Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany
IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective inst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.e022694-e022694 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e022694 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e022694 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Schulze, Lars Bürkner, Paul-Christian Bohländer, Julian Zetsche, Ulrike |
description | IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.Methods and analysesWe will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6169760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2115608807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c02f8e86e87b5e51b2f846780b850bdaf7b07584af08355f188b721e7f5c0f393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEolXbJ0BClrhwIK3txI7DAamsoCBV6qWcLTsZL14ldrCdirwWT4izu1SFE77Ynvnmn7H1F8Urgi8JqfiVHnd-AldSTESJKeVt_aw4pbiuS44Ze_7kfFJcxLjDedWsZYy-LE4qTAXloj4tfm381tlkHwB13qXgB6Rcj3plhwUpY6BLKMB2HlSy3iHr0Kh2PqAepgAxrrGV1z70EAbrAE0QondqsGlBvY37xHs0BZ98l9VNLlYOwc_M2RFcUrnjqNcGPuSWMWbZNY5imvtl7fhxr_wO3UAYlVvOixdGDREujvtZ8e3zp_vNl_L27ubr5vq21HVDU9lhagQIDqLRDBjR-VrzRmAtGNa9Mo3GDRO1MlhUjBkihG4ogcawDpuqrc6KDwfdadYj9F2eKahBTnlsFRbplZV_Z5z9Lrf-QXLC24bjLPD2KBD8jxlikqONHQyDcuDnKCkhnFDSVjyjb_5Bd34O-Rf3FONYCNxkqjpQXfAxBjCPwxAsV1vIoy3kagt5sEWuev30HY81f0yQgcsDkKv_S_E38UnJVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115608807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schulze, Lars ; Bürkner, Paul-Christian ; Bohländer, Julian ; Zetsche, Ulrike</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Lars ; Bürkner, Paul-Christian ; Bohländer, Julian ; Zetsche, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.Methods and analysesWe will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30282684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Ambulatory assessment ; Borderline personality disorder ; Emotions ; Hypotheses ; Memory ; Mental depression ; Mental Health ; Personality disorders ; Psychopathology ; Quantitative psychology</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.e022694-e022694</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2018 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c02f8e86e87b5e51b2f846780b850bdaf7b07584af08355f188b721e7f5c0f393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c02f8e86e87b5e51b2f846780b850bdaf7b07584af08355f188b721e7f5c0f393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e022694.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/10/e022694.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27549,27550,27924,27925,53791,53793,77601,77632</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30282684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürkner, Paul-Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohländer, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zetsche, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><title>Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.Methods and analysesWe will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.</description><subject>Ambulatory assessment</subject><subject>Borderline personality disorder</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Personality disorders</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNksFu1DAQhiMEolXbJ0BClrhwIK3txI7DAamsoCBV6qWcLTsZL14ldrCdirwWT4izu1SFE77Ynvnmn7H1F8Urgi8JqfiVHnd-AldSTESJKeVt_aw4pbiuS44Ze_7kfFJcxLjDedWsZYy-LE4qTAXloj4tfm381tlkHwB13qXgB6Rcj3plhwUpY6BLKMB2HlSy3iHr0Kh2PqAepgAxrrGV1z70EAbrAE0QondqsGlBvY37xHs0BZ98l9VNLlYOwc_M2RFcUrnjqNcGPuSWMWbZNY5imvtl7fhxr_wO3UAYlVvOixdGDREujvtZ8e3zp_vNl_L27ubr5vq21HVDU9lhagQIDqLRDBjR-VrzRmAtGNa9Mo3GDRO1MlhUjBkihG4ogcawDpuqrc6KDwfdadYj9F2eKahBTnlsFRbplZV_Z5z9Lrf-QXLC24bjLPD2KBD8jxlikqONHQyDcuDnKCkhnFDSVjyjb_5Bd34O-Rf3FONYCNxkqjpQXfAxBjCPwxAsV1vIoy3kagt5sEWuev30HY81f0yQgcsDkKv_S_E38UnJVw</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Schulze, Lars</creator><creator>Bürkner, Paul-Christian</creator><creator>Bohländer, Julian</creator><creator>Zetsche, Ulrike</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany</title><author>Schulze, Lars ; Bürkner, Paul-Christian ; Bohländer, Julian ; Zetsche, Ulrike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b472t-c02f8e86e87b5e51b2f846780b850bdaf7b07584af08355f188b721e7f5c0f393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory assessment</topic><topic>Borderline personality disorder</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Personality disorders</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulze, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürkner, Paul-Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohländer, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zetsche, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulze, Lars</au><au>Bürkner, Paul-Christian</au><au>Bohländer, Julian</au><au>Zetsche, Ulrike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e022694</spage><epage>e022694</epage><pages>e022694-e022694</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionAffective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.Methods and analysesWe will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>30282684</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.e022694-e022694 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6169760 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ambulatory assessment Borderline personality disorder Emotions Hypotheses Memory Mental depression Mental Health Personality disorders Psychopathology Quantitative psychology |
title | Cognitive control and daily affect regulation in major depression and borderline personality disorder: protocol for an experimental ambulatory assessment study in Berlin, Germany |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A40%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cognitive%20control%20and%20daily%20affect%20regulation%20in%20major%20depression%20and%20borderline%20personality%20disorder:%20protocol%20for%20an%20experimental%20ambulatory%20assessment%20study%20in%20Berlin,%20Germany&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Schulze,%20Lars&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e022694&rft.epage=e022694&rft.pages=e022694-e022694&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2115608807%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115608807&rft_id=info:pmid/30282684&rfr_iscdi=true |