in aging
container_volume 1
creator Kuhne, J.
Bobitt, J.
Twomey, M.
Carter, J.
Whittier Eliason, S.
Mabe, R.
description The Administration for Community Living (ACL), seeking to ensure that the policies and practices of Adult Protective Services Programs (APS) are consistent nationwide, opened a process of public and stakeholder input on draft Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for State APS Systems in 2015. This draft was created by a working group of experts in the abuse, fraud, and neglect of vulnerable adults, and is intended to provide a framework for state APS jurisdictions when updating, refining, or clarifying current APS rules and laws. Seven domains of APS Practice were identified that informed the Guidelines project: Program Administration, Time Frames for Response, Reporting, Investigating, Interventions, Training, and Program Evaluation. ACL received public comment on the draft Guidelines in 2015 and convened listening sessions to invite stakeholder input. In order to incorporate stakeholder ideas effectively, ACL engaged a Health and Aging Policy Fellowship (HAPF) team, to provide a qualitative research analysis of the public comments on the draft Guidelines. This analysis will inform efforts to revise the guidelines based on the stakeholder input. The Guidelines in final form will provide consensus expert recommendations, best practices when identifiable, and information regarding evidence-based interventions. This session will provide an overview of the development of the guidelines, including the stakeholder engagement process. We will then discuss the qualitative research methods used to analyze the public comments by the HAPF team. Finally, we will conclude by sharing updates to the guidelines based on the results of the data analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geroni/igx004.3988
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6185169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6185169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1428-63d40733b4e03e62191ed846319d936c04eeb40c931a34a979fb988e9cf46ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOOZewKu8QLekJ8uaG2F02Vas7VjTglehTdNZ2dbRqujbu1ERvTo_HP4P_g-he0rGlAiY7GzbHOtJvfskhI1BeN4VGrgghDMFQq7_5Fs06rpXQggVwARzB-hxITMZxpsnGSkcL7FaSzxfpKHCm22spK-CTOJEbrPAlwnO4jCN1Hz7jP04SmSUpAlepcFChkEkkzt0U-X7zo5-7hClS6n8tRPGq8Cfh46hzPUcDiUjM4CCWQKWu1RQW3qMAxWlAG4Is7ZgxAigObBczERVnDdZYSrGjQUYooeee3ovDrY09vjW5nt9autD3n7pJq_1_8-xftG75kNz6k0pF2eA2wNM23Rda6vfLiX6olT3SnWvVF-UwjcDL2cf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kuhne, J. ; Bobitt, J. ; Twomey, M. ; Carter, J. ; Whittier Eliason, S. ; Mabe, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuhne, J. ; Bobitt, J. ; Twomey, M. ; Carter, J. ; Whittier Eliason, S. ; Mabe, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Administration for Community Living (ACL), seeking to ensure that the policies and practices of Adult Protective Services Programs (APS) are consistent nationwide, opened a process of public and stakeholder input on draft Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for State APS Systems in 2015. This draft was created by a working group of experts in the abuse, fraud, and neglect of vulnerable adults, and is intended to provide a framework for state APS jurisdictions when updating, refining, or clarifying current APS rules and laws. Seven domains of APS Practice were identified that informed the Guidelines project: Program Administration, Time Frames for Response, Reporting, Investigating, Interventions, Training, and Program Evaluation. ACL received public comment on the draft Guidelines in 2015 and convened listening sessions to invite stakeholder input. In order to incorporate stakeholder ideas effectively, ACL engaged a Health and Aging Policy Fellowship (HAPF) team, to provide a qualitative research analysis of the public comments on the draft Guidelines. This analysis will inform efforts to revise the guidelines based on the stakeholder input. The Guidelines in final form will provide consensus expert recommendations, best practices when identifiable, and information regarding evidence-based interventions. This session will provide an overview of the development of the guidelines, including the stakeholder engagement process. We will then discuss the qualitative research methods used to analyze the public comments by the HAPF team. Finally, we will conclude by sharing updates to the guidelines based on the results of the data analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igx004.3988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2017-07, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.1087-1087</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6185169/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6185169/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27902,27903,53768,53770</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuhne, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobitt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittier Eliason, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabe, R.</creatorcontrib><title>DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>The Administration for Community Living (ACL), seeking to ensure that the policies and practices of Adult Protective Services Programs (APS) are consistent nationwide, opened a process of public and stakeholder input on draft Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for State APS Systems in 2015. This draft was created by a working group of experts in the abuse, fraud, and neglect of vulnerable adults, and is intended to provide a framework for state APS jurisdictions when updating, refining, or clarifying current APS rules and laws. Seven domains of APS Practice were identified that informed the Guidelines project: Program Administration, Time Frames for Response, Reporting, Investigating, Interventions, Training, and Program Evaluation. ACL received public comment on the draft Guidelines in 2015 and convened listening sessions to invite stakeholder input. In order to incorporate stakeholder ideas effectively, ACL engaged a Health and Aging Policy Fellowship (HAPF) team, to provide a qualitative research analysis of the public comments on the draft Guidelines. This analysis will inform efforts to revise the guidelines based on the stakeholder input. The Guidelines in final form will provide consensus expert recommendations, best practices when identifiable, and information regarding evidence-based interventions. This session will provide an overview of the development of the guidelines, including the stakeholder engagement process. We will then discuss the qualitative research methods used to analyze the public comments by the HAPF team. Finally, we will conclude by sharing updates to the guidelines based on the results of the data analysis.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkNFKwzAUhoMoOOZewKu8QLekJ8uaG2F02Vas7VjTglehTdNZ2dbRqujbu1ERvTo_HP4P_g-he0rGlAiY7GzbHOtJvfskhI1BeN4VGrgghDMFQq7_5Fs06rpXQggVwARzB-hxITMZxpsnGSkcL7FaSzxfpKHCm22spK-CTOJEbrPAlwnO4jCN1Hz7jP04SmSUpAlepcFChkEkkzt0U-X7zo5-7hClS6n8tRPGq8Cfh46hzPUcDiUjM4CCWQKWu1RQW3qMAxWlAG4Is7ZgxAigObBczERVnDdZYSrGjQUYooeee3ovDrY09vjW5nt9autD3n7pJq_1_8-xftG75kNz6k0pF2eA2wNM23Rda6vfLiX6olT3SnWvVF-UwjcDL2cf</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Kuhne, J.</creator><creator>Bobitt, J.</creator><creator>Twomey, M.</creator><creator>Carter, J.</creator><creator>Whittier Eliason, S.</creator><creator>Mabe, R.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES</title><author>Kuhne, J. ; Bobitt, J. ; Twomey, M. ; Carter, J. ; Whittier Eliason, S. ; Mabe, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1428-63d40733b4e03e62191ed846319d936c04eeb40c931a34a979fb988e9cf46ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuhne, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bobitt, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twomey, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carter, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittier Eliason, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mabe, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuhne, J.</au><au>Bobitt, J.</au><au>Twomey, M.</au><au>Carter, J.</au><au>Whittier Eliason, S.</au><au>Mabe, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>1087</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1087-1087</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>The Administration for Community Living (ACL), seeking to ensure that the policies and practices of Adult Protective Services Programs (APS) are consistent nationwide, opened a process of public and stakeholder input on draft Voluntary Consensus Guidelines for State APS Systems in 2015. This draft was created by a working group of experts in the abuse, fraud, and neglect of vulnerable adults, and is intended to provide a framework for state APS jurisdictions when updating, refining, or clarifying current APS rules and laws. Seven domains of APS Practice were identified that informed the Guidelines project: Program Administration, Time Frames for Response, Reporting, Investigating, Interventions, Training, and Program Evaluation. ACL received public comment on the draft Guidelines in 2015 and convened listening sessions to invite stakeholder input. In order to incorporate stakeholder ideas effectively, ACL engaged a Health and Aging Policy Fellowship (HAPF) team, to provide a qualitative research analysis of the public comments on the draft Guidelines. This analysis will inform efforts to revise the guidelines based on the stakeholder input. The Guidelines in final form will provide consensus expert recommendations, best practices when identifiable, and information regarding evidence-based interventions. This session will provide an overview of the development of the guidelines, including the stakeholder engagement process. We will then discuss the qualitative research methods used to analyze the public comments by the HAPF team. Finally, we will conclude by sharing updates to the guidelines based on the results of the data analysis.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igx004.3988</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2399-5300
ispartof Innovation in aging, 2017-07, Vol.1 (suppl_1), p.1087-1087
issn 2399-5300
2399-5300
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6185169
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts
title DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DEVELOPMENT%20OF%20THE%20ADULT%20PROTECTIVE%20SERVICES%20VOLUNTARY%20CONSENSUS%20GUIDELINES&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Kuhne,%20J.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=1087&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1087-1087&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igx004.3988&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6185169%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true