Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels

Kinetic analysis of solid-state fermentation (SSF) of fruit peels with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture was studied in flask and 7 kg capacity reactor. Modified Monod kinetic model suggested by Haldane sufficiently described microbial growth with co-efficient of de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:3 Biotech 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.429-429, Article 429
Hauptverfasser: Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed, Jamal, Parveen, Alam, Md. Zahangir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 429
container_issue 10
container_start_page 429
container_title 3 Biotech
container_volume 8
creator Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed
Jamal, Parveen
Alam, Md. Zahangir
description Kinetic analysis of solid-state fermentation (SSF) of fruit peels with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture was studied in flask and 7 kg capacity reactor. Modified Monod kinetic model suggested by Haldane sufficiently described microbial growth with co-efficient of determination ( R 2 ) reaching 0.908 at increased substrate concentration than the classical Monod model ( R 2  = 0.932). Leudeking–Piret model adequately described product synthesis in non-growth-dependent manner ( R 2  = 0.989), while substrate consumption by P. chrysosporium and S. commune fungal mixed culture was growth-dependent ( R 2  = 0.938). Hanes–Woolf model sufficiently represented α-amylase and cellulase enzymes synthesis ( R 2  = 0.911 and 0.988); α-amylase had enzyme maximum velocity ( V max ) of 25.19 IU/gds/day and rate constant ( K m ) of 11.55 IU/gds/day, while cellulase enzyme had V max of 3.05 IU/gds/day and K m of 57.47 IU/gds/day. Product yield in the reactor increased to 32.65 mg/g/day compared with 28.15 mg/g/day in shake flask. 2.5 cm media thickness was adequate for product formation within a 6 day SSF in the tray reactor.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13205-018-1452-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6162195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2118311902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-e7f28195c58e1daa5a7fc077b5a0ee6974f4cdec36b32e12a2c4a1e522f0e5b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktrFTEUxwdRbKn9AG4k4MZFR_O4mcdGkKKtUFBQwV3IzZx0UifJmEf1-rH8hM049foAwWwSzvmdZ_5V9ZDgpwTj9lkkjGJeY9LVZMNpze5Uh5T0uOYt6-7u3_TjQXUc4xUuhxPeE3y_OmCYYd733WH1_Sz4L2k8QTFvYwoyAVLexWznZLw7QdINaA5-yCoh7YOVixl9Mg6SURF5jd6O0kHwapSwBI9hF32cfTDZ_oh-p0bzzc_jbpqKRXlrswNkzVcYkMpTygFQdgMEFP1khjqmpQkNwYJLa7lSRYdsEpoBpviguqflFOH49j6qPrx6-f70vL54c_b69MVFrThmqYZW0470XPEOyCAll61WuG23XGKApm83eqMGUKzZMgqESqo2kgCnVGPgW8aOqudr3jlvLQyqtBPkJOZgrAw74aURf3qcGcWlvxYNacryeUnw5DZB8J8zxCSsiQqmqSzM5ygo4awpv0jpf6CkY6T86II-_gu98jm4somFYi1ueNcViqyUCj7GAHrfN8Fi0Y9Y9SOKfsSiH7EM_Oj3gfcRP9VSALoCsbjcJYRfpf-d9QZEYtaj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2113706588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed ; Jamal, Parveen ; Alam, Md. Zahangir</creator><creatorcontrib>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed ; Jamal, Parveen ; Alam, Md. Zahangir</creatorcontrib><description>Kinetic analysis of solid-state fermentation (SSF) of fruit peels with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture was studied in flask and 7 kg capacity reactor. Modified Monod kinetic model suggested by Haldane sufficiently described microbial growth with co-efficient of determination ( R 2 ) reaching 0.908 at increased substrate concentration than the classical Monod model ( R 2  = 0.932). Leudeking–Piret model adequately described product synthesis in non-growth-dependent manner ( R 2  = 0.989), while substrate consumption by P. chrysosporium and S. commune fungal mixed culture was growth-dependent ( R 2  = 0.938). Hanes–Woolf model sufficiently represented α-amylase and cellulase enzymes synthesis ( R 2  = 0.911 and 0.988); α-amylase had enzyme maximum velocity ( V max ) of 25.19 IU/gds/day and rate constant ( K m ) of 11.55 IU/gds/day, while cellulase enzyme had V max of 3.05 IU/gds/day and K m of 57.47 IU/gds/day. Product yield in the reactor increased to 32.65 mg/g/day compared with 28.15 mg/g/day in shake flask. 2.5 cm media thickness was adequate for product formation within a 6 day SSF in the tray reactor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-572X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-5738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1452-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30305998</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; alpha-amylase ; Amylases ; Bioinformatics ; Biomaterials ; Biotechnology ; Cancer Research ; Cell culture ; Cellulase ; cellulases ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; culture flasks ; Enzymes ; Fermentation ; fruit peels ; fungi ; kinetics ; microbial growth ; Microorganisms ; Mixed culture ; Monod kinetics ; Original ; Original Article ; Phanerochaete chrysosporium ; Reaction kinetics ; Schizophyllum commune ; Solid state ; Solid state fermentation ; Stem Cells ; Substrates ; Synthesis ; α-Amylase</subject><ispartof>3 Biotech, 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.429-429, Article 429</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>3 Biotech is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-e7f28195c58e1daa5a7fc077b5a0ee6974f4cdec36b32e12a2c4a1e522f0e5b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-e7f28195c58e1daa5a7fc077b5a0ee6974f4cdec36b32e12a2c4a1e522f0e5b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162195/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6162195/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30305998$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Parveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alam, Md. Zahangir</creatorcontrib><title>Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels</title><title>3 Biotech</title><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><description>Kinetic analysis of solid-state fermentation (SSF) of fruit peels with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture was studied in flask and 7 kg capacity reactor. Modified Monod kinetic model suggested by Haldane sufficiently described microbial growth with co-efficient of determination ( R 2 ) reaching 0.908 at increased substrate concentration than the classical Monod model ( R 2  = 0.932). Leudeking–Piret model adequately described product synthesis in non-growth-dependent manner ( R 2  = 0.989), while substrate consumption by P. chrysosporium and S. commune fungal mixed culture was growth-dependent ( R 2  = 0.938). Hanes–Woolf model sufficiently represented α-amylase and cellulase enzymes synthesis ( R 2  = 0.911 and 0.988); α-amylase had enzyme maximum velocity ( V max ) of 25.19 IU/gds/day and rate constant ( K m ) of 11.55 IU/gds/day, while cellulase enzyme had V max of 3.05 IU/gds/day and K m of 57.47 IU/gds/day. Product yield in the reactor increased to 32.65 mg/g/day compared with 28.15 mg/g/day in shake flask. 2.5 cm media thickness was adequate for product formation within a 6 day SSF in the tray reactor.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>alpha-amylase</subject><subject>Amylases</subject><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cellulase</subject><subject>cellulases</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>culture flasks</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>fruit peels</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>kinetics</subject><subject>microbial growth</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mixed culture</subject><subject>Monod kinetics</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phanerochaete chrysosporium</subject><subject>Reaction kinetics</subject><subject>Schizophyllum commune</subject><subject>Solid state</subject><subject>Solid state fermentation</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>α-Amylase</subject><issn>2190-572X</issn><issn>2190-5738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktrFTEUxwdRbKn9AG4k4MZFR_O4mcdGkKKtUFBQwV3IzZx0UifJmEf1-rH8hM049foAwWwSzvmdZ_5V9ZDgpwTj9lkkjGJeY9LVZMNpze5Uh5T0uOYt6-7u3_TjQXUc4xUuhxPeE3y_OmCYYd733WH1_Sz4L2k8QTFvYwoyAVLexWznZLw7QdINaA5-yCoh7YOVixl9Mg6SURF5jd6O0kHwapSwBI9hF32cfTDZ_oh-p0bzzc_jbpqKRXlrswNkzVcYkMpTygFQdgMEFP1khjqmpQkNwYJLa7lSRYdsEpoBpviguqflFOH49j6qPrx6-f70vL54c_b69MVFrThmqYZW0470XPEOyCAll61WuG23XGKApm83eqMGUKzZMgqESqo2kgCnVGPgW8aOqudr3jlvLQyqtBPkJOZgrAw74aURf3qcGcWlvxYNacryeUnw5DZB8J8zxCSsiQqmqSzM5ygo4awpv0jpf6CkY6T86II-_gu98jm4somFYi1ueNcViqyUCj7GAHrfN8Fi0Y9Y9SOKfsSiH7EM_Oj3gfcRP9VSALoCsbjcJYRfpf-d9QZEYtaj</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed</creator><creator>Jamal, Parveen</creator><creator>Alam, Md. Zahangir</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels</title><author>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed ; Jamal, Parveen ; Alam, Md. Zahangir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-e7f28195c58e1daa5a7fc077b5a0ee6974f4cdec36b32e12a2c4a1e522f0e5b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>alpha-amylase</topic><topic>Amylases</topic><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cellulase</topic><topic>cellulases</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>culture flasks</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>fruit peels</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>kinetics</topic><topic>microbial growth</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mixed culture</topic><topic>Monod kinetics</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phanerochaete chrysosporium</topic><topic>Reaction kinetics</topic><topic>Schizophyllum commune</topic><topic>Solid state</topic><topic>Solid state fermentation</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>α-Amylase</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Parveen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alam, Md. Zahangir</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olorunnisola, Kola Saheed</au><au>Jamal, Parveen</au><au>Alam, Md. Zahangir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels</atitle><jtitle>3 Biotech</jtitle><stitle>3 Biotech</stitle><addtitle>3 Biotech</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>429</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>429-429</pages><artnum>429</artnum><issn>2190-572X</issn><eissn>2190-5738</eissn><abstract>Kinetic analysis of solid-state fermentation (SSF) of fruit peels with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture was studied in flask and 7 kg capacity reactor. Modified Monod kinetic model suggested by Haldane sufficiently described microbial growth with co-efficient of determination ( R 2 ) reaching 0.908 at increased substrate concentration than the classical Monod model ( R 2  = 0.932). Leudeking–Piret model adequately described product synthesis in non-growth-dependent manner ( R 2  = 0.989), while substrate consumption by P. chrysosporium and S. commune fungal mixed culture was growth-dependent ( R 2  = 0.938). Hanes–Woolf model sufficiently represented α-amylase and cellulase enzymes synthesis ( R 2  = 0.911 and 0.988); α-amylase had enzyme maximum velocity ( V max ) of 25.19 IU/gds/day and rate constant ( K m ) of 11.55 IU/gds/day, while cellulase enzyme had V max of 3.05 IU/gds/day and K m of 57.47 IU/gds/day. Product yield in the reactor increased to 32.65 mg/g/day compared with 28.15 mg/g/day in shake flask. 2.5 cm media thickness was adequate for product formation within a 6 day SSF in the tray reactor.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>30305998</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13205-018-1452-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-572X
ispartof 3 Biotech, 2018-10, Vol.8 (10), p.429-429, Article 429
issn 2190-572X
2190-5738
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6162195
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
alpha-amylase
Amylases
Bioinformatics
Biomaterials
Biotechnology
Cancer Research
Cell culture
Cellulase
cellulases
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
culture flasks
Enzymes
Fermentation
fruit peels
fungi
kinetics
microbial growth
Microorganisms
Mixed culture
Monod kinetics
Original
Original Article
Phanerochaete chrysosporium
Reaction kinetics
Schizophyllum commune
Solid state
Solid state fermentation
Stem Cells
Substrates
Synthesis
α-Amylase
title Growth, substrate consumption, and product formation kinetics of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Schizophyllum commune mixed culture under solid-state fermentation of fruit peels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A28%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Growth,%20substrate%20consumption,%20and%20product%20formation%20kinetics%20of%20Phanerochaete%20chrysosporium%20and%20Schizophyllum%20commune%20mixed%20culture%20under%20solid-state%20fermentation%20of%20fruit%20peels&rft.jtitle=3%20Biotech&rft.au=Olorunnisola,%20Kola%20Saheed&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=429&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=429-429&rft.artnum=429&rft.issn=2190-572X&rft.eissn=2190-5738&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13205-018-1452-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2118311902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2113706588&rft_id=info:pmid/30305998&rfr_iscdi=true