Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?
Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2S |
container_start_page | 84 |
container_title | Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Di Benedetto, Paolo Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele Salviato, Daniele Beltrame, Alessandro Gissoni, Renato Cainero, Vanni Causero, Araldo |
description | Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections.
We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach.
If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures.
DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6178991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28657569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-22dde02c7e0c70f43ca33077d41bf5df55cf77fb2c3ffb8067565ca7c9a14dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKAzEYhYMotlYfwI3kBWbMZXIZF0ppvRQKgnY_ZJI_NjqdGTJpoW9vwQu6OouP83E4CF1SkjOuBLk29SbfaR1Y9ppLQfURGjPBaSZVIY7RmPCSZQUjfITOhuGdEClEQU_RiGkplJDlGM2ndpsA9xBDH7shrSEFiz9aABxaDzaFrr3BYcAHEgEPKTQNNjh2DWDfRTyfLl7uztGJN80AF985QauH-9XsKVs-Py5m02XWU01TxphzQJhVQKwivuDWcE6UcgWtvXBeCOuV8jWz3PtaE3mYKKxRtjS0cI5P0O2Xtt_WG3AW2hRNU_UxbEzcV50J1X_ShnX11u0qSZUuS3oQXP0V_DZ_7uCfouVkyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections.
We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach.
If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures.
DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-4203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2531-6745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28657569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Mattioli 1885</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Debridement ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Original ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</subject><ispartof>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense, 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178991/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178991/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salviato, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gissoni, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cainero, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><title>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</title><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections.
We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach.
If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures.
DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</subject><issn>0392-4203</issn><issn>2531-6745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtKAzEYhYMotlYfwI3kBWbMZXIZF0ppvRQKgnY_ZJI_NjqdGTJpoW9vwQu6OouP83E4CF1SkjOuBLk29SbfaR1Y9ppLQfURGjPBaSZVIY7RmPCSZQUjfITOhuGdEClEQU_RiGkplJDlGM2ndpsA9xBDH7shrSEFiz9aABxaDzaFrr3BYcAHEgEPKTQNNjh2DWDfRTyfLl7uztGJN80AF985QauH-9XsKVs-Py5m02XWU01TxphzQJhVQKwivuDWcE6UcgWtvXBeCOuV8jWz3PtaE3mYKKxRtjS0cI5P0O2Xtt_WG3AW2hRNU_UxbEzcV50J1X_ShnX11u0qSZUuS3oQXP0V_DZ_7uCfouVkyg</recordid><startdate>20170607</startdate><enddate>20170607</enddate><creator>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creator><creator>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creator><creator>Salviato, Daniele</creator><creator>Beltrame, Alessandro</creator><creator>Gissoni, Renato</creator><creator>Cainero, Vanni</creator><creator>Causero, Araldo</creator><general>Mattioli 1885</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170607</creationdate><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><author>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-22dde02c7e0c70f43ca33077d41bf5df55cf77fb2c3ffb8067565ca7c9a14dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salviato, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gissoni, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cainero, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Benedetto, Paolo</au><au>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</au><au>Salviato, Daniele</au><au>Beltrame, Alessandro</au><au>Gissoni, Renato</au><au>Cainero, Vanni</au><au>Causero, Araldo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</atitle><jtitle>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><date>2017-06-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2S</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>84-91</pages><issn>0392-4203</issn><eissn>2531-6745</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections.
We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach.
If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures.
DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Mattioli 1885</pub><pmid>28657569</pmid><doi>10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0392-4203 |
ispartof | Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense, 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91 |
issn | 0392-4203 2531-6745 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6178991 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation Debridement Humans Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Original Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy |
title | Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20periprosthetic%20knee%20infection:%20is%20there%20still%20a%20role%20for%20DAIR?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20bio-medica%20de%20l'Ateneo%20Parmense&rft.au=Di%20Benedetto,%20Paolo&rft.date=2017-06-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2S&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=84-91&rft.issn=0392-4203&rft.eissn=2531-6745&rft_id=info:doi/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E28657569%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28657569&rfr_iscdi=true |