A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?

Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perfor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation physiology 2018-01, Vol.6 (1), p.coy057-coy057
Hauptverfasser: Geiser, Fritz, Stawski, Clare, Doty, Anna C, Cooper, Christine E, Nowack, Julia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page coy057
container_issue 1
container_start_page coy057
container_title Conservation physiology
container_volume 6
creator Geiser, Fritz
Stawski, Clare
Doty, Anna C
Cooper, Christine E
Nowack, Julia
description Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and post-fire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/conphys/coy057
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607349577</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607349577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-194e558206418c39870ed83e530e0bbbc7429f20f136314ee394789a701edc723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1PGzEQhq2KChDlyrHysT0Exl_xuodWESofElKltpwt72Y2Mezaqe0t5N-zIQHBaUaex6_seQg5YXDKwIizJobVcp3HugalP5BDDopNmBRy701_QI5zvgMABlopU-2TAwGCCyP4IbEzWg8p-LCg_wbMxcfwjT4sXaEuIS1LpMnn-0xdmNMaA7a-ZBpb2ru-d513gZaYVjHR-ZA2IRvOtQUTbX3C_OMT-di6LuPxrh6R24uff8-vJje_Lq_PZzeTRnJZJsxIVKriMJWsaoSpNOC8EqgEINR13WjJTcuhZWIqmEQURurKOA0M543m4oh83-auhrofjzCU5Dq7Sr53aW2j8_b9JPilXcT_dsoqxpUYA77sAlJ83oTtfW6w61zAOGTLGQctx8VVI_p1iy5ch9aHUUPBx7JwQ872-s9vO5uCFtIorUf2dMs2KeacsH19EgO7kWh3Eu1W4njh89uPvOIvysQT9yiaQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120743038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Geiser, Fritz ; Stawski, Clare ; Doty, Anna C ; Cooper, Christine E ; Nowack, Julia</creator><contributor>Fuller, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Fritz ; Stawski, Clare ; Doty, Anna C ; Cooper, Christine E ; Nowack, Julia ; Fuller, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and post-fire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-1434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coy057</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30323932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Insects ; Physiological aspects ; Review ; Water ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Conservation physiology, 2018-01, Vol.6 (1), p.coy057-coy057</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-194e558206418c39870ed83e530e0bbbc7429f20f136314ee394789a701edc723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-194e558206418c39870ed83e530e0bbbc7429f20f136314ee394789a701edc723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181253/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6181253/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fuller, Andrea</contributor><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Fritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawski, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doty, Anna C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Christine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowack, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?</title><title>Conservation physiology</title><addtitle>Conserv Physiol</addtitle><description>Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and post-fire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>2051-1434</issn><issn>2051-1434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkU1PGzEQhq2KChDlyrHysT0Exl_xuodWESofElKltpwt72Y2Mezaqe0t5N-zIQHBaUaex6_seQg5YXDKwIizJobVcp3HugalP5BDDopNmBRy701_QI5zvgMABlopU-2TAwGCCyP4IbEzWg8p-LCg_wbMxcfwjT4sXaEuIS1LpMnn-0xdmNMaA7a-ZBpb2ru-d513gZaYVjHR-ZA2IRvOtQUTbX3C_OMT-di6LuPxrh6R24uff8-vJje_Lq_PZzeTRnJZJsxIVKriMJWsaoSpNOC8EqgEINR13WjJTcuhZWIqmEQURurKOA0M543m4oh83-auhrofjzCU5Dq7Sr53aW2j8_b9JPilXcT_dsoqxpUYA77sAlJ83oTtfW6w61zAOGTLGQctx8VVI_p1iy5ch9aHUUPBx7JwQ872-s9vO5uCFtIorUf2dMs2KeacsH19EgO7kWh3Eu1W4njh89uPvOIvysQT9yiaQA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Geiser, Fritz</creator><creator>Stawski, Clare</creator><creator>Doty, Anna C</creator><creator>Cooper, Christine E</creator><creator>Nowack, Julia</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?</title><author>Geiser, Fritz ; Stawski, Clare ; Doty, Anna C ; Cooper, Christine E ; Nowack, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-194e558206418c39870ed83e530e0bbbc7429f20f136314ee394789a701edc723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geiser, Fritz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stawski, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doty, Anna C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Christine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowack, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geiser, Fritz</au><au>Stawski, Clare</au><au>Doty, Anna C</au><au>Cooper, Christine E</au><au>Nowack, Julia</au><au>Fuller, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?</atitle><jtitle>Conservation physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Physiol</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>coy057</spage><epage>coy057</epage><pages>coy057-coy057</pages><issn>2051-1434</issn><eissn>2051-1434</eissn><abstract>Although wildfires are increasing globally, available information on how mammals respond behaviourally and physiologically to fires is scant. Despite a large number of ecological studies, often examining animal diversity and abundance before and after fires, the reasons as to why some species perform better than others remain obscure. We examine how especially small mammals, which generally have high rates of energy expenditure and food requirements, deal with fires and post-fire conditions. We evaluate whether mammalian torpor, characterised by substantial reductions in body temperature, metabolic rate and water loss, plays a functional role in survival of mammals impacted by fires. Importantly, torpor permits small mammals to reduce their activity and foraging, and to survive on limited food. Torpid small mammals (marsupials and bats) can respond to smoke and arouse from torpor, which provides them with the possibility to evade direct exposure to fire, although their response is often slowed when ambient temperature is low. Post-fire conditions increase expression of torpor with a concomitant decrease in activity for free-ranging echidnas and small forest-dwelling marsupials, in response to reduced cover and reduced availability of terrestrial insects. Presence of charcoal and ash increases torpor use by captive small marsupials beyond food restriction alone, likely in anticipation of detrimental post-fire conditions. Interestingly, although volant bats use torpor on every day after fires, they respond by decreasing torpor duration, and increasing activity, perhaps because of the decrease in clutter and increase in foraging opportunities due to an increase in aerial insects. Our summary shows that torpor is an important tool for post-fire survival and, although the physiological and behavioural responses of small mammals to fire are complex, they seem to reflect energetic requirements and mode of foraging. We make recommendations on the conditions during management burns that are least likely to impact heterothermic mammals.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30323932</pmid><doi>10.1093/conphys/coy057</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2051-1434
ispartof Conservation physiology, 2018-01, Vol.6 (1), p.coy057-coy057
issn 2051-1434
2051-1434
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6181253
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Animal behavior
Insects
Physiological aspects
Review
Water
Wildfires
title A burning question: what are the risks and benefits of mammalian torpor during and after fires?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T19%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20burning%20question:%20what%20are%20the%20risks%20and%20benefits%20of%20mammalian%20torpor%20during%20and%20after%20fires?&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20physiology&rft.au=Geiser,%20Fritz&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=coy057&rft.epage=coy057&rft.pages=coy057-coy057&rft.issn=2051-1434&rft.eissn=2051-1434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/conphys/coy057&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA607349577%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120743038&rft_id=info:pmid/30323932&rft_galeid=A607349577&rfr_iscdi=true