Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?

Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91
Hauptverfasser: Di Benedetto, Paolo, Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele, Salviato, Daniele, Beltrame, Alessandro, Gissoni, Renato, Cainero, Vanni, Causero, Araldo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 2S
container_start_page 84
container_title Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense
container_volume 88
creator Di Benedetto, Paolo
Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele
Salviato, Daniele
Beltrame, Alessandro
Gissoni, Renato
Cainero, Vanni
Causero, Araldo
description Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections. We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach. If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures. DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.
doi_str_mv 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6178991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28657569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-22dde02c7e0c70f43ca33077d41bf5df55cf77fb2c3ffb8067565ca7c9a14dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKAzEYhYMotlYfwI3kBWbMZXIZF0ppvRQKgnY_ZJI_NjqdGTJpoW9vwQu6OouP83E4CF1SkjOuBLk29SbfaR1Y9ppLQfURGjPBaSZVIY7RmPCSZQUjfITOhuGdEClEQU_RiGkplJDlGM2ndpsA9xBDH7shrSEFiz9aABxaDzaFrr3BYcAHEgEPKTQNNjh2DWDfRTyfLl7uztGJN80AF985QauH-9XsKVs-Py5m02XWU01TxphzQJhVQKwivuDWcE6UcgWtvXBeCOuV8jWz3PtaE3mYKKxRtjS0cI5P0O2Xtt_WG3AW2hRNU_UxbEzcV50J1X_ShnX11u0qSZUuS3oQXP0V_DZ_7uCfouVkyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><description>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections. We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach. If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures. DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0392-4203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2531-6745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28657569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Mattioli 1885</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Debridement ; Humans ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Original ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology ; Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</subject><ispartof>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense, 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 ACTA BIO MEDICA SOCIETY OF MEDICINE AND NATURAL SCIENCES OF PARMA 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178991/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6178991/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salviato, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gissoni, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cainero, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><title>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</title><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><description>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections. We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach. If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures. DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</subject><issn>0392-4203</issn><issn>2531-6745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtKAzEYhYMotlYfwI3kBWbMZXIZF0ppvRQKgnY_ZJI_NjqdGTJpoW9vwQu6OouP83E4CF1SkjOuBLk29SbfaR1Y9ppLQfURGjPBaSZVIY7RmPCSZQUjfITOhuGdEClEQU_RiGkplJDlGM2ndpsA9xBDH7shrSEFiz9aABxaDzaFrr3BYcAHEgEPKTQNNjh2DWDfRTyfLl7uztGJN80AF985QauH-9XsKVs-Py5m02XWU01TxphzQJhVQKwivuDWcE6UcgWtvXBeCOuV8jWz3PtaE3mYKKxRtjS0cI5P0O2Xtt_WG3AW2hRNU_UxbEzcV50J1X_ShnX11u0qSZUuS3oQXP0V_DZ_7uCfouVkyg</recordid><startdate>20170607</startdate><enddate>20170607</enddate><creator>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creator><creator>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creator><creator>Salviato, Daniele</creator><creator>Beltrame, Alessandro</creator><creator>Gissoni, Renato</creator><creator>Cainero, Vanni</creator><creator>Causero, Araldo</creator><general>Mattioli 1885</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170607</creationdate><title>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</title><author>Di Benedetto, Paolo ; Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele ; Salviato, Daniele ; Beltrame, Alessandro ; Gissoni, Renato ; Cainero, Vanni ; Causero, Araldo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-22dde02c7e0c70f43ca33077d41bf5df55cf77fb2c3ffb8067565ca7c9a14dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salviato, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrame, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gissoni, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cainero, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causero, Araldo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Benedetto, Paolo</au><au>Di Benedetto, Enrico Daniele</au><au>Salviato, Daniele</au><au>Beltrame, Alessandro</au><au>Gissoni, Renato</au><au>Cainero, Vanni</au><au>Causero, Araldo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?</atitle><jtitle>Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Biomed</addtitle><date>2017-06-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>2S</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>84-91</pages><issn>0392-4203</issn><eissn>2531-6745</eissn><abstract>Periprosthetic knee infection is a rare complication associated with prosthetic failure; incidence change from 0,4-2% of primary total knee replacement and 5.6% in revisions. Indications for debridment, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are early acute infections or acute delayed infection. Aim of the work is to check if this technique is still a successful in early infections. We have analyzed recent literature data on DAIR and all DAIR procedures in our clinic in the last 10 years, the mean time between onset of symptoms and surgery, the mean antibiotic therapy duration and results we have obtained. We evaluate the diagnostic process and different treatments in early knee periprosthetic infections, especially the DAIR approach. If correct indications are followed, DAIR has a success rate in 31-100% of the cases; if it is applied in late chronic infection the success rate is 28-62%. In our experience DAIR has an 80% success rate: in 20 patients treated with DAIR we had 4 failures. DAIR can be considered a successful treatment, but it depends from individual patient factors, from the microorganisms involved, from the duration of antibiotic therapy and from correct choice in timing and in execution of DAIR by the orthopedic surgeon.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Mattioli 1885</pub><pmid>28657569</pmid><doi>10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0392-4203
ispartof Acta bio-medica de l'Ateneo Parmense, 2017-06, Vol.88 (2S), p.84-91
issn 0392-4203
2531-6745
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6178991
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Debridement
Humans
Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects
Original
Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis
Prosthesis-Related Infections - etiology
Prosthesis-Related Infections - therapy
title Acute periprosthetic knee infection: is there still a role for DAIR?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20periprosthetic%20knee%20infection:%20is%20there%20still%20a%20role%20for%20DAIR?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20bio-medica%20de%20l'Ateneo%20Parmense&rft.au=Di%20Benedetto,%20Paolo&rft.date=2017-06-07&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=2S&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=84-91&rft.issn=0392-4203&rft.eissn=2531-6745&rft_id=info:doi/10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6518&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E28657569%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28657569&rfr_iscdi=true